SPP FIELDS DFB Quarterly June 2014 Solar Probe Plus FIELDS Instrument Quarterly Digital Fields Board 1

SPP FIELDS DFB Quarterly June 2014 DFB Development Status DFB work proceeding well EM1 tested and characterization in-process Xilinx FPGA Daughter Board complete and integrated with EM1 EM2 development moving into layout, schematic review held last Friday, 6/13 SIDECAR ASIC screening complete on FM parts, in-process on remaining EM part FPGA development continues on remaining modules: Triggers, Burst Memory, and Spectra/Cross-Spectra  EEE Parts approved by PCB, and procurements nearing completion –All known orders for EM2 and FM complete, with most parts are in house ASIC CGA attachment PO placed with BAE Systems –1 st article inspection ~ 5 weeks, Eng & QA on-site inspection –Three mechanical parts for vibe and ‘practice’ for board assembly; and one part for EM2 –After EM2 board assembly and testing, will turn-on attachment of two FM parts Closed 7 of 8 Peer Review actions items, –8 th response in review by SPF team; no I-PDR or M-PDR action items assigned to DFB Risk mitigation plans are proceeding and trending downward –ASIC screening confirms parts are viable flight candidates –Board deflection analysis indicates positive margin, vibration testing to confirm 2

SPP FIELDS DFB Quarterly June 2014 DFB Development Road Map 3 Prototype DFBXilinx FPGA DBSIDECAR Evaluation Board Flight DFB EMs and FM DFBs can accommodate all variations of FPGA DB: Xilinx, ProASIC, ProtoRTAX, FM RTAX FPGA DB EM1 EM2-Flatsat EM2 Schematic Review complete 6/13 Notional Layout Shown

SPP FIELDS DFB Quarterly June 2014 DFB EM1 4 EM1 bench testing complete FPGA testing and characterization of DFB (including ASIC) starting FPGA DB ASIC FPGA DB with programmable Xilinx, upward compatible code with ProASIC/RTAX FPGAs SIDECAR ASIC in a socket with PCB structural enhancement cap

SPP FIELDS DFB Quarterly June 2014 DFB FPGA DIAGRAM Spectra & X-Spectra DBM

SPP FIELDS DFB Quarterly June 2014 DFB Test Lab Configurations 6 DFB bench-level testing and characterization set-up FPGA loads and science analysis continue for next couple months ASIC characterization included Thermal testing while EM2 is in layout/fab/assembly SIDECAR ASIC screening Both FM and spare selected Remaining EM part screening in-process SIDECAR ASIC Thermal Screening EM1 Testing Configuration

SPP FIELDS DFB Quarterly June 2014 DFB Schedule 7 Critical path is thru EMs Reserve 1mnth/year Schedule threat is CGA attachment and EM2 assembly Work-around is use of EM1 until EM2 is ready EM1 EM2

SPP FIELDS DFB Quarterly June 2014 DFB Backup slides

SPP FIELDS DFB Quarterly June 2014 Digital Fields Board Block Diagram Generates time domain and spectral domain data products (DC – 75kHz) Implementation includes: - Programmable gain states - Burst memory - Flexible configurations - Search coil cal. signal - Low mass, low power ADC 9 inputs: 5 E-field antennas 4 search coil channels 26 signals 150 kS/s Analog Filters / Gain stages FPGA processing

SPP FIELDS DFB Quarterly June 2014 IDTITLEPICritImpactTrendRetire At SPF- DFB01SIDECAR workmanship23 L PMPost PDR characterization testing - Screening complete SPF- DFB02PWB Structural Deflection23 L PMSCPost PDR vibration testing, Q If the SIDECAR experiences latent failure and/or has reliability issues, then the lack of a complete EIDP and respective workmanship could hinder the debug/troubleshooting, and have the potential to degrade performance and warrant possible redesign which could increase needed mass and power. Risk mitigation plan is to perform characterization and environmental testing on the SIDECARs. These parts have prior electrical burn-in testing hence characterization and environmental tests will demonstrate good rigor to retire the risk. Risk rating: Probability 2, Impact 3; not likely to occur based on successful burn-in testing completed by GSFC/Teledyne; consequences slightly higher based on possibility of reverting to backup plan of discrete ADCs. Proposed/heritage ADCs are not as rad-tolerant, require more board space (mass increases), more power, and/or could drive science return. Newer, more viable, ADCs identified but require radiation testing. DFB Risk Mitigation Proceeding If the DFB PWBA experiences too high of structural deflection, then the assembled components may experience package stresses, with respective workmanship and/or reliability issues. The primary concern is the SIDECAR CGAs. This potential could warrant possible redesign of the PWB layout, structural stiffness design, or reduction in DFB capability due to replacing the SIDECAR/other components to stay within mass and power constraints. Analysis and part modeling in process now. Risk mitigation plan is to perform vibration testing to SPF-MEP vibration levels on an EM PWB with representative components and mass models. Analysis and modeling, along with vibration testing, must prove the PWBA design and demonstrate good rigor to retire the risk Risk rating: Probability 2, Impact 3; not likely to occur based on analysis and modeling and good design practices of the PWBA. Consequences now lowered with addition of ASIC Al cap which lowers structural deflection in areas of concern. Analysis complete, vibe test pre-CDR, cap in place on EM1.

SPP FIELDS DFB Quarterly June 2014 DFB Related Action Items 11 DFB Peer Review held Nov 4-5 th, materials available on SPF site Action Items from this and other Peer reviews included here (SCM Peer Review Sept 4-5, 2013) No DFB actions assigned at I-PDR or M-PDR