NY Migration Planning Meeting APPR Requirements with Teachscape.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ongoing Training Day 1. Welcome Back! [re]Orientation Lead Evaluator Training Agenda Review.
Advertisements

... and what it means for teachers of non-tested subjects Johanna J. Siebert, Ph.D. NAfME Symposium on Assessment June 24-25, 2012.
Gwinnett Teacher Effectiveness System Training
New Mexico Teachscape Reflect for Teachers Collaborative Norms Equity of voice Active listening Safety to share different perspectives Commitment.
Most current teacher evaluations provide little information that can be used to give teachers the training and tools they need to be effective; better.
Teacher Evaluation & Developing Goals Glenn Maleyko, Executive Director, Ph.D Haigh Elementary September 8, 2014.
David Guyette, Laura Six, Rose Drake and Paige Kinnaird
OCM BOCES APPR Regulations As of % Student Growth 20% Student Achievement 60% Multiple Measures APPR NOTE: All that is left for implementation.
OCM BOCES APPR Regulations As of % Student Growth 20% Student Achievement 60% Multiple Measures APPR.
RISE Principal Evaluation and Development System: Overview and Principal Effectiveness Rubric.
1. Learning Targets 2 Staff will understand the various Teachscape platforms offered by South Dakota Staff will be able to login to their Teachscape account.
Educator Evaluation System Salem Public Schools. All DESE Evaluation Information and Forms are on the SPS Webpage Forms may be downloaded Hard copies.
LCSD APPR Introduction: NYS Teaching Standards and the Framework for Teaching Rubric Welcome! Please be seated in the color-coded area (marked off by colored.
EDUCATOR EFFECTIVENESS: 1 An Orientation for Teachers.
What is the Educator Development Suite? Provides teachers with the results of classroom observations and student perception surveys Suggests contextualized.
TEACHER EVALUATIONS. REVIEW OF POLICY Classroom teaching must be observed using one of the four piloted observation tools: Charlotte Danielson’s.
Measuring Principal Effectiveness Tom Corbett, Governor ▪ Carolyn C. Dumaresq, Acting Secretary of Education Measuring Principal.
Differentiated Supervision
Day 3. Agenda [always] Aligning RTTT Growth and Value-Added Update 21 st Century Readiness and APPR Evidence Collection Inter-rater agreement.
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
Full District Pilot EDUCATOR EFFECTIVENESS.
Teachscape Overview John Monahan, Instructional Supervisor
Agenda Overview of evaluation Timeline Next steps.
Annual Professional Performance Review (APPR) Evaluation Process for Teachers.
Lead Evaluator Training
LCSD APPR: Overview Review and Focus on the 60 points December 3, 2012.
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
PILOT REQUIREMENTS FOR EACH DISTRICT: Select a minimum of 10% of schools to participate. A minimum of 1 school MUST meet the minimum participant requirements.
Volusia System For Empowering Teachers (VSET)
CESA #4 EEL Meeting Thursday, December 4, o Evaluator Step 4 Deep Dive for Evaluators Evaluator Step 4 Deep Dive for Evaluators.
Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.
Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.
What is the Educator Development Suite? Provides teachers with the results of classroom observations and student perception surveys Suggests contextualized.
Evidence-Based Observations Training for Observers of Teachers Module 5 Dr. Marijo Pearson Dr. Mike Doughty Mr. John Schiess Spring 2012.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II (DPAS II) for Teachers Training Module I Introduction to DPAS II Training for Teachers.
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Teachers Training Module 3 The DPAS II Process Training for Teachers.
Ongoing Training Day 2. Welcome Back! [re]Orientation Lead Evaluator Training Agenda Review.
Teacher and Principal Evaluations and Discipline Under Chapter 103.
Teacher Evaluations Swartz Creek Community Schools.
Frequently Asked Questions about the Teacher Evaluation System August 28, 2013 CFN 536- Gerard Beirne, Network Leader Center for Education Innovation –
EDUCATOR EFFECTIVENESS: 1 An Orientation for Teachers.
TAPCo. Full Staff Mtg March 17 th Agenda ● ADVANCE ● Regents.
Secaucus Reflect Live Observation Process Observer Guide.
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
TEM 4.0 For School Librarians Laurie Butler, Library Services Advisor 2014.
Jeffrey Freund. Jeff Freund: Education and Work History Class of 2000 Class of 2004 Elementary Education Middle Level Mathematics.
Day 9. Agenda Research Update Evidence Collection SLO Summative Help Summative Evaluation Growth-Producing Feedback The Start of the Second.
Teachscape Reflect User Guide Teacher Observation and Evaluation Howard County Public School System.
Holland Central School District Opening Day September 3, 2013.
 Pre-Observation Conference  Priority component: 1e (Designing Coherent Instruction)  Observation  Priority components: 3c, 3d (Engaging Students in.
What does it mean to be a RETA Instructor this project? Consortium for 21 st Century Learning C21CL
2011 – 2012 School Year. * Walk-Throughs * Observation(s) * Pre-/Post-Evaluation Form * Year-End Evaluation * Summative Score Report.
APPR & SLO Solutions Innovation for Teaching & Learning RIGHT REASON TECHNOLOGIES YOUR SOLUTION FOR STUDENT SUCCESS.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
KPBSD Effective Instruction Evaluation Committee LaDawn Druce Marina Bosick Daniel Olson Margaret Griffen Troy Minogue Juliana DeBoard Megan.
What Does it Mean to Observe Only Observable Elements? Defining Observation for Your District for
Expanded ADEPT Guidance Presentation Office of Educator Effectiveness May 9, 2016.
Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Update Kentucky Board of Education August 8,
EVALUATIONS Evaluations are regulated and required by KDE (KAR’s and KRS’s) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards.
Educator Supervision and Evaluation Clarke and Diamond MS September 2013.
EISD Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System T-TESS
EVALUATIONS Evaluations are regulated and required by KDE (KAR’s and KRS’s) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards.
Your instruction - differentiated. Student learning - personalized.
Evaluations (TPGES) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards. SB 1 Changes The Process Starts with the PGP. Bourbon.
Lead Evaluator for Principals Part I, Series 1
APPR Overview 3012c Draft Revision March 2012
Overview of Implementation and Local Decisions
Steps in the TDES Evaluation Process
SGM Mid-Year Conference Gina Graham
Presentation transcript:

