Route 1 Project Study Report Overview. A report that describes the transportation problem and identifies the project scope, schedule and estimated cost.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Beltline Highway ITS – Ramp Metering Project ODOT Planners Meeting April 25, 2012.

Advertisements

County of Fairfax, Virginia Sully District Council Meeting November 19, 2014.

West Contra Costa Unified School District

August 18, 2011 State Route 99 Auxiliary Lanes Project Route 32 to East 1st Avenue.

I-394 Express Lane Community Task Force March 18, 2004.

75 Express Lanes Segment D Construction From South of Sheridan Street to North of Griffin Road Presentation to Ivanhoe Community August 27, 2014.

Wiehle Ave. Traffic Concerns Created by Judy and Doug Pew.

Tropicana Avenue To Blue Diamond Road I-15 South Design-Build Project Paving the Way to a More Mobile Las Vegas Presented to Las Vegas Convention and Visitors.

5/19/20151 Segoe Road Proposed Remarking Plan Scott Langer Traffic Engineer City of Madison Traffic Engineering Division Madison, Wisconsin.

Route 28 South of I-66 Corridor Safety and Operations Study Technical Committee Meeting #2 June 25,

Case Study 4 New York State Alternate Route 7. Key Issues to Explore: Capacity of the mainline sections of NYS-7 Adequacy of the weaving sections Performance.

DRAFT 2009 Long Range Transportation Plan Highway Projects August 11, 2009.

Archived Data User Services (ADUS). ITS Produce Data The (sensor) data are used for to help take transportation management actions –Traffic control systems.

Month XX, 2004 Dr. Robert Bertini Using Archived Data to Measure Operational Benefits of ITS Investments: Ramp Meters Oregon Department of Transportation.

Less Stop More Go EXPRESS LANES Travel Choices and Strategies to Relieve Congestion Presentation to FDOT’s Annual ITS Working Group Meeting March 2008.

Page Avenue What has it done for the region? A comparison of traffic volumes from Fall 2003 to Fall 2004 What has it done for the region? A comparison.

National Road Pricing Conference June 4, 2010 Mark Burris, Texas Transportation Institute Jessie Yung, Federal Highway Administration.

USING PeMS DATA TO EMPIRICALLY DIAGNOSE FREEWAY BOTTLENECK LOCATIONS IN ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Robert L. Bertini Portland State University Aaron M.

Transpo 2012 The Future of Traffic Incident Management, October 30, 2012 Javier Rodriguez, P.E., ITS Operations Engineer Joe Snyder, TMC Manager FDOT District.

Multimodal Corridor System Management – Incorporating Analysis of Transit, Demand Management Programs and Operational Strategies Presented by Bill Loudon,

I-680 Value Pricing: A “Smart Carpool “ Lane Demonstration Project June 2004.

Pat Bursaw, Minnesota DOT International Partnership Meeting Washington D.C. January 26, 2012.

What are Managed Lanes What are Express Lanes What are HOT Lanes Regional Express Lanes Network I-95 Express I-595 Express I-75 Express.

Freeway Capacity Analysis

I-394 MnPASS Technical Evaluation Doug Sallman – Cambridge Systematics, Inc.

TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING Planes, Trains, Automobiles and More Ardrey Kell High School February 23, 2012.

Business Logistics 420 Urban Transportation Fall 2000 Lectures 6: Coping with Edge City Transportation Problems: Livable Cities, Transit-Friendly Land.

Modeling HOT Lanes TPB’s Approach AMPO Travel Modeling Group March 21, 2006 I:\ateam\meetings_conf\ampo_tms\ \Hot_Lane_Pres_to_AMPO_Final.ppt.

Public safety (vehicular & pedestrian) Worker safety Maintenance of traffic flow Business access Maintenance of utility services.

Major Transportation Corridor Studies Using an EMME/2 Travel Demand Forecasting Model: The Trans-Lake Washington Study Carlos Espindola, Youssef Dehghani.

Freeway Congestion In The Washington Region Presentation to National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board February 15, 2006 Item # 9.

Regional HOT Lanes Study Preliminary Findings An Informational Hearing of the Senate Transportation and Housing Committee Toll Roads and Managed Lanes.

Project Location Map Contents of Presentation Welcome Project Location Map Contents of Presentation Agency Involvement & Responsibilities Project Purpose.

1 Congestion Measurement Mark Hallenbeck TRAC. 2 Historical Use of volume data –AADT –AWDT, –Hourly volumes To estimate delays Can produce a reasonable.

Senior Project SR-60/Theodore St. November 14, 2014.

I-95 Access Study Fredericksburg Area Project Status Update February 12, 2010.

