Standard Four: Faculty Michael Connolly, D.M.A. University of Portland Michael Connolly, D.M.A. University of Portland.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Understanding MSCHE Expectations for Governance Ellie A. Fogarty, Vice President Middle States Commission on Higher Education 2010 Annual Conference Philadelphia,

Advertisements

Dual Purpose Use of Data by the MSU ADVANCE Project Outline Overview of the ADAPP Project Framework of the Project Use of a Work Environment Survey to.

Tenure is awarded when the candidate successfully demonstrates meritorious performance in teaching, research/scholarly/creative accomplishment and service.

Promotion and Tenure Workshop for MUSM Faculty A Faculty Development Opportunity Mercer University School of Medicine 2012.

PEER REVIEW OF TEACHING WORKSHOP SUSAN S. WILLIAMS VICE DEAN ALAN KALISH DIRECTOR, UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT OF TEACHING ASC CHAIRS — JAN. 30,

ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION Assessment, data analysis and evaluation of findings as essential components of the self study for determining if objectives.

Why Bother? Helping Women Achieve Full Professor Rank Christine A. Hult Utah State University.

WELCOME TO THE FACULTY FORUM ON THE FACULTY EVALUATION SYSTEM Thank you for coming! November 2002.

Introduction to the Faculty Evaluation System

Maximizing Faculty Talent and Efficiency through Workload Allocation: A Business School Example Annette L. Ranft College of Business Administration August.

FACULTY DEVELOPMENT AND PERFORMANCE REVIEWS CHM Chair Collaboration Meeting January 7, 2004 Presented by: Terry Curry, Professor and Director.

Standard 4 Faculty. Committee Membership Marta Meana Carryn Bellomo Andrew Bell Skip Swerdlow.

1 Southern Connecticut State University Graduate Council Academic Standards Committee Procedures for Southern Connecticut State University.

Graduate Program Review Prof. Emad Ali. Major Review Steps Self-study Report External evaluation Apply actions for improvement.

Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European

NLU Governance Understanding our Structure November, 2012.

February 13, From NEW to MAINSTREAM 6.7 million students took at least one online course in the Fall % of all higher education students.

FACULTY PERFORMANCE REVIEW AND DEVELOPMENT: Key Issues and Challenges Penn State “Academic Leadership Forum” February 12, 2015 Presented by: Theodore H.

Creating a Teaching/Professional Dossier Shea Wang, Ph.D Interim Faculty Evaluation Coordinator

Standard 1 The institution’s mission and goals define the institution The institution’s mission and goals define the institution …evaluation proceeds.

1(4.89). Reform Faculty Evaluation Process  Streamline and Simplify it  No Annual Evals in Dossier Years  Electronic Dossier System  Senate Interface.

Sub-theme Three The Self-Assessment Process and Embedding QA into the Life of an Institution by Terry Miosi, Ph.D. UAE Qualification Framework Project.

Bush School Diversity Report January 29, A General Comparison of Student Data.

Promotion and Tenure Lois J. Geist, M.D. Associate Dean for Faculty Affairs and Development.

Student Learning Outcome Assessment: A Program’s Perspective Ling Hwey Jeng, Director School of Library and Information Studies June 27,

FACULTY COMPENSATION AND LEAVES Janet Dukerich, Senior Vice Provost for Faculty Affairs Carmen Shockley, Director, Academic Personnel Services August 18,

2012 Regional Assessment Workshops Session 2 Dr. Maryellen Cosgrove, Dean School of Business, Education, Health and Wellness Gainesville State University.

Faculty Senate Orientation October 10, 2011 Faculty Senate.

Highlights from Dr. Robin Dasher-Alston To Periodic Review Report Committee November 24, 2003.

Introduction to the Faculty Evaluation System. Learning Objectives for this Session After completing this session you should be able to… 1.Articulate.

MSCHE Expectations for Governance Mary Ellen Petrisko, Vice President Middle States Commission on Higher Education Annual Conference December 12, 2011.

