1. RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP/EFW I-PER 21 January 2011 9 EFW Overview and Status Keith Goetz University of Minnesota

2. RBSP/EFW I-PER 21 January 2011Goetz 10 RBSP EFW Mission IDPU (inside S/C bus) Axial Booms (1 of 2) Spin Plane Booms (1 of 4)

3. RBSP/EFW I-PER 21 January 2011Goetz 11 IDPU AXB (1 of 2), Stowed SPB (1 of 4), Stowed Instrumentation Designs

4. RBSP/EFW I-PER 21 January 2011Goetz 12 EFW Block Diagram

5. RBSP/EFW I-PER 21 January 2011Goetz 13 EFW Organization RBSP Project Office APL EFW PI John Wygant UMN RBSP SWG EFW Co-I team EFW PM Keith Goetz UMN EFW IM Kim Cooper APL LASP lead Bob Ergun LASP Mechanical Paul Turin UCB SE Michael Ludlam UCB UCB PM John Bonnell UCB Electrical Michael Ludlam UCB Flight Software Peter Harvey UCB SMA Jorg Fischer UCB DFB SE Susan Batiste LASP LASP PM Mary Bolton LASP Finance Kate Harps UCB Ground SW Will Rachelson UCB UCB lead John Bonnell UCB

6. RBSP/EFW I-PER 21 January 2011Goetz 14 Team members Minnesota –John WygantEFW PI JWygant@fields.space.umn.edu –Keith GoetzEFW PM Goetz@umn.edu Berkeley –John BonnellUCB Hardware Co-I and UCB PM JBonnell@ssl.berkeley.edu –Michael Martin LudlamEFW System Engineer and IDPU Lead MLudlam@ssl.berkeley.edu –Jorg FischerSMA - Parts and Mission Assurance Jorg@ssl.berkeley.edu –Christopher SmithEFW Thermal Engineer CSmith@ssl.berkeley.edu –Paul TurinME Lead PTurin@ssl.berkeley.edu –Gregory DaltonME – SPBs GDalton@ssl.berkeley.edu –Jeremy McCauleyME – AXBs JeremyMc@ssl.berkeley.edu –Rachel HochmanPA Lead RHochman@ssl.berkeley.edu

7. RBSP/EFW I-PER 21 January 2011Goetz 15 Review History RBSP Mission Concept Review30-31 January 2007 RBSP Requirements & Mission Definition Review2-4 October 2007 RBSP/EFW Preliminary Design Review (w/ SOC)3-4 September 2008 RBSP Mission Preliminary Design Review14-16 October 2008 RBSP/EFW Peer Reviews –AXB, SPB, IDPU structure28 July 2009 –PRE, BEB, DCB electronics, backplane, harness2 September 2009 –DCB FPGA, DCB FSW3 September 2009 –DFB, DFB FPGA10 September 2009 RBSP/EFW Critical Design Review30 September 2009 RBSP Mission Critical Design Review1-3 December 2009 RBSP/EFW SOC Critical Design Review26 January 2010 RBSP/EFW Boom Pre-Environmental Review30 June 2010 RBSP/EFW Instrument Pre-Environmental Review21 January 2011 RBSP/EFW Instrument Pre-Ship Review

8. RBSP/EFW I-PER 21 January 2011Goetz 16 Review RFA Status Review# A/I# Open# Closed# Concurred BoomPER4 (+2)043 I-CDR (SOC)3 (+3)033 M-CDR00 I-CDR13 (+2)01312 M-PDR00 I-PDR25 (+4)025 I-PDR (SOC)5055

9. RBSP/EFW I-PER 21 January 2011Goetz 17 I-PER Entrance Criteria Successful completion of the I-CDR and responses made to all CDR RFAs and/or a timely closure plan exists for those remaining open A preliminary I-PER agenda, success criteria, and charge to the board have been agreed to by the technical team, project manager, and review chair prior to the I-PER The I-PER package (RE-001) is distributed 7 days in advance to members of the review board. Package should include the current version of the test verification matrix I-PER technical work products have been delivered and approved –SW-005, Software Test Plan Update to Baseline (if changed since CDR) –TE-001, Instrument Verification, Validation, Test and Calibration Plans, Baseline I-PER technical work products listed below for both hardware and software system elements have been made available to the cognizant participants before or at the review: –hardware fabrication and component level testing results –CPT results on integrated hardware –flight software testing results –travelers/work orders –copy of all deviations and waivers –closed and open PFRs –test procedures –instrument acceptance criteria –command and telemetry list –updated design (hardware and software) documentation –current versions of deliverables

10. RBSP/EFW I-PER 21 January 2011Goetz 18 I-PER Documentation Current versions of deliverables –MA-001 -002, -007, Performance Assurance Matrix –MA-002, FMEA(s) –MA-002 -009 Limited Life list –MA-005, As designed parts list –MA-006, Instrument Safety Data Inputs –SE-001, Instrument Requirements Document –SE-002, ICD –SE-006, Instrument User’s Manual Information –SE-007, As designed Materials and Processes List –SW-002, Software Requirements Document

11. RBSP/EFW I-PER 21 January 2011Goetz 19 I-PER Success Criteria The instrument is expected to meet the requirements with adequate margins at an acceptable level of risk Test plans and procedures are complete or a completion plan for any open item is established The product verification and product validation requirements and plans are complete The testing approach is comprehensive, and the planning test, and launch site and mission operations is sufficient to proceed Adequate technical and programmatic margins and resources exist to complete the testing within budget, schedule, and risk constraints Risks to success are understood and credibly assessed, and plans and resources exist to effectively manage them Safety and mission assurance (e.g., safety, reliability, maintainability, quality, and EEE parts) have been adequately addressed in system, testing and operational designs, and any applicable S&MA products (e.g., PRA, system safety analysis and failure modes and effects analysis) have been approved

12. RBSP/EFW I-PER 21 January 2011Goetz 20 I-PER Expectations Engineering model development has proceeded well –AXB mechanism has been developed, tested and fully qualified –SPB mechanism has been developed, tested and fully qualified –ETU electronics have been developed and tested –EFW system has been integrated with EMFISIS –Flight and ground software allow end-to-end data flow Flight model development has proceeded well Procedures and documentation are in place No major open issues EFW is ready to move into environmental testing of mechanical flight hardware