NY Migration Planning Meeting APPR Requirements with Teachscape

Agenda Introductions: Alison Doucette, Director, Implementation Services Sue Wiley, Director Northeast Sales Sue Bellamy, Regional Vice President, Sales New Platform Products Overview: Reflect, Focus, Learn, Advance Q & A APPR and Teachscape Reflect – functionality and presentation Q & A What’s new in the spring? Q & A Overview of the Implementation/Migration Process Q & A

Teachscape Effectiveness Platform FFTPS & FFTES Proficiency = FOCUS Reflect Live = REFLECT Professional Learning Suite = LEARN ADVANCE– Strategic Planning, Goal setting, Personnel Profiles and Planning

NY Standard Configuration Non-tenured teacher:Tenured Teacher Other Measures: (60%) 2 Announced observations1 Announced observations 1 Unannounced observation Teacher provided Structured Portfolio (Domain 4 +) State /SLO Measures (20%) Local Measures (20%) Composite Score (100%)

NY Standard Configuration The NY Standard uses the Danielson Rubric to score all measures in the evaluation process. Domains 1,2,3, and component 4a for announced observations Domains 2 and 3 and Domain 4 component 4a for unannounced observations Domain 4 components 4b-4f for the structured portfolio artifacts (although evaluators can request evidence from other domains and scoring is optional).

Evaluation workflow for a non-tenured teacher 6 Annual Planning Conference Evaluator schedules Annual Planning and Goal Setting conference Teacher completes Planning and Goal Setting Form Announced observation (2): Evaluator schedules the observation Teacher completes the pre-observation form Teacher uploads lesson plan (optional) Teacher uploads other artifacts (optional) Evaluator completes the observation by collecting evidence, tagging it to components Teacher completes the post-observation form Teacher has the option to upload other artifacts (optional) Evaluator has the option to upload other artifacts (optional) Evaluator scores the observation using evidence gathered during the observation and from the pre- and post-observation forms

Evaluation workflow for a non-tenured teacher 7 Unannounced observation (1): Evaluator completes the observation by collecting evidence, tagging it to components Teacher completes the post-observation form Teacher uploads other artifacts (optional) Evaluator has the option to upload other artifacts (optional) Evaluator scores the observation using evidence gathered during the observation and from the post-observation forms Portfolio Evaluation (Domain 4 +):. Teacher uploads Portfolio evidence in the form of artifacts Evaluator scores the observation using evidence from the artifacts Summative Conference:. Teacher completes self-review form and summative form Evaluator completes summative form

NY State Standard Configuration: Weighting/Formulas 8 All the scores for the components for each domain are averaged at the component and domain level across all observations and other measures The domains and the domain components within the domain are weighted using NYSUT recommendations The composite scores are then converted to the NY State score using the NYSUT CONVERSION CHART. Effective: Overall performance and results meet NYS Teaching Standards. Effective =57 2.6= = = =57.8

NY Standard Configuration: Product Presentation

Principal’s View 10

Teacher’s View 11

Administrators View 12

vs. 13 New Reflect System Custom evaluation workflows with pre-defined formula and weighting rules Online and Offline Observations Tools: Walk, Live, Video Summative Evaluation Report Observation dashboard and tracking tools Integration of Multiple Measures of Teaching Effectiveness(Student Assessment and Survey data) Reflect Live on TXLNew Reflect System

14

Reflect System vs Reflect Live – Detailed View 15 Functional AreaFeature / SupportReflect LiveReflect System Mobile Application Support (offline) iPad, iPad2, New iPad ✔✔ Android Devices ✔ Support for unscheduled observations ✔✔ Support for scheduled and pre-defined observations ✔ Observation Management Evaluation workflow management ✔ Scheduling observations ✔✔ Scheduling goal setting, pre and post observation conferences with calendar attachments ✔ Lesson artifacts attached to observation ✔ Lesson artifact and form scoring (coming soon) ✔ Integration of student achievement data ✔ Visibility into all aspects of evaluation process ✔ ReportingSummative and formative evaluation templates and reports ✔

Reflect System vs Reflect Live – Detailed View 16 Functional AreaFeature / SupportReflect LiveReflect System Mobile ApplicationiPad, iPad2, New iPad ✔✔ Android Devices ✔ Support for unscheduled observations ✔✔ Support for scheduled and pre-defined observations ✔ Observation Management Evaluation workflow management ✔ Scheduling observations ✔✔ Scheduling goal setting, pre and post observation conferences with calendar attachments ✔ Lesson artifacts attached to observation ✔ Lesson artifact and form scoring ✔ (Coming soon!) Integration of student achievement data ✔ Visibility into all aspects of evaluation process ✔ ReportingSummative evaluation report ✔

Summative Teacher Evaluation Report

Imports and Exports in Teachscape Reflect for Evaluations 18 HR Import File of users and relationships State Teacher Score File Local Teacher Score File Observations and Other Evaluation Components (60%) State Measures (20%) Local Measures (20%) SIS Export File: Overall Composite (100%) TEACHSCAPE SYSTEM

What’s new in the Spring? 19 Focus: o Training for Domains 1 & 4 (Feb ‘13) o Certificate of Completion (Mar ‘13) o Calibration GA (Mar ‘13) o Focus based on FFT 2013 with Common Core integration (Apr ’13) Reflect: o iPad Observation app (February ‘13) o Walkthroughs and Walkthrough Reports (February ’13) o Video Observations (February ’13) o Conversion tables & formula preview (February ’13) o Teachers’ Self-Review (March ’13) o Forms and Artifact scoring (May’13) o SIS export for NY State (May ‘13)

What’s new in the Spring? (cont.) 20 Learn: o Video Channels (Jan ‘13) o Video capture and upload tools - Lucy, Mini, Uploaders (Feb ’13) o Video clipping and usage reports (Feb ’13) o Refinements of user experience and workflows: search, catalogs, communities, LP workflows o Continuing Education: tracking and reporting on two types of units (e.g. credits and hours) o Content New courses in the Competency-Based Learning Series (Q3 ’13) ELA Common Core Series (Q4 ’13) Mapping of Learn content to InTASC standards (Q4 ’13)

Calibration FeatureComment FrameworkFfT 2011 Delivery platformFocus 2011 # of Calibration windows3 per year Start and end dates for calibration windowsConfigurable Number of videos to score in each window2 Duration of Calibration WindowApprox. 1 hr. to complete each window (15 min. video segments) Observer Eligibility All Observers Proficient Observers Configurable Calibration Model Compliance Oversight Model Accountability Model Configurable

Phases of Implementation/Migration Process PhaseActivityNext Steps Initial District Requirements Meeting Project Team Defined Documents Required Listed Overview of the Implementation Process District Approver/Team Leader defined District provides documentation(APPR, Questionnaire replies) Detailed District Requirements Gathering Analysis of the District documents for “best fit” in the product configuration Teachscape provides District Requirements Configuration documentation. Initial Test users are trained. Pilot SystemDistrict provides feedback on test system Signoff by District OR Modify configuration document and reconfigure Migration PlanningDetermine migration window “Please complete all ongoing observations by this date.” Production SystemTeachscape configures production system District users are trained Determine rollout process