Flanders project application and appraisal How it supports partnership.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Project Cycle Management
Advertisements

Financial Planning 2 Resource Mobilization. Learning Objectives Identify and understand various sources of funds Understand how the strategic planning.
Guidance Note on Joint Programming
Setting internal Quality Assurance systems
Project Appraisal Module 5 Session 6.
Assessing student learning from Public Engagement David Owen National Co-ordinating Centre for Public Engagement Funded by the UK Funding Councils, Research.
Improving how your organisation supports the use of research evidence to inform policymaking.
Cyprus Project Management Society
PROJECT CYCLE MANAGEMENT (PCM)
Evaluating public RTD interventions: A performance audit perspective from the EU European Court of Auditors American Evaluation Society, Portland, 3 November.
Results-Based Management: Logical Framework Approach
Screen 1 of 24 Reporting Food Security Information Understanding the User’s Information Needs At the end of this lesson you will be able to: define the.
Global Poverty Action Fund Community Partnership Window Funding Seminar January 2014 Global Poverty Action Fund Community Partnership Window Funding Seminar.
Benchmarking as a management tool for continuous improvement in public services u Presentation to Ministry of Culture of the Russian Federation u Peter.
Project Cycle Management (PCM)
Research Infrastructures The Research Infrastructures in FP7.
Education and Culture Name Education and Culture International opportunities for Higher Education D. Angelescu (EACEA A4)
Challenge Questions How good is our operational management?
Challenge Questions How good is our strategic leadership?
CONTACT SEMINAR November 2008 Project management tools.
Submission Writing Fundamentals – Part Webinar Series Leonie Bryen.
CASE STUDIES IN PROJECT MANAGEMENT
1 … Projects … How to be more successful?. 2 3 What are the criteria of success?
Culture Programme - Selection procedure Katharina Riediger Infoday Praha 10/06/2010.
TEMPUS IV- THIRD CALL FOR PROPOSALS Recommendation on how to make a good proposal TEMPUS INFORMATION DAYS Podgorica, MONTENEGRO 18 th December 2009.
This project is funded by the EUAnd implemented by a consortium led by MWH Logical Framework and Indicators.
Evaluation plans for programming period in Poland Experience and new arrangements Ministry of Infrastructure and Development, Poland Athens,
Shelter Training 08b – Belgium, 16 th –18 th November, 2008 based on content developed by p This session describes the benefits of developing a strategic.
Ref: Youth Peer Education toolkit: Standard of Peer Education Programmes, 2005.
IPA Funds Programme Management sept Bölgesel Rekabet Edebilirlik Operasyonel Programı’nın Uygulanması için Kurumsal Kapasitenin Oluşturulmasına.
Project design & Planning The Logical Framework Approach An Over View Icelandic International Development Agency (ICEIDA) Iceland United Nations University.
Inspire Personal Skills Interpersonal & Organisational Awareness Developing People Deliver Creative Thinking & Problem Solving Decision Making, Prioritising,
Commissioning Self Analysis and Planning Exercise activity sheets.
INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT AND PLANNING FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT 1 Click to edit Master title style 1 Analysis of the planning process Why and how? Session.
EU Funding opportunities : Rights, Equality and Citizenship Programme Justice Programme Jose Ortega European Commission DG Justice.
1 PROJECT CYCLE MANAGEMENT Gilles Ceralli TR Methodology – HI Luxembourg 06/2008.
EDPQS in 10 minutes: Overview of European Drug Prevention Quality Standards (EDPQS) With financial support from the Drug Prevention and Information Programme.
Regional Training/Consultations on Capacity Development for Sustainable Growth and Human Development in Europe and CIS Application of Capacity Development.
EUROPEAN SOCIAL FUND EQUAL - The European Perspective EQUAL Initiative EQUAL The European Perspective Dublin - 25 September 2003 Ian Livingstone European.
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Participatory Planning Project Cycle Management (PCM)
Copyright  2005 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPTs t/a Australian Human Resources Management by Jeremy Seward and Tim Dein Slides prepared by Michelle.
Advice on Data Used to Measure Outcomes Friday 20 th March 2009.
Date: in 12 pts Education and Culture HOW TO PREPARE A GOOD PROJECT PROPOSAL ? Ms. Piia Heinamaki Project adviser, European Commission - Education, Audiovisual.
The partnership principle and the European Code of Conduct on Partnership.
Queen’s Management & Leadership Framework
Good Management Effective Organisations Bjørn Bauer PlanMiljø.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
July 2007 National Quality Assurance and Accreditation Committee & Quality Assurance and Accreditation Project Role of Action Planning in The Developmental.
1 Tempus Tempus Workshop Sarajevo 7 June 2006 « Good practice in Preparing an Application » Anne Collette European Training Foundation Tempus Department.
Grant Application Form (Annex A) Grant Application Form (Annex A) 2nd Call for Proposals.
Waisea Vosa Climate Change Unit Division of Political and Treaties Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation.
Evaluating Engagement Judging the outcome above the noise of squeaky wheels Heather Shaw, Department of Sustainability & Environment Jessica Dart, Clear.
Parallel Session A - Prevention Proposed List of Minimum Quality Standards.
EUROPEAN NEIGHBOURHOOD AND PARTNERSHIP INSTRUMENT - ENPI CROSS-BORDER COOPERATION PROGRAMMES.
AGRO PARKS “The Policy Cycle” Alex Page Baku November 2014.
Exploitation means to use and benefit from something. For Erasmus+ this means maximising the potential of the funded activities, so that the results are.
Collaborative & Interpersonal Leadership
Social Protection Global Technical Team Retreat,
Project Cycle Management
Structural Funds Programming Predeal, Romania
11/18/2018 ANNUAL performance PLAN (2018/19) NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE – 02 MAY 2018.
12/5/2018 ANNUAL performance PLAN (2018/19) NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY Select COMMITTEE – 19 June 2018.
Evaluation plans for programming period in Poland
Helene Skikos DG Education and Culture
Portfolio, Programme and Project
Department of Applied Social Sciences
OGB Partner Advocacy Workshop 18th & 19th March 2010
Implementing the 2030 Agenda in the Asia- Pacific region, January 2019, Shanghai Institutional arrangements to facilitate coherence in sustainable.
Civil Society Facility and Media Programme Call for proposals: EuropeAid/162473/DH/ACT/Multi Webinar no. 3: Preparing effective Concept Note.
Presentation transcript:

