©M. Horvat, BIT, AT - Nr. 1 How to participate in the 6th EU Framework Programme Manfred Horvat BIT - Bureau for International Research and Technology.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
– Seoul December 06 ERCIM Preparing European proposals Bruno Le Dantec ERCIM EEIG France – Seoul December 2006.
Advertisements

How to submit a Proposal Elisabeth COLINET. Conception Phase MAIN MILESTONES IN PREPARING A RESEARCH PROPOSAL Elaboration Phase Submission Phase.
1 17/3/2009 European Commission Directorate General Information Society & Media Funding Instrument Briefing for Remote Reading.
Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) in the Seventh Framework Programme Large-scale integrating projects (IPs)
Stefano Fontana European Commission DG RTD Research for the benefit of SMEs SMEs in the.
University of Trieste PHD school in Nanotechnology Writing a proposal … with particular attention to FP7 Maurizio Fermeglia.
Anthea Fabri Horizon 2020 National NCP Coordinator
Horizon 2020 Energy Efficiency Information Day 12 December 2014 Essentials on how to submit a good proposal EASME Project Advisors: Francesca Harris,
Capitalising the full potential of online-collaboration for SME innovation support Horizon 2020 call Innosup (Participant Portal code: H2020-INNOSUP )
Provisional draft The ICT Theme in FP7 Submission and Evaluation (preliminary information) ICT-NCP Information Day 19 th October 2006.
1 The ICT Theme in FP7 How to participate to ICT in FP 7 3. Submission, evaluation and selection ICT Proposer’s Day Köln, 1 February 2007.
Horizontal Research Activities involving SMEs Joachim Ball, European Commission, DG RTD B3 n Co-operative Research n Collective Research General Introduction.
Bureau for International Research- and Technology Co-operation M. Horvat 1 Acceding and Candidate Countries and the 6th Framework Programme Bucharest,
Istanbul, 24 April 2003 European Commission - Directorate General for Research DGRTD- Dir B.3 Dr. If.Pottaki SMEs & Research SMEs and Research under the.
Companies and the Sixth Framework Programme. Agenda Overview of the 6 th Framework Programme (FP6) Why participate ? Industry participation in FP6 What’s.
Specific Programme Cooperation in FP7 - Proposal submission -
ESPON 2013 Programme Info Day on Calls and Partner Café Brussels, 10 May 2012 How to apply: Application Form and Eligibility A Decade of Territorial.
Provisional FP7-ICT InfoDay, Torino, 11/12/ The ICT Theme in FP7 How to submit a proposal 3. Submission and selection.
Self-evaluation of project concepts for application in Horizon 2020
Sixth Framework Programme INTRODUCTION . Contents Contents of FP6 Instruments in FP6 Financing Budgets Timetable Highlights.
APRE Agency for the Promotion of European Research Lifecycle of an FP 7 project Caterina Buonocore Riga, 13th September, 2007.
1 Framework Programme 7 Guide for Applicants
FP6 Project Organisation. Participating in FP6 How Projects Are Organised FP6 research projects are almost always collaborative 1 and implemented using.
Work Programme for the specific programme for research, technological development and demonstration "Integrating and strengthening the European Research.
Application Form Part 1, Sections 4-9 How to Apply Seminar 16 th September 2010 – Copenhagen Kirsti Mijnhijmer.
European Cooperation in the EU RTD Framework Programme: Experiences in FP6 and perspectives for FP7 Manfred Horvat bm:bwk and ASO Bratislava Kosice 2 nd.
1 The Project Circle, January 27, 2005 How can the NCP support you? Mária Búciová, IST NCP Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava, Slovakia.
Implementation Instruments for FP6 Thematic Priorities Joseph Prieur - Aeronautics DG Research- Space &Transport.
Technology Strategy Board Driving Innovation Participation in Framework Programme 7 Octavio Pernas, UK NCP for Health (Industry) 11 th April 2012.
NANOTECHNOLOGIES AND NANO-SCIENCES, KNOWLEDGE-BASED MULTIFUNCTIONAL MATERIALS AND NEW PRODUCTION PROCESSES AND DEVICES Priority 3 – NMP in FP6 Ewa Jędryka.
IST programme 1 IST KA3: The Evaluation Introduction & Contents Principles Outline procedures Criteria and Assessment What this means for proposers.
Dr. Margaretha Mazura (EMF) ICT Day Opportunities to participate in EU ICT research projects San José, 16 February 2010 Principles of EU Research Funding.
