1 OPTIMA INCO-MPC Project kick-off Meeting, October 28/29 Malta DDr. Kurt Fedra ESS GmbH, Austria Environmental Software.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Reporting sheet no.3 State and quantity of water resources.
Advertisements

Green Water Credits Use of quantitative tools to evaluate potential Green Water Credits options Peter Droogers Wilco Terink Johannes Hunink Sjef Kauffman.
WEAP Water Evaluation & Planning System
EWater Road Show 21 Feb – Part 3 of 5 Dr Peter Wallbrink Source Project Director, eWater Building the new integrated modelling system for Australia.
LOGO Bangkok, May 2009 Water Resources Management in Ba River Basin under Future Development and Climate Scenarios Presented by: Nguyen Thi Thu Ha Examination.
Antamina Mine Water Management Model Alan Keizur Golder Associates Roberto Manrique Arce Compañia Minera Antamina User Conference 2006 Background The Antamina.
1 OPTIMA INCO-MPC Third Management Board Meeting, May 18/ Gumpoldskirchen DDr. Kurt Fedra Environmental Software & Services GmbH A-2352 Gumpoldskirchen.
EU, SIXTH FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME AUSTRIA, MAY EU funded Project: Partner: INTERGEO Environmental Technology Ltd.- Greece WPO4: Data compilation and.
SMART INCO-MED 1 st Management Board Meeting, June NCRS, Beirut WaterWare Data Requirements DDr. Kurt Fedra ESS GmbH, Austria
DSS for Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM) Simulation based MC optimization DDr. Kurt Fedra ESS GmbH, Austria
© K. Fedra GIS 2004 Kurt Fedra, Dr.phil., Dr.sci. 1952, Vienna Environmental Software & Services P.O. Box 100 A-2352 Gumpoldskirchen AUSTRIA tel:
Nathan VanRheenen Richard N. Palmer Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Washington Recasting the Future Developing.
Climate Change and Water Resources Management WEB pages on water management activities Max Campos San Jose – Costa Rica.
S. Mohsen Sadatiyan A., Samuel Dustin Stanley, Donald V. Chase, Carol J. Miller, Shawn P. McElmurry Optimizing Pumping System for Sustainable Water Distribution.
URBAN AND NATURAL ENVIRONMENT CONSULTANTS European Commission 6 th Framework Programme for research and Technological Development Optimisation For Sustainable.
The Upper Rio Grande. Multi-objective River and Reservoir System Modeling Flood Control Water Supply Navigation Aquatic/Riparian Habitat Recreational.
EU, SIXTH FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME Optimisation for Sustainable Water Management EU funded Project: OPTIMA INCO-MPC Partner: INTERGEO Environmental Technology.
When integrated models meet stakeholders and data (& vice-versa) WATER BASIN MODELS DATA STAKEHOLDERS POPULATION MODELLERS.
Integrated Water Management Modeling Framework in Nebraska Association of Western State Engineers Spring Workshop Salt Lake City, Utah June 9, 2015 Mahesh.
Dr. R.P.Pandey Scientist F. NIH- Nodal Agency Misconception: A DSS takes decisions ---(No)
SMART INCO-MED 4 th Management Board Meeting, September , Hammamet, Tunisia DDr. Kurt Fedra ESS GmbH, Austria
WaterWare concepts and data requirements DDr. Kurt Fedra ESS GmbH, Austria Environmental Software & Services A-2352.
K.Fedra ‘05 1 Water Resources Simulation and Optimization: a web based approach MSO August 2005, Aruba DDr. Kurt Fedra ESS GmbH, Austria
Introduction A GENERAL MODEL OF SYSTEM OPTIMIZATION.
© K.Fedra DSS for Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM) Problems, data, instruments DDr. Kurt Fedra ESS GmbH, Austria
OPTIMA Optimisation for Sustainable Water Management corridoio.zero Multidisciplinary Laboratory for Exchanges with the Balkans and the Mediterranean Region.
OPTIMA October 2004 WP01 Requirements and constraints.