Flanders project application and appraisal How it supports partnership

Proposal questions and assessment criteria directly relevant to partnership

PCM in Flanders: application form  Application form consists of list of +/- 30 standard questions:  Analysis:  Analysis of policy context  Stakeholder analysis  Problem analysis  Formulation of the project:  Objectives and risk analysis  Work programme  Measures concerning sustainability  Management and partnership arrangements  Tools are provided to enable applicants to answer each question properly

PCM in Flanders: project appraisal  Detailed appraisal questions (criteria) for readers of project proposals now linked directly to applicant answers:  Relevance: the project should meet demonstrated and high priority needs:  Relevance towards European and Flemish policy  Relevance to stakeholders (incl. target groups)  Feasibility: the project should be well-designed and deliver sustainable benefits to target groups  Feasibility of objectives  Feasibility of work programme  Sustainability  Good project management:  Appropriate monitoring and evaluation mechanisms  Well-managed

PCM in Flanders: questions and associated appraisal question -1 Analysis: Stakeholders: Who are the other stakeholders in the project? Describe their interests, their perception of the difficulties, and their qualifications and resources. Do the same for the final target group. Proposal question Relevance Stakeholders Are all the stakeholders listed, including the final target group? Is there a clear picture of what they can bring to the project (resources and qualifications) and how they see the problem area from their own perspectives? Appraisal question Stakeholder analysis to back it up

