WP4 AWAST Trondheim, June 2002 – ISWA / Cemagref WORKPACKAGE 4 Collection & Transport O. Tabasaran, D. Steinbach, A. Schultheis.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Head of Policies & Planning Division Ministry of Environment
Advertisements

Cara - Waste Management That Doesn't Cost The Earth WASTE MANAGEMENT - INDUSTRY BEST PRACTICE Dr. Peter Coulahan Cara Group Safety Manager A PRESENTATION.
LGA Resource Recovery and Waste Summit - 10 February 2006 Transportation of Waste Greg Panigas.
Environmental Life Cycle Assessment PSE 476/WPS 576/WPS Fall 2014 Richard A. Venditti Forest Biomaterials North Carolina State University Raleigh,
Solid Waste Management Capacity Analysis for Collection and Transportation of Solid Waste Vehicles.
The quantification test results indicate that St. Stephen produces an average of 31 ft 3 or 96lb. of target recoverable waste per week. Most of the waste.
Prepared by Denese Ballew and Brian Taylor from Land-of-Sky Regional Council Solid Waste Management Study for the Town of Waynesville.
San Juan County Solid Waste: Funding. Solid Waste Funding Current Solid Waste Revenue Current Solid Waste Revenue Rate Structure used to collect revenue.
Presented to SWAC February 16, 2012 City of Cleveland Automated Waste Collection And Curbside Recycling Program.
Waste Collection. Lesson Objectives  Understand problems and concerns associated with MSW collection.  Compare and contrast privately and publicly operated.
WASTE AUDITING 101. What Direction Are You Going?
MULTI-FAMILY SOLID WASTE COLLECTION WHY FOOD SCRAPS IN GARBAGE ARE A PROBLEM ? More than 40% of garbage is food scraps Tipping fee for garbage $109/MT.
NORWICH CITY RECYCLING AGENDA 1)Introduction 2)Basic Facts 3)Where we are now 4)Issues - City Centre - Flats & Difficult Access Areas - Residents Views.
University Of Utah Enhanced Recycling Program. Why Recycle? Environmental Stewardship Environmental Stewardship Sustainability Leadership Sustainability.
„Business opportunities in waste treatment” Conference -Tel Aviv
AWAST final meeting - Brussels december 2003 Aid in the management and European comparison of Municipal Solid WASte Treatment methods for a global.
Environmental protection Department ing. Dragos Manu PLOIESTI MECHANICAL-BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT PLANT.
ANALYSIS OF COLLECTION SYSTEMS -Must be optimized to save collection time and costs. -Important to determine vehicle and labor requirements -Activities.
OPTIMIZING THE SOLID WASTE COLLECTION SYSTEM OF ACSS USING LINEAR PROGRAMMING & GIS Mohammed Abdi Ali Term Project Fall 2000 CE 394 GIS for Water Resources.
San Juan County Solid Waste Program Rate Workshop 12/10/02.
Waste Collection Exercises
WASTES TRANSFER AND TRANSPORT.  Facilities and appurtenances used to effect the transfer of waste from the one location to other, usually more distance,
Implementing and optimising separate collection: operational and economic issues Enzo Favoino Scuola Agraria del Parco di Monza.
Sustainable Communities Initiative © Dr. P. Hossay Community Sustainability Patrick Hossay The Richard Stockton College of NJ.
AWAST final meeting - Brussels December 2003 Aid in the management and European comparison of Municipal Solid WASte Treatment methods for a global.
WP4 AWAST Rennes, November 2001 – ISWA / Cemagref WORKPACKAGE 4 Collection & Transport O. Tabasaran, D. Steinbach, A. Schultheis, K. Fischer.
MED 2007 – 2013 Low Cost Zero Waste Municipality The Integrated Decision Support Tool under development within Zero Waste project: the 1 st step towards.
B BASF Eco-Efficiency C. Wall BASF Corporation HELPING MAKE PRODUCTS BETTER TM 1 Eco-efficiency: Inside BASF and Beyond… Charlene Wall, BASF Corporation,
