1. Ensuring an Equitable Review AmeriCorps External Review Training

2. Training Objectives By the end of this training, you should be able to:  Describe the Review Participants’ responsibilities in ensuring a fair and equitable review  Outline the steps to take if you identify a potential Conflict of Interest  Explain examples of potential bias  List proper disposal methods for all confidential materials  State and understand the purpose of the “Confidentiality & Conflict of Interest Form” for Review Participants  Discuss the recognition and value of diversity in programs  Discuss the importance of page limits for applications 2

3. What does it mean to be equitable?  Ensuring that each application receives consideration through a fair and impartial process that preserves the transparency and integrity of the grant application review  Understanding the Selection Criteria  Assessing each criterion and applying the appropriate rating  Balancing the value of your expertise, professional opinion  Appreciating the variety and diversity of programs  Understanding and following the Review (Scoring) Rubric  Using only the materials provided; not considering outside information  Shared responsibility as a Review Participant  Confidentiality, Conflicts of Interest, Bias  Understanding and following page limits 3

4. Conflict of Interest  Conflict of Interest is any private interest, affiliation, or relationship which could potentially compromise your ability to impartially carry out your official responsibilities.  Before you review any grant applications, you must tell CNCS about any possible Conflicts of Interest or even the appearance of a Conflict of Interest.  The duty to disclose potential Conflicts of Interest is an ongoing duty. If a Conflict of Interest or the appearance of a Conflict of Interest arises during the course of your participation, you must tell CNCS. 4

5. Examples of Conflicts of Interest Scenarios listed in the Conflict of Interest Form  Affiliation with an applicant organization  Includes Continuing Applications (in 2nd or 3rd year of funding cycle)  Includes State Commissions 5

6. Importance of Reporting COIs  Ensure a fair and equitable review for each application  Preserving the integrity of the External Review process  If you have any questions or think a conflict may exist, immediately contact your Panel Coordinator and GARP Liaison  CNCS staff will review the information, make a determination as to whether there is a conflict, and notify you of what steps, if any, need to be taken. 6

7. Understanding Potential Bias  What is bias?  A preference or inclination that may inhibit impartial judgment  Can be for or against – positive or negative  Examples of potential bias can include:  Comments about the proposed methods or models in the Program Design that have no basis  Favor or dislike of the author or applicant  Consideration of outside information  How should instances of bias be handled?  Often will be flagged by another panel member  Return to assessment; only use information provided in the application  Exercise consideration and respect – remove emotions  Possible recusal from review of that application 7

8. Confidential Information Applicant names Applicant business information and financial data Details about the proposed program Review comments and review ratings Applicant Confidentiality Identity of all Review Participants The link between Reviewers and their comments Participant Confidentiality 8

9. Proper Handling of Confidential Items 9 All Review Notes All Applications Review Artifacts

10. Confidentiality & COI Form: Process and Purpose Read the Confidentiality & COI FormSign and return to CNCSReceive the applicationsReview for potential COIsMaintain appropriate confidentiality 10

11. Diversity in Programs Focus Areas Types of Organizations Scope of Proposed Project/ Program Size Program ModelTarget Population 11

12. Narrative Page Limit: 15 Pages (18 pgs) The narrative page limit includes:  SF-424 Face Sheet  Executive Summary  Program Design  Organizational Capability  Cost Effectiveness and Budget Adequacy The narrative page limit DOES NOT include:  Logic Model  Budget  Performance Measures  Evaluation Plan  Additional Documents 12 CNCS reviews the page limits for all application narratives prior to the review. Applications are flagged, and Reviewers must not read beyond the 15 page limit (18 page limit for Multi-Focus Intermediaries). If you have a narrative that exceeds the page limit and it was not flagged, please report it to your Panel Coordinator and GARP Liaison immediately.

13. Wrap Up  Describe Review Participants’ responsibilities in ensuring a fair and equitable review  Restate steps to take if you identify a potential COI  Understand examples of potential bias  List proper disposal methods for all confidential materials  Understand the purpose of the Confidentiality & Conflict of Interest Form for Review Participants  Recognize and value the importance of diversity in programs and following page limits 13

14. Understanding the CNCS Grant Application Review Process AmeriCorps External Review Training

15. Training Objectives  Identify the steps in the life cycle of CNCS competitive grants  Understand the steps of the CNCS External Review process  Understand the roles and responsibilities of Review Participants  Understand eGrants and when it should be used 15

16. Background on CNCS  Created in 1993, and expanded opportunities for Americans to serve their communities through national service  Nation’s largest grant-maker supporting service and volunteering  Engages millions of Americans of all ages and backgrounds in service each year through its programs  Promotes United We Serve: www.serve.govwww.serve.gov  For more information, please review the CNCS Strategic plan: http://go.usa.gov/Z6eFhttp://go.usa.gov/Z6eF 16

17. Life-Cycle of Competitive Grants 17

18. External Review Process  Review trainings and orientations sessions  Download assigned applications  Review applications for COI  Assess applications  Read the application  Provide a rating for each External Review criterion  Comment on significant strengths and weaknesses  PC reviews IRF and provides feedback  Participate in Panel Discussion Calls  Reviewer revises IRF and incorporates PC feedback  Review of IRF by Program Officer Liaison (POL)  Submit final Individual Review Forms (IRFs)  Complete the closeout process 18

19. Review Participants Roles & Responsibilities: Review Participants  External Reviewer  Conducts assessments of and provides ratings for each application  Participates in Panel Discussion Calls  Completes high-quality IRFs  Incorporates Panel Coordinator (PC) feedback to improve IRF  Three (3) Reviewers on each panel  Panel Coordinator (PC)  Manages panel logistics and facilitates the Panel Discussion Calls  Provides feedback to each Reviewer on every IRF  Completes Panel Coordinator Notes for each application after the Panel Discussion Call 19

20. CNCS Staff Liaisons Roles and Responsibilities: CNCS Staff Liaisons  Grant Application Review Process (GARP) Liaison  Primary contact for process-related guidance and logistical support  Checks with each Reviewer and PC to assist on review progress  Program Officer Liaison (POL)  Provides CNCS programmatic expertise and guidance  Available as a resource for clarification of Selection Criteria  Reviews the IRFs to ensure comments relate to Selection Criteria 20

21. Key Review Forms  Individual Reviewer Form (IRF)  Captures the External Reviewers’ assessments and the significant strengths and weaknesses identified in an application  Completed by External Reviewers for each application  Panel Coordinator (PC) Notes  Completed after every Panel Discussion Call for each application  Provides an opportunity to capture noteworthy discussion, points of (dis)agreement, panel anomalies, and potential bias  Captures any issues that were not considered in the Panel Discussion Call that CNCS staff should be aware of when considering this application 21

22. eGrants  You will access eGrants at two junctures in the Review—  Download applications  Enter banking information for honorarium  To access eGrants: https://egrants.cns.gov/espan/main/login.jsp https://egrants.cns.gov/espan/main/login.jsp 22

23. Expectations of Review Participants  Review all orientation and training materials  2015 AmeriCorps External Review Handbook  Orientation Sessions  Notice of Federal Funding Opportunity (Notice or NOFO)  Report any actual or potential COIs and comply with confidentiality expectations  Produce high-quality review products  Be responsive to requests from the GARP Liaison and POL  Satisfactorily complete all Review Participant responsibilities 23

24. Wrap Up and Review 24 You should now be able to:  Identify the steps in the life cycle of CNCS competitive grants  Understand the steps of the CNCS External Review process  Understand the roles and responsibilities of Review Participants  Understand eGrants and when it should be used

25. Assessment  To check for understanding and to verify that you have completed this orientation session, please complete the assessment at the following link: https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/EquitableReview https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/EquitableReview (Please reference the PowerPoint on the Reviewer Resource Webpage to access the link) 25