Gerard L. Hanley, Ph.D. Executive Director, MERLOT Senior Director, California State University Using MERLOT To Support Retention, Tenure, and Promotion.

Work of the Faculty Leadership Team A Progress Report.

ASSESSMENT. Assessment is the systematic and on-going process of collecting and reviewing evidence about the College's academic and administrative programs.

Promotion in the Clinical Track Lois J. Geist, M.D. Associate Dean for Faculty Affairs and Development.

Working Personnel Action File Sections Colleen Mullery Sr. Associate Vice President, Faculty Affairs & Human Resources.

SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,

Some examples of quality standards and their use for self assessment and planning CINDA Workshop for TEIs Ramallah, May 2007.

Management in relation to learning processes Proposal Sources: ANECA, CHEA, DETC.

Standard Two: Understanding the Assessment System and its Relationship to the Conceptual Framework and the Other Standards Robert Lawrence, Ph.D., Director.

Legal framework for student participatiing in decison making process in Serbia V. Dondur University of Belgrade-Faculty of physical chemistry CAQA, HERE.

Student Support Services Standard II B & C. II.B. The institution recruits and admits diverse students who are able to benefit from its programs, consistent.

Columbia University School of Engineering and Applied Science Review and Planning Process Fall 1998.

Changes in the Faculty Review Process for United Academics Faculty Presenter: Patricia Linton, College of Arts & Sciences.

POST-TENURE REVIEW: Report and Recommendations. 2 OVERVIEW Tenure Field Test Findings Recommendations This is a progress report. Implementation, assessment,

ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION Standards 1,6, & 9 Bill Bonaudi Big Bend Community College.

Saundra Yancy McGuire, Ph.D., Chair Kurt Keppler, Ph.D., Vice-Chair The LSU Retention Committee: Procedures, Findings and Recommendations LSU Faculty Senate.

Faculty Governance Jane Dillehay Faculty Chair Jan Hafer AAUP Chair 12 August 2011.

ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.

Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.

ASSESSMENT DO THIS, NOT THAT! UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO ASSESSMENT DAY

Service Opportunities & Shared Governance P. Johnelle Sparks Associate Professor Department of Demography Friend of the Faculty Senate

Patricia Linton, Ph.D. Professor of English Senior Associate Dean for Academics College of Arts and Sciences Faculty Evaluation.

Criterion 1 – Program Mission, Objectives and Outcomes Weight = 0.05 Factors Score 1 Does the program have documented measurable objectives that support.

Criterion 1 Mission A. The institution's mission is broadly understood within the institution and guides its operations. B. The mission is articulated.

PATHS TOWARD EQUITY Melissa R. Gilbert Associate Professor Department of Geography and Urban Studies Temple University Achieving Equity: Women, the Workplace.

Discussion on Compensation. Goal To assist in securing and retaining a staff of necessary quality to achieve the goals and objectives of the organization.

Standard Two Les Steele Executive Vice President.

Dallas County Community College District – The LeCroy Center Taking the Pulse of Online Learning: Using the Quality Score Card in the DCCCD ROOM X2005.

Standard 4: Faculty, Staff, & Students 1. Standard 4: Faculty, Staff, and Students Standard 4: Faculty, Staff, and Students (#82) INTENT STATEMENTS 4.1.

The Application Process Understanding the IERs (Institutional Eligibility Requirements ) 2106 TRACS Annual Conference.

Introduction to the Faculty Evaluation System

Using MERLOT To Support Retention, Tenure, and Promotion Reviews

Standard III Faculty.

