Aceh and Yogjakarta Comparing international response to the crises Toshihiro Nakamura Team Leader, Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation Unit UNDP Indonesia

INDONESIA Source:UNDP Indonesia; UNDP BCPR

COMPARING THE MAGNITUDES OF DISASTERS Source: Preliminary Damage and Losses Assessment, Bappenas, 2006 Disaster eventDateNumber killedDamage & losses (USD)Country Turkey Aceh (Indonesia) Honduras Yogyakarta (Indonesia) Gujurat (India) Earthquake Tsunami Hurricane Earthquake April 1999 December 2004 Oct 1998 May 2006 June , ,708 14,600 5,716 20,005 10,281 4,747 4,698 3,134 2,958

EMERGING PATTERNS IN DISASTER RESPONSE BeforeAfter Immediate humanitarian assistance Humanitarian coordination –HIC –UNDAC No framework for medium and longer term strategy Immediate humanitarian assistance Humanitarian coordination –HIC –UNDAC Damage and losses assessment (ECLAC) Followed by reconstruction master plan development DAD Multi-donor Trust Fund Coordination among and between UN and IFI Emergency relief Reconstruction Longer term development MDGs

Source:BAPPENAS Time frame Key objective Focus areas 1-2 months To save lives 2-12 months7-24 months To rehabilitate basic services on: To revitalize all system of oEmergency response oProvision of food oEvacuation of the people oDebris cleaning oProvision of temporary settlement oPublic services oBasic social services oBasic infrastructure oBasic economic infrastructure oHousing rehabilitation oMental/psycho- social rehabilitation oEconomic system oTransportation oTelecommunication oSocial and cultural reconstruction oInstitutional reconstruction Emergency relief & Recovery planning RehabilitationReconstruction Recovery RESPONDING TO YOGYAKARTA

OVERVIEW OF NATIONAL RECOVERY STRATEGY Source:BAPPENAS; UNDP Indonesia Time frame Key objective Focus areas - 6 months Humanitarian relief Recovery planning 6-12 months1-3/5 years Restoring the situation to the minimum level Achieving improved conditions Emergency rescue Emergency food and medical assistance Emergency infrastructure and temporary shelter Burying the bodies Rubble clearing Livelihood Recovery planning Public services Economic facilities Banking and financial institutions Land rights Law and order Temporary shelter Economy Transportation system Telecommunication system Social and cultural system Institutional capacity Housing Dec 2004 Emergency relief & Recovery planning Key UNDP support Overall UN coordination Flash Appeal/Emergency Relief and Transitional Recovery Programme (ERTR) Support to the Damage and Losses assessment Support to the development of recovery blue print Private sector partnership Continuation of ERTR Development and implementation of new programmes with a focus on governance within the framework of the national recovery blueprint Overall policy guidance mid 2005 RehabilitationReconstruction Recovery programme overall management & implementation 2009

DAMAGE AND LOSSES ASSESSMENT Jakarta team Taskforce Secretariat Communication Aceh team Taskforce Secretariat National team BAPPDA Bappenas International team WB UN ADB Source:UNDP Indonesia

Source:Bappenas, 29 May 2006 YOGYA DAMAGE AND LOSSES ASSESSMENT TEAM SectorPotential UN agencies involvement Indicative names 1: Facility and infrastructures 2: Transportationxxx 3: IDP health and condition xxx 4: Social-cultural conditionxxx 5: Trade related services 6: Education related services xxx 7: Energy related servicesxxx– 8: Live supportxxx–xxx 9: Telecommunication 10: Securityxx Secretariatxxx

Source:Bappenas, 29 May 2006 YOGYA DAMAGE AND LOSSES ASSESSMENT TEAM RESTRUCTURED Social Sectors Housing Education Health Religious and culture Coordinator: ADB Infrastructure Transport Communcations Energy Water and Sanitation Flood control Coordinator: WB Productive Sectors Agriculture Fisheries Industry and Trade Coordinator: GTZ Cross-Sectoral Environment Governance and Admin. Bank and Finance Coordinator: UNDP Humanitarian impactCoordinator: UN

Source:Damage and Loss Assessment, BAPPENAS, January 2004; ECLAC handbook for estimating the socio-economic and environmental effects of disasters, ECLAC 2003 ECLAC METHODOLOGY SUMMARY Basic information Developed by the Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC) since the 1970s Valuate the socio-economic and environmental impact of a natural disaster Applied in –Belize and Dominican Republic in 1998 –Venezuela in 1999 –El Salvador in 2001 –Indian Ocean Tsunami in 2004 SectorDamageLossTotal Social sector -Affected Populations -Housing& Human settlements -Education and culture -Health sector Infrastructure -Energy -Water and sanitation -Transport and communication Productive sector -Agriculture -Trade and industry -Tourism Overall effect -Environment -Women -Macro economics -Employment and income There is no reference to ‘governance’ issue in the methodology handbook Direct impact, which refers to the impact on assets, stock, property, valued at agreed replacement unit prices Indirect impact, which refers to flows that will be affected, such as revenue, public and private expenditure etc over the time period until the assets are recovered

Source:Bappenas, 29 May 2006 RAW DATA LOOK LIKE THIS

Source:WB/UNDP Joint working paper for Pokja 10 (financial management), WB/UNDP, Jakarta, 2005 Funding source Estimated Amount (USD million) Domestic funds Bilateral NGO 2,000 2, ,000? 7,409 Multilateral 1,043 (on) Grant or Loan? N/A Grant Loan Grant Loan Grant TOTAL 1, (off) 1,366 (on) 857 (off) 4,254 (on) 3,155 (off)

INFORMATION PLATFORM IMMEDIATELY AFTER TSUNAMI Source:WB Programme and projects ReportsProcurement information Citizen’s cornerPre-Tsunami sectoral information Donor sites About e-AcehGovernment sitesPress release