Modeling Various Tolling Schemes Using Emme: Seattle Experience Andrew Natzel, Parsons Brinckerhoff Bhanu Yerra, Parsons Brinckerhoff Craig Helmann, Puget.

Review of the Texas Transportation Institute (TTI) 2007 Urban Mobility Report By Ronald F. Kirby Daivamani Sivasailam TPB Technical Committee October 5,

Northside Transportation Network Community Meeting November 17 th, 2010 UROC.

County of Fairfax, Virginia Department of Transportation Fairfax County Parkway Corridor Study Board of Supervisors Transportation Committee December 1,

Managed Lanes and Bus Rapid Transit: Emerging New Financing Opportunities ENGINEERS PLANNERS ECONOMISTS Wilbur Smith Associates Ed Regan Senior Vice President.

Expressway Driving Legacy High School Drivers Education.

I-15 Express Lanes Project January 2012 I-15 Express Lanes Project January 2012.

Regional Transportation Management Center Shared Operations Center – Mn/DOT Traffic Operations – Mn/DOT Maintenance Dispatch – State Patrol Dispatch 400.

Rainier Avenue South Pilot Project Update Seattle Bicycle Advisory Board Project Manager Jim Curtin September 2, 2015.

I-680 Value Pricing: A HOT Lane Demonstration Project of “Smart Carpool Lanes” Sponsor: Alameda County Congestion Management Agency 2003 Sponsor: Alameda.

Orange County Business Council Infrastructure Committee Overview of RCTC’s Major Projects December 8, 2015.

Interstate 95 Managed Lanes PD&E Study (95 Express) Project Development and Environment Study SE FSUTMS Users Group The Corradino Group November 2, 2007.

Centre for Transport Studies Imperial College 1 Congestion Mitigation Strategies: Which Produces the Most Environmental Benefit and/or the Least Environmental.

Review of the Texas Transportation Institute (TTI) 2007 Urban Mobility Report By Ronald F. Kirby Presentation to Transportation Planning Board October.

EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT WARRANDYTE COMMUNITY FORUM, 12 NOV 2015 TRAFFIC MODELLING.

156 th Street Design in Bennington Public Open House Meeting October 28, 2009 City of Bennington, NE.

Chapter 9 Capacity and Level of Service for Highway Segments

IH-10 Managed Lanes Project: A “Public-Public” Partnership ENGINEERS PLANNERS ECONOMISTS Wilbur Smith Associates Presented at the Value Pricing Conference.

2015 Urban Mobility Scorecard Tim Lomax Texas A&M Transportation Institute Austin Chamber of Commerce December 2015.

Fehr & Peers | March 13 th, 2012 Traffic Access and Circulation Analysis Pinole Valley High School Reconstruction.

Secondary & Cumulative Effects Analysis Training Program Module 1: How to Determine Which Resources Should be Considered in a SCEA How to identify what.

Garden State Parkway HOT Lanes By Matt Lawson October 14, 2010.

I-5/Genesee Avenue Interchange Project. Project Purpose Improve east and west traffic flow on Genesee Ave. Enhance access to and from I-5 Replace and.

(Expressway Traffic Management System)

Macro / Meso / Micro Framework on I-395 HOT Lane Conversion

Sully District Council of Citizens Associations January 25, 2017 Susan Shaw, P.E., Megaprojects Director Virginia Department of Transportation.

TVTC Impact Fee Update Nexus Study January 30, 2008

Nick Wood, P.E. Texas A&M Transportation Institute

PROJECT LOCATION Project begins at Garden Lane (East of I-4)

Slugging in the I-395 Corridor

Problem 5: Network Simulation

Current and proposed HOT facilities update

State Route 55 Improvement Project from Interstate 5 to State Route 91

West Cervantes Traffic Feasibility Study Jill Lavender, Transportation Planner Cory Wilkinson, AICP CEP, Project Manager Mary Morgan, PE, Engineer.

Presentation transcript:

Route 1 Project Study Report Overview

A report that describes the transportation problem and identifies the project scope, schedule and estimated cost so that the project can be programmed for environmental studies.

Two PSRs Developed (1) Widening with Interchange Modifications (2) Auxiliary Lanes with Ramp Metering

Range of Alternatives Widening for High Occupancy Vehicles (HOV) Widening for Mixed Flow Vehicles Widening for High Occupancy Toll (HOT) Interchange/Ramp Improvements Auxiliary Lanes at Various Locations Ramp Metering (with all build alternatives) No Build

Project Purpose To facilitate more efficient and safe operations of Route 1 as measured by congestion, travel times, mobility and accidents. To discourage reliance on single-occupant vehicle travel by improving travel conditions and interconnectivity for transit and high occupancy vehicles. To maximize the utility of any additional capacity that is created.