DRAFT Standards for the Accreditation of e-Learning Programs

Faculty Performance Reviews at MSU

SP / SP 17-xx UNIVERSITY RETENTION, TENURE, & PROMOTION POLICY

Faculty Assembly Retreat September 19, 2012

Faculty Leadership Institute, June 17, 2017, Sacramento Sheraton

Fort Valley State University

Presentation transcript:

Standard Four: Faculty Michael Connolly, D.M.A. University of Portland Michael Connolly, D.M.A. University of Portland

Standard 4.A Faculty Selection Evaluation Roles Welfare Development Faculty Selection Evaluation Roles Welfare Development

Faculty Data Qualifications: degrees, sources of degrees, experience Faculty Rank Salaries and Benefits. Comparison data, e.g. from the College and University Personnel Association (CUPA) Number, sufficient for the mission Qualifications: degrees, sources of degrees, experience Faculty Rank Salaries and Benefits. Comparison data, e.g. from the College and University Personnel Association (CUPA) Number, sufficient for the mission

Faculty Data Workload Retention data Exit interview data Student survey data on faculty advising, etc. Standard faculty surveys with comparisons Workload Retention data Exit interview data Student survey data on faculty advising, etc. Standard faculty surveys with comparisons

Policies and Implementation Academic planning, curriculum development and review Academic advising Faculty role in governance Give examples and data about how policies are applied. Academic planning, curriculum development and review Academic advising Faculty role in governance Give examples and data about how policies are applied.

Policies and Implementation Salaries and Benefits Workload: amount and the procedure for assignment Systematic faculty evaluation (See 4.1) Personnel policies and procedures Recruitment and appointment Salaries and Benefits Workload: amount and the procedure for assignment Systematic faculty evaluation (See 4.1) Personnel policies and procedures Recruitment and appointment

Policies and Implementation Academic freedom within the mission of the institution (See Policy A-8) Part-time and adjunct faculty Academic freedom within the mission of the institution (See Policy A-8) Part-time and adjunct faculty

Standard 4.b Scholarship Research Artistic Creation Scholarship Research Artistic Creation

Scholarship Data Records of faculty activity in scholarship, research, and artistic creation Example: the number and type of scholarship, published and unpublished, by academic unit Records of faculty activity in scholarship, research, and artistic creation Example: the number and type of scholarship, published and unpublished, by academic unit

Scholarship Data Sabbatical program Number and percentage of faculty Frequency Salary provided Financial support for scholarship: Institutional External Sabbatical program Number and percentage of faculty Frequency Salary provided Financial support for scholarship: Institutional External

Scholarship Policies Faculty participation in policy development and administration Sabbatical policy Scholarship that is consistent with the mission (See Policy A-8 again) Faculty participation in policy development and administration Sabbatical policy Scholarship that is consistent with the mission (See Policy A-8 again)

Time to Catch Up If data is not available, make a plan to collect pertinent information. If policies are not in place or outdated, inform decision makers and get moving! If data is not available, make a plan to collect pertinent information. If policies are not in place or outdated, inform decision makers and get moving!

Get the big picture but with details! See example: but with details! See example:

Faculty Evaluation, 4.1 Clear procedures Ongoing, regular Based on the institution’s Size Complexity Mission Clear procedures Ongoing, regular Based on the institution’s Size Complexity Mission

Faculty Evaluation, 4.1 Multiple indices that may include Annual merit salary evaluations Promotions Tenure reviews Post-tenure reviews Student/peer/administrator evaluations of teaching and service Peer review of scholarship Multiple indices that may include Annual merit salary evaluations Promotions Tenure reviews Post-tenure reviews Student/peer/administrator evaluations of teaching and service Peer review of scholarship

Faculty Evaluation, 4.1 A comprehensive evaluation of each faculty member at least once every five years. A policy that addresses concerns that may arise between regular evaluations A comprehensive evaluation of each faculty member at least once every five years. A policy that addresses concerns that may arise between regular evaluations

Analysis and Appraisal Based on your mission, what is working well…or not? What do you value? Go beyond providing data and confirming the existence of policies. What are the next steps regarding faculty? How can you improve? This is the heart of a self study! Based on your mission, what is working well…or not? What do you value? Go beyond providing data and confirming the existence of policies. What are the next steps regarding faculty? How can you improve? This is the heart of a self study!