MICE Collaboration Meeting at Frascati, Jun 26~29, 2005 PID Support Design Stephanie Yang.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Team Members: Jon DixonMatt SacksDarrin BeamNathan Murray

Advertisements

Group 5 Self-Assembling Picnic Table

January 14, 2004 TJR - - UPDATED 1/25/04 1 MICE Beamline Analysis Using g4beamline Including Jan 25 Updates for Kevin’s JAN04 Beamline Design Tom Roberts.

MICE RF and Coupling Coil Module Outstanding Issues Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE Collaboration Meeting October 26, 2004.

MICE Radiation Shield Design review for the proposed ‘Direct Drive’ MICE Spectrometer Radiation Shield 17/11/2011Norbert Collomb.

MICE Collaboration meeting at RAL 26 th Oct ~ 29 th Oct, 2004 Wrap up on Radiation Shielding Module Design Stephanie Yang 26 th October, 2004.

Tutorial 4 MECH 101 Liang Tengfei Office phone : Mobile : Office hour : 14:00-15:00 Fri 1.

THE CLIENT: Mark Novak Outreach Specialist Biological Systems Engineering The Needs: Hand Controls for Safe and Reliable Lawn Tractors Design Practical.

MICE Hall – South Mezzanine Jason Tarrant - STFC l Contents »Device checks with current South Mezzanine »South Mezzanine change summary »Conclusion.

MICE Collaboration Meeting at Frascati, Jun 26~29, 2005 Iron Shield Mounting Design Stephanie Yang.

Action Who Progress made status Implement central repository for drawings -- need detector information to add to official drawing WL Progress on-going.

23 October 2005MICE Meeting at RAL1 MICE Tracker Magnets, 4 K Coolers, and Magnet Coupling during a Quench Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory.

1 Issues concerning the Design of the Tracker Solenoids Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 17 August 2005.

MICE Collaboration meeting at LBNL: 9 ~13 th Feb, 2005 Force reaction analysis Stephanie Yang Feb 10 th, 2005.

Tracker Solenoid Module Design Update Steve VirostekStephanie Yang Mike GreenWing Lau Lawrence Berkeley National LabOxford Physics MICE Collaboration Meeting.

MICE VC 17 Aug MICE MAGNETIC FIELDS & SHIELDS J. H. Cobb & H. Witte Oxford University Magnet fields for MICE (VI) calculated including magnetic shield.

1 RAL Integration Issues MICE Collaboration Meeting, Osaka, August 1-3, 2004 Elwyn Baynham, Paul Drumm, Yury Ivanyushenkov, Tony Jones RAL.

Progress on the MICE 201 MHz Cavity Design Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab RF Working Group Fermilab August 22, 2007  automatic.

MTF SLIT COMPONENTS Adjusting Blocks and Mounting Plate Steel Blocks

Background to the current problem 1. As a result of the high stresses in the bobbin due to the magnet load, the bobbin end plate needs to be increased.

The CKOV support By P Lau. Hall space available to the Ckov & TOF 0 Beam line 3.

MICE Collaboration Meeting at Frascati, Jun 26~29, 2005 Diffuser Mounting Design Stephanie Yang.

MICE Installation and Commissioning meeting RAL, 12 June 2007 Diffuser Oxford University.

1 Status of infrastructure MICE Video Conference, August 17, 2005 Yury Ivanyushenkov Applied Science Division, Engineering and Instrumentation Department.

Phone meeting on PID Detectors 25 Jan 2006 Implementation of PID detectors in the general MICE layout By Wing Lau, Oxford.

A reminder of the outstanding action list:- Implement central repository for drawings – need detector information to add to official drawing Instrumentation.

MICE AFC Group phone conference on 27 January 2005 AFC module progress By Wing Lau, Oxford.

MICE Alignment and Support Structure Tony Jones and Yury Ivanyushenkov Engineering Department RAL.

Progress status of the Cherenkov / TOF support stand & TOF Shielding cage.

G.Barber Mice Tracker Mechanical Progress Imperial Tracker Update Contents:- Components Station Layout Light Guide Map QA Patch Panel Alignment.

Chapter 19 Floors.

Joint Institute for Nuclear Research Further optimization of the solenoid design A.Efremov, E.Koshurnikov, Yu.Lobanov, A.Makarov, A.Vodopianov GSI, Darmstadt,

2 nd Year Trade Overview M. S. Martin Revised Feb

RFCC Module Design Update  automatic tuners  cavity suspension  cavity installation Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE Collaboration.

MICE Integration Engineering Jason Tarrant - STFC l Contents »Device Interfaces – General »AFC »Spectrometer Solenoids »RFCC »EMR / KL »South Mezzanine.

HCAL Mechanical Design Victor Guarino HEP-ANL. Work to date.. Have been thinking about how to construct individual modules and assemble them into a barrel.

PRY Base - Contents l PRY Support/Base/Platform in the MICE Hall l History l Requirements l Environment l Design l Structural Integrity l Preparation l.

Static Analysis Static Analysis, Internal Forces, Stresses: Normal and Shear 1.

Design & Safety Review Work Group meeting 10 March 2005 Progress update Wing Lau, Oxford.

56 MHz SRF Cavity Thermal Analysis and Vacuum Chamber Strength C. Pai

MICE Collaboration Meeting Frascati 26 – 29 June 2005 Work Group report On Design & Safety Review.

PRY Base - Contents l PRY Support/Base/Platform in the MICE Hall l Requirements l Environment l Design l Structural Integrity l Preparation l Installation.

F. Dahlgren -SC Project Review of NCSX, April 8-10, 2008 PF, TF, & Trim Coil Supports (WBS-15) Core Base Support Structure (WBS-17) F. Dahlgren NCSX Coil.

Stave C channel side closeout gluing jig S Yang WP4 monthly meeting at Liverpool University 26 th March 2014.

MICE Project Report Alan Bross (for Paul Drumm). Project Issues ● Key dates: – ISIS Synchrotron start-up scheduled for 1st August ● Shielded area around.

RICH1 Gas Enclosure Installation. Experimental Area Meeting at CERN on 21st June 2006 Bill Cameron (Imperial College London) on behalf of the RICH1 team.

1 MICE PID Group Meeting 11 May 2005 Update on Design & Safety Review Presented by Wing Lau.

Spectrometer Solenoid Fabrication Update Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab NFMCC at LBNL January 25, 2009.

G.Barber Mice Tracker Mechanical Progress Tracker Mechanical Progress Contents:- Station Space Frame Station Layout Light Guide Map Connectors Patch.

22 October 2005MICE Meeting at RAL1 Tracker Solenoid Overview Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory MICE Collaboration Meeting 22 October 2005.

FETS meeting, 14th February 2007 Peter Savage The Front End Test Stand Collaboration 1 Finalising the design of the FETS main support stands.

1 Status of infrastructure MICE Collaboration Meeting, Frascati, June 26-29, 2005 Yury Ivanyushenkov Applied Science Division, Engineering and Instrumentation.

G.Barber Mice Tracker Mechanical Ral June Tracker Mechanical Update Contents:- Station Space Frame Station Layout Connectors Patch Panel Still to.

1 MICE UK meeting at RAL 05 May 2005 Integrated Design & Safety Review Presented by.

May 31, 2010Bill Wisniewski1 Mechanical Integration Issues.

1 Implementation at RAL Iouri Ivaniouchenkov on behalf of Elwyn Baynham, Tom Bradshaw, Tony Jones, Jim Rochford Engineering Department, RAL MICE Collaboration.

12 July 2007IRENG07 WG-A M. Breidenbach1 SiD Concept SiD is relatively modest in scale compared to the LHC detectors, and comparable to SLD: Tracker Radius.

ORKA support - status report Scope of conceptual design task Develop a conceptual design for how to support the ORKA detector inside the CDF detector Develop.

Status of the Yoke Interfaces Presented by Evgeny Koshurnikov February 2013.

K.Long/G.Barber Mice Tracker Mechanical Status CM20 Feb 08 1 Mice Tracker Mechanical Status Contents:- Tracker 1 Status Tracker 2 Status Further Hardware.

Radiation Shutter Re-Purposing Roy Preece STFC RAL 18 th December 2014.

Update on PANDA solenoid design

Status of the PANDA Magnet mechanics (yoke & cryostat)

STRAW TRACKER SYSTEM CAD STATUS :

Solenoid Yoke Door-Barrel Connection

Escalator Installation

Present status of the flux return yoke design

MICE Partial Return Yoke Mechanical Design

Spectrometer Solenoid Fabrication Status and Schedule

SiD Engineering Status Report

Presentation transcript:

MICE Collaboration Meeting at Frascati, Jun 26~29, 2005 PID Support Design Stephanie Yang

S Yang, 26-Jun Why a common support structure for the PID equipments: There is very little space along the beam line direction for the accommodation of the PID equipments; As a result, they need to be packed quite closely to each other. These “lollipop” looks like are unstable and unsafe to work with; It was agreed that the TOF2, the Cherenkov 2 and the EmCalorimeter are to be mounted on a common support structure. The common support maximises the space utilisation and provides a reliable and safe working environment

S Yang, 26-Jun The existing support provision for the PID equipment

S Yang, 26-Jun Iron Shield suspended off the tracker solenoid cryostat The revised PID support structure TOF 2 Cherenkov 2 EMCalorimeter PID support can slide in and out of normal anchor position in both X & Z directions X Y Z

S Yang, 26-Jun Elevation view of the support structure End view of the support structure The PID support Structure

S Yang, 26-Jun Cherenkov Connection details at the PID seating locations

S Yang, 26-Jun Support details at the Cherenkov 2 Support is via two 125 x 125 x 10 C-Channels bolted on existing Cherenkov outer frame Shim pack to adjust the final height

S Yang, 26-Jun Support arrangement for the TOF2 Seating plate is via a 10mm thick plate welded to the end of the C-channel TOF support legs: 50 x 50 x 4mm thick C- channel

S Yang, 26-Jun Support channels bolted to the TOF 2 outer frame

S Yang, 26-Jun CKOV2 drawing received from Ghislain in Feb,2005 TOF2 drawing received from Maurizio in Feb, 2005

S Yang, 26-Jun

S Yang, 26-Jun Similar support arrangement for the EMCalorimeter EmC drawing received from Ludovico on 15 th Jun,2005.

S Yang, 26-Jun How strong is this structure? The structure is made up of a series of C-channel and L - beams; The main load bearing beams are 75 x 75 mm wide with 6 mm thick; The heaviest component (the Cherenkov) weighs about 1 to 1.5 tonnes and sits on the mid span of the main support beam. A quick calculation, using twice the load and a conservative support condition (load at mid-span) showed an acceptable stress (131 MPa compared with an allowable of over 240 MPa) and deflection of 0.4mm;

S Yang, 26-Jun What next? The design was done based on support being able to move in and out of the normal operation position by rail. Features associating with this will be worked out once the railing design is complete There may be access requirements that we are not aware of; We now need to go through the design with the PID group leaders to see if there is any particular need they wish to see on the structure; We believe the design is fit for its purpose.