1. November 2008
doc.: IEEE /1437r1
July 2010
P802.11z report to EC on request for conditional approval to proceed to RevCom
Date:
Authors:
Name
Company
Address
Phone
Menzo Wentink
Qualcomm
Straatweg 66, Breukelen, the Netherlands
Bruce Kraemer
Marvell
5488 Marvell Lane, Santa Clara, CA 95054
+1 (321)
M. Wentink (Qualcomm), B.Kraemer (Marvell)
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

2. November 2008
doc.: IEEE /1437r1
July 2010
Introduction
This document contains the report to the IEEE 802 Executive Committee in support of a request for conditional approval to send IEEE P802.11z to RevCom.
This document (11-10/0854r0) was approved during the closing plenary session of the working group on July 16, 2009.
Passed in the Working Group x-x-x
M. Wentink (Qualcomm), B.Kraemer (Marvell)
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

3. IEEE 802 Sponsor Ballot Results – P802.11z
November 2008
doc.: IEEE /1437r1
July 2010
IEEE 802 Sponsor Ballot Results – P802.11z
Draft
Opened
Closed
Days
Ballot Type
Pool
Approve
Disapprove
Abstain
Return
D6.0 30
Initial
144
103
87% 15
13% 7 5%
125
86%
D7.0
Recirc 1
105 16
14% 9 6%
130
90%
D8.0
Recirc 2
121
93% 8 7%
136
94%
D9.0
Recirc 3
123
95% 6
D9.0a
Recirc 3a
97% 4 3%
D9.0a includes post ballot vote changes received via .
M. Wentink (Qualcomm), B.Kraemer (Marvell)
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

4. Comments by Ballot – P802.11z July 2010 November 2008
doc.: IEEE /1437r1
July 2010
Comments by Ballot – P802.11z
Draft
Ballot
Not Required
Satisfied
Known Unsatisfied
Assumed Unsatisfied
Total
D6.0
Initial 44
150
1 (Trainin)
16 (Roy)
4 (Palm)
4 (Epstein)
218
D7.0
Recirc 1 12 38 50
D8.0
Recirc 2 3
2 (Palm) 17
D9.0
Recirc 3 9 77
194 1 26
297
M. Wentink (Qualcomm), B.Kraemer (Marvell)
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

5. Unsatisfied Comments by Commenter
November 2008
doc.: IEEE /1437r1
July 2010
Unsatisfied Comments by Commenter
Commenter
D6.0
D7.0
D8.0
D9.0
Total
R. Roy (SRA)
16*
S. Palm (Broadcom) 4* 2* 6*
J. Epstein (Interdigital)
S. Trainin (Intel) 1 25 2 27
*Assumed unsatisfied, no response to repeated s to commenter
M. Wentink (Qualcomm), B.Kraemer (Marvell)
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

6. Mandatory coordination
June 2009
November 2008
doc.: IEEE /0674r0
doc.: IEEE /1437r1
July 2010
Mandatory coordination
Coordination Entity
Draft
Date
Status
IEEE-SA Editorial (MEC)
D6.0
July 09
“Meets all editorial requirements. “
Quantities, Units and Letter Symbols
(SCC14)
Not required
Terms and Definitions (SCC10)
Registration Authority Committee (RAC)
M. Wentink (Qualcomm), B.Kraemer (Marvell)
Page 6
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell; Adrian Stephens, Intel

7. Unsatisfied Comments – Topics
November 2008
doc.: IEEE /1437r1
July 2010
Unsatisfied Comments – Topics
Topic
#Comments
Editorial 14
Power save 1
Security
Frame routing 2
Off-channel 7
Frame priority
Encapsulation
Total 27
M. Wentink (Qualcomm), B.Kraemer (Marvell)
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

8. November 2008
doc.: IEEE /1437r1
July 2010
Unsatisfied comments
The composite of all unsatisfied comments and the resolutions approved by the ballot resolution committee during sponsor ballot is attached.
Double click on the icon to the right to open this.
A copy of the unsatisfied comments presented using MyBallot access database report format is attached.
M. Wentink (Qualcomm), B.Kraemer (Marvell)
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

9. TGz Timeline Open Close Clean recirculation (TGz draft 10.0)
November 2008
doc.: IEEE /1437r1
July 2010
TGz Timeline
Open
Close
Clean recirculation
(TGz draft 10.0)
M. Wentink (Qualcomm), B.Kraemer (Marvell)
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

10. 802.11 EC Motion – Conditional Approval to send P802.11z to RevCom
June 2009
November 2008
doc.: IEEE /0674r0
doc.: IEEE /1437r1
July 2010
EC Motion – Conditional Approval to send P802.11z to RevCom
Request the IEEE 802 Executive Committee for conditional approval to forward P802.11z D10.0 to RevCom.
P802.11z had a 97% approval on the last Recirculation Sponsor Ballot, including post ballot vote changes. There are 4 disapprove voters, and 27 unsatisfied comments.
CRC vote on the Motion Passed: 12 y, 0 n, 0 a
Moved: Bruce Kraemer Second: <tbd>
Yes No Abstain
M. Wentink (Qualcomm), B.Kraemer (Marvell)
Page 10
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell; Adrian Stephens, Intel

11. Key July 2010 June 2009 November 2008 doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0674r0
Coordination: comment supplied by a Mandatory coordination entity
Not Required: comment indicated as not required to satisfy voter
Satisfied: comment required to satisfy voter that is indicated as satisfied either by the voter indicating satisfaction with the specific comment, or by voting yes in a subsequent ballot
Known Unsatisfied: a comment that is indicated to be “required” by the voter, and the voter is maintaining a “no” vote, and the voter has indicated they are unsatisfied with the comment resolution.
Assumed Unsatisfied: comment not meeting any of the above criteria – i.e., a comment that is indicated to be “required” by the voter, and the voter is maintaining a “no” vote, and the voter has not responded when asked about their satisfaction with the comment resolution.
M. Wentink (Qualcomm), B.Kraemer (Marvell)
Page 11
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell; Adrian Stephens, Intel