Boyd Independent School District 2012 District Performance/AEIS Report.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Miami ISD Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR)
Advertisements

State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness.
Data Analysis State Accountability. Data Analysis (What) Needs Assessment (Why ) Improvement Plan (How) Implement and Monitor.
1 Accountability System Overview of the Accountability Rating System for Texas Public Schools and Districts.
Accountability preview Major Mindshift Out with the Old – In with the New TEPSA - May 2013 (Part 2) Ervin Knezek John Fessenden
Accountability Updates Testing & Evaluation Department May 21, 2014 Mission High School MISSION CISD DEIC MEETING.
Accountability Update Ty Duncan Coordinator of Accountability and Compliance, ESC
2013 State Accountability System Allen ISD. State Accountability under TAKS program:  Four Ratings: Exemplary, Recognized, Academically Acceptable, Academically.
2014 Accountability System 2014 Accountability System Jana Schreiner Senior Consultant Accountability State Assessment
The best and most sought-after school district where every student is future ready: ready for college, ready for the global workplace, ready for personal.
Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Report Presented to ACISD Board of Trustees 12/15/2011 ARANSAS COUNTY ISD – A TEA RECOGNIZED SCHOOL.
2015 Goals and Targets for State Accountability Date: 10/01/2014 Presenter: Carla Stevens Assistant Superintendent, Research and Accountability.
Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR) Tom Bean ISD.
Index Accountability 2014 Created by Accountability and Compliance staff of Region 17 Education Service Center.
Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR) [insert district name] [insert district logo above]
Timmerman Public Hearing September 16, :00-7:00.
Public Hearing & Presentation of MISD Annual Accountability Report 2011 MILLSAP ISD Prepared in compliance with Texas Education Code January 2012.
TASSP Spring 2014 Tori Mitchell, ESC 17 Specialist Ty Duncan, ESC 17 Coordinator Overview of 2014 Accountability
AYP vs. AEIS Talking Carroll Elementary October 5, 2010.
2013 Accountability System Design Assessment & Accountability, Plano ISD.
Timmerman Public Hearing February 4, :00-4:00.
1 Accountability System Overview of the PROPOSED Accountability Rating System for Texas Public Schools and Districts.
Public Hearing & Presentation of MISD Annual Accountability Report 2009 MILLSAP ISD Prepared by Lois Johnson in compliance with Texas Education Code
Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Report January 20, 2009 Dr. Joan Bowman Assistant Superintendent Sheldon ISD.
March 7, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Accountability Policy Advisory Committee.
Understanding the Texas Accountability System. – 1979 Texas Assessment of Basic Skills (TABS) – 1985 Texas Educational Assessment of Minimum Skills (TEAMS)
ESC Region XI Module Two B Studying Local Data for Region XI Fort Worth Partners All AVATAR artifacts :
Lazbuddie ISD Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR)
AEIS Orenda Charter Schools. Changes to the AEIS 2  Assessment results include TAKS, TAKS (Accommodated), and TAKS-M for grades
Academic Excellence Indicator System Report For San Antonio ISD Public Meeting January 23, 2006 Board Report January 23, 2006 Department of Accountability,
Welcome to Abbett Elementary! Curriculum Night 2015.
Assigns one of three ratings:  Met Standard – indicates campus/district met the targets in all required indexes. All campuses must meet Index 1 or 2.
Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR) Lockhart Independent School District December
Texas Academic Performance Report NATALIA ISD Public Hearing Presentation February 5, 2014.
2013 – 2014 TEXAS ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE REPORT Donna Independent School District Annual Report 2013 – 2014 January 20, 2015 Mari Valdez, Director Testing.
Dumas Independent School District Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR)
Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR) Hudson ISD.
Kingsville ISD Annual Report Public Hearing.
Northwest ISD January 11, 2016 The best and most sought-after school district where every student is future ready: ready for college, ready for the global.
Bastrop ISD January 19, Annual Report Public Hearing.
HISD Becoming #GreatAllOver 1 Accountability Rating System Commissioner’s Final Rules 2014.
Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR) Hudson ISD.
Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR)
Edgewood ISD of San Antonio Annual Performance Report February 9, 2012.
Adequate Yearly Progress [Our School District]
Annual Report presented to CISD School Board: Thursday, February 5, 2015 Annual Report prepared by: Shelley L. Rena – District Coordinator of Assessment.
Academic Performance Index (API) and AYP
Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR) Shallowater ISD
Texas Academic Performance Report
Accountability Overview 2016
2013 – 2014 TEXAS ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE REPORT
Bixby Public Schools OCCT Data and AYP/API December 12, 2011.
Accountability Rating
Annual Report Georgetown ISD 2016 Accountability Rating:
Bixby Public Schools OCCT Data and AYP/API September 13, 2010.
Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR) Hudson ISD
Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR) [insert district name]
Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR)
Texas Academic Performance Report
Annual Report Public Hearing
Texas Academic Performance Report TAPR)
Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR)
AEIS [Our School District]
Texas Academic Performance Report
Texas State Accountability
Texas Academic Performance
Annual Report Public Hearing
A-F Accountability and Special Education
T = Texas A = Academic P = Performance R = Report
Annual Report Public Hearing
Presentation transcript:

Boyd Independent School District 2012 District Performance/AEIS Report

Academic Excellence Indicator System Report The Board shall publish (BR Legal) an annual report describing the educational performance of the District and of each campus in the District. This report is provided by TEA It is intended to inform the public about the educational performance of the District and of each campus in relation to the District, the state, and a comparable group of schools.

