United South Middle School Texas Educator Grant Presentation “Aim High for Success” in 2007-2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
School Improvement Grants Webinar – Tier I and II Schools April 21, 2010.
Advertisements

Leon County Schools Performance Feedback Process August 2006 For more information
Kara Hanges, Martha Slamer, Maribeth Pennekamp, Debbie Dye, Rhonda Parker, and Kim Davidson.
Roles and Responsibilities. Collaborative Efforts to Improve Student Achievement Guidelines for developing integrated planning and decision making processes.
Goals-Based Evaluation (GBE)
Teacher Evaluation and Rewards OECD Mexico Joint Workshop December 1-2, 2009 Susan Sclafani National Center on Education and the Economy.
ESEA: Developing the Paraprofessional Portfolio Prepared by Carolyn Ellis Logan, Consultant Professional Development/Human Rights Department Michigan Education.
Educational Support Professional Evaluation Orientation August,
Cobb County Non-Profit Grant Process FY 15/16. Agenda Welcome- Karen Carter, Cobb Community Collaborative Background/Budget- Buddy Tesar/Mary Anna Gunther,
District Awards for Teacher Excellence A presentation to the ACISD Board of Trustees 4/17/08.
2013 State Accountability System Allen ISD. State Accountability under TAKS program:  Four Ratings: Exemplary, Recognized, Academically Acceptable, Academically.
A Distinction That Matters: National Board Certification ® National Board for Professional Teaching Standards ® (NBPTS)
1 Career Ladder Informational Meeting Fall
Bloom-Vernon Schools OHIO TIF Bloom-Vernon’s TIF Award Model Overview.
Finley Elementary “Believe, Achieve and Succeed” Governor’s Educator Excellence Award Program Texas Educator Excellence Grant Cycle 2.
KCTCS PERFORMANCE REVIEW PROCESS RESULTS OF KCTCS EMPLOYEE PPE SURVEY (Overall 317 faculty and 614 staff responded, a total of 931) Only 6% of.
FAMU ASSESSMENT PLAN PhD Degree Program in Entomology Dr. Lambert Kanga / CESTA.
Laredo Independent School District District Awards for Teacher Excellence (D.A.T.E) Plan
Speech/Language Pathologist Evaluation System Orientation SY14-15 Evaluation Systems Office, HR John Adams, CHRO.
TIF Award Model Overview New Boston Local School District.
A Joint Labor/Management Effort Spring Lori Chapman Labor Relations Associate Office of Faculty & Staff Labor Relations Elizabeth Sullivan Executive.
Compensation Model Supervisor Training Presented by: Jennifer Larson
Debbie C. Hester Austin ISD July 9 & 11, 2012 Texas Turnaround Center.
Teacher-Designed Incentive Pay in Texas A Presentation to the IES Research Conference by Lori L. Taylor.
BO MERRITT DIRECTOR OFFICE OF FEDERAL PROGRAMS Federal Grants Planning Titles I, II, & III.
1. Please refer to your Data Sheet: 96% The Absence Management Program allows you to: ◦ Develop strategies and tactics to improve staff attendance.
Professional Development Department Kathleen Jimenez / Administrator for Prof. Dev. Julio Cesar Martinez / CPE Specialist Textbook Voting Procedures: Proclamation.
Performance Pay in Arizona
“Teachers do make a difference…” - Jere Brophy, 1979.
Planning Time & Florida’s K-12 Comprehensive Reading Program Contractual Provisions.
Site-Based Decision Making: A Basic Overview Texas Education Agency – Resource Guide.
PDC Procedures – Individual Growth Action Plan The Individual Growth Action Plan (IGAP) is a plan each individual completes describing professional.
TEXAS LITERACY INITIATIVE.  San Antonio Independent School District (SAISD) will partner with an approved service provider to deliver literacy readiness.
Making Demonstrable Improvement: Request for Feedback (Updated) July 2015 Presented by: Ira Schwartz Assistant Commissioner of Accountability.
The world is changing. Meet the future. Every student prepared for a world yet to be imagined Provide excellent, distinctive educational experiences that.
Collective Bargaining Retreat for Management Discussion of the Impact of Measuring Teacher and Leader Effectiveness on Collective Bargaining August 17,
What you need to know about Dual Credits Team Challenge 2015.
Observations Pre observation (optional) Observations (minimum of 2 thirty minute) Post observation Rubric
ADEPT 1 SAFE-T Judgments. SAFE-T 2 What are the stages of SAFE-T? Stage I: Preparation  Stage I: Preparation  Stage II: Collection.
Title I Parent Meeting at Back-to-School Night Tri-Community Elementary School September 2, 2015.
THE 25% PLAN. Superintendents must review the performance and evaluations of all “teachers” who have been employed by the board of education for at least.
Texas Educator Excellence Grant (TEEG) Frank Borman Elementary Denton ISD.
Governor’s Educator Excellence Awards Program Plano ISD Mendenhall Elementary.
March 7, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Accountability Policy Advisory Committee.
Training for Problem Solving Teams Susan Clay Jefferson County Board of Education Fall 2014.
School Social Workers’ Evaluation System Orientation SY10-11 School Social Workers Office, SSS Paulette Herbert, Supervisor Evaluation Systems Office,
Understanding Work-Based Learning. What is Work-Based Learning? Students attend school part of the day and work part of the day  1 credit for class work.
March 15, :00pm Daryton A. Ramsey Educator Quality Grant Administrator.
Presented to:Bellefontaine City Schools RECOGNIZING TEACHING EXCELLENCE [insert district logo]
Monetary Award $120,000. Distribution of Funds for Teachers (75%) $90,000  75% of grant money will be distributed equally for teachers that are working.
Learning More About Oregon’s ESEA Waiver Plan January 23, 2013.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
INTERNAL AWARDS CRITERIA Revised September 1, 2015 Awards Committee
Texas Behavior Support Initiative: Module 6 1 Module 6: Action Planning.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
Spring 2015 OMSP Request For Proposal. Important Dates Intent to Submit: March 21, 2015 Applications: 4:30 p.m., Friday, May 15, 2015 Announcement of.
Cora Howe Annual Title I Meeting and Open House Understanding Title 1 Support for Schools September 12, 2013.
Standards-Based Teacher Education Continuous Assessment of Teacher Education Candidates.
Policy Guidelines on Awards and Recognition for the K to 12 Basic Education Program DepEd Order No. 36 , s
Longview ISD Show Me The Money
IT – Staffing and Support
Introduction to the Faculty Evaluation System
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PROCESS Daniel Dominguez-Moncada Director of Administration January 12, 2017.
WELCOME.
DESE Educator Evaluation System for Superintendents
Leader of soar Hoyt middle school.
Roles and Responsibilities
Roles and Responsibilities
PAc-28 Educational Leave of Absence
State Examples and Follow-up Data Requests for SOQ Proposals
Presentation transcript:

United South Middle School Texas Educator Grant Presentation “Aim High for Success” in

Texas Educator Excellence Grant (TEEG) UNITED SOUTH MIDDLE SCHOOL School Year The total amount for our school is $165, % of the award, which is $123,750.00, will be used for teachers. The remaining 25% of the award, which totals $ 41,250, will be used for non-teaching positions.

Summary: This model was developed by a middle school that places value on student achievement in all subject areas, teacher involvement in lesson development and professional development participation. The campus incentive plan provides teachers in all grades the opportunity to attain incentive awards. The plan uses a few data sources and determines the data source associated with the different teacher types. The minimum possible award for teachers who meet Criteria I, II and III is $ and the initial maximum possible award amount is $1,

Criteria I: Teacher has a record of improving student performance using objective and quantifiable measures by meeting performance level 1. Part I Teacher Type Data Source Performance Level (s) Award Amount(s) All Teachers Report Card Grades Level I All teachers must meet 85% passing rate of all their students at mid- term and at the end of the school year. $500.00$500.00

Sign- in sheets will need to be submitted after every meeting and should reflect a 95%attendance by teachers on a bi-monthly (for department meetings) and bi-weekly (for team meetings); unless absence is due to school business, jury duty, workers comp., FMLA approved or bereavement leave for the school year. Teacher TypeData SourcePerformance Level IAward Amount(s) All teachersSign in sheetsMeeting an overall$ minimum of 95% participation in all Campus department and faculty meetings (not more than 5 absences) for the entire school year. Criteria II: Teacher has demonstrated collaborations, which contributes directly to improving overall campus achievement by meeting performance levels 1.

Criteria III: Teacher demonstrates on going initiative, commitment, professionalism, personalization, and involvement in other activities that directly result in improved student performance. Teacher TypeData SourcePerformance Level 1Award Amount(s) All TeachersPentamationTeacher attendance for the$ Reportschool year must reflect 97% for the entire school year, (5 days for the year, half a day will count as a whole day). Unless absence is due to school business, jury duty, workers comp., FMLA approved or bereavement leave for the school year. Teacher TypeData SourcePerformance Level 2Award Amount(s) All TeachersOffice Doc.Teacher referrals must not exceed 5% for $ Level I referrals. Teacher referrals must not exceed 10% for level 2 referrals. Repeated offense for students with behavioral plans will be excluded from criteria-provided that the teacher is following the behavior plan.

Part II Additional Incentives for Campus Faculty and Staff (Please see attachment of Tier Monies) Data Source: we will use the school year employee evaluations. Performance Level: To be proficient or better on their annual evaluation.

Contingency Plan I&II If a teacher does not meet a criteria, the monies left will be redistributed among those who met the criteria specified. If a staff member does not meet the criteria, the monies will be redistributed among those who met the criteria. If the teacher meets any of the three criteria, but leaves during the course of the school year, he/she will not be eligible to receive any incentive monies from the grant. Furthermore, a teacher must remain on the United Independent School District’s payroll for the school year in order to qualify for the grant monies.

In Closing: Plan was developed and approved by United South Middle School’s Site-Based Decision Making Committee (S.B.D.M.) At United South Middle School we are, “Aiming High for Success!”