Presentation Team Rich KrumholzTransportation Planner Claudia Espino Senior Design Engineer Scott EadesTransportation Engineer Luis Duazo Project Manager

PROJECT LOCATION MAP

CROSS SECTIONS

CROSS SECTION LOCATIONS

CROSS SECTIONS

AUXILIARY LANE LOCATIONS

PEDESTRIAN OVERCROSSING LOCATIONS

On Route 1 Northbound at Morrissey On Ramp

On Route 1 Southbound at Morrissey Off Ramp

41st and Bay

On Route 1 Northbound at State Park On Ramp

On Route 1 Southbound at State Park On Ramp

Traffic Analysis

FREQ Output: 06 miles Northbound AM: Existing Configuration

6:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 11:00 10:00 Timeslices (each =15 minutes) Subsections (Freeway segments) Sample FREQ Output - Northbound Direction of travel Time Period = 5 hrs, 45 min. Timeslice > Timeslice > Timeslice >. Green = Uncongested flow (v/c < 0.9), 60+ MPH Blue = Near Capacity (0.9 < v/c < 1.0), 50 + MPH Yellow = At Capacity (v/c = 1), Represents bottleneck location Orange = Congested Flow - Resulting from upstream bottleneck, typically 0-35 MPH Legend Rte 17 off NBMorrissey Blvd41st AveBay/Porter Ave Soquel Ave Park Ave State Park DrRio Del MarFreedom BlvdMar MonteLarkin ValleyBuena Vista

No-Build Green = Uncongested (v/c < 0.9) Blue = Near Capacity (0.9 < v/c < 1.0) Yellow = At Capacity (v/c = 1) Orange = Congested Flow Ramp Meter (4-Lane) Auxiliary Lane 6-Lane Mixed Flow Northbound AM Existing Conditions (2001) HOV (Mixed Flow Lanes) Alternatives Analysis (with 2020 Volumes)

Northbound AM 2020 volumes2001 *during the 6 hour peak period (6am-Noon) * 2020 volumes volumes2001

2020 No-Build Green = Uncongested (v/c < 0.9) Blue = Near Capacity (0.9 < v/c < 1.0) Yellow = At Capacity (v/c = 1) Orange = Congested Flow Ramp Meter (4-Lane) Auxiliary Lane 6-Lane Mixed Flow Northbound PM Existing Conditions (2001) HOV (Mixed Flow Lanes) Alternatives Analysis (with 2020 Volumes)

Northbound PM 2020 volumes volumes2001 * * * 2020 volumes volumes2001 *during the 6 hour peak period (2pm-8pm)

Green = Uncongested flow Blue = Near Capacity Yellow = At Capacity Orange = Congested Flow Legend Sample FREQ Output - Southbound Yellow = At Capacity Orange = Congested Flow Green = Uncongested flow Blue = Near Capacity 2:00 3:00 4:00 5:00 7:00 6:00 Rte 17 on SBMorrissey Blvd41st AveBay/Porter AveSoquel AvePark AveState Park DrRio Del MarFreedom BlvdLarkin ValleyOcean St Direction of travel Timeslice > Timeslice > Timeslice >. Scale

No-Build Green = Uncongested (v/c < 0.9) Blue = Near Capacity (0.9 < v/c < 1.0) Yellow = At Capacity (v/c = 1) Orange = Congested Flow Ramp Meter (4-Lane) Auxiliary Lane 6-Lane Mixed Flow* Southbound PM - With widening to State Park Drive Existing Conditions (2001) HOV ( Mixed Flow Lanes) * Alternatives Analysis (with 2020 Volumes) *Extended only to State Park Drive

Southbound PM 2020 volumes 2001 **during the 6 hour peak period (2pm-8pm) 2020 volumes 2001 ** *Additional lane terminates at State Park Drive * * * * * * 2020 volumes2001

2020 No-Build Green = Uncongested (v/c < 0.9) Blue = Near Capacity (0.9 < v/c < 1.0) Yellow = At Capacity (v/c = 1) Orange = Congested Flow Ramp Meter (4-Lane) Auxiliary Lane 6-Lane Mixed Flow* Southbound PM - With widening to Larkin Valley/San Andreas Existing Conditions (2001) HOV (Mixed Flow Lanes)* Alternatives Analysis (with 2020 Volumes) *Extended to Larkin Valley Road

Southbound PM 2020 volumes volumes2001 ** *Extended to Larkin Valley/San Andreas * * ** * * 2020 volumes2001 **during the 6 hour peak period (2pm-8pm)