doc.: /04 Submission August 2010 D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell) Slide 1 P802.11REVmb Report to EC on meeting the terms of Conditional Approval to go to Sponsor Ballot Date: Authors:

doc.: /04 Submission August 2010 D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell) Slide 2 Summary The IEEE 802 EC granted conditional approval to P802.11REVmb to proceed to sponsor ballot at its July 2010 closing meeting. WG recirculation ballot on P802.11REVmb_D5.0 closed, meeting the terms of the conditional approval Details of meeting these terms is shown on the next slide, and the status of the P802.11REVmb WG ballot are shown on the following slides. WG requests that the IEEE 802 EC approve the start of sponsor ballot on P802.11REVmb.

doc.: /04 Submission Meeting the terms of conditional approval As per LMSC OM Clause 14: Recirculation ballot is completed. Generally, the recirculation ballot and resolution should occur in accordance with the schedule presented at the time of conditional approval. –The Ballot occurred, in accordance with the schedule presented to the EC in document 11-10/0801r02. After resolution of the recirculation ballot is completed, the approval percentage is at least 75% and there are no new valid DISAPPROVE votes. –The approval percentage is 92% –There are no new valid disapprove votes. No technical changes, as determined by the WG Chair, were made as a result of the recirculation ballot. –No technical changes were made as a result of the recirculation ballot. No new valid DISAPPROVE comments on new issues that are not resolved to the satisfaction of the submitter from existing DISAPPROVE voters –There were 16 comments received, of which 7 were marked disapprove, from 3 voters. All three voters subsequently withdrew their disapprove comments. Two of the disapprove comments were received from a new no voter who changed his vote to approve on withdrawal of his comments. –So there are no new disapprove comments. August 2010 D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell) Slide 3

doc.: /04 Submission Meeting the terms of conditional approval - continued If the WG Chair determines that there is a new invalid DISAPPROVE comment or vote, the WG Chair shall promptly provide details to the Sponsor. –None The WG Chair shall immediately report the results of the ballot to the Sponsor including: the date the ballot closed, vote tally and comments associated with any remaining disapproves (valid and invalid), the WG responses and the rationale for ruling any vote invalid. –The Ballot closed on –The comments associated with remaining disapproves and the WG responses are attached to slide 10 –As indicated above, one negative vote received in the recirculation was subsequently changed by the voter to approve coincident with withdrawal of all his disapprove comments from that recirculation. August 2010 D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell) Slide 4

doc.: /04 Submission August 2010 D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell) Slide 5 WG Letter Ballot Results Ballot ID Ballot Close Date Draft Number Ballot TypePoolReturn%ReturnAbstain % Abstain Appr ove Disap prove %Appro ve Draft 1.0Initial Draft 2.0Recirculation Draft 3.0Recirculation Draft 4.0Recirculation * Draft 5.0Recirculation * Includes one post-ballot change of vote

doc.: /04 Submission August 2010 D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell) Slide WG Letter Ballot Comments Ballot ID Ballot Close Date DraftBallot Type Number of Comments received Draft 1.0Initial730 (491T, 239E) Draft 2.0Recirculation246 (188T, 58E) Draft 3.0Recirculation149 (129T, 20E) Draft 4.0Recirculation98 (57T, 41E) Draft 5.0Recirculation16 (9T, 7E)

doc.: /04 Submission August 2010 D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell) Slide 7 Unsatisfied comments by commenter VoterLB149LB160LB162LB163Total Bagby, David4 4 Bajko, Gabor5 5 Cam-Winget, Nancy2 2 Chu, Liwen Erceg, Vinko 2 2 Marshall, Bill 11 Myles, Andrew4 4 Rosdahl, Jon Stephenson, David234 9 Vlantis, George 55 Total As described previously, there are no unsatisfied comments from LB 167.

doc.: /04 Submission August 2010 D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell) Slide 8 Updates since ballot Commenters have indicated that all their disapprove comments in LB167 are satisfied/resolved. –H. Ramamurthy: I will like to withdraw CIDs 5008, and And I hereby change my vote on P802.11REVmb to approve. –L. Chu: I hereby withdraw my "part of a no vote" comments on LB167. –G. Vlantis: I would like to withdraw my two part of a no vote comments from LB167mb.

doc.: /04 Submission August 2010 D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell) Slide 9 Unsatisfied comments The composite of all unsatisfied comments and the resolutions approved during working group ballot is attached. –Double click on the icon to the right to open this. A copy of the unsatisfied comments presented using MyBallot access database report format is attached. –Double click on the icon to the right to open this.

doc.: /04 Submission August 2010 D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell) Slide 10 Timeline Fourth recirculation (Draft 5.0) Open Close Pool formation (45 days)2010 Aug/Sept First sponsor ballot Second sponsor ballot Third sponsor ballot Fourth sponsor ballot Final Recirc (10 days) EC to RevCom July RevCom to SB2011 Sept