Solid Waste collection Equipment. Solid Waste Collection Systems It includes both primary and secondary collection system Most of the developed countries.
AWAST final meeting - Brussels december 2003 Aid in the management and European comparison of Municipal Solid WASte Treatment methods for a global.
WORK PACKAGE 5 BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT. PARTICIPANTS:  Lqars  Cemagref  Tratolixo PERIOD: 1 – 24 (Months)
Environmental management Office waste recycling March 2006 University of Leeds EAUC Hazardous Waste seminar – 5 July 2006 Dr Keith PitcherEnvironmental.
EAUC Hazardous Waste seminar – January 2007 Dr Keith PitcherEnvironmental Officer tel: web:
Workshop Trondheim, June 20th-21st 2002 WP 1 Waste Matter Aspects: Characterisation and Data Processing Roland Fehringer Vienna University of Technology.
Information campaigns and motivational principles in household waste management in Flanders ETT – Kiev, Ukraine Christof Delatter Association.
Priority Environmental Investment Programme National Workshop Serbia Overview Of EU Waste Policy Belgrade, 8 th May 2008 Ruslan Zhechkov, REC
March 2003 Focused Workshop on the Informal Draft Revised Disposal Reporting System Regulations Session #2: Transfer Station Issues.
12 – 13 février 2001 – Cemagref / ISWA WORKPACKAGE 3 Economic aspects AWASTWP 3.
WP4 AWAST Rennes, November 2001 – ISWA / Cemagref Material Recovery Facility (Sorting Plant)
The Recycling Journey Stage 1. Collection On collection day the recycling vehicle empties the contents of your blue bin into the lorry.
AWAST final meeting - Brussels december 2003 Aid in the management and European comparison of Municipal Solid WASte Treatment methods for a global.
CASELLA RESOURCE SOLUTIONS ZERO-SORT® RECYCLING COLLECTION ORGANICS ENERGY LANDFILLS casella.com 1 Bob Cappadona Vice President Casella November 5, 2015.
Kindersley Waste & Recycle: Landfill Impacts SWANA Regional Waste Management Workshop November 16, 2015 – Saskatoon, SK.
Workshop on recycling Tirana, September 2011 Waste management in Croatia Jasna Kufrin Head of Waste Department Croatian Environment Agency Teo Čolan.
EnE 301: ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING
Board Workshop: Overview Of CIWMB Waste Characterization Studies and Tools May 9, 2006.
Delivering source separation in an urban environment Brussels - 29 th January 2016 John Bland (Treasurer and Deputy Clerk)
Assessment of separate collection in 28 capitals of the EU
Organic waste Pretreatment plant Tender- and site-presentation.
Broadland’s Trial Food Waste Recycling Scheme Andy Jarvis & Bob Wade.
Recycling in the IVAR - region Sibiu, november 2009 Tron Ree, Chief engineer IVAR IKS.
New Recycling and Waste Collection Service Starting 4 th July 2016.
Waste management by YTV Teemu-Oskari Kiiveri 08A Nahla Hewidy 08C Tuomas Salminen 08A.
WLTP-DHC Analysis of in-use driving behaviour data, influence of different parameters By Heinz Steven
Lecture (3) : Primary storage of waste.
Power | Case Study The Client
Impact on the recycling rate
Fotis Kourmousis Environmental Scientist, PhD candidate
Modelling Sustainable Urban Transport
Waste Collection.
Impacts of new Legislation on waste statistics
RDE Regulation Commission Meeting
Main Objectives of This Secession
Collection and Transportation
Japanese Fuel Efficiency Standard for Heavy Duty Vehicles
HDV CO2 Regulation in REPUBLIC OF KOREA
SOLID WASTE COLLECTION COLLECTION SERVICES COLLECTION SYSTEMS COLLECTION ROUTES NEED FOR TRANSFER OPERATION RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND RECOVERY.
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT IN Asera – Ash-shamalia
5 SWAC Agenda: June 2018 Introduction – Timm Schimke
Central Vermont Solid Waste Management District
Presentation transcript:

WP4 AWAST Trondheim, June 2002 – ISWA / Cemagref WORKPACKAGE 4 Collection & Transport O. Tabasaran, D. Steinbach, A. Schultheis

WP4 AWAST Trondheim, June 2002 – ISWA / Cemagref Collection & Transport Objectives of WP 4 1 Development of a general methodology for data collection to evaluate the efficiency of collection/ transportation schemes and sorting plants 2 Data collection in several cities and counties (case studies) following the procedure developed 3 Simulation with the aim to improving the efficiency of collection/ transport and sorting schemes 4 If feasible, to implement and assess selected improvement measures

WP4 AWAST Trondheim, June 2002 – ISWA / Cemagref Problems encountered 3 Evaluation of the efficiency of sorting plants is very time consuming as there are five sorting plants in Stuttgart operating with different technologies and dealing with different input material 2 At the moment, the focus of work is on collection and transport as it is the topic that lacks of information and data 1 Data collection does not have the priority that is required in the project 4 No delays

WP4 AWAST Trondheim, June 2002 – ISWA / Cemagref General results 1 Collection transport:  Model structure is completed  Programming has started  Equations are determined  Most of the required default values are available  Detailed data from Stuttgart will be received the next weeks

WP4 AWAST Trondheim, June 2002 – ISWA / Cemagref 2 Sorting plant:  Data of one sorting plant for mixed recyclables are available in parts to be integrated into the simulator  Data collection from Stuttgart sorting plants is ongoing 3 Environmental aspects:  The structure to assess the aspects is finished for collection/transport  Data from Rennes sorting plant are available in parts

WP4 AWAST Trondheim, June 2002 – ISWA / Cemagref Collection and transport For evaluation of efficiency and environmental aspects the simulator will  reflect the present situation of collection/transport and sorting plants in the case study cities and in cities which want to use the system  improve/ optimise the existing system by changing factors  introduce additional collection systems and sorting streams for selected waste fractions % of total waste disposal costs

WP4 AWAST Trondheim, June 2002 – ISWA / Cemagref

WP4 AWAST Trondheim, June 2002 – ISWA / Cemagref Per area and fraction

WP4 AWAST Trondheim, June 2002 – ISWA / Cemagref Per area and fraction

WP4 AWAST Trondheim, June 2002 – ISWA / Cemagref  Waste amounts and composition per capita If waste data are unknown, default values are available and will be provided by the programme Basic data required to feed the simulator  Description of collection area(s) normally 1 collection area for smaller towns bigger cities are often divided into several (independent) areas

WP4 AWAST Trondheim, June 2002 – ISWA / Cemagref Area description should include For optimisation or introduction of a new system, existing area divisions can be changed or areas can be added Basic data required to feed the simulator  Number of inhabitants  Number of households  Number of properties  Building structures  Inhabitants/households per building structure  Km² of area

WP4 AWAST Trondheim, June 2002 – ISWA / Cemagref  Fractions collected separately per bin/bag, or together in one container (quantities)  User decides which fractions are to be collected separately with bin/bags New system / improvementPresent situation Data required per collection area  additive, alternating, integrated Data required per collection area and fraction  Collection system  central collection points; inhabitants connected per central container  User can chose or change the collection system  kerbside  collection frequency  Back-calculations will avoid logical errors

WP4 AWAST Trondheim, June 2002 – ISWA / Cemagref  Number of bins according to sizes ( litres) per area and fraction  The programme suggests bin sizes according to area specifications  Number of bins required is back- calculated by the programme using: Bins/ containers per area and fraction New system / improvementPresent situation  User can fix bin sizes  bin sizes chosen by the user  area specifications  volume weight of waste fraction  or by volume which must be provided by municipal regulation

WP4 AWAST Trondheim, June 2002 – ISWA / Cemagref Collection and transport per area, vehicle and day is determined by the following factors: Collection specifications per area and fraction  Length of a working day  Time spent driving between stops  Distance to the disposal site  Average haul speed to and from disposal site  One way delay time  Unloading time at disposal site  Off route time per day  Number of shifts  Vehicle specifications, lifter system  Area specifications

WP4 AWAST Trondheim, June 2002 – ISWA / Cemagref Calculations of the collection parameters are related to  a vehicle collecting a specific waste fraction per day during a defined route  per route several trips to the disposal site may be required, so the calculations are normally related to one trip  important aspect for efficiency is the time spent for the different collection steps Collection specifications per area and fraction Equations and parameters for calculations are related to bring and kerbside systems using specific modifications if required

WP4 AWAST Trondheim, June 2002 – ISWA / Cemagref Collection per trip can be divided into: Pick-up [P scs ] Haul [x] At site [t u ] From 1st container to be emptied until vehicle is full Transport to the waste disposal plants, recycling facilities or transfer station (and back) Time required for unloading the vehicle at the waste disposal plant, recycling facility or transfer station Time per trip T scs = P scs + t u + a + bx Collection specifications per area and fraction a, b are empirical constants for distances and related velocities

WP4 AWAST Trondheim, June 2002 – ISWA / Cemagref Pick-up- time depends onP scs = C t (uc) + (N p ) (dbc)  Number of containers emptied per trip [C t ]  Unloading time per container (collector specific) [uc t ]  Number of container pick-up locations (stops) [N p ]  Average time spent driving between the pick-up locations [dbc] Collection specifications per area and fraction

WP4 AWAST Trondheim, June 2002 – ISWA / Cemagref  Default values available and provided  Programme calculated  Selection of vehicle types (axles, payload, volume, rear, front, side loaders) provided  Previously selected  Number of containers emptied per trip [C t ] C t = vr/cf New system / improvement Depends on  Container sizes  Volume weight per waste fraction and container size  Vehicle volume, payload [v] (maximum volume weight)  Possible compaction ratio [r] [cf]

WP4 AWAST Trondheim, June 2002 – ISWA / Cemagref  To be selected by the user  Lifter system  Number of collectors/ vehicle [N c ]  Average default values are available and provided  Container sizes  Average default values are available and provided or  Unloading time per container [uc t ] uc t = (Lt 0 + LT 1 )/N c *z  Set out time for full service [Lt 0 ]  Emptying time per container [Lt 1 ] is a function of New system / improvement Depends on  Programme provides possibility to chose the lifter system, providing unloading times according to container sizes  Factor used if lifters are not divided [z]

WP4 AWAST Trondheim, June 2002 – ISWA / Cemagref  Number of container pick-up locations per trip N p = H/N d - 2x/s - 2 t d - t u - B/N d t p New system / improvement  Length of working day/vehicle [H]  Number of trips [N d ]  Mean time per stop + time to reach the next stop [t p ]  At site unloading time [t u ]  Off-route time [B]  Distance to the disposal plant [x]  One way delay time [t d ] t p = (uc*c loc )+dbc  Average haul speed to disposal plant [s]  1 or 2 shifts, working hours can be changed  Back-calculated  Can be changed for simulating transfer station, etc.  Average values road and distance specific available For the present situation the following parameters are known or calculated  Related to selected vehicle  All factors can be changed (collectors, containers, vehicles...)

WP4 AWAST Trondheim, June 2002 – ISWA / Cemagref  Changing collection system, container neighbourhoods, etc. dbc = D/V max [1-exp(0,03D)]  Average time spent driving between the pick-up locations [dbc] New system / improvement  Distance between stops [D]  Velocity [V]  Average values (number of bins/100 m) available according to area structures  Average values available according to area structures

WP4 AWAST Trondheim, June 2002 – ISWA / Cemagref Environmental aspects collection/ transport Parameters per waste vehicles  Age  Maximum payload  Average load  Number of axles  Average speed  Diesel/ 100 km  Diesel/ t collected  Percentage of increased efforts  km/ year  Filters installed  Particles Emissions considered  CO  NO x  HC Emissions will be evaluated according to existing norms for the following parameters:

WP4 AWAST Trondheim, June 2002 – ISWA / Cemagref  For central collection points/ civic amenity sites, private trips will be calculated by using average default values (according to inhabitants connected per location)  Waste transport from transfer station to recycling facilities, composting plant, incineration, MBPT or landfill (specific transportation trucks)  Waste transport from sorting plant to recycling facilities, incineration, MBPT or landfill Transport considered  Waste collection and transport to the waste disposal plant or transfer station

WP4 AWAST Trondheim, June 2002 – ISWA / Cemagref Sorting plant (MRF) for mixed recyclables  Packaging waste  Paper/ cardboard sorted into different qualities Sorted:  Small WEEE Inhabitants connected: 182,000 Input: 22,700 tons/year (maximum capacity 26,000 tons/year)  Batteries

WP4 AWAST Trondheim, June 2002 – ISWA / Cemagref

WP4 AWAST Trondheim, June 2002 – ISWA / Cemagref Data available in parts  Input streams, quantities per fraction  Input/ output of each sorting station  Technical data and input/output drum 1 and 2  Technical data input/ output Sotima (density separator)  Technical data and efficiency of the magnetic separators and Eddy-Current separator  Technical data conveyor belts, pressing devices etc.  For some aggregates equations for the simulator are available

WP4 AWAST Trondheim, June 2002 – ISWA / Cemagref Available data concerning sorting efficiency (on a monthly basis)  Staff per shift  Quantities collected per fraction and shift  Time for pressing  Running hours  Tons per hour (from green household bin)  Tons per hour (commercial recyclables)  Additional cleaning  Interruption hours divided into cleaning, overfilled sorting belt, defect...  Capacity utilisation (%)  Working time (hours per person and month)  Working days per month  Total hours per shift

WP4 AWAST Trondheim, June 2002 – ISWA / Cemagref Collection transport Bio-Bin Biowaste Lunch-time !!! Origin ???