Presentation at the PRC review, 26.5.2005, DESY Status of DEPFET pixel detectors for ILC Peter Fischer for the DEPFET collaboration Bonn University:R.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Radiation damage in silicon sensors
Advertisements

Kailua-Kona, Marcel Trimpl, Bonn University Readout Concept for Future Pixel Detectors based on Current Mode Signal Processing Marcel Trimpl.
H1 SILICON DETECTORS PRESENT STATUS By Wolfgang Lange, DESY Zeuthen.
M. Szelezniak1PXL Sensor and RDO review – 06/23/2010 STAR PXL Sensors Overview.
Bulk Micromegas Our Micromegas detectors are fabricated using the Bulk technology The fabrication consists in the lamination of a steel woven mesh and.
Development of an Active Pixel Sensor Vertex Detector H. Matis, F. Bieser, G. Rai, F. Retiere, S. Wurzel, H. Wieman, E. Yamamato, LBNL S. Kleinfelder,
R. H. Richter et al - VERTEX 2002 Kailua-Kona, DEPFET sensors for a LC vertex detector (1) »DEP(leted)F(ield)E(ffect)T(ransistor) operation.
Standalone VeloPix Simulation Jianchun Wang 4/30/10.
Victoria04 R. Frey1 Silicon/Tungsten ECal Status and Progress Ray Frey University of Oregon Victoria ALCPG Workshop July 29, 2004 Overview Current R&D.
Performance of the DZero Layer 0 Detector Marvin Johnson For the DZero Silicon Group.
SPiDeR  First beam test results of the FORTIS sensor FORTIS 4T MAPS Deep PWell Testbeam results CHERWELL Summary J.J. Velthuis.
Charge collection studies on heavily diodes from RD50 multiplication run G. Kramberger, V. Cindro, I. Mandić, M. Mikuž Ϯ, M. Milovanović, M. Zavrtanik.
Performance test of STS demonstrators Anton Lymanets 15 th CBM collaboration meeting, April 12 th, 2010.
Hamburg, Marcel Trimpl, Bonn University A DEPFET pixel-based Vertexdetector for TESLA 55. PRC -MeetingHamburg, Mai 2003 M. Trimpl University.
DEPFET Electronics Ivan Peric, Mannheim University.
Monolithic Pixels R&D at LBNL Devis Contarato Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory International Linear Collider Workshop, LCWS 2007 DESY Hamburg, May.
2. Super KEKB Meeting, DEPFET Electronics DEPFET Readout and Control Electronics Ivan Peric, Peter Fischer, Christian Kreidl Heidelberg University.
ECFA ILC Workshop, November 2005, ViennaLadislav Andricek, MPI für Physik, HLL DEPFET Project Status - in Summary Technology development thinning technology.
Medipix sensors included in MP wafers 2 To achieve good spatial resolution through efficient charge collection: Produced by Micron Semiconductor on n-in-p.
07 October 2004 Hayet KEBBATI -1- Data Flow Reduction and Signal Sparsification in MAPS Hayet KEBBATI (GSI/IReS)
Vertex05, 8/11/05Jaap Velthuis, Bonn University DEPFET Status DEPFET Principle Readout modes Projects: –XEUS –WIMS –ILC ILC Testbeam results Summary &
Carlos Mariñas, IFIC, CSIC-UVEG DEPFET Technology for future colliders Carlos Mariñas IFIC-Valencia (Spain) 1 LCPS09, Ambleside.
Fully depleted MAPS: Pegasus and MIMOSA 33 Maciej Kachel, Wojciech Duliński PICSEL group, IPHC Strasbourg 1 For low energy X-ray applications.
Recent developments on Monolithic Active Pixel Sensors (MAPS) for charged particle tracking. Outline The MAPS sensor (reminder) MIMOSA-22, a fast MAPS-sensor.
Fine Pixel CCD for ILC Vertex Detector ‘08 7/31 Y. Takubo (Tohoku U.) for ILC-FPCCD vertex group ILC vertex detector Fine Pixel CCD (FPCCD) Test-sample.
ILC VXD Review, Fermilab, October 23, 2007 Hans-Günther Moser, MPI für Physik DEPFET Devices Hans-Gunther Moser for the DEPFET Collaboration (
8 July 1999A. Peisert, N. Zamiatin1 Silicon Detectors Status Anna Peisert, Cern Nikolai Zamiatin, JINR Plan Design R&D results Specifications Status of.
J. Crooks STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
Valerio Re, Massimo Manghisoni Università di Bergamo and INFN, Pavia, Italy Jim Hoff, Abderrezak Mekkaoui, Raymond Yarema Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory.
Technology Overview or Challenges of Future High Energy Particle Detection Tomasz Hemperek
LCWS08, Chicago, November 2008 Ladislav Andricek, MPI fuer Physik, HLL 1 DEPFET Active Pixel Sensors - Status and Plans - Ladislav Andricek for the DEPFET.
