Reviewing the 2015 AmeriCorps Applications & Conducting the Review AmeriCorps External Review.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Key Concepts for AmeriCorps. Session Objectives Provide an opportunity for participants to network in program specific group Discuss key fiscal and grant.
Advertisements

AmeriCorps is introducing a new online payment system for the processing of AmeriCorps forms
The Performance Appraisal Process
Reviewing Course Outlines for C-ID Designation
Performance Development
Introduction and Overview.   PowerPoint  Civil Service chapter 10 rules  Planning and evaluation form  Performance notes  Request for review Handouts.
Faculty Affairs presents:. PPCs  Consist of 3 or 5 members  Are selected based on Program Personnel Standards (i.e. one per program or one per faculty.
2014 AmeriCorps External Reviewer Training Assessing Need, Theory of Change, and Logic Model.
High-Quality Supplemental Educational Services And After-School Partnerships Demonstration Program (CFDA Number: ) CLOSING DATE: August 12, 2008.
Ensuring Equitable Reviews School Turnaround AmeriCorps FY13 Orientation Session III Part 2.
The Application for Renewal Accreditation: Electronic Submissions.
Grant Writing 101 – Part 2 Information and Tips for Preparing and Submitting a Grant Application Nancy Alexander, MBA Office of Sponsored Programs.
2014 AmeriCorps State and National Symposium Updates and Fixed Awards.
Member Training, Supervision, and Experience AmeriCorps State and National External Review Daniel Barutta and Sarah Yue, Program Officers.
How to write a Report On Assessment Source: AUN Secretariat.
2010 Performance Evaluation Process Information Session for Staff
NON-UNIT EMPLOYEE EVALUATION PROCESS
Changing applicant statuses, salary and Equal Opportunity approvals, offering the position to the applicant.
Pre-Review Orientation Conference Call Bureau of Health Workforce HRSA Health Careers Opportunity Program June 29 – July 1, am Review Administrator.
Pre-Review Orientation Conference Call Maternal and Child Health Bureau Universal Newborn Hearing Screening Program HRSA National Technical Resource.
REGIONAL PEER REVIEW PANELS (PRP) August Peer Review Panel: Background  As a requirement of the ESEA waiver, ODE must establish a process to ensure.
Emily Lynn Grant Administrator Office of Sponsored Projects and Research Administration.
2014 AmeriCorps External Reviewer Training
Ensuring an Equitable Review AmeriCorps External Review Training.
Introduction to Proposal Writing Proposal Development Team Office of Research & Sponsored Projects (ORSP) September 30, 2009.
CSBS Fourth Friday Faculty Workshop 1: Grant Management CSBS: Frances Solano ORSP: Stefanie Friesen TUC: Stacey Lord / Maryann Camarillo 1/23/
1 Welcome to GE! The attached presentation has been put together to assist you in completing your required I-9 form through the use of our I-9 wizard.
Learning Outcomes Assessment in WEAVEonline
NSW Department of Education & Training NSW Public Schools – Leading the Way SELECTION PANEL PROCEDURES FOR SCHOOL TEACHERS 2009 Procedural.
Continuing Accreditation The Higher Learning Commission provides institutional accreditation through the evaluation of the entire university organization.
Your Role in Ensuring Equitable Reviews 2014 AmeriCorps External Review Training.
1 HRSA Division of Independent Review The Review Process Regional AIDS Education and Training Centers HRSA Toni Thomas, MPA Lead Review Administrator.
Rhona Sharpe, Head of OCSLD Liz Turner, Head of APQO 11 th April 2013 CHAIRING VALIDATION PANELS.
Past Performance AmeriCorps State and National External Review Daniel Barutta and Sarah Yue, Program Officers.
AmeriCorps Education Award Program Student Orientation.
Social Innovation Fund Creating an Application in eGrants Technical Assistance Call 1 – 2:00 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, March 19, ;
How to Submit An Amendment Tips from the 21 st CCLC Unit Updated September 17, 2009.
WELCOME to the QSNY Portal Public School Self-Study 1.
1 You are a New Member of the JAC; NOW WHAT? As a new Journey-Level Advisory Council (JAC) member, you probably have many questions, including those about.
Implementing School Plans in ePlan
CED Application Reviewer Training Module 1: Introduction to CED Program and Application Review June 2012.
Miami-Dade County Public Schools Title I Administration School-level Parental Involvement Plan (PIP)
Carilion Clinic, Office of Sponsored Projects Frequently Asked Questions Pre-Award Procedures For Principal Investigators.
Health Resources and Services Administration Division of Independent Review Objective Review Orientation Scholarships for Disadvantaged Students 1.
WLUSA/OSSTF Annual Performance Review Process Human Resources & WLUSA| 2015.
TTI Performance Evaluation Training. Agenda F Brief Introduction of Performance Management Model F TTI Annual Performance Review Online Module.
1 Panel Review Orientation Administration for Children and Families Office of Grants Management Division of Discretionary Grants.
SWRK 3150 & 4120 Mid-term Evaluation. Welcome Please take some time to review these PowerPoint slides. They contain important information for students,
NH Department of Education Developing the School Improvement Plan Required by NH RSA 193-H and Federal Public Law for Schools in Need of Improvement.
Reviewing the Applications & Preparing for the Review School Turnaround AmeriCorps FY13 Peer Review Orientation Session IV.
IT 499 Bachelor Capstone Week 2. Adgenda Administrative Review UNIT One UNIT Two Project UNIT Three Preview Project Status Summary.
Gifted & Talented Students Education Program Grant Webinar April 12, 2016.
2015/16 Staff Performance Appraisals Webinar for ANR Supervisors Spring 2016.
Application Tips School Leadership Program U. S. Department of Education 2005.
How to complete and submit a Final Report through
Payments Report Verification and Request March 2017
Review, Revise and Amend from Procedures for State Board Policy 74
Heath Reimbursement Account (HRA)
Polices, procedures & protocols
Please review these important Webinar Etiquette guidelines
2016 Year-End Performance Management
Welcome to the Nevada Test Administration Training and Q&A Session
THE OFFICE OF PROCUREMENT CONTRACT TRAINING MAY 2018
Webinar: ESSA Improvement Planning Requirements
External Peer Reviewer Orientation
2018 SMU Staff Performance Review Training
Reviewing Course Outlines for C-ID Designation
PRESENTATION TITLE Faculty Enhancement and Instructional Development (FEID) Proposal Support Sharon Seidman, Ph.D. (HHD) and Erica Bowers, Ed.D. (Director,
Hands-On: FSA Assessments For Foreign Schools
Presentation transcript:

Reviewing the 2015 AmeriCorps Applications & Conducting the Review AmeriCorps External Review

Training Objectives  Identify key changes from last year’s competition  Understand the expectations of the review  Ensure that you feel prepared to begin the review  Understand the steps for completing an IRF  Understand how to review applications  Identify resources to help with high-quality IRFs  Discuss considerations for participating in the Panel Discussion Calls  Reference the closeout process 2

Key Changes from Last Year  Using an Excel-based electronic Individual Review Form (IRF)  There are no separate Standards  Criterion Descriptions document  Less forms – Applicant Feedback Summary and Justification of Evidence Level & Quality Form were eliminated  Reviewers should not consider any aspect of the Performance Measures  Reviewers should only rate, not comment on, Past Performance 3

Expectations and Steps Ensure your participation is verifiedFamiliarity with materialsReceive Panel Assignment 4

Review Preparation  Review all orientation and training materials  2015 AmeriCorps External Review Handbook  Orientation Sessions  Notice of Federal Funding Opportunity (Notice)  Review, initial, sign, and submit the Confidentiality & Conflict of Interest Form and Participation Agreement as instructed  Familiarize yourself with review tools and resources:  Receive Panel Assignment  Download assigned applications from eGrants  Participate in Panel Intro Call  Review each application for COI – contact CNCS if anything is identified 5

Review Preparation: Dates  The following is due on Monday, February 2nd – one day prior to the review launch  Return Administrative Forms  Participation in the Live Q&A Call  Review dates: February 3 – 17 th 6