CLIMATE CHANGE AND WATER MAKING RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT PLANS “CLIMATE PROOF” IN SPAIN.
1 OPTIMA PROJECT Third Management Board Meeting, Gumpoldskirchen, Austria, May 18/20, 2006 Tunisia case study By Ahmed EZZINE.
Linkage Between StreamStats and Water-Use Database SWUDS Water-Use Database (UNIX/ Ingres) Data Ware- house (Windows/ Access) StreamStats Output Web service.
1 OPTIMA INCO-MPC Third Management Board Meeting, May 18/ Gumpoldskirchen DDr. Kurt Fedra Environmental Software & Services GmbH A-2352 Gumpoldskirchen.
Resource allocation and optimisation model RAOM October 2003.
SMART INCO-MED 5 th Management Board Meeting, January Grenoble, France DDr. Kurt Fedra ESS GmbH, Austria
1 OPTIMA INCO-MPC Fourth Management Board Meeting, December 19/ Milano DDr. Kurt Fedra Environmental Software & Services GmbH A-2352 Gumpoldskirchen.
WEAP Demand Management
DSS for Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM) Success and failure DDr. Kurt Fedra ESS GmbH, Austria Environmental.
BASIN SCALE WATER INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT EVALUATION CONSIDERING CLIMATE RISK Yasir Kaheil Upmanu Lall C OLUMBIA W ATER C ENTER : Global Water Sustainability.
OPTIMA OPTIMA Optimisation for Sustainable Water Resources Management The Case of the Gediz River in Turkey 28–30 October 2004 Senglea, MALTA.
Hydrology and application of the RIBASIM model SYMP: Su Yönetimi Modelleme Platformu RBE River Basin Explorer: A modeling tool for river basin planning.
1 januari 2008 RIBASIM input data by Wil N.M. van der Krogt.
Hydrology and application of the RIBASIM model SYMP: Su Yönetimi Modelleme Platformu RBE River Basin Explorer: A modeling tool for river basin planning.
Modeling with WEAP University of Utah Hydroinformatics - Fall 2015.
Universität zu Köln A model to simulate water management options for the Lake Naivasha Basin Arnim Kuhn Institute for Food and Resource Economics Bonn.
1 WaterWare description Data management, Objects Monitoring, time series Hydro-meteorological data, forecasts Rainfall-runoff: RRM, floods Irrigation water.
WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT
1 WaterWare description Data management, Objects Monitoring, time series Hydro-meteorological data, forecasts Rainfall-runoff: RRM, floods Irrigation water.
1 WaterWare description Data management, Objects Monitoring, time series Hydro-meteorological data, forecastsHydro-meteorological data, forecasts Rainfall-runoff:
CASE STUDY: LITANI LOWER BASIN Progress Gumpoldskirchen May 2006.
5th Shire River Basin Conference 22 February 2017 Shire River Basin Management Project Shire Basin Planning Tool Sub-Component A1 Development of a.
Steven Burian and Erfan Goharian Hydroinformatics Fall 2013
PIAMDDI Meeting Preparation University of New Hampshire
CANAL NETWORK CONTROL AJAY K BASU
WaterWare description
Distributed modelling
Modeling tools Training Module
Mauricio Santillana April 28, 2005
Beta Release of Delta Channel Depletion Model (DCD v1
WaterWare description
Environmental modeling application domains
WaterWare description
Benefit (Cost) Sharing
WaterWare description
Presentation of Jordan Case Study Second Management Board Meeting
Systems and Components – A Process for Developing the Total Water Budget Handbook for Water Budget Development - With or Without Models CWEMF 2019 Annual.
Optimization for Sustainable Water Resources
OPTIMA INCO-MPC Management Board Meeting, April 1/ Izmir
OPTIMA INCO-MPC Project Kick-off Meeting, October 28/ , Malta
EU, SIXTH FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME
OPTIMA INCO-MPC Management Board Meeting, April 1/2 2005, Izmir
Water Resources Management: concepts, tools, and applications
Presentation transcript:

1 OPTIMA INCO-MPC Project kick-off Meeting, October 28/29 Malta DDr. Kurt Fedra ESS GmbH, Austria Environmental Software & Services A-2352 Gumpoldskirchen DDr. Kurt Fedra ESS GmbH, Austria Environmental Software & Services A-2352 Gumpoldskirchen

2 WP03: Modelling MODELS provide a Formal Structured Quantitative description of the problems and possible solutions. MODELS provide a Formal Structured Quantitative description of the problems and possible solutions.

3 WP03: Modelling WP1: identifies problem issues, develops a structure for the description of the cases, identifies data needs and availability, constraints; WP2 analyzes perceptions and preferences, institutional or regulatory frameworks, plausible socio-economic developments; WP4 compiles the set of ALTERNATIVE WATER TECHNOLOGIES that can be used; WP5 looks into LAND USE change as one of the major driving forces, consistent with WP 2. WP1: identifies problem issues, develops a structure for the description of the cases, identifies data needs and availability, constraints; WP2 analyzes perceptions and preferences, institutional or regulatory frameworks, plausible socio-economic developments; WP4 compiles the set of ALTERNATIVE WATER TECHNOLOGIES that can be used; WP5 looks into LAND USE change as one of the major driving forces, consistent with WP 2.

4 WP03: Modelling WP1, 2, 4 and 5 develop the boundary conditions and specifications for Complete Consistent Plausible Set of SCENARIOS for simulation modelling and optimization. WP1, 2, 4 and 5 develop the boundary conditions and specifications for Complete Consistent Plausible Set of SCENARIOS for simulation modelling and optimization.

5 WP03: Modelling WaterWare dynamic water resources model (daily, annual)  optimization Embedded models: RRM rainfall-runoff model Automatic RRM calibration IRWDM irrigation water demand model Related model: LUC dynamic land use change model WaterWare dynamic water resources model (daily, annual)  optimization Embedded models: RRM rainfall-runoff model Automatic RRM calibration IRWDM irrigation water demand model Related model: LUC dynamic land use change model

6 WP 3: Modelling Models provide estimates for 1.Economic efficiency 2.Environmental compatibility 3.Equity (intra- and intergenerational) Models provide estimates for 1.Economic efficiency 2.Environmental compatibility 3.Equity (intra- and intergenerational)

7 WP03: Modelling LUC: land use change model Discrete state (LUC) transition model Markov chain with stochastic transition probabilities Rule-based constraints and TP adjustments Temporal resolution: year, scope: decades ( years) Spatial resolution: ha to km 2 Resource use and pollution as land-use specific output; Possibility for external, global driving forces LUC: land use change model Discrete state (LUC) transition model Markov chain with stochastic transition probabilities Rule-based constraints and TP adjustments Temporal resolution: year, scope: decades ( years) Spatial resolution: ha to km 2 Resource use and pollution as land-use specific output; Possibility for external, global driving forces

8 WP03: LUC Modelling Global/local adjustments of the transition probabilities expressed as First-order logic RULES in relative terms (INCREASE, DECREASE in %). Global/local adjustments of the transition probabilities expressed as First-order logic RULES in relative terms (INCREASE, DECREASE in %).

9

10

11

12 WP03: LUC Modelling Interactive editors for 1.Land use classes 2.Transition probabilities 3.Modifying rules 4.Class specific resource needs/outputs are available on-line together with the viewer (player for animated results) Links from will be moved to Interactive editors for 1.Land use classes 2.Transition probabilities 3.Modifying rules 4.Class specific resource needs/outputs are available on-line together with the viewer (player for animated results) Links from will be moved to

13

14 WP03: LUC Modelling Derived values per unit area, class specific: 1.Water consumption 2.Waste water generated 3.Energy use 4.Solid waste production OTHERS ?? Derived values per unit area, class specific: 1.Water consumption 2.Waste water generated 3.Energy use 4.Solid waste production OTHERS ??

15

16 WP03: Modelling LUC EXTENSIONS : Include transportation network in rules (connectivity) Other external variables (specified as time series) More LUC specific coefficients and processes (employment, value added, etc) LUC EXTENSIONS : Include transportation network in rules (connectivity) Other external variables (specified as time series) More LUC specific coefficients and processes (employment, value added, etc)

17 WP03: Modelling LUC OBJECTIVES: 1.Hypothesis testing 2.Developing CONSISTENT scenarios with high explanatory value that can also be used directly in the rainfall-runoff basin water budget model LUC OBJECTIVES: 1.Hypothesis testing 2.Developing CONSISTENT scenarios with high explanatory value that can also be used directly in the rainfall-runoff basin water budget model

18 WP03: Modelling RRM: rainfall-runoff model Dynamic, daily time step Uses daily rainfall and temperature Major basin characteristic: LAND USE (summarized from LUC scenarios ??) Estimates runoff and dynamic water budget for ungaged basins, provides input for WRM start nodes (catchment) RRM: rainfall-runoff model Dynamic, daily time step Uses daily rainfall and temperature Major basin characteristic: LAND USE (summarized from LUC scenarios ??) Estimates runoff and dynamic water budget for ungaged basins, provides input for WRM start nodes (catchment)

19 WP03: RRM Modelling Includes automatic calibration with runoff observation data Method: Monte Carlo, evolutionary programming; Extract reliable features (Gestalt) from observations, define as constraints on model behavior, FROM  TO (period) CMIN < FEATURE < CMAX FEATURES: min, max, avg, total, values Includes automatic calibration with runoff observation data Method: Monte Carlo, evolutionary programming; Extract reliable features (Gestalt) from observations, define as constraints on model behavior, FROM  TO (period) CMIN < FEATURE < CMAX FEATURES: min, max, avg, total, values

20

21

22

23 WP03: WR Modelling WRM: water resources model Dynamic, daily time step Topology of NODES and REACHES Demand nodes (cities, irrigation, industry, tourism) Estimates dynamic water budget, supply/demand, reliability of supply Complete on-line implementation with editors WRM: water resources model Dynamic, daily time step Topology of NODES and REACHES Demand nodes (cities, irrigation, industry, tourism) Estimates dynamic water budget, supply/demand, reliability of supply Complete on-line implementation with editors

24 WP03: Modelling User/scenario management: User authentication by name and password (monitored … ) User can see and copy ALL scenarios, edit/delete only their own ! TEST scenarios installed as EXAMPLES to demonstrate features implemented On-line manual pages User/scenario management: User authentication by name and password (monitored … ) User can see and copy ALL scenarios, edit/delete only their own ! TEST scenarios installed as EXAMPLES to demonstrate features implemented On-line manual pages

25

26 WP03: Modelling Model structure: Topology (network) of NODES, connected by REACHES; NODES represent functional OBJECTS in the basin: Sub-catchments, well(s) fields, springs Reservoirs, structures Water demand: cities, irrigation districts, industries, environmental uses (wetlands, minimum flow) Model structure: Topology (network) of NODES, connected by REACHES; NODES represent functional OBJECTS in the basin: Sub-catchments, well(s) fields, springs Reservoirs, structures Water demand: cities, irrigation districts, industries, environmental uses (wetlands, minimum flow)

27 WP03: Modelling Model structure: Topology (network) of NODES, connected by REACHES: Represent natural and man-made channels, canals, pipelines that transfer (route) water between NODES. Networks include: Diversions (splitting the flow) Confluences (merging flow) Model structure: Topology (network) of NODES, connected by REACHES: Represent natural and man-made channels, canals, pipelines that transfer (route) water between NODES. Networks include: Diversions (splitting the flow) Confluences (merging flow)

28

29

30 Water demand NODES Intake quality constraint, conveyance loss Consumptive use recycling return flow (pollution) Water demand and use: 1.domestic, 2. agricultural, 3. industrial Costs of supply Benefits of use Costs of supply Benefits of use losses

31 WP03: Modelling DEMAND NODE is defined by Its type (domestic, industrial, agricultural) Its connectivity (upstream, downstream, aquifer) Its water demand (time series) Conveiance losses (evaporation, seepage) Consumptive use fraction, resulting in return flow, and its losses Quality changes (pollution) Costs of supply – Benefits of use DEMAND NODE is defined by Its type (domestic, industrial, agricultural) Its connectivity (upstream, downstream, aquifer) Its water demand (time series) Conveiance losses (evaporation, seepage) Consumptive use fraction, resulting in return flow, and its losses Quality changes (pollution) Costs of supply – Benefits of use

32

33

34 WP03: Modelling WRM EXTENSIONS: 1.Full groundwater coupling, single or multi-cell aquifers with Darcy-flow coupling, in/exfiltration for reaches 2.Quality integration (return flow) 3.Economic analysis: 1.Water efficiency; added value/unit water 2.Cost-benefit analysis, requires, per node: Investment, lifetime, OMR, discount rate WRM EXTENSIONS: 1.Full groundwater coupling, single or multi-cell aquifers with Darcy-flow coupling, in/exfiltration for reaches 2.Quality integration (return flow) 3.Economic analysis: 1.Water efficiency; added value/unit water 2.Cost-benefit analysis, requires, per node: Investment, lifetime, OMR, discount rate

35 WP03: Modelling Full groundwater coupling, single or multi- cell aquifers with Darcy-flow coupling, in/exfiltration for reaches Every node is optionally connected to an AQUIFER OBJECT: 1.Extracting water from it (wells, infiltration (lateral inflow, baseflow contribution) into reaches, depending on relative levels 2.Returning water to it: seepage losses, explicit recharge Full groundwater coupling, single or multi- cell aquifers with Darcy-flow coupling, in/exfiltration for reaches Every node is optionally connected to an AQUIFER OBJECT: 1.Extracting water from it (wells, infiltration (lateral inflow, baseflow contribution) into reaches, depending on relative levels 2.Returning water to it: seepage losses, explicit recharge

36 WP5-9: Modelling REMEMBER: Model applications are THE central part of the case studies !!! All data compilation in view of model input data requirements REMEMBER: Model applications are THE central part of the case studies !!! All data compilation in view of model input data requirements

37 WP03: Model steps 1.Define the domain or system boundaries (river basin including any transfers !) 2.Describe all important OBJECTS: Inputs = sub-catchments, wells, springs, transfers, desalination, Aquifers Demands: cities, tourist resorts, industries, agriculture (irrigated) Structures: reservoirs 2.Define NETWORK: link nodes through reaches (connectivity) 1.Define the domain or system boundaries (river basin including any transfers !) 2.Describe all important OBJECTS: Inputs = sub-catchments, wells, springs, transfers, desalination, Aquifers Demands: cities, tourist resorts, industries, agriculture (irrigated) Structures: reservoirs 2.Define NETWORK: link nodes through reaches (connectivity)

38 WP03: Model steps 1.Compile and edit the DATA for the NODES and REACHES: –Time series of flow, pumping, water demand, diversion, reservoir release as rules or explicit time series, –Loss coefficients –Consumptive use fractions, –Costs (investment, OMR, and benefits per units water supplied/used; 2.Edit one or more scenarios, document 3.RUN the model, evaluate runs. 1.Compile and edit the DATA for the NODES and REACHES: –Time series of flow, pumping, water demand, diversion, reservoir release as rules or explicit time series, –Loss coefficients –Consumptive use fractions, –Costs (investment, OMR, and benefits per units water supplied/used; 2.Edit one or more scenarios, document 3.RUN the model, evaluate runs.

39 WP03: OPTMIZATION steps 1.Define CRITERIA, sort into 1.OBJECTIVES (min/max) and 2.CONSTRAINTS (inequalities), set numerical values, symbolic targets; 2.RUN the optimization model on-line (that may take a while …) 3.ANALYZE results as input to WP 14, 15 1.Define CRITERIA, sort into 1.OBJECTIVES (min/max) and 2.CONSTRAINTS (inequalities), set numerical values, symbolic targets; 2.RUN the optimization model on-line (that may take a while …) 3.ANALYZE results as input to WP 14, 15

40 WP03: OPTMIZATION steps OPTIMIZATION generates sets of feasible alternatives, each optimal in some (well defined) sense; Discrete multi-criteria methodology SELECTS a single preferred solution from that set by defining preferences and trade-offs (multi-criteria) interactively: Users explore the decision space to learn what can be obtained, and for what price (the trade-offs) and how to approach their UTOPIA solutions. OPTIMIZATION generates sets of feasible alternatives, each optimal in some (well defined) sense; Discrete multi-criteria methodology SELECTS a single preferred solution from that set by defining preferences and trade-offs (multi-criteria) interactively: Users explore the decision space to learn what can be obtained, and for what price (the trade-offs) and how to approach their UTOPIA solutions.