65 nm CMOS analog front-end for pixel detectors at the HL-LHC
Fig. 1: Cross section of a circular DEPMOS- FET pixel cell. Charges collected in the “in- ternal gate’ modulate the transistor current. DEPMOSFET team,
The development of the readout ASIC for the pair-monitor with SOI technology ~irradiation test~ Yutaro Sato Tohoku Univ. 29 th Mar  Introduction.
Radiation hardness of Monolithic Active Pixel Sensors (MAPS)
Prague, Marcel Trimpl, Bonn University DEPFET-Readout Concept for TESLA based on Current Mode Signal Processing Markus Schumacher on behalf.
FEE 2006, Perugia, Marcel Trimpl, University of Bonn VIth Workshop on Front End Electronics Perugia, Mai 2006 M.Trimpl DEPFET – collaboration:
LHCb Vertex Detector and Beetle Chip
The Belle II DEPFET Pixel Detector
LC Power Distribution & Pulsing Workshop, May 2011 Super-ALTRO Demonstrator Test Results LC Power Distribution & Pulsing Workshop, May nd November.
CMS Pixels: Fermilab Farah Fahim, Gregory Deptuch, Jim Hoff, Alpana Shenai, Marcel Trimpl.
Characterization of irradiated MOS-C with X-rays using CV-measurements and gated diode techniques Q. Wei, L. Andricek, H-G. Moser, R. H. Richter, Max-Planck-Institute.
Tracking in a TPC D. Karlen / U. Victoria & TRIUMF for the LCTPC collaboration.
-1-CERN (11/24/2010)P. Valerio Noise performances of MAPS and Hybrid Detector technology Pierpaolo Valerio.
SuperKEKB 3nd open meeting July 7-9, 2009 Hans-Günther Moser MPI für Physik Sensor and ASIC R&D Sensor Prototype Production: running, ASICs: Switcher,
Design and Technology of DEPFET Active Pixel Sensors for Future e+e- Linear Collider Experiments G. Lutz a, L. Andricek a, P. Fischer b, K. Heinzinger.
Position Sensitive Detector Conference, September 2005, LiverpoolGerhard Lutz 1 (Semiconductor) Pixel Detectors for charged particles (and other applications)
Highlights from the VTX session Marc Winter & Massimo Caccia R&D reports: – DEPFET (M. Trimpl) – CCD (S. Hillert) – UK-CMOS (J.Velthuis) – Continental-CMOS.
H. Krüger, , DEPFET Workshop, Heidelberg1 System and DHP Development Module overview Data rates DHP function blocks Module layout Ideas & open questions.
1 Characterization of Pilot Run Modules for the Belle II Pixel Detector Felix Müller Max-Planck-Institut für Physik IMPRS Young Scientist Workshop Ringberg.
Comparison of the AC and DC coupled pixels sensors read out with FE-I4 electronics Gianluigi Casse*, Marko Milovanovic, Paul Dervan, Ilya Tsurin 22/06/20161.
Low Mass, Radiation Hard Vertex Detectors R. Lipton, Fermilab Future experiments will require pixelated vertex detectors with radiation hardness superior.
Pixel Sensors for the Mu3e Detector Dirk Wiedner on behalf of Mu3e February Dirk Wiedner PSI 2/15.
TILC08, Sendai, March DEPFET Active Pixel Sensors for the ILC Marcel Vos for the DEPFET Collaboration (
H.-G. Moser Max-Planck-Institut for Physics, Munich Vertex07 Lake Placid, NY 9/25/2007 DEPFET Active Pixel Detectors H.-G. Moser on behalf of the DEPFET.
Clear Performance and Demonstration of a novel Clear Concept for DEPFET Active Pixel Sensors Stefan Rummel Max-Planck-Institut für Physik – Halbleiterlabor.
1 First large DEPFET pixel modules for the Belle II Pixel Detector Felix Müller Max-Planck-Institut für Physik DPG-Frühjahrstagung der Teilchenphysik,
ASICs1 Drain Current Digitizer Chip (DCD) Status and Future Plans.
Andrei Nomerotski 1 Andrei Nomerotski, University of Oxford Ringberg Workshop, 8 April 2008 Pixels with Internal Storage: ISIS by LCFI.
Ivan Peric, Christian Kreidl, Peter Fischer University of Heidelberg
The DEPFET for the ILC Vertex Detector
Charge collection studies with irradiated CMOS detectors
Jan Soldat, Heidelberg University for the DSSC ASIC design groups
First Testbeam results
DEPFET Active Pixel Sensors (for the ILC)
Silicon Lab Bonn Physikalisches Institut Universität Bonn
Lars Reuen, 7th Conference on Position Sensitive Devices, Liverpool
Yasuhiro Sugimoto KEK 17 R&D status of FPCCD VTX Yasuhiro Sugimoto KEK 17
Vertex Detector Overview Prototypes R&D Plans Summary.
R&D of CMOS pixel Shandong University
Presentation transcript:

Presentation at the PRC review, , DESY Status of DEPFET pixel detectors for ILC Peter Fischer for the DEPFET collaboration Bonn University:R. Kohrs, M. Karagounis, H. Krüger, L. Reuen, C. Sandow, M. Trimpl, N. Wermes MPI Munich, HLL, ILC:L. Andricek, G. Lutz, H. G. Moser, R. H. Richter, M. Schnecke Mannheim University:P. Fischer, F. Giesen, I. Peric MPI Munich, HLL, XEUS:K. Heinzinger, P. Lechner, L. Strüder, J. Treis

P. Fischer for the DEPFET collaboration, page 2Status of DEPFET Pixel Detectors – DESY, Talk Outline  Summary of ILC requirements  Possible geometry of ILC DEPFET layer  The DEPFET working principle  Sensor design & technology  Thinning technology  ILC prototype system  Measurements on ILC structures: -Irradiations -Noise, clear efficiency -Matrix: Lab results -Matrix: Test beam results  Power consumption of ILC system  Summary and outlook

P. Fischer for the DEPFET collaboration, page 3Status of DEPFET Pixel Detectors – DESY, Requirements for ILC innermost Tracker Layer  Time structure:one train of 2820 crossings in ~1 ms every ~200ms  Hit density:For a 10 cm long cylinder at r=15 mm (A=10500 mm 2 ): ~ 370 tracks / crossing ~ tracks / mm 2 / crossing ~ 100 tracks / mm 2 / train much less if r > 15 mm (~ 1/7 for r=27 mm)  Row readout rate:some 10 MHz  Resolution:few µm (  pixel size ≤ 25 x 25 µm 2 )  Radiation tolerance  200 krad (for 5 years operation)  Radiation length very small: ~0.1% X 0 per layer (simulation from C. Büsser, DESY)

P. Fischer for the DEPFET collaboration, page 4Status of DEPFET Pixel Detectors – DESY, ILC DEPFET Module (Layer 1)  Modules have active area ~13 x 100 mm 2  They are read out on both sides. Active area: 512 x 4096 pixels of 25 x 25 µm 2 = 12.8 x mm 2 R/O chips steering chips R/O chips  Occupancy simulation: - Assume signal width of 10µm - Read 10 frames per train i.e. 10 x 2048 rows in 1ms or one row in 50ns (20MHz) - Expect ~10 tracks / mm 2 / event  Pattern recognition should not be a problem! 1 mm 2

P. Fischer for the DEPFET collaboration, page 5Status of DEPFET Pixel Detectors – DESY, Possible Geometry of Layer 1 r=15.5 mm 8 Modules in Layer1 Estimation of material budget:  pixel area:13x100 mm 2, 50µm:0.05% X 0  steering chips: 2x100 mm 2, 50µm:0.01% X 0  frame w. holes: 4x100 mm 2, 50% of 300µm:0.05% X 0  total:0.11% X 0 Thinned sensor (50 µm) in active area Chips are thinned to 50 µm, connection via bump bonding Cross section of a module ‘Holes’ in frame can save material Thick support frame (~300 µm)

P. Fischer for the DEPFET collaboration, page 6Status of DEPFET Pixel Detectors – DESY, p+ n+ rear contact drainbulksource p s y m m e t r y a x i s n+ n internal gate top gateclear n - n+ p+ DEPFET Principle of Operation  A p-FET transistor is integrated in every pixel  A potential minimum for electrons is created under the channel by sideward depletion  Electrons are collected in the „internal gate“ and modulate the transistor current  Signal charge is removed via a clear contact MIP ~1µm 50 µm  Fast signal collection in fully depleted bulk  Low noise due to small capacitance and first amplification  Transistor can be switched off by external gate – charge collection is then still active !  Readout can be at the source (‘voltage signal’) or at the drain (‘current signal’) – ILC uses drain readout

P. Fischer for the DEPFET collaboration, page 7Status of DEPFET Pixel Detectors – DESY, Matrix Operation  Connect gates and clears horizontally to select / clear single rows. Apply voltages with SWITCHER chips.  Connect drains (or sources) vertically and amplify current (or voltage): CURO chip  Charge is not shifted!  Readout sequence: Enable row – read current (I sig + I ped ) – clear – subtract current (I ped ) – move to next row T ROW Readout sequence

P. Fischer for the DEPFET collaboration, page 8Status of DEPFET Pixel Detectors – DESY, Sensor Design: MOS Devices  Moved from JFETs to MOSFETs (top gate): -smaller device variations (required for large sensors) -smaller pixels (linear transistors possible) -radiation tolerance of gate oxide ?  Increased amplification (now ~1nA / e - )  Fast and complete clear (using clear gate)  Compact double pixel cell gate clear source drain 1drain 2 also: clear gate

P. Fischer for the DEPFET collaboration, page 9Status of DEPFET Pixel Detectors – DESY, Sensor Simulations  Use 3D-Simulator (Poseidon) for complicated structures  Device behavior can be predicted accurately. Important for successful new designs! potential energy [eV] Potential distribution in 1µm depth in charge collection mode double pixel clear (off) internal gates charge gain g q for varying gate length prediction and measurement agree very well!

P. Fischer for the DEPFET collaboration, page 10Status of DEPFET Pixel Detectors – DESY, Device Cross Sections  Added ‘clear gate’ to lower the clear barrier. Clocked and static operation possible  Added a deep high-E n-implantation in some devices to lower clear voltages (clear channel is moved into bulk) channel internal gate clear gate (Poly) clear (n + ) p-well high-E (some devices) source drain

P. Fischer for the DEPFET collaboration, page 11Status of DEPFET Pixel Detectors – DESY, Sensor Fabrication Technology  A sensor-compatible technology with 2 poly and 2 metal layers has been developed at HLL  These are required for large matrix designs 16x128 test matrix, double pixel cell 33 x 47 µm 2 double metal matrix gate clear drain double pixel

P. Fischer for the DEPFET collaboration, page 12Status of DEPFET Pixel Detectors – DESY, Making thin Sensors  A novel technology to produce detectors with thin active area has been developed and prototyped (L. Andricek) sensor wafer handle wafer 1. implant backside on sensor wafer 2. bond wafers with SiO 2 in between 3. thin sensor side to desired thick. 4. process DEPFETs on top side 5. etch backside up to oxide/implant first ‘dummy’ samples: 50µm silicon with 350µm frame thinned diode structures: leakage current: <1nA /cm 2

P. Fischer for the DEPFET collaboration, page 13Status of DEPFET Pixel Detectors – DESY, Quality of Thin Diodes  10mm 2 diodes on 50µm have been produced (in test lab, ‘real’ devices will be even better!)  Measured leakage currents are very low: 150 nA/cm 3 (~very good strip detector)  No breakdown is observed even at strong over-depletion Sensor wafer side (diodes + guards) Handle wafer side (holes) n + backside p + diode and guard Alu

P. Fischer for the DEPFET collaboration, page 14Status of DEPFET Pixel Detectors – DESY, Dummy Module with ~ ILC Geometry ‘holes’ to save material

P. Fischer for the DEPFET collaboration, page 15Status of DEPFET Pixel Detectors – DESY, ILC Prototype System Gate Switcher Clear Switcher Current Readout CUROII DEPFET Matrix 64x128 pixels, 36 x 28.5µm 2 USB based digital interface board Analog board with ADCs etc. PCB with DEPFET matrix

P. Fischer for the DEPFET collaboration, page 16Status of DEPFET Pixel Detectors – DESY, Switcher ASIC (Multiplexer)  64 channels with 2 analog MUX outputs (‘A’ and ‘B’)  Can switch up to 25 V  digital control ground + supply floating  fast internal sequencer for programmable pattern (operates up to 80MHz)  Daisy chaining of several chips on a module possible  Present dissipation: 30MHz  0.8µm AMS HV technology  Radiation tolerance may be problematic! 4.6 mm 4.8 mm 20V ! Pads for daisy chain control inputs 2x64 outputs with spare pads Switching 30MHz

P. Fischer for the DEPFET collaboration, page 17Status of DEPFET Pixel Detectors – DESY, CURO ASIC (Drain Readout)  128 channel drain readout chip  Drain voltages are kept constant with regulated cascode circuits  Direct current subtraction by switched current technique  Real time hit finding and zero suppression  Hit addresses store in on-chip RAM  0.25µm technology. Radiation tolerance should be fine.  Noise per sampling: 30e 25MHz  Row rate of 25 MHz has been achieved (i. e. 50MHz)  Digital zero suppression works at >100 MHz noise for multiple sampling

P. Fischer for the DEPFET collaboration, page 18Status of DEPFET Pixel Detectors – DESY, Irradiation of Single Pixels  Crucial question: Threshold shift of the (external) MOSFET (oxide thickness ~200nm)  Irradiations with 60 Co and Xrays (~17keV,Mo) up to ~1Mrad pre-rad post-rad  Threshold shifts are negative, as expected from positive oxide charge  This can be compensated for by variation of bias voltages  Transconductance remains unchanged  noise should not degrade drain current vs. gate voltage transconductance vs. drain current

P. Fischer for the DEPFET collaboration, page 19Status of DEPFET Pixel Detectors – DESY, Effect of dose rate / annealing  Shifts are small: only - 4…- 6 V  Observe saturation after 200 krad  Device ‘off’ state is slightly better – good: this is where devices are operated most of the time! 60 Co X-rays  But: possible explanations for these good results need to be confirmed 200krad

P. Fischer for the DEPFET collaboration, page 20Status of DEPFET Pixel Detectors – DESY,  55 Fe spectrum with ILC structure taken at room temperature with 10µs shaping time:  Noise peak: 10e -  Best measurements so far (large XEUS structure, cold, slow): 2.2e -  DEPFETs regularly provide noise below 10e room temperature (single devices with slow shaping)! Measurements on ILC Pixels: Noise

P. Fischer for the DEPFET collaboration, page 21Status of DEPFET Pixel Detectors – DESY, Clear Efficiency  Study mini matrix devices in laser setup  Plot pedestal variations (‘noise’). If they are constant, clearing is complete!  Study various designs (high-E, no high-E), geometries (length of clear gate) and operating conditions (static or clocked clear gate) Cl-gate length=7.2µm Cl-gate length=4.2µm region of complete clear region of complete clear Complete clear achieved with static clear gate ! Required voltages are small (5-7V) – very important for future SWITCHER! (Clear off = 2V) high-E static!

P. Fischer for the DEPFET collaboration, page 22Status of DEPFET Pixel Detectors – DESY, Fast Clearing  Study clear efficiency for short clear pulses (new result, not in PRC report!)  Device with common clear gate, High-E Complete clear in only  V clear = 11-7 V U Clear-off = 3 V

P. Fischer for the DEPFET collaboration, page 23Status of DEPFET Pixel Detectors – DESY, ILC DEPFET-System in the Lab ILC system performance in the lab:  High speed: row rate: 0.6 MHz  Noise: 230 e - Noise contributions: ~ 100e- from CURO etc. ~ 60e- from I2U converter (CURO → ADC) ~ noise pickup of I2U converter 1keV…13keV 13keV…1MeV 2.7 mm 3.4 mm 10µm thick Tungsten-Mask irradiation with 55 Fe (6keV  1700 e - )

P. Fischer for the DEPFET collaboration, page 24Status of DEPFET Pixel Detectors – DESY, Test Beam Setup (Jan / Feb T24, DESY) Scintillator Telescope- Modules 3 x 3 mm 2 Scintillator DEPFET System  Beam DESY, Jan/Feb  4GeV  Reference telescope: 4 Si-strip planes (pitch in x- and y: 50µm)  Two matrices have been tested with 4 x 128 pixels of 36µm x 28.5µm

