Energy Forum 2011, Changing the Energy Paradigm and Outlook for South-Eastern EU Energy Forum 2011 Nuclear Safety Regulation in Romania Recent Developments.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ENEF WG Risks / Bernard Fourest 12 September 2012 PRAGUEBRATISLAVA ENEF WG RISKS Current activities of the SWG Nuclear Installation Safety Bernard Fourest.
Advertisements

Energy Proposal for a Council Directive amending Directive 2009/71/EURATOM establishing a Community framework for the nuclear safety of nuclear installations.
Pakistan Nuclear Regulatory Authority
Presented by: Muhammad Ayub Pakistan Nuclear Regulatory Authority Safety Enhancement at Nuclear Power Plants in Pakistan Prospects of Nuclear Energy in.
Licensing of Nuclear Power Plants in Pakistan
INSAG DEVELOPMENT OF A DOCUMENT ON HIGH LEVEL SAFETY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR NUCLEAR POWER Milestone Issues: Group C. Nuclear Safety. A. Alonso (INSAG Member)
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Lessons Learned from the Tailored IRRS Module on Regulatory Implications of the Fukushima Accident Presentation.
Main Requirements on Different Stages of the Licensing Process for New Nuclear Facilities Module 4.7 Commissioning Geoff Vaughan University of Central.
1 Regulatory Challenges During and Following a Major Safety or Security Event Muhammad Iqbal Pakistan Nuclear Regulatory Authority Presentation at General.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency CS-81 to prepare a work plan and material for developing a guidance on management of large amounts of radioactive.
Outcome of the EU Nuclear Safety Stress Tests Andrej Stritar Chairman, ENSREG.
Bulatom Annual Forum, Bulgaria, Varna - Riviera, 2-4 June 2011 LICENSING PROCESS FOR BELENE NPP: CURRENT STATUS AND NEXT STEPS Tinko Ganchev Head of Department.
Summary of Session 1: International Operational Safety Peer Reviews 1 Dominique Miniere EdF, France IAEA International Conference on Operational Safety.
IAEA - Department of Nuclear Safety & Security
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency LICENSING OF RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITIES Luc Baekelandt Safety of radioactive.
08 October 2015 M. Ammar Mehdi Introduction to Human Resource Management & SSG-16 Actions 4 th Steering Committee on Competence of Human.
Energy Nuclear stress tests and follow up in Europe Brussels, 25 May 2012 Nina Commeau Adviser to the Deputy Director-General in charge of nuclear energy.
School for drafting regulations Nuclear Safety Operation Vienna, 26 November -7 December 2012 Tea Bilic Zabric.
LESSONS LEARNED IN DEVELOPMENT OF SAFETY CULTURE FOR REGULATORY BODIES
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency ESTABLISHING THE SAFETY INFRASTRUCTURE FOR A NUCLEAR POWER PROGRAMME IAEA WORKSHOP ON LEADERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT.
School for Drafting Regulations on Radiation Safety Vienna, November 2012 EU Requirements Jiří Veselý, SONS, Czech republic.
SÄTEILYTURVAKESKUS STRÅLSÄKERHETSCENTRALEN RADIATION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY AUTHORITY Key outcomes of IRRS Mission in Finland Kirsi Alm-Lytz.
Report about activities of ENSREG Andrej Stritar Chairman of ENSREG Director of the Slovenian Nuclear Safety Administration 12. October 2009.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline Learning Objectives Introduction IRRS review of regulations and guides Relevant safety standards.
Main Requirements on Different Stages of the Licensing Process for New Nuclear Facilities Module 4.5/1 Design Geoff Vaughan University of Central Lancashire,
56th Regular Session of the IAEA General Conference
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency School of Drafting Regulations – November 2014 Government and Regulatory Body Functions and Responsibilities IAEA.
Main Requirements on Different Stages of the Licensing Process for New Nuclear Facilities Module 4.10 Documents to be Submitted to the Regulatory Body.
Fukushima Lessons Learnt and Follow-up Activities of Rostechnadzor Alexey Ferapontov, Acting Chairman Second European Nuclear Safety Conference
15th Pacific Basin Nuclear Conference, Sydney, 2006 Nuclear Regulatory Decision Making The Australian Context John Loy CEO Australian Radiation Protection.
Summary of Session 3 Post-Fukushima Operational Safety Improvements 1 Fred Dermarkar IAEA International Conference on Operational Safety Vienna International.
Organization of the peer review process of stress tests in the European context “stress tests of NPP Dukovany and NPP Temelín - evaluation of safety and.
Parliamentary Portfolio Committee Presentation Annual Report 2012.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Methodology and Responsibilities for Periodic Safety Review for Research Reactors William Kennedy Research Reactor.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Governmental, Legal and Regulatory Framework for Safety and Regulatory Functions William Kennedy Research Reactor.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency IAEA Safety Standards for Research Reactors W. Kennedy Research Reactor Safety Section Division of Nuclear Installation.
23 January 2016 Gustavo C ARUSO Head, Regulatory Activities Section Division of Nuclear Installations Safety Department of Nuclear Safety and Security.
The CNCAN Knowledge Portal TM on the Use of GSAN and SAET Programme November 2015 ROMANIA National Commission for Nuclear Activities Control.
Summary of Session 2: Corporate Management of Safety 1 Iva Kubanova IAEA International Conference on Operational Safety Vienna International Centre
Milestones for Nuclear Power Infrastructure Development Establishment of A Regulatory Framework Gustavo Caruso, Section Head, Regulatory Activities Section.
Technical Meeting on Regulatory Oversight of Human and Organizational Factors IAEA, Vienna, 14 – 18 December 2015 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK AND PRACTICES FOR.
IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to Assist Decision Making Workshop Information IAEA Workshop Safety Assessment Process. Plant Modification.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Development of the Basis Document for Periodic Safety Review for Research Reactors William Kennedy Research Reactor.
DEVELOPMENT OF THE NATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE FOR NUCLEAR POWER IN VIETNAM DEVELOPMENT OF THE NATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE FOR NUCLEAR POWER IN VIETNAM Vuong Huu.
By Annick Carnino (former Director of IAEA Division of Nuclear Installations Safety) PIME, February , 2012.
Energy Meeting with the NGOs Taipei, 25 September 2013 Christian Kirchsteiger European Commission, Directorate-General for Energy (DG ENER) EU Policy Context.
IAEA TSO-Conference, April 2007, Aix en Provence 1 Independent technical and scientific advice for regulatory decision making L. Hahn, GRS International.
Use and Conduct of Safety Analysis IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to Assist Decission Making Workshop Information IAEA Workshop Lecturer.
REPUBLIC OF SLOVENIA MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND THE ENVIRONMENT SLOVENIAN NUCLEAR SAFETY ADMINISTRATION 1 Regulatory Information Conference 2014 Regulatory.
International Topical Conferences on Nuclear Safety, IAEA, June 6-9, 2017, Vienna Workshop 2: An Introduction and Further Explanation on Design Extension.
THAILAND Training and Tutoring Feedback
SESSION 3 Policy Framework
STRESS TESTS and TAIWAN PEER REVIEW PROCESS
Brazil - Training and Tutoring Feedback Second Coordination Meeting
ETSON: its role and activities for harmonizing safety assessment practices Benoît De Boeck, ETSON President Presented by Pieter De Gelder (Bel V) CN-251.
The Revision of WENRA Reference Levels and their Implementation
Offerings for design safety from harmonization
WENRA Current activities of WENRA 4th GNSSN Steering Committee Meeting
Armenia Training and Tutoring Feedback
Communication and Consultation with Interested Parties by the RB
RCF Plenary Session 21 September 2018
Presentation to the EPREV Lessons Learned Workshop
IAEA General Conference Regulatory Cooperation Forum Regulatory Approach Prescriptive vs Performance Based David Senior Executive Director -
Regulatory Cooperation Forum (RCF) - Plenary 2018
International Atomic Energy Agency - IAEA
USNRC IRRS TRAINING Lecture18
Legal and Regulatory Framework for Nuclear Installations in IRAN
National Commission for Nuclear Activities Control
The International Governance of Nuclear Safety after Fukushima
Safety Standards Committee meetings 24th TRANSSC meeting Agenda item 3
Presentation transcript:

Energy Forum 2011, Changing the Energy Paradigm and Outlook for South-Eastern EU Energy Forum 2011 Nuclear Safety Regulation in Romania Recent Developments and Planned Actions Cantemir CIUREA – ERCAU, Director, Nuclear Fuel Cycle Division CNCAN ( National Commission for Nuclear Activities Control) Bucharest, Romania

Energy Forum 2011, Changing the Energy Paradigm and Outlook for South-Eastern EU 2 Presentation Outline  Development of nuclear safety regulations for new reactors  Licensing of new reactors  Safety reviews in the light of the Fukushima Accident  Concluding Remarks

Energy Forum 2011, Changing the Energy Paradigm and Outlook for South-Eastern EU 3 Regulatory requirements in Romania  During the period 2009 – 2010, CNCAN has reviewed and revised its nuclear safety regulation establishing general design criteria and requirements on sitting for nuclear power plants.  The revision led to the elaboration of two new regulations, “Nuclear Safety Requirements on Siting of Nuclear Power Plants” and “Nuclear Safety Requirements on Design and Construction of Nuclear Power Plants” published at the end of Development of nuclear safety regulations for new reactors

Energy Forum 2011, Changing the Energy Paradigm and Outlook for South-Eastern EU 4 The most important elements introduced by the new regulations on siting, design and construction of NPPs:  the establishment of numerical nuclear safety targets / quantitative nuclear safety objectives;  requirements on the consideration of severe accidents in the establishment of design bases and in the choice of site for nuclear power plants and on the analysis of severe accidents for demonstrating compliance with the quantitative nuclear safety objectives;  formalised requirements on accident analysis, including on the way in which deterministic and probabilistic safety analyses should be used together in the design of nuclear power plants; Regulatory requirements in Romania

Energy Forum 2011, Changing the Energy Paradigm and Outlook for South-Eastern EU 5 The most important elements introduced by the new regulations on siting, design and construction of NPPs (cont’d):  detailed requirements on the format and contents of the safety analysis reports which need to be elaborated by the applicants for site and construction licenses;  formulation of nuclear safety requirements for generic plant systems in a technology-neutral, function oriented manner, without prescribing technical design solutions;  establishment of requirements on the safety classification of nuclear power plant systems, structures and components based on their safety importance, i.e. their contribution to ensuring the essential nuclear safety functions. Regulatory requirements in Romania

Energy Forum 2011, Changing the Energy Paradigm and Outlook for South-Eastern EU 6 Licensing of new reactors  Pre-licensing activities for Cernavoda Units 3 and 4 are ongoing. In May 2011, CNCAN has approved the Licensing Basis Documents (LBDs) for Cernavoda NPP Units 3 and 4.  The LBD includes all applicable regulatory documents, codes and standards, safety design requirements, the list of all the design basis events, safety analysis requirements, and the general requirements for the stages of construction, commissioning and operation. The applicable international safety standards and guides are also endorsed by means of the LBD.  Approval of the LBD by CNCAN means that the proposed design is licensable.  An application for a construction license for resuming construction of Cernavoda NPP Units 3 and 4 is expected in Cernavoda Units 3 and 4

Energy Forum 2011, Changing the Energy Paradigm and Outlook for South-Eastern EU 7 Licensing of new reactors  In addition to the restart of the construction of Units 3 & 4 of Cernavoda NPP, the Government also announced plans for a new NPP, at a new site. However, no application for a siting licence has been yet submitted to CNCAN.  The new regulatory requirements on siting, design and construction of nuclear power reactors are formulated in a technology-neutral manner, are aligned with the latest international safety standards and represent a comprehensive framework for the licensing of new reactors.

Energy Forum 2011, Changing the Energy Paradigm and Outlook for South-Eastern EU 8 Safety reviews in the light of the Fukushima accident  Following the accident occurred at Fukushima Daiichi NPP in Japan, the international organisations (e.g. IAEA, WANO, WENRA, ENSREG) and the national regulatory authorities have initiated reviews of the safety of existing nuclear power plants in extraordinary situations such as those caused by extreme natural events.  The reviews are aimed at assessing the current safety margins and at identifying potential improvements to increase protection against severe accidents.

Energy Forum 2011, Changing the Energy Paradigm and Outlook for South-Eastern EU 9 Examples of actions requested at international level include:  The Significant Operating Experience Report issued by the World Association of Nuclear Operators (WANO), WANO SOER , Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Station Fuel Damage Caused by Earthquake and Tsunami  The “stress tests” required by the European Commission for all the nuclear power plants in the European Union, based on specifications developed by WENRA (Western European Nuclear Regulators Association) and agreed by ENSREG (European Nuclear Safety Regulators Group). As a member of WENRA and ENSREG, CNCAN has committed to the implementation of “stress tests” for Cernavoda NPP. Safety reviews in the light of the Fukushima accident

Energy Forum 2011, Changing the Energy Paradigm and Outlook for South-Eastern EU 10  CNCAN has requested both Nuclearelectrica (the owner and operator of Cernavoda NPP Units 1 and 2) and EnergoNuclear (the company in charge of the Cernavoda Units 3 and 4 project) to reassess safety based on the ENSREG specifications for “stress tests”.  Preliminary safety evaluation reports are expected by the 15th of August, with the final reports scheduled for submission to CNCAN by 31st of October  CNCAN will review the safety evaluation reports and will draw its own conclusions by the end of The reports resulting from the regulatory review performed by CNCAN will be made public and will be subject to a peer review by other European regulators in the first quarter of Safety reviews in the light of the Fukushima accident

Energy Forum 2011, Changing the Energy Paradigm and Outlook for South-Eastern EU 11  In line with the conclusions of the IAEA Ministerial Conference on Nuclear Safety (20-24 June 2011, Vienna), CNCAN is committed to take measures to strengthen its regulatory oversight of nuclear installations and activities and to perform a thorough review of the current arrangements for severe accident management, emergency preparedness and response, as well as the design provisions for coping with extreme external events. CNCAN will also take steps for promoting safety culture through a transparent dialogue with licensees, applicants and other stakeholders.  Based on the preliminary measures already taken by Cernavoda NPP to enhance protection against severe accident scenarios, we are confident that the licensees are conscious of their responsibility for safety and will implement all practicable safety improvements.  Apart from subjecting its own assessment to a European peer review, CNCAN will also report to the Extraordinary Review Meeting of the Contracting Parties to the Convention on Nuclear safety in Safety reviews in the light of the Fukushima accident

Energy Forum 2011, Changing the Energy Paradigm and Outlook for South-Eastern EU 12 Concluding remarks  The new Romanian regulations on siting, design and construction of nuclear power reactors offer a technology-neutral framework for the licensing of new reactors and impose high standards aimed at better prevention and enhanced protection against severe accidents.  CNCAN is committed to the implementation of the lessons learned from the Fukushima accident. Safety reviews for the re-assessment of nuclear power reactors in operation and under construction are ongoing and any reasonably practicable improvements resulting from the reviews will be implemented. The results of these safety reviews will be made public.  Ensuring safety is essential for the sustainable development of the Romanian nuclear power programme. Safety should be the first priority of all those involved in the nuclear industry.