Action Research Deployment Teams

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Title I School Improvment - Mission, Vision, Values and Goals
Advertisements

Alaska Accountability Adequate Yearly Progress February 2007, Updated.
The Continuous Improvement Classroom
Continuous Improvement Professional Learning Community Framework What does it look like? What does it look like? Module Two.
What are they? Why use them? How do you write them?
Creating the Continuous Improvement Classroom Goal Setting.
Continuous Improvement in the Classroom -Professional Learning Communities.
PDSA in the Classroom
Enhancing our guiding philosophy of continuous improvement
Agenda December 11, 2008 Learning by Doing Break
Continuous Improvement
The Continuous Improvement Classroom
Quality Liaison Network May 15, Agenda Year in Review Year in Review Changes for 07 & 08 Changes for 07 & 08 Complete Paperwork Complete Paperwork.
Clear Learning Targets
Agenda For Today! School Improvement Harris Poll Data PDSA PLC
Continuous Improvement Update June 11, (Your School/Departments Mission Statement Here) (Your School/Departments SMART Goals Here)
Reading ARDT Teams September 10 & 11, Agenda Your Role Your Role Big Picture Big Picture PLC for ARDT PLC for ARDT CI support CI support Plan on.
Action Research Deployment Teams November 29/30, 2006.
Continuous Improvement Update The Integration of Continuous Improvement and Curriculum, Instruction, Assessment & Technology October 13 th, 2008.
PDSA Classroom.
Annual Progress Report Submitted to The Iowa Department of Education by the Cedar Rapids Community School District.
Pre Planning: Identification of Need 1. Develop/Review Student Learning Expectations 2. Examine alignment of learning expectations with assessments 3.
Quality Liaison Meeting Thursday – April 10, 2008 Wilson Middle School.
SMART GOALS What are they? How do you write them?.
Agenda For Today! Professional Learning Communities (Self Audit) Professional Learning Communities (Self Audit) School Improvement Snapshot School Improvement.
Agenda - January 28, 2009 Professional Learning Community – Jefferson HS Learning by Doing What does the data tell us? ITED results SIP Goals Data Questions.
The Integration of Curriculum, Instruction, Assessment and Continuous Improvement Board of Education Update October 13 th, 2008.
The Continuous Improvement Classroom
Math Action Research Team
Continuous Improvement in the Classroom
Agenda For Today! Welcome/Housekeeping
Introductions & Welcome!
Continuous Improvement In the CRCSD Putting the Pieces Together.
Quality Liaisons November 6th, Responsibilities of the Quality Liaison: Main communication channel between the District and school/department Serve.
The Continuous Improvement Classroom Please sit by SIP goal area 1.) Find the SIP goal area that matches the Action Research area you work on.
Support Services Department- Leadership Teams Alignment: Setting and Communicating Direction.
Continuous Improvement In the CRCSD
The Continuous Improvement Classroom Day
QAR Questions Answer Relationships
Action Research Deployment Teams September, 2006.
Please sit by level. Welcome! Quality Liaisons Leaders of Continuous Improvement.
Science Action Research Team Kennedy High School.
2007 ITBS/ ITED Results Cedar Rapids Community Schools.
Classroom SMART goals. Ground rules created by students Classroom mission statements Classroom & student measurable goals Quality tools and PDSA used.
Department Leadership Teams Involving Everyone in the Plan on a Page! November 17, 2009.
Support Services Department- Leadership Teams Involving Everyone in the Plan on a Page!
Agenda Technology Department KAIZEN event/report out Technology Department KAIZEN event/report out Updating the Plan on a Page for Updating the.
I Can Goal Statements Connect Students to Formative Assessment 18 th National Quality in Education Conference November 2010 Chicago, Illinois Becky Martin.
The Continuous Improvement Classroom
The Continuous Improvement Classroom Level II
Support Services Department- Leadership Teams Alignment: Setting and Communicating Direction.
The Continuous Improvement Classroom
YOU are LEADERS of the change process Are you feeling the heat of communicating the vision of change? Are you feeling the heat of communicating the vision.
Data Retreat® is a registered service mark of Cooperative Educational Service Agency 7, Green Bay, WI Todays Leadership for Tomorrows Results.
Gwinnett Teacher Effectiveness System Training
SMART GOALS APS TEACHER EVALUATION. AGENDA Purpose Balancing Realism and Rigor Progress Based Goals Three Types of Goals Avoiding Averages Goal.
APS Teacher Evaluation A SMART Process for Student and Teacher Growth.
Tracy Unified School District Leadership Institute – “Leading the Transformation” Breakout Session Authentic Data Driven Decision Making July/August 2014.
SMART GOALS What are they? Why use them? How do you write them?
Improvement That Talks Back: Design, Monitor and Measure Continuous Improvement Efforts Dr. Stephan Knobloch Director of Research Loudoun County Public.
Building Leadership Teams Driving Continuous Improvement Throughout the School! Session #3 January 2012.
Action Research Deployment Teams March, Agenda  Team reflection  Completing the PDSA cycle  Team planning for continuous improvement.
Why must we do Data Teams? We know the implementation of DT benefit STUDENTS -helps teachers identify exceeding/proficient students and plan for targeted.
Becky Martin Continuous Improvement Facilitator Paul Hayes Secondary Student Services Facilitator 17th National Quality Education Conference October 2009.
The PLC Team Learning Process Review Step One: Identify essential (key) learning standards that all students must learn in each content area during each.
SMART GOALS What are they? What are they? Why use them? Why use them? How do you write them? How do you write them?
East Longmeadow Public Schools SMART Goals Presented by ELPS Leadership Team.
What are they? Why use them? How do you write them?
What are they? Why use them? How do you write them?
تحقیقات عملیاتی دکتر نگین مسعودی علوی
Presentation transcript:

Action Research Deployment Teams May - 2007

Agenda Strategic Plan/Plan on a Page SIP Rubric SMART Goals Team planning for continuous improvement Workshop evaluation & planning for next year

Random Acts of Improvement School Direction Goals and Measures School Direction Goals and Measures Plan to pull all together Aligned Acts of Improvement

Build as examples

(Your School Mission Statement Here) Each department and school to work toward Templates Help from production Standard format Set and communcate direction (Your School SIP SMART Goals Here)

Action Research Overview for Professional Learning Communities Pre Planning: Identification of Need 1. Develop/Review Student Learning Expectations 2. Examine alignment of learning expectations with assessments 3. Review assessment data 4. Identify areas of need based on assessment Plan: 1. Describe the current process for addressing the identified area of need (flow chart) 2. Review data to determine baseline performance in the specific area identified (Run Chart/Pareto Diagram) 3. Identify potential root causes contributing to the identified area of need (Cause & Effect Diagram, 5 Why’s, Relations Diagram) 4. Study research-based best practice/improvement theory addressing areas of need Action Research Overview for Professional Learning Communities DO 1. Plan for implementation of improvement theory (Force Field Analysis, Action Plan) 2. Implement research-based best practices improvement theory based on root causes according to the Action Plan 3. Monitor the implementation of research-based best practice/improvement theory to insure integrity and fidelity 4. Assess student learning Act: 1. Standardize the implementation of research-based best practice (improvement theory) that improved student learning (revise the flow chart to reflect changes made to the system) 2. If improvement theory was unsuccessful continue the PDSA cycle (try another improvement theory based on the next identified root causes) Study: 1. Examine student assessment results (compare to baseline) 2. Assess the impact of research-based best practice/improvement theory on student achievement

Alignment & SMART Goals

What Are SMART GOALS? M easurable A ttainable R esults-oriented S pecific, strategic M easurable A ttainable R esults-oriented T ime-bound

Math sub-test 11th grade Math subtest ITED NPR Target 85% based on trend data Proficient above 40th NPR Fall 2008 ITED By the fall of 2008, 85% of all 11th grade students will score above the 40th NPR on the ITED math subtest.

SMART Goal By the fall of 2008, 85% of all 11th grade students will score above the 40th NPR on the ITED math subtest.

SMART Goal During the 2006-07 school year, SAMPLE school will increase students’ proficiency in vocabulary skills in the non-proficient student subgroups as measured by the ITBS vocabulary sub test assessment (See targets below for each non-proficient sub group) Subgroup 05-06 Actual 06-07 Target African American 52.4% 55.4% American Indian 50% 53% IEP 0% 10% Free & Reduced 58.7% 64%

Action Plan - PDSA

Action Research Overview for Professional Learning Communities Pre Planning: Identification of Need 1. Develop/Review Student Learning Expectations 2. Examine alignment of learning expectations with assessments 3. Review assessment data 4. Identify areas of need based on assessment Plan: 1. Describe the current process for addressing the identified area of need (flow chart) 2. Review data to determine baseline performance in the specific area identified (Run Chart/Pareto Diagram) 3. Identify potential root causes contributing to the identified area of need (Cause & Effect Diagram, 5 Why’s, Relations Diagram) 4. Study research-based best practice/improvement theory addressing areas of need Action Research Overview for Professional Learning Communities DO 1. Plan for implementation of improvement theory (Force Field Analysis, Action Plan) 2. Implement research-based best practices improvement theory based on root causes according to the Action Plan 3. Monitor the implementation of research-based best practice/improvement theory to insure integrity and fidelity 4. Assess student learning Act: 1. Standardize the implementation of research-based best practice (improvement theory) that improved student learning (revise the flow chart to reflect changes made to the system) 2. If improvement theory was unsuccessful continue the PDSA cycle (try another improvement theory based on the next identified root causes) Study: 1. Examine student assessment results (compare to baseline) 2. Assess the impact of research-based best practice/improvement theory on student achievement

Professional Development

Team Planning Use the planning tool Leave with a plan!

Thinking about PDSA this past year… what’s in your “top 3”? Top 3 Successes Top 3 Struggles Reaction question What changes will be made to next year’s PDSA efforts?

Next steps… SIP SMART goals PDSA Professional Development Use the “Organizing and Planning for CI” tool to guide your planning Update your SIP by June 30th Your school’s “plan on a page” draft with your SIP June 30th Set and communicate direction! Please complete the evaluation for today’s session

During the 2006-07 school year, non-proficient students (as indicated by the ITBS math problem-solving subtest) at Sample school will improve their math problem-solving skills as measured by an increase in the percentage of students scoring in the “high” and “proficient” levels on the ITBS math problem –solving assessment. The 2006-07 performance target is for 85% of Sample School students for score in the “high and “proficient levels.