PCM in Flanders: questions and associated appraisal question -2 Analysis: Stakeholders: How are the stakeholders, particularly the final target group, involved in preparing the application and/or implementing the project? If the stakeholders are not involved, why not? Proposal question Relevance Stakeholders Will an accurate estimate be made of the influence which the stakeholders can have on implementation of the project (given their qualifications and resources) and their interest in the project (based on their interests and their perception of the difficulties)? In this light, will the stakeholders be involved in a targeted manner in preparing the project (empowerment insofar as the final target group is concerned)? Appraisal question Stakeholder strategies to back it up

PCM in Flanders: questions and associated appraisal question -3 Formulation: Work programme: State what resources will be used for the main activities and (if relevant) what partner organisation bears responsibility for specific main activities. Proposal question Good management Management. Do the partners have added value? Appraisal question Indicative activity and budget schedules to back this up

PCM in Flanders: questions and associated appraisal question -4 Formulation: Management:. What will be done to ensure that the project is adequately monitored by the umbrella organisation(s) and that it has access to resources from those organisations? Proposal question Good management Management Is there a sufficient guarantee that the project will be anchored in the umbrella organisation(s)? Are the decision makers in the umbrella organisations involved in the project ? Appraisal question RACI/VS or similar to back it up

PCM in Flanders: questions and associated appraisal question -5 Formulation: Partnership:. How is the work of the various partners to be coordinated? Proposal question Good management Management Is coordination within the partnership sufficient for the participants to check the quality of each other's work, avoid/solve conflicts and streamline project management? Appraisal question RACI/VS or similar in partnership cooperation agreement has to be added to back this up

Supporting tools offered to projects

Stakeholder analysis Group/organisation … Defending interests (goals) Perception of issues Resources (R) and mandates (M) Centre for equal ops Combat discrimination, poverty, insecurity Prejudices are at basis of discrimination in job i M:advising parliament; R : knowledge on inter- cultural communication; R :sensibilisation campagnes Group 2 Group 3 etc.

Interest in project (goals, perception of issues) Importance (mandates, resources) Importance (mandates, resources) Involve closely Keep satisfied Recognise Monitor Positive Negative Low High Stakeholder strategies A B D C

From problem analysis to goals formulation Global objectives More disabled persons feel appreciated Specific objective More disabled persons fulfill their potential in a work environment Global Specific Operational TO TAKE ON NOT TO TAKE ON Strategy 1: mobilise supply Strategy 2: increase demand Project intervention logic MiEANS Disabled retain security when they take a job Disabled do not want to look for work Disabled invited more for job inteviews Disabled find job more easily Disabled feel appreciated Physical environment more adapted to disabilities Disabled have more self- confidence Adapting physical environment is expensive Employers make better assessment of potential of disabled Disabled are able to perform better Training more adapted to disabled Adaptation of training is expensive Objective tree derived from problem tree Non-disabled interact more easily with disabled GOAL Operational objectives Employers make better assessment of potential of disabled Disabled are able to perform better Disabled interact more easily with non-disabled

From analysis and goals to partnership Disabled retain security when they take a job Disabled do not want to look for work Disabled invited more for job inteviews Disabled find job more easily Disabled feel appreciated Physical environment more adapted to disabilities Disabled have more self- confidence Adapting physical environment is expensive Employers make better assessment of potential of disabled Disabled are able to perform better Training more adapted to disabled Adaptation of training is expensive Non-disabled interact more easily with disabled COMPREHENSIVE SOLUTIONS REQUIRE PARTNERSHIPS -to develop them -to deliver them … But first partners need a common vision of the depth and breadth of problems…

Management and partnership  Coordination:  Responsible:does it;  Accountable: approves it with end- responsability;  Supportive: helps “R”;  Consulted: needed so R can complete work  Informed;  Verifies: checks criteria and quality standards;  Signs: decides if project really finalised Activity/ Person in org Person 1 Person 2 … Activity 1RA Activity 2IA … RACI/VS