SPEECH ACT THEORY J. Austin & J.Searle

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DOING THINGS WITH LANGUAGE
Advertisements

Unit : 22 Perlocution and Illocution.
Conversational Implicature (Based on Paltridge, chapter 3)
Pragmatics SPEECH ACTS & EVENTS.
Review Exercises 1) Do the COMPONENTIAL analysis (not the compositional one) of the following words: hen b) rooster Componential analysis 2) Does ‘A’
Philosopher J.L.Austin’s book How to do things with words (1962)
Lecture Six Pragmatics.
Yule, Speech Acts Pertemuan 7 Matakuliah: G1042/Pragmatics Tahun: 2006.
CAS LX 502 7a. Speech acts Ch. 8. How to do things with words Language as a social function. — I bet you $1 you can’t name the Super Tuesday states. —You’re.
Yule, Politeness and interaction Pertemuan 9 Matakuliah: G1042/Pragmatics Tahun: 2006.
Presentation on Formalising Speech Acts (Course: Formal Logic)
Speech acts and events. Ctions performed To express themselves, people do not only produce utterances, they perform actions via those Utterances, such.
Reported Speech Roll No Presented By:- Class: Ixth “A”
Macropragmatics Speech act theory.
Direct and indirect speech acts
Introduction to linguistics II
Pragmatics.
Speech Acts & Language Functions Pragmatics Not only language structure is rule governed – language use is, too Rules of language use are social: ”Is saying.
Advanced Spoken English Speech Act Theory What are Speech Acts? Speaking is performative Utterances are functional -Giving orders, instructions -Making.
PS429 Social and Public Communication PS429 Social and Public Communication Week 4 (25/10/2005) Reading group discussion.
Semantics 3rd class Chapter 5.
 We have been considering ways in which we interpret the meaning of an utterance in terms of what the speaker intended to convey.  However, we have.
6.3 Macropragmatics Speech act theory The cooperative principle The politeness principle.
Theories of Discourse and Dialogue. Discourse Any set of connected sentences This set of sentences gives context to the discourse Some language phenomena.
Topic 9: perlocution and illocution
Speech Acts Svatava Heinlová UJP/ZCU Plzeň
Yule, Speech Acts Pertemuan 8 Matakuliah: G1042/Pragmatics Tahun: 2006.
Practice Examples 1-4. Def: Semantics is the study of Meaning in Language  Definite conclusions Can be arrived at concerning meaning.  Careful thinking.
PRAGMATICS HOW TO DO THINGS WITH WORDS. What is Pragmatics? Pragmatics is the study of invisible meaning. Identifying what is meant but not said. J. L.
Direct speech Indirect speech Present simple She said, "It's cold." › Past simple She said it was cold. Present continuous She said, "I'm teaching English.
Pragmatics 1 Ling400. What is pragmatics? Pragmatics is the study of language use.Pragmatics is the study of language use. Intuitive understanding of.
Standards Of Textuality And Speech Acts.
Your host E. Aminudin Aziz. Austin’s observation on (many or even most) acts realised through speech  People do things with words  The idea sharply.
Speech Act. Speech act theory was proposed by John. L. Austin and has been developed by J. R. Searle. They believe that language is not only used to inform.
Speech Act Theory Mohammad Alipour Ahvaz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz, Iran.
Pragmatics (1) Dr. Ansa Hameed.
Speech Acts and Speech Events Austin (1962) and Searle (1969)-it is possible to classify utterances into very small set of functions. We ought to assign.
SPEECH ACTS Saying as Doing See R. Nofsinger, Everyday Conversation, Sage, 1991.
SPEECH ACT THEORY: Direct and Indirect. Sentence Structure Sentences can be classified based on the structures into: Declarative sentence Declarative.
Speech Act Theory Instructor: Dr Khader Khader.  Outline:  How Speech Act Theory began  What is the theory about  Levels of performing speech acts.
Introduction to Linguistics
Speech Acts Actions performed via utterances e.g. You are fired
Discourse and Pragmatics Speech Acts Lecture 4: Paltridge, pp
MODAL VERBS MODAL VERBS.
CONDITIONAL CLAUSES  complex clauses: main clause + subordinate clause  main clause: can stand on its own  subordinate clause: starts with the conjunction;
Direct and indirect speech acts
PRAGMATICS 2.
Aristotel‘s concept to language studies was to study true or false sentences - propositions; Thomas Reid described utterances of promising, warning, forgiving.
Speech Acts: What is a Speech Act?
Chapter 8 Spoken Discourse. Linguistic Competence communicative competence: the knowledge we bring to using language as a communicative tool in conversation.
Questions.
Pragmatics within Linguistics
SPEECH ACT AND EVENTS By Ive Emaliana
SPEECH ACT THEORY: Three Kinds of Act.
SPEECH ACT THEORY: Felicity Conditions.
Lecture 7 Speech Acts II.
SPEECH ACT THEORY: Direct and Indirect.
Speech Acts.
Welcome back!.
SPEECH ACTS AND EVENTS 6.1 Speech Acts 6.2 IFIDS 6.3 Felicity Conditions 6.4 The Performative Hypothesis 6.5 Speech Act Classifications 6.6 Direct and.
Week 9 language in context
REPORTED SPEECH.
SPEECH ACTS Saying as Doing
Pragmatics.
Semantics Seven kinds of speech acts
Pragmatics.
How To Do Things With Words
SPEECH ACTS Saying as Doing Professor Lenny Shedletsky
Direct and indirect speech acts
SPEECH ACT THEORY: Felicity Conditions.
Presentation transcript:

SPEECH ACT THEORY J. Austin & J.Searle Language as action Declarations & performatives Felicity conditions The force of utterances Taxonomy f speech acts Tasks

LANGUAGE AS ACTION Speech Act Theory was developed from the basic belief that language is used to perform actions. (meaning and action are related to language) Speech acts = actions performed via utterances (apology, complaint, compliment, etc.) They apply to the speaker’s communicative intention in producing an utterance. The speaker - expects that his/her communicative intention will be recognized by the hearer. Both speaker and hearer are usually helped in this process by the context = speech events.

DECLARATIONS AND PERFORMATIVES a class of highly ritualistic utterances which carry no information about the world outside language at all because they refer to themselves. (SAYING=DOING) E.g.: a. I swear to… . b. I sentence you to death. c. I hereby open the Theater House. d. I hereby name this ship ‘Aurora’.

1. explicit performative: I order you to clean your boots. 2. implicit performative: Clean your boots! The assumption is that underlying every utterance (U) there is a clause containing a performative verb (Vp) which makes the function explicit. I (hereby) Vp you (that) the subject must be first person sg., + the adverb ‘hereby’, indicating that the utterance counts as an action by being uttered + a performative verb in the present tense + indirect object

FELICITY CONDITIONS for an utterance to perform a certain act, some appropriate conditions have to be fulfilled. Technically, they are called ‘felicity conditions’.

FELICITY COND. FOR THE ACT OF ORDERING 1. the sender believes the action should be done 2. the receiver has the ability to do the action 3. the receiver has the obligation to do the action 4. the sender has the right to tell the receiver to do the action EG I think your boots need cleaning, Jones (Condition 1) I’m bloody sure you can get your boots cleaner than that, Jones! (Condition 2) You’re supposed to come on to parade with clean boots, Jones! (Condition 3) It’s my job to see you’ve got cleaner boots than this! (Condition 4)

UNDERLYING FORCE 1. locutionary act: the basic act of utterance, producing a meaningful linguistic expression. 2. illocutionary act/force: performed via the communicative force of an utterance, the function that we have in mind when we produce an utterance. We might utter I’ve just made some coffee to make a statement, an offer, an explanation, etc. 3. perlocutionary act/effect: the effect you intend your utterance to have on the hearer, for example, to get the hearer drink the coffee.

TAXONOMY OF SPEECH ACTS Declarations: speech acts that change the world via their utterance. 2. Representatives For example, statements of fact (The earth is round) assertions (Chomsky didn’t write about peanuts) descriptions (It was a sunny day) In using a representative, the speaker makes words fit the world (of belief).

3. Expressives: speech acts that state what the speaker feels (psychological states). For example, expressing pleasure, pain, likes, dislikes, joy, sorrow, etc. They can be caused by something the speaker does or the hearer does, but they are about the speaker’s experience: E.g. a. I’m really sorry. b. Congratulations! c. Oh, yes, mummy, great, mmmm! In using expressives the speaker makes the words fit the world (of feeling).

4. Directives: speech acts that speakers use to get someone else do something. They express what the speaker wants. For example, commands, orders, requests, suggestions, etc. and can be positive or negative: E.g. a. Gimme a cup of coffee. Make it black. b. Could you lend me a pen please. c. Don’t touch that. In using a directive, the speaker attempts to make the world fit the words (via the hearer).

5. Commissives: speech acts that the speakers use to commit themselves to some future action.).They express what the speaker intends. For example, promises, threats, refusals, pledges and can be performed by the speaker alone or as a member of a group: E.g. a. I’ll be back. b. I’m going to get it right next time. c. We will not do that. In using a commissive, the speaker undetakes to make the world fit the words (via the speaker).

DIRECT & INDIRECT SPEECH ACTS on the basis of structure, provided by the three basic sentence types in English which relate to the three general communicative functions (Yule, 1996:54): Direct/indirect relationship between sentence type & function ________________________________________________ Utterance Sentence type Comm. function You wear a seat belt. Declarative Statement Do you wear a seat belt? Interrogative Question Wear a seat belt! Imperative Command/Request

TASKS 1. Look at the following utterances and try to determine what might have been their illocutionary force (Source: Cook, 1989): 1. Please, open the window. 2. It’s very stuff in here, isn’t it? 3. I’m sorry for what I’ve done. 4. I promise to repay you tomorrow. 5. Somebody’s messed up my computer.

TASKS 2. Look at the following transcripts of exchanges between a husband and a wife. How does A exploit ambiguity in the illocutionary force of what is said? (Source: Cook, 1989) Exchange 1. A: Are you planning to do it this afternoon? B: (angrily) Well WHEN this afternoon? A: (with injured innocence) I’m just asking whether you’ll be able to do it this afternoon. Exchange 2. B: Oh no, we haven’t got the TV programme. A: Go and get one then. B: Go and get one! I’ve just come in. A: Well if you don’t go I’ll go. B: That’s blackmail. A: It’s not blackmail, it’s just a FACT.

TASKS 3. What is the problem with the following speech acts. (Source: Mey, 1993:127) I promise (hereby) to set fire to your house. I hereby warn you that you will be awarded the Nobel prize in literature. WRNING: Your lawn will turn brown in November

TASKS 4. Consider the following text, found on a package of American brewers’ yeast in the 1920s: (Source: Mey, 1993:127) Do not mix the contents of this package with 2 qts of lukewarm water Do not add 1 lb of sprouted barley Do not put in a warm spot (74 degrees) for 7-10 days Do not skim Do not put mixture in copper pot and heat Do not condense vapors Do not consume end product Do not get caught