Harald Winkler, Randall Spalding-Fecher, Stanford Mwakasonda & Ogunlade Davidson Energy & Development Research Centre University of Cape Town Sustainable.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Framework Convention on Climate Change n Basis for all negotiations since 1992 n Ratified by 186 Countries n Ratified by United States n Commits all Parties.
Advertisements

RIVM/Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency 1 Michel den Elzen, Paul Lucas and Marcel Berk National Institute of Public Health.
Sustainable Development Policies and Measures: Putting development first in a carbon-constrained world. BASIC MEETING February, 2005 Jonathan Pershing.
1 Introduction to the Climate Change Regime: the Role of the GEF By Bonizella Biagini Program Manager Climate Change Adaptation Global Environment Facility.
1 Sustainable development policies and measures A strategic approach for enhancing the climate regime post-2012 Presentation by South Africa to 2 nd Workshop.
1 Programmes containing measures to mitigate climate change (Decision 17/CP.8) Seoul, Rep. Of Korea 26 – 30 September 2005 Dominique Revet (UNFCCC)
UNFCCC WORKSHOP Port Louis, Mauritius (8-11 April 2003) USE OF THE GUIDELINES FOR THE PREPARATION OF NATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS FROM NON-ANNEX I PARTIES MITIGATION.
Programming directions for GEF-6 Climate Change Mitigation
Climate Change Adaptation Louise Collett Climate Change Advocacy Coordinator Oxfam Australia
Ideas on NAMA development and implementation Carolyn Neufeld KfW Carbon Fund.
1 The African Bio-Carbon Initiative Dr Charlotte Streck.
Sustainable Development Policies and Measures: Putting development first in a carbon-constrained world. COP11 December 5, 2005 Rob Bradley Climate and.
International Climate Policy Hamburg Institute of International Economics International Climate Policy Graduation and deepening: a suggestion to move international.
Beyond CDM: Options for the wind industry 21 April 2010, Warshaw EWEC 2010 Marion Vieweg.
GEF and the Conventions The Global Environment Facility: Is the financial mechanism for the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants Is the.
IPCC IPCC Working Group III Policies, Instruments and Co-operative Arrangements Dennis Tirpak (CLA Chapter 13)
READINESS TO IMPLEMENTATION Lessons and Experiences from Zambia Presented by: Deuteronomy Kasaro National REDD+ Coordinator 7th November,
CONFIDENTIAL THE DOHA AMENDMENT TO THE KYOTO PROTOCOL TO THE UNITED NATIONS FRAMEWORK CONVENTION ON CLIMATE CHANGE (UNFCCC) SELECT committee 25 NOVEMBER.
Francesca Romanin Jacur Milan University
UNFCCC Workshop on the Use of the Guidelines for the Preparation of National Communications from non- Annex I Parties Programmes Containing Measures to.
Vulnerability Assessments and Adaptation to Climate Change Consultations on the Relationship between Climate and human rightsGeneva 22 October 2008 Festus.
ADAPTATION TO ADVERSE EFFECTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE, CRITICAL FACTOR IN DEVELOPMENT PLANNING Valentin Bartra Buenos Aires, Dec 2004.
1 United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change UNFCCC press conference, Bonn, 20 November 2007 Kyoto Protocol “go-live”: data, policies, infrastructures.
Africa and National Communications under UNFCCC : A Means To An End Dr. George Manful Senior Task Manager, Climate Change Enabling Activities, UNEP.
1 SOUTH AFRICA’S PERSPECTIVES ON CLIMATE ACTION Dialogue on Long-Term Cooperative Action 15 & 16 May 2006 Bonn Germany.
Capacity Building in National Communications Role of UNEP RISOE CENTRE Presentation at side event on: financial and technical support on NC, Bonn 9 June.
Cooperation to reduce developing country emissions Suzi Kerr (Motu) and Adam Millard-Ball (McGill) Motu climate change economics workshop, March, 2012.
Estimating and Comparing Costs and Benefits of Adaptation Projects in Africa – Project AF47 Participating organisations: Energy and Development Research.
WRI Climate of Trust Expert Meeting on Climate Change and Sustainable Development Seoul, November 20, 2002.
Brief Overview of Legal Framework: UNFCCC and Kyoto Protocol M.J.Mace Climate Change and Energy Programme, FIELD LDC Workshop Nairobi, Kenya 2-3 November.