Steps to Complete an IRF 1)Reviewer individually reads and assesses application 2)Reviewer completes an IRF and sends to PC for feedback 3)Engage in Panel Discussion Call 4)Reviewer returns to IRF to revise 5)Reviewer sends 2 nd draft IRF to PC 6)PC reviews 2 nd draft IRF, and advances to Program Officer Liaison if it meets “near final” requirements 7)POL reviews and provides feedback on IRF as necessary 8)PC ensures that Reviewer incorporates feedback to finalize IRF 7

Reviewing the Applications  Applications generally will be reviewed and discussed in groups  Order will be determined by the Panel Assignment  Read the full application (within the 15 or 18 page limit)  Applications should be assessed against the Selection Criteria, not other applications or outside information  Apply your experience and expertise with balance  Use the IRF to complete your assessment of the application 8

Rating the Applications  As you rate each application, keep these nearby:  Review (Scoring) Rubric  Criterion Descriptions  Be familiar with the 4-point rating scale:  Exceeds the criterion  Meets the criterion  Partially meets the criterion  Does not meet the criterion 9

Panel Discussion Calls  There is a Panel Discussion Call for each application  Led by the Panel Coordinator  Estimate minutes per application  Assessments should not be shared with other Reviewers in advance  Purpose of the Panel Discussion Calls  Open forum to discuss and re-consider your assessment of an application  Ensure fairness in the review  Ensure Selection Criteria are the basis for assessment  Discuss points of agreement and disagreement  Serving as an Effective Panel Member  Be prepared, on time  Responsive to feedback 10

Keep In Mind… 11 Please remember that not every organization has the resources to hire an experienced grant-writer. Applications should be assessed based upon how the narrative addresses the Selection Criteria; not how well the narrative was written.

Significant Strengths & Weaknesses  A strength becomes significant when it shows that the applicant has clearly demonstrated both an understanding of and the ability to address a key issue in program implementation or management.  A weakness becomes significant when a criterion is not addressed at all or is addressed poorly, causing concern about the applicant’s ability to successfully implement the proposed project.  Do not focus on generating a particular number of comments or on providing a comment for every criterion. The quality of the comments is much more important than the quantity. 12

Significant Strengths & Weaknesses  Incorporate the application’s significant strengths and weaknesses in the appropriate feedback boxes  Not every section of the IRF requires comments, but all comment boxes should receive a response  Each Strength/Weakness should be written on separate lines, not paragraph form, and in complete sentences  Do not use any bullets, symbols, (+), (=), or (+/-) indicators 13

Tips for Producing High-Quality IRFs  Address only the Selection Criteria  Address only the information found within the application  Do not address: budget, suggestions for improvement, the Performance Measures, what “the panel thinks” etc.  Do not copy and paste/restate the application  Avoid making references to page numbers  Avoid making generic comments that can be applied to “any” application  Use language that is evaluative, grammatically correct, and does not include inflammatory remarks  Reference the Reviewer Tips: Writing Meaningful Comments & Sentence Starters 14

Expectations for Closeout  Documents are labeled, verified, clean  Individual Reviewer Forms  Panel Coordinator Notes  Confirm requirements are met with PC and GARP Liaison  Complete Evaluations  Confirmation received of approval for Honorarium  All conditions stated in the Participation Agreement  Information covered during the Confirmation Call is included on the next slide reference 15

Honorarium Banking Information will be entered in eGrants, prompt will arrive. All honoraria payments are made with federal funds; therefore, there are three items for your attention:  Current federal employees are not eligible to receive payment.  If you are indebted to the Federal government for any delinquencies (any debts that are 90 days or older i.e. Child Support, Federal Taxes, and defaulting on a Federal Loan, etc.)  Partial or full garnishment of that debt may be automatically deducted from your Honorarium payment by the Department of Treasury.  This is not controlled or requested by CNCS, and is an action of the Treasury Department when payments are processed.  You should expect a 1099 to arrive in January 2016 that you will need to use for tax-filing purposes.  This will arrive even in cases where you choose to donate your honorarium to a corporate account or another entity, as it is based on your participation and agreement with CNCS. 16

Assessment 17  To check for understanding and to verify that you have completed this orientation session, please complete the assessment at the following link: (Please reference the PowerPoint on the Reviewer Resource Webpage to access the link)