Practical aspects Dr. Ir Matthijs Soede Senter/EG-Liaison “Practical Aspects of Preparation FP6 projects Poznan - 21 November 2002 Dr. Ir.
Sustainable Energy Systems – research activities having an impact in the medium and longer term 1 Invitation to submit Expressions of Interest (EoI) 2003.
IST4Balt Training Course on FP6 and IST Version 2.0, 30/05/20061 IST4Balt Training Course “The Sixth Framework Programme (FP6) of the European Community.
Contract No. FP INSEC is a project co-funded by the European Commission under the Seventh Framework Programme ( ) INCREASE INNOVATION.
The FP7 Inputs for building a project proposal AN INFORMATION POINT FOR FP7 IN PALESTINE: Training Seminar of experts Nicosia, Cyprus November.
“Thematic Priority 3” Draft Evaluation of IP + NoE.
1 SMEs – a priority for FP6 Barend Verachtert DG Research Unit B3 - Research and SMEs.
Citizens and Governance in a Knowledge-based Society Guidelines on Proposals Presented by Henry Scott, EKT.
Participation in 7FP Anna Pikalova National Research University “Higher School of Economics” National Contact Points “Mobility” & “INCO”
Stepping up Economic and Technological Intelligence Brussels, 18 December 2002 Germán Valcárcel European Commission DG Research - Research and SMEs.
FP7 National Contact Points: Assistance during the proposal preparation Friday 31 st August, 2012 Anthea Fabri FP7 NCP Coordinator.
1 Information Society Technologies Information Society Technologies Proposal submission in IST – Five golden rules Collaborative Working Environments Information.
Malta Council for Science and Technology Practicalities Health and Food, Agriculture, Fisheries & Biotechnology – Information Session 25 th September 2008.
COMPETITIVE AND SUSTAINABLE GROWTH Research DG European Commission Expressions of interest / Dedicated call mechanism.
Overview of the IST Priority Information Package National Contact Points 23rd Oct 2002 Tom McKinlay: IST Operations.
Warszawa 18 luty th Framework Programme NMP - 2nd Calls Integrated Projects for SMEs Hervé Péro, Christophe Lesniak DG Research.
Poznan 19 April Kwietnia 2005 Poznan FP6 The Next Calls for 2005 Technology Platforms FP7.
Proposals and projects in FP7 On-line Information Day Brussels/Budapest 22nd January 2007.
European Commission Research 1 Participation in the EU 6th Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development Peter Härtwich, DG Research,
Bureau for International Research and Technology Cooperation Herlitschka 1 Warsaw FP6 Launch Conference - 26 Nov Small and Medium Enterprises -
The ICT Theme in FP7 Proposal evaluation The Evaluation criteria: Keys to success and reasons for failure - The Golden Rules.
1 Priority 3 NMP: generalities Renzo TOMELLINI Head of Unit “Nanosciences and Nanotechnologies” Directorate “Industrial Technologies” Research Directorate-general.
1 Call for Proposals & Eligibility Call for Proposals & Eligibility Guide for Proposals & Evaluation Criteria Guide for Proposals & Evaluation Criteria.
© Services GmbH Proposal writing: Part B 2/1/ St. Petersburg, May 18, 2011 Dr. Andrey Girenko
1 STREPS INTELLIGENT HERITAGE IN FP6. “Traditional Instruments in FP6 ” An outline of the implementation of Specific Targeted Research Projects (STREPs)
E u r o p e a n C o m m i s s i o n - W a r s a w 2002 Sixth Framework Programme Instruments.
Jörg Niehoff European Commission DG Research - Unit T4: SMEs SMEs in the.
Erasmus Mundus Joint Master courses How to write a good proposal ? Hélène Pinaud- 18 December 2015.
Practical Aspects of Preparation FP 6 projects Senter/EG-Liaison Nationaal Contact Punt voor het 6de Kaderprogramma Sandra de Wild 11 december 2002.
Richard Escritt, Director – Coordination of Community Actions DG Research, European Commission “The development of the ERA: Experiences from FP6 and reflections.
Training Event, Sofia – Feb 22 nd, 23 rd 2007 Recommendations for building successful proposals in FP7* Dipl.-Ing. Pierre.
“Preparing competitive grant proposals that match policy objectives - project proposal evaluators' viewpoint ” Despina Sanoudou, PhD FACMG Assistant Professor.
2. The funding schemes ICT Proposer’s Day Köln, 1 February 2007 The ICT Theme in FP7 How to participate to ICT in FP 7.
The ICT Theme in FP7 How to participate to ICT in FP 7
Drafting the Guidelines for applicants
Priority 3 NMP: generalities
Information Society Technologies in the 6th Framework Programme
Presentation transcript:

©M. Horvat, BIT, AT - Nr. 1 How to participate in the 6th EU Framework Programme Manfred Horvat BIT - Bureau for International Research and Technology Cooperation, AT An initiative of the Austrian Government and the Economic Chamber Austria New opportunities for academic institutions and enterprises to participate in EU RTD programmes TU Kosice, December 2002

©M. Horvat, BIT, AT - Nr. 2 Source of information 1  Decision of the Framework Programme  Decision of the Specific Programmes  Work Programmes  Call for Proposals  Information Packages  Guide for Proposers for the instrument choosen  the proposal submission forms for the instrument choosen  Evaluation Manual  the Model Contract  the rules for participation  background documents on FP6 instruments

©M. Horvat, BIT, AT - Nr. 3 Source of information 2  National Contact Points, regional contact points, university contact points, etc.  practical information & advice on modalities and rules  National delegates in Programme Committee  background information on EU policies  experienced (critical) colleagues  the project coordinator and partners   Calls for Proposals  all documents for FP6  results of Call for Expressions of interest  projects data base

©M. Horvat, BIT, AT - Nr. 4 Short vs. full proposal  One stage submission of proposals  full proposal with all details  evaluation criteria defined in the work programme  Two-stage submission of proposals  first stage: short (outline) proposal (15-20 pages) use of limited set of criteria successful proposers invited to submit full proposal  second stage: like one-stage proposal  to be defined in the work programme: first call(s) mostly one-stage submission

©M. Horvat, BIT, AT - Nr. 5  Integrated projects (IP)  Networks of excellence (NoE)  “Article 169”  Specific targeted research projects (STREPs)  Specific Coordination Actions (CA)  Specific Support Actions (SSA)  Human resources and mobility actions  Horizontal measures for SMEs  CRAFT  Collective Research  Specific information material will be available for each area of FP6 (thematic priorites, etc.) and for each instrument! Choice of modality for participation There is a spectrum of instruments!

©M. Horvat, BIT, AT - Nr. 6 Parts/content of a proposal Part A: FORMS  A1: General info on proposal (Title, abstract, keywords, etc.)  A2: Info on the coordinator and the other partners (one form per partner)  A3: Cost breakdown (one sheet for the whole consortium; one line per partner with information on costs and funding requests per activity *) * e.g. for IPs and STREPs: RTD and innovation related activities, demonstration activities, training activities, consortium management Part B: CONTENT (e.g. IP)  Objectives and expected impact  Implementation plan and associated budget  consortium and the project resources  project management  exploitation and dissemination plans  ethics, safety, and other issues (where relevant) There may be recommendations as to the lengths of certain parts!

©M. Horvat, BIT, AT - Nr. 7 Fundamental issues for IPs and NoEs  Integrated projects  Integration of disciplines, activities, actors, sectors and finance  scale of ambition  Networks of Excellence  bring about structural change, mutual specialisiation  more than just coordination  top management (and budgetary authorities) must be involved  unified management structure

©M. Horvat, BIT, AT - Nr. 8 Some recommendations 1  Check priorities and objectives of the Work Programme and the Call for Proposals (objectives, contents and instrument!)  ensure completeness of proposal: Part A and B  use correct forms and instruments  eligibility of partnership!  a convincing consortium assembling the critical mass of expertise and resources  well designed management structures & procedures!  address all evaluation criteria (Guide for Proposers!)  address ethical issues

©M. Horvat, BIT, AT - Nr. 9 Some recommendations 2  Choose a strong expressive title & a good acronym  prepare an interesting project summary  convincing technical (and political) backgound  How will your projects contribute to integrating and/or structuring European research (ERA!)  present clear objectives and results, methods  How will results be exploited and disseminated?  edit your proposal carefully before submission

©M. Horvat, BIT, AT - Nr. 10 Some recommendations 3  Use concise standard English  don’t address the ultimate expert - he/she may not be around...  make the text well structured, precise, clear, understandable, easy to read, not “wordy”  add a Table of Content  choose a type face that is attractive & easy to read  use short paragraphs  use bullet points to break up lists  highlight key points in italics  make your proposal visually attractive and inviting, using graphic devices

©M. Horvat, BIT, AT - Nr. 11 Some recommendations 4  Get early advice by your National Contact Point and the EC help desk  submit your complete proposal before the deadline  inform National Contact Point and national delegates about your submitted proposal  don’t contact Commission services in the first two weeks after submission!

©M. Horvat, BIT, AT - Nr. 12 Proposal submission  On-line preparation and submission using the Electronic Proposal Submission System (EPSS)  Preparation off-line using the same tool as EPSS, followed by on-line submission via EPSS  Off-line preparation using the same tool as EPSS followed by submission on CD or diskette  On paper

©M. Horvat, BIT, AT - Nr. 13 Experiences from previous FPs Why proposals failed!  Too ambitious, too complex to be believable  unclear, chaotic  not relevant for the Call and the Work Programme  not innovative, going beyond the state of the art  objectives, methods, approach unclear  results neither clear nor quantified, no exploitation  all results at project end, no intermediate results  unrealistic cost estimates  unbalanced project consortium, “alibi” partners  management structure & processes not appropriate

©M. Horvat, BIT, AT - Nr. 14 Thank you for your attention! Prof. Manfred Horvat Director Tel (-109) Fax (-18)