The District Performance Report includes: Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Report District Performance Objectives A Report of Violent or criminal incidents Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board for each High School Campus

District Ratings 2011 Boyd ISD Academically Acceptable Neither the district or campuses were rated for the 2012 school year due to the introduction of the STAAR test and new state Accountability System being developed.

2012 Student Performance Data District Data compared to 2011 data as measured by the Adequately Yearly Progress system

Student Demographics Our Students: Based on AEIS Report African American %Economically Dis % Caucasian %Special Education % Hispanic % At-Risk % Native American %ESL % Asian 2 0.2% Career and Tech % 2 or more races %GT 615.4% Our instructional staff to student ratio is 1:13

Performance Objectives ATTENDANCE RATE: The attendance rate for all BISD students will improve for all students as identified below: Group Past PerformancesCurrent GoalGoal Objective All Students95.3%95.3%96%98% African Amer.97.8%95.5%96%98% Hispanic95.3%95.3%96%98% White95.2%95.2%96%98% Amer. Indian95.5%95.8%96%98% Special Ed93.6%93.7%96%98% Econ. Disad94.3%94.4%96%98%

Performance Objectives Student Academic Performance Objectives: 2013 % Met Standard All StudentAfrican American HispanicWhiteEcon. Disadv.Special Education ReadMathReadMathReadMathReadMathReadMathReadMath Boyd E.S.93%92%93%92%93%92%93%92%93%92%93%92% Boyd I.S.93%92%93%92%93%92%93%92%93%92%93%92% Boyd M.S.93%92%93%92%93%92%93%92%93%92%93%92% Boyd H.S.93%92%93%92%93%92%93%92%93%92%93%92% District93%92%93%92%93%92%93%92%93%92%93%92%

Reading/ELA: 2012 AYP Target=87%: 2011 AYP Target=83% % Met Standard All StudentAfrican AmericanHispanicWhiteEcon. Disadv.Special Education Boyd E.S.89%88%100%--90%100%89%87%88%78%71%80% Boyd I.S.77%87%100% 69%72%78%91%72%82%50%65% Boyd M.S.79%89%-- 50%94%83%89%71%82%43%50% Boyd H.S.81%84%100% 75%89%82%83%72%85%27%40% District80%88%80%67% 82% 88%74%82%44%56%

Math: 2012 AYP Target=83%: 2011 AYP Target=75% % Met Standard All StudentsAfrican AmericanHispanicWhiteEcon. Disadv.Special Education Boyd E.S.75%79%100%--90%80%73%79%75%78%57%80% Boyd I.S.78%77%100% 76%72%78%77%75%73%33%61% Boyd M.S.74%84%--100%45%75%80%84%67%78%33%50% Boyd H.S.58%59%100%--56%67%59%58%55%59%40%36% District73%77%80%67%66%73%75%76%70%73%38%54%

STAAR End of Course Exams End of Course Subject Number of Students Assessed % Achieved Minimum Score %Met Level II: Satisfactory at Phase in Standard % Met Satisfactory at Recommended Standard (Level II) % Met Advanced Standard (Level III) Spr/Sum 2012 Fall 2012Spr/Sum 2012 Fall 2012Spr/Sum 2012 Fall 2012 Spr/Sum 2012 Fall 2012 English I- Reading 9985%94%72%80%36%38%1%NA English I- Writing 9968%83%56%68%29%33%1%NA Biology10091%93%78%80%25%NA3%NA W. Geography 10183%99%63%73%28%NA9%NA Algebra I7682%86%71%75%3%NA0%NA Geometry2796%NA96%NA37%NA4%NA

Report on Violent or Criminal Incidents Campus Number of Violent Incidents (Requiring Mandatory DAEP/Expulsion) Number of Criminal Incidents--Type Boyd High School0 4—Conduct Punishable as a Felony 3—Possess, Sell or Use controlled substance Boyd Middle School0 2—Possess, Sell or Use controlled substance 4—Criminal Mischief Boyd Intermediate School0 Boyd Elementary School0

Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board Report Student Enrolled in Higher Education in Fall 2011 (2011 Graduates) WEATHERFORD COLLEGE7 TARLETON STATE UNIVERSITY5 TARRANT CO NORTHWEST CAMPUS5 Other Pub/Ind 4-yr Inst. (13)17 Other Pub/Ind 2-yr Inst. (1)1 Not trackable2 Not found46 Total high school graduates83

Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board Report Enrolled students GPA for 1 st Year in Public Higher Education in Texas Total Graduates < >3.5Un k 4 Yr Public University yr Public Colleges Independent Colleges1 Not Trackable3 Not Found33 Total H.S. Grads69

District and Campus Planning Data from these reports will be analyze in committees to determine effectiveness of the programs in the district, and adjustments will be made accordingly.