The GEF in Mexico Integrating GEF Programmes and Strategies at Country Level Cape Town, August, 2006.
SHIFTING POWERS AND INTERNATIONAL CLIMATE NORMS Dr Rowena Maguire.
FAO NAMA learning tool to support NAMA preparation in agriculture
EPA Offsets Experience and Analysis Bill Irving Climate Change Division U.S. Environmental Protection Agency April 28, 2009.
The NGP and Local Government Economic Planning and Coordination 27 May
Climate Change Mitigation and Sustainable Development: A Framework for Integration John Robinson CLA, WGIII July 18, 2001.
1 Overcoming Challenges in Preparation and Implementation of NAMAs Kigali, 17 th August 2015 African Regional Workshop on NAMAs.
Financing climate-friendly projects in the Balkan region DAC PROJECT CAPACITY BUILDING IN BALKAN COUNTRIES IN ORDER TO DEAL WITH CLIMATE CHANGE Prepared.
1 ERC Sustainable Development Policies & Measures SD-PAMs Stanford Mwakasonda “Global Challenges toward Low-Carbon Society (LCS) through Sustainable Development.
European Commission: Environment Directorate General Slide: 1 The EU and the international negotiations on climate change May 2008 Dr. Nicola Notaro, Policy.
WRI Moderator: Christiana Figueres, Center for Sustainable Development in the Americas (CSDA) Speakers 1.Kevin Baumert, WRI 2.Harald Winkler, EDRC 3.Yong-Gun.
GEF and the Conventions The Global Environment Facility: Is the financial mechanism for the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants the.
Overview: Mitigation of Climate Change UNFCCC COP 6 Part Two Special Event, July 2001 IPCC Third Assessment Report.
Click to edit Master subtitle style 10/25/11 Gender and Climate Change Finance Stacy Alboher Presentation to the Multi-Party Women’s Caucus Cape Town,
AFRICAN CLIMATE PLATFORM TO COPENHAGEN KEY MESSAGES TO MINISTERS AND HEADS OF STATES AND GOVERNEMENTS (Africa’s Common Negotiation Position) Adopted in.
What constitutes a fair level of effort for individual Parties? Ben Gleisner: Post-2012 Emission Reduction Targets.
Informal Thematic Debate of the General Assembly Climate Change as a Global Challenge 31 July 2007, United Nations The way forward: International Context.
Presentation to the South African Parliament on the occasion of the Pre-COP17 Climate Change National Consultative Seminar Cape Town : 28 October 2011.
Pricing Carbon: Carbon Emission Trading Potential in South Africa Proposed Research Papers.
Post-2012 Issues under the UNFCCC and Kyoto Protocol ______________ LDC Workshop Nairobi, Kenya Windsor Golf and Country Club 2-3 November 2006 M.J. Mace.
European capacity building initiativeecbi POST-2012 AND FUTURE ACTION Discussions based on the Sao Paulo Proposal for the BASIC project Alejandra Lopez.
Financing Arrangements in the International Climate Change and Biodiversity Regimes Jolene Lin Assistant Professor Faculty of Law The University of Hong.
REDD+ negotiations and key milestones from Cancun to Durban Geneva, 9 May 2011 Clea Paz-Rivera, UN-REDD Secretariat.
European Union Emissions Trading Scheme: Institutional Lessons for China Ping CHEN, PhD Researcher Department of Public International Law Gent University.
Brief Overview of Legal Framework: UNFCCC and Kyoto Protocol M.J.Mace Climate Change and Energy Programme, FIELD LDC Workshop Montreal Canada November.
Equity and Global Climate Change Developing Countries and the Climate Change Challenge Alistair Maclean, Australian Embassy.
CLIMATE CHANGE A PERSPECTIVE FROM MEXICO Seminar of Governmental Experts Bonn, 16-17th of May, 2005 SEMARNAT MEXICO.
Template Contents of the Low Carbon Development Strategy (LCDS)
Sustainable development policies and measures
Global Climate Change Alliance: Intra-ACP Programme
Lessons and Experiences from Zambia National REDD+ Coordinator
Overview Rationale Context and Linkages Objectives Commitments
Policy integration challenge
Roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050
Accounting and Environmental Integrity in Article 6
Presentation by South Africa
Climate Change: Towards COP 21
Climate Change Mitigation: Research Needs
Overview Rationale Context and Linkages Objectives Commitments
The Technology Mechanism of the UNFCCC
Presentation transcript:

Harald Winkler, Randall Spalding-Fecher, Stanford Mwakasonda & Ogunlade Davidson Energy & Development Research Centre University of Cape Town Sustainable development policies and measures

2 What is the SD-PAMs approach? Sustainable development (SD) policies and measures (PAMs) Sustainable development (SD) policies and measures (PAMs) Backcast from desired future state of development, not GHG reduction goal or cap Backcast from desired future state of development, not GHG reduction goal or cap  define more sustainable paths to meet development objectives Climate change as ‘ancillary benefit’ of achieving SD Climate change as ‘ancillary benefit’ of achieving SD  Developing countries (DC) focused on basic development needs; climate change not a priority  commit to implementing SD policies in practice Basis in Article 3.4 of the Convention – the right to sustainable development Basis in Article 3.4 of the Convention – the right to sustainable development

IPCC SRES B1 Scenarios B IPCC SRES A1T Scenarios A1T IPCC SRES B2 Scenarios B IPCC SRES A1FI Scenarios A B2B1 Emissions from development path matter at least as much as mitigation policy A1TA1FI Source: IPCC 2001 Third Assessment Report, WG3, p. 151 IPCC Emission Scenarios (grey) versus emissions path needed for stabilisation (red)

4 Steps in applying SD PAMs 1. Country outlines future development objectives  backcasting from long term goals where possible 2. Identify PAMs to achieve development objectives more sustainably, for reasons other than CC a.Existing policy not fully implemented; or b.New policies and / or more stringent measures 3. Quantify the changes in GHG emissions from individual PAMs 4. Identify PAMs with synergies or conflicts between SD benefits and GHG limitations 5. Summarise the net impact of a basket of SD-PAMs on development and GHG emissions

5 Disadvantages of SD-PAMs approach Does not ensure a global reduction or cap on GHG emissions Does not ensure a global reduction or cap on GHG emissions  reduces emissions from BAU, not from 1990 levels Analytically hard to summarise net impacts of basket of PAMs on GHGs Analytically hard to summarise net impacts of basket of PAMs on GHGs  See SA case study in the chapter in the book

6 Advantages of SD-PAMs approach Starts from SD, which DC policymakers prioritise Starts from SD, which DC policymakers prioritise  Extend and implement existing domestic policies  synergies are ‘win-win’ or ‘no-regrets’ policies  Builds DC leadership by showing what DC are doing Takes account of national circumstances Takes account of national circumstances  builds in domestic energy resource endowment, climate, levels of industrialisation and motorisation, income  develops capacity to mitigate Create incentives for early DC action – differentiated responsibility and action Create incentives for early DC action – differentiated responsibility and action Helps build a climate of trust for potential future commitments Helps build a climate of trust for potential future commitments

7 Institutional challenge: Formalising the approach Accountability in a pledge-based approach Accountability in a pledge-based approach  How does this link to the UNFCCC / KP system?  Countries make pledges  Countries make pledges to implement SD-PAMs  Commitments under UNFCCC Article 4.1 b and 4.1 f  Mandatory reporting under new registry versus reporting in National Communications

8 The funding challenge: Who pays? For PAMs that reduce emissions For PAMs that reduce emissions  Annex II already have commitment for incremental costs of implementing mitigation measures and full costs of formulation and reporting (Article 4.3)  For additional funds, access GEF, CDM, new Convention and KP funds  Broader than CDM – need national, sectoral baselines to assess impact For PAMs that do not reduce emissions For PAMs that do not reduce emissions  Access ODA, Dev Banks, private capital Since it promotes development, may mobilise domestic funding more readily Since it promotes development, may mobilise domestic funding more readily

9 What you won’t find in this presentation …  … but can read in the chapter in the book! More detailed ideas about implementing SD-PAMs More detailed ideas about implementing SD-PAMs  Defining and formalising the commitment  What might baselines for SD be?  Timing and graduation issues  How should SD-PAMs be reviewed and accounted for? Link between climate policies and SD policies Link between climate policies and SD policies More on funding More on funding Case study: SD-PAMs applied to South African situation Case study: SD-PAMs applied to South African situation

10 Concluding remarks Climate change negotiations have to address the political priorities of DCs Climate change negotiations have to address the political priorities of DCs SD PAMs is an possible first step in DC participation SD PAMs is an possible first step in DC participation Can start now and continue in parallel to negotiations around second commitment period Can start now and continue in parallel to negotiations around second commitment period

Thank you for listening

12 Which developing countries might find it attractive? Least Developed Countries in particular? Least Developed Countries in particular? Rapidly industrialising countries Rapidly industrialising countries  would not have surplus under top-down allocation schemes Analytical Analytical  grouping by emissions intensity (CO2 / GDP), ability to pay (GDP / pop), Human Dev Index?

13 Equity and future commitment regimes One major question: How to set up a framework for global participation in the effort to combat climate change? One major question: How to set up a framework for global participation in the effort to combat climate change?  Top-down approaches: can guarantee an environmental outcome  Bottom-up approaches: politically more likely to bring DCs into the system  Could include this slide, leave out points on slide 7? And what about the graphic? Consider both responsibility of countries, and their capacity to meet targets Consider both responsibility of countries, and their capacity to meet targets SD-PAMs a bottom-up approach that builds capacity in DCs SD-PAMs a bottom-up approach that builds capacity in DCs

14 Implementation challenges: conceptual What is the baseline for SD? Business-as-usual? What is the baseline for SD? Business-as-usual?  Conventional development / dirty development  Current policy? Or implementation?  Multi-sectoral - how many baselines can you monitor  How to prevent gaming  countries claiming existing policies as ‘new’ SD-PAMs Link between SD-PAMs and climate mitigation policies Link between SD-PAMs and climate mitigation policies  end up dealing with energy services, transport, housing  difference in the motivation / starting point - to achieve development or to reduce GHGs