© Crown copyright Met Office Cost benefit studies for observing systems Stuart Goldstraw, Met Office, CBS-RA3-TECO-RECO, 13 th September 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WMO Interactions on Ocean Matters Weather and Disaster Risk Reduction Services Department Marine Meteorology and Ocean Affairs Division.
Advertisements

WMO WMO Integrated Global Observing System (WIGOS) CBS EXPERT TEAM ON AIRCRAFT-BASED OBSERVING SYSTEMS 1st Session (Geneva, September, 2013) Dr I.
WMO CBS in support of DRR 2013 Coordination Meeting of DRR FP October 2013, Geneva Mr Michel Jean CBS DRR Coordinator.
1 Links between DAOS-WG and ET-EGOS John Eyre (Chair ET-EGOS) DAOS-WG, 4 th meeting, Exeter, June 2011.
© The Aerospace Corporation 2014 Observation Impact on WRF Model Forecast Accuracy over Southwest Asia Michael D. McAtee Environmental Satellite Systems.
WMO Outcomes & Recommendations of the Workshop on Radar Data Exchange WMO; Name of Department (ND)
EUCOS The EUMETNET Composite Observing System Stuart Goldstraw – EUCOS Operations Manager Thanks to Jacqui Rogers, EUCOS Technical Co-ordinator.
© Crown copyright Met Office Impact experiments using the Met Office global and regional model Presented by Richard Dumelow to the WMO workshop, Geneva,
© Crown copyright Met Office Breakout sessions Stuart Goldstraw, UK Met Office, Chair ET-SBO-1, July 2013.
Slide 1 Evaluation of observation impact and observation error covariance retuning Cristina Lupu, Carla Cardinali, Tony McNally ECMWF, Reading, UK WWOSC.
Climate quality data and datasets from VOS and VOSClim Elizabeth Kent and David Berry National Oceanography Centre, Southampton.
Dr Mark Cresswell Model Assimilation 69EG6517 – Impacts & Models of Climate Change.
GOES Users’ Conference The Role of Geostationary Satellites in WMO’s Global Observing System Dr. Donald E. Hinsman Senior Scientific Officer WMO Satellite.
Details for Today: DATE:18 th November 2004 BY:Mark Cresswell FOLLOWED BY:Literature exercise Model Assimilation 69EG3137 – Impacts & Models of Climate.
Korea Institute of Atmospheric Prediction Systems (KIAPS) ( 재 ) 한국형수치예보모델개발사업단 Observation impact in East Asia and western North Pacific regions using.
Slide: 1 27 th CEOS Plenary |Montréal | November 2013 Agenda item: 29 Adrian Simmons, Chair of the GCOS Steering Committee Update from the Global.
Earth Science Division National Aeronautics and Space Administration 18 January 2007 Paper 5A.4: Slide 1 American Meteorological Society 21 st Conference.
© Crown copyright Met Office Requirements, objectives and desired outcomes for the Workshop