P. Fischer for the DEPFET collaboration, page 25Status of DEPFET Pixel Detectors – DESY, Test Beam Results: Online Correlations Beam spot on telescopeBeam spot on (small) DEPFET correlation telescope x  DEPFET x  Event rate: 10Hz  collected 10 million events  highE / non-highE in beam  data analysis ongoing

P. Fischer for the DEPFET collaboration, page 26Status of DEPFET Pixel Detectors – DESY, Test beam: Event Displays  Cluster: Only 1-2 pixels hit in x and y at perpendicular beam incidence  Much more information about event structure due to spectroscopic quality of the device! single hit cluster Some  -electrons with perpendicular tracks ! (range of tracks is ~ consistent with measured energy of few 100keV)

P. Fischer for the DEPFET collaboration, page 27Status of DEPFET Pixel Detectors – DESY, Custer Amplitudes  Amplitude sum in cluster (with preliminary calibration…)

P. Fischer for the DEPFET collaboration, page 28Status of DEPFET Pixel Detectors – DESY, Expected Power Dissipation  For V Drain = 5V and I Drain = 100µA (conservative values): P DEPFET = 0.5mW per active device  Layer1 (8 Modules x 2 sides x 512 = 8192 pixels), duty cycle = 1/200: Sensor: only active pixels dissipate power  8192 x 0.5mW / 200= 20 mW SWITCHER:6.3mW per active channel at 50MHz (measured)  16 x 6.3mW / 200= 0.5 mW CURO:2.8mW / channel (measured)  8192 x 2.8mW / 200= 114 mW Sum:~ 135 mW  Scaling up from 18.7 Mpixels (L1) to ~493 Mpixels for 5 layers gives: Total:~ 3.6 W  Note: Largest dissipation (CUROs) is outside active area where cooling is less problematic!  This calculation assumes that all chips can be switched into a stand-by mode with ~ zero power dissipation between bunch trains. This feature must be included in future chip versions.

P. Fischer for the DEPFET collaboration, page 29Status of DEPFET Pixel Detectors – DESY, Conclusion  Our DEPFET prototype module is close to ILC specs  Achievements: -Technology for thin ( ≤ 50µm) detectors established (total budget of sensor 0.11% X 0 ) -Present Pixel size: 24x33 µm 2 – can go to ~ 20x20 µm 2, limited only by manufacturing equipment ! -Complete clearing works with short (10ns) clear pulses at moderate voltages. No need to clock clear gate ! -Radiation tolerance (threshold voltage shift) demonstrated up to 1MRad !  Advantages DEPFET -Charge collection in fully depleted bulk with high charge collection field -High S/N (~40 at 100e noise), high spatial resolution (expect ~2µm) -Low average power dissipation for full ILC system (4W) -Fast readout possible (some 10 MHz) -Low material  Next steps -Irradiate chips and full system -Operate complete system at full ILC speed -Produce thin sensors with larger matrices -Design new SWITCHER (lower voltage operation, smaller chip, standby mode, radiation hardness?) -Design new CURO (deeper FIFO, standby mode, ADC?, …)

P. Fischer for the DEPFET collaboration, page 30Status of DEPFET Pixel Detectors – DESY, Full Bunch Train Event for Comparison

P. Fischer for the DEPFET collaboration, page 31Status of DEPFET Pixel Detectors – DESY, Charge Collection  Plot signal after laser injection (pedestal corrected)  Vary clear-gate (off) and clear (off) voltage.  If clear-gate (off) = clear-gate (on) possible: No pulsing of clear-gate necessary

P. Fischer for the DEPFET collaboration, page 32Status of DEPFET Pixel Detectors – DESY, Achieved Performance (non-ILC structures) single pixel spectrum: ENC = 4.8 +/- 0.1 e °C autoradiogram with 3 H: ~ 10 mm 3 H mean energy: 5.6 keV Matrix noise ~ 100e - spatial resolution (50x50 µm 2 pixel): ~ 6.5µm (6 keV, 55 Fe) ~ 3.2 mm matrix picture with 55 Fe:  x,y = 4.5µm (22 keV, 109 Cd) detection of Tritium

P. Fischer for the DEPFET collaboration, page 33Status of DEPFET Pixel Detectors – DESY, CURO: Linearity, Threshold dispersion > 5mips Linearity: Threshold dispersion: