Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

MICE Collaboration meeting at LBNL: 9 ~13 th Feb, 2005 Force reaction analysis Stephanie Yang Feb 10 th, 2005.

Published by Modified over 8 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "MICE Collaboration meeting at LBNL: 9 ~13 th Feb, 2005 Force reaction analysis Stephanie Yang Feb 10 th, 2005."— Presentation transcript:

1 MICE Collaboration meeting at LBNL: 9 ~13 th Feb, 2005 Force reaction analysis Stephanie Yang Feb 10 th, 2005

2 Estimate the module displacement and force reactions under the unbalance magnetic forces. FEA modelling of the super module. The FEA model consists of 3 AFC and 2 RFCC modules. Connecting bolts are modelled between the AFC module and RFCC module Objectives Magnetic force profile on 7 different cases were generated by Yury. All those cases have been studied and their results are summarized.

3 Case No. Forces (MN) AFC 1RFCC 1AFC 2RFCC 2AFC 3 1-0.088-0.21400.2140.088 20.0370.1860-0.186-0.037 30-0.21100.2110 4-0.3980000.398 50.312-0.31300.313-0.312 6-0.0840.095-0.31300.401 7-0.0878-0.22130.00090.3057-0.3121 Force profile received from Yury in January 2005

4 MICE cooling channel FEA model with the loading and boundary conditions Case 1:Forces (in MN) for Flip mode, Stage 6, p=240 MeV/c, β=42cm

5 Case 1: FEA result Max displacement: 0.114mm Max stress: 37MPa Max reaction force in Y direction at the support base is 44548 N

6 Case No.Max stress MPa Max displacement mm Max horizontal reaction force N Max vertical reaction force N 1 370.1142914844548 2 280.0752158833201 3 260.0632067231797 4 890.2913700555633 5 700.16437479213 6 880.286683346302 7 690.225069885550 FEA result summary

7 Sensitivity study has also carried out to exam whether there is any impact by opening a big access hole on each side of the RF support plate. Max displacement: 0.138mm Max stress: 45MPa The FEA results show that the max displacement is increased from 0.114mm to 0.138mm, and the max stress is increased from 37MPa to 45 MPa. Sensitivity Study Case

8 Conclusion The reaction forces on the support base of the Cooling channel indicates that: The majority of the horizontal reaction forces are being absorbed by the RFCC supports. The loads on AFC is passed through the connecting vessel flanges to the adjacent RFCC shell, rather than through its own support legs. We believe, there is no need to transmit the magnet forces from the Cooling Channel directly to the tracker solenoid as the super module (3 AFC modules & 2 Coupling Coil modules) are more than capable of sustaining the forces without any excessive sway. The support legs have to be strong enough to minimize the module movement due to the magnetic forces.

Download ppt "MICE Collaboration meeting at LBNL: 9 ~13 th Feb, 2005 Force reaction analysis Stephanie Yang Feb 10 th, 2005."

Similar presentations

MICE RF and Coupling Coil Module Outstanding Issues Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE Collaboration Meeting October 26, 2004.

MICE RF and Coupling Coil Module Outstanding Issues Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE Collaboration Meeting October 26, 2004.
MICE Collaboration meeting at RAL 26 th Oct ~ 29 th Oct, 2004 Wrap up on Radiation Shielding Module Design Stephanie Yang 26 th October, 2004.

MICE Collaboration meeting at RAL 26 th Oct ~ 29 th Oct, 2004 Wrap up on Radiation Shielding Module Design Stephanie Yang 26 th October, 2004.
Vacuum Vessel Production Readiness Review

Vacuum Vessel Production Readiness Review
MICE RF Cavity Design and Fabrication Update Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE Collaboration Meeting October 27, 2004.

MICE RF Cavity Design and Fabrication Update Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE Collaboration Meeting October 27, 2004.
MICE Absorber cryostat Forces and power dissipation - for normal operation and during a magnet quench Elwyn Baynham James Rochford MICE Meeting November.

MICE Absorber cryostat Forces and power dissipation - for normal operation and during a magnet quench Elwyn Baynham James Rochford MICE Meeting November.
MICE Collaboration Meeting at Frascati, Jun 26~29, 2005 Iron Shield Mounting Design Stephanie Yang.

MICE Collaboration Meeting at Frascati, Jun 26~29, 2005 Iron Shield Mounting Design Stephanie Yang.
Update on ARIES-CS Coil Structural Analysis X.R. Wang and A.R. Raffray ARIES Meeting PPPL, NJ October 4-5, 2006.

Update on ARIES-CS Coil Structural Analysis X.R. Wang and A.R. Raffray ARIES Meeting PPPL, NJ October 4-5, 2006.
Integration of Cavities and Coupling Coil Modules Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE Collaboration Meeting March 28 – April 1, 2004.

Integration of Cavities and Coupling Coil Modules Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE Collaboration Meeting March 28 – April 1, 2004.
Action Who Progress made status Implement central repository for drawings -- need detector information to add to official drawing WL Progress on-going.

Action Who Progress made status Implement central repository for drawings -- need detector information to add to official drawing WL Progress on-going.
A simple clamping device for the Solid absorber Wing Lau, Oxford.

A simple clamping device for the Solid absorber Wing Lau, Oxford.
MICE RF and Coupling Coil Module Integration Issues Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE Collaboration Meeting October 27, 2004.

MICE RF and Coupling Coil Module Integration Issues Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE Collaboration Meeting October 27, 2004.
Progress on the MICE Cooling Channel Solenoid Magnet System

Progress on the MICE Cooling Channel Solenoid Magnet System
23 October 2005MICE Meeting at RAL1 MICE Tracker Magnets, 4 K Coolers, and Magnet Coupling during a Quench Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory.

23 October 2005MICE Meeting at RAL1 MICE Tracker Magnets, 4 K Coolers, and Magnet Coupling during a Quench Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory.
Installation Issues Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE CM23 at ICST, Harbin January 13, 2009.

Installation Issues Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE CM23 at ICST, Harbin January 13, 2009.
Module Vessel Connection Concept Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory AFC Module Meeting April 23, 2004.

Module Vessel Connection Concept Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory AFC Module Meeting April 23, 2004.
1 Issues concerning the Design of the Tracker Solenoids Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 17 August 2005.

1 Issues concerning the Design of the Tracker Solenoids Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 17 August 2005.
1 Update on Focus Coil Design and Configuration M. A. Green, G. Barr, W. Lau, R. S. Senanayake, and S. Q. Yang University of Oxford Department of Physics.

1 Update on Focus Coil Design and Configuration M. A. Green, G. Barr, W. Lau, R. S. Senanayake, and S. Q. Yang University of Oxford Department of Physics.
MICE RF Module Safety Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE Collaboration Meeting February 12, 2005.

MICE RF Module Safety Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE Collaboration Meeting February 12, 2005.
Tracker Solenoid Module Design Update Steve VirostekStephanie Yang Mike GreenWing Lau Lawrence Berkeley National LabOxford Physics MICE Collaboration Meeting.

Tracker Solenoid Module Design Update Steve VirostekStephanie Yang Mike GreenWing Lau Lawrence Berkeley National LabOxford Physics MICE Collaboration Meeting.
Module Connection and Support Arrangement Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory AFC Module Meeting May 21, 2004.

Module Connection and Support Arrangement Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory AFC Module Meeting May 21, 2004.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google