Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 1 Multimodal Maturity of Virginia’s Transportation Corridors April 19, 2006 presented.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Oregon Freight Plan July 28, Linking Freight Improvements to Economic Growth Travel Time Freight Transportation Improvements Productivity Competitiveness.
Advertisements

March 2012 Ports and Cities Conference Newcastle Dorte Ekelund, Executive Director Major Cities Unit Department of Infrastructure and Transport
VTrans2035 Update March 30, Dironna Belton Office of Intermodal Planning and Investment.
Updating the Washington Transportation Plan February 4,
Wade E. Kline, AICP Community Development Planner.
Public Listening Session Long-Range Transportation Plan for the State of Connecticut ( )
Colorado Transportation Finance and Implementation Panel Overview Fort Morgan,Colorado September 13, 2007.
Corridor of Statewide Significance North South Corridor April 3, 2012 Presented by Deputy Secretary David Tyeryar For Loudoun Board of County Supervisors.
1 How to Succeed in Statewide and MPO Transportation Planning.
Comprehensive Freight Movement Plan Pennsylvania Rail Freight Seminar May 22, 2013 Pennsylvania Long Range Transportation Plan Pennsylvania Long Range.
Chapter 5 1 Chapter 5. The Transportation- Planning Process 1.Explain how travel demand modeling fits into the transportation-planning process 2.Explain.
21 st Century Committee Report Recommendations NC 73 Council of Planning Annual Meeting January 22, 2009.
2015 Interregional Transportation Strategic Plan Active Transportation and Livable Communities August 21, 2014 Scott Sauer.
Framework for Model Development General Model Design Highway Network/Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZs) Development of Synthetic Trip Tables Development of.
Planning for One Transportation System – Marine Highways Kevin Schoeben Deputy Director Office of Planning and Programming Illinois Department of Transportation.
2030 Long-Range Transportation Plan Ithaca-Tompkins County Transportation Council Public MeetingFernando de Aragón TCPL October 15, 2008Staff Director.
May 28, Vision Statement and Goals, Objectives and Performance Measures for the 2040 LRTP Status of these items: Draft Approved by LRTP Subcommittee.
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 1 Update for VTrans2025 Technical Committee February 13, 2006 Dr. James H. Lambert.
TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference Houston, Texas May 2009 Ann Arbor Transportation Plan Update-- Connecting the Land Use & Transportation.
Freight Bottleneck Study Update to the Intermodal, Freight, and Safety Subcommittee of the Regional Transportation Council September 12, 2002 North Central.
Overview to CDOT Policies and Guidance Transit and Rail Advisory Committee Meeting April 13, 2012.
Overview of SAFETEA-LU Sections 6001, 6002, 3005, and 3006 TRB January 13, 2008 Shari Schaftlein FHWA Project Development & Environmental Review Washington,
Quality Region Principles The New Visions Plan addresses the region’s quality of life in a number of important ways and provides a framework for improving.
Freight Issues in the Report of the National Surface Transportation Policy and Revenue Study Commission Transportation for Tomorrow.
BPAC. “Congestion management is the application of strategies to improve transportation system performance and reliability by reducing the adverse impacts.
HB2 Briefing for Tennessee MPOs & TDOT June 11, 2015 Meadowview Conference Center.
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia, Charlottesville Slide 1 Analytical Support for the Statewide Multimodal Long-Range.
1 June 11, 2015 Raleigh, NC. PRESENTATION OBJECTIVE To give an overview on the newly adopted Strategic Transportation Corridors. 2.
May 14, Our transportation system will provide a safe and accessible range of options that enhances existing urban areas communities while providing.
On the Road to a New Metropolitan Transportation Plan Spokane Regional Health District Board of Health April 25, 2013.
Planning and Design in Rockford: South Main Street Corridor Overview 315 North Main Street · Rockford IL
Comprehensive Plan Update Kevin O’Neill Seattle Bicycle Advisory Board September 2, 2015.
Chapter 5 1 Chapter 5. The Transportation- Planning Process 1.Explain how travel demand modeling fits into the transportation-planning process 2.Explain.
1 Scenario-Based Planning for the Regional Impacts of Statewide Multimodal Transportation Policies Progress Report to the VTrans2035 Advisory Committee.
Presentation for Talking Freight, November 16, 2011 Debbie Bowden Freight and Economic Policy Analyst, Office of Freight and Multimodalism Maryland Department.
Transportation Funding Workshop Nova Southeastern University December 10, 2012.
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 1 Update for VTrans2025 Technical Committee April 12, 2006.
Projects of National and Regional Significance Program.
System Management and Operations System Development and Design Growth and Development Plan Components E AST -W EST G ATEWAY.
200/768_K 0 Sustainable Growth & Development Subcommittee Report Committee for a Sustainable Emerald Coast May 17, 2007.
National Forum on Performance Based Planning and Programming Michael King North Country Council Bethlehem, NH September 13, 2010.
San Diego Regional Comprehensive Plan Presentation to Senate Transportation and Housing Committee February 8, 2005.
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 1 Update for VTrans2025 Multimodal Advisory Committee August 8, 2006.
Washington Transportation Plan 2030 A comprehensive and balanced statewide transportation policy plan reflecting the multi-faceted needs of the state’s.
The technical approach is as follows: Study transit policies Identify potential future regional scenarios Adopt evaluation criteria for transit policies.
Regional Mobility Plan I. Introduction This process for creating a regional mobility plan is designed for geographic areas with a small to medium sized.
Transport Integration of cross-border transport infrastructure TEN-T strategy on large cross- border cooperation projects Gudrun Schulze, Team leader,
Unit 2 DEVELOPMENT OF THE LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN (LRTP) LCTCC Educational Program.
ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION AND CONGESTION MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGIES DEPLOYMENT (ATCMTD) PROGRAM 1 Bob Arnold, Director Office of Transportation Management,
Virginia House Bill 2 – Funding the Right Projects Intelligent Transportation System Activities May 19, 2016.
0 Freight Activities: Year in Review Dec. 12 th 2015.
2040 LONG RANGE PLAN UPDATE Congestion Management Process Plan (CMPP) Major Update February 24, 2016.
DESTINATION 2030 Regional Local Personal Adopted May 24, 2001.
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia Update for VTrans2025 Technical Committee June 14, 2006 Dr. James H. Lambert Alexander.
 SCDOT has over 41,000 miles of pavements and over 8,400 bridges.  4 th largest state maintained system in the country.  Started working on the TAMP.
Buena Park General Plan Update Overview Presentation.
Statewide Transportation Planning Oklahoma DOT Planning Process Statewide Long Range Transportation Plan Statewide Freight Transportation Plan Arkansas.
Oregon State Rail Plan Update
Chelan County Transportation Element Update
Project Overview – Phase 1
21st Century Transportation Committee Finance Subcommittee
Technical and Public Advisory Committee Meeting #3
Presentation to DATA on VTrans 2040 / HB2
Chapter 5. The Transportation-Planning Process
Public Transit Case Study
Commonwealth Transportation Board
What is an MPO Anyway? (and why should I care?)
Coordinating And Prioritizing Multimodal Transportation Projects
What is TSMO? TSMO encompasses a broad set of strategies that aim to optimize the safe, efficient, and reliable use of existing and planned transportation.
What is TSMO? TSMO encompasses a broad set of strategies that aim to optimize the safe, efficient, and reliable use of existing and planned transportation.
Presentation transcript:

Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 1 Multimodal Maturity of Virginia’s Transportation Corridors April 19, 2006 presented by Alex Linthicum

Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 2 Overview Introduction to VTrans2025 Multimodal Corridors Multimodal Corridor Maturity Model Future work

Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 3 Introduction to VTrans2025 Implementation of a statewide multi-modal long-range transportation plan is both a federal and state legislative requirement –The Federal Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21) establishes procedures for statewide transportation planning –The Code of Virginia requires the state to prepare a statewide transportation plan VTrans 2025 fulfills the requirements of both TEA-21 and the Code of Virginia

Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 4 Introduction to VTrans2025 TEA-21 requires the following considerations as part of the LRTP 1.Support economic vitality 2.Increase the safety and security for motorized and non-motorized users 3.Increase the accessibility and mobility options available 4.Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, and improve quality of life 5.Enhance the integration and connectivity across and between modes 6.Promote efficient system management and operation 7.Emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system

Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 5 Introduction to VTrans2025 The legislation required presentation of the plan to the Governor and General Assembly, December 2002, and every five years thereafter The plan must –Contain a comprehensive review of statewide transportation needs –Establish goals, objectives, and priorities covering a 20- year planning horizon –Consider all modes of transportation –Promote economic development, multi-modal connectivity, environmental quality, accessibility, and safety

Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 6 Introduction to VTrans2025 Responsible for creating and maintaining the statewide multimodal long-range transportation plan is the Vtrans2025 Technical Committee –Developed by the Secretary of Transportation –Department of Aviation (DOAV) –Department of Rail and Public Transportation (VDRPT) –Port Authority (VPA) –Department of Transportation (VDOT)

Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 7 What is VTrans2025? The 2002 VTrans2025 Final report projects $108 Billion in unmet needs over the next 20 years Our work is to assist the state in determining strategies for cost effective allocation of transportation funding

Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 8 Multimodal Corridors Cost effective strategies include –Improving efficiency using existing network capacity –Balancing traffic of passengers and goods across modes –Concentrating improvements in corridors of statewide significance The above strategies are manifested in Virginia’s Multimodal Corridors –Major transportation links for people and/or goods –Multiple modes Automobiles / Trucks Rail Transit Air

Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 9 Multimodal Corridors

Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 10 Multimodal Corridor Maturity Model Projects located within a corridor might receive priority for investment, but how should corridor investments be judged against one another? Which corridors benefit most from multimodal investment?

Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 11 Multimodal Corridor Maturity Model Carnegie Mellon Software Engineering Institute developed the Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI) A maturity model provides a –Common language and a shared vision –Framework for prioritizing actions –Way to define improvement Can benchmark different organizations for equivalent comparison

Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 12 MaturityPotential Multimodal Corridor Maturity Model Instead of software design capability of organizations, we focus on ability of statewide transportation corridors to provide robust and varied service The Multimodal Corridor Maturity Model borrows from the CMMI framework, viewing each corridor in terms of its –Potential for multimodal investment –Existing multimodal maturity

Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 13 Multimodal Corridor Maturity Model We can create stages of maturity based on performance metrics –Density (population, housing, jobs, attractions) –Accessibility to attractions by mode within time radius –Percent/amount of mixed use zoning –Mode split –Presence / Quality of intermodal facilities –Multimodal LOS –Accidents/injuries/fatalities by mode, normalized by person- mile traveled

Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 14 Multimodal Corridor Maturity Model Density example –Census 2000 blockgroup density maps –Transit requires density Gray, George Systems and service planning in Gray & Hoel, eds. Public Transportation, 2nd edition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, pg

Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 15

Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 16

Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 17

Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 18

Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 19 Future work Define the maturity levels of the MCMM based on performance metrics Integrate further data into model –Accessibility index –Multimodal “LOS” –Number and quality of intermodal facilities –Zoning regulations Density Mixes of Use

Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 20 Future Work Accessibility – number of opportunities (jobs) within a specific amount of time (45min) by a particular mode (auto) provided by Wendy Klancher, MWCOG

Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 21 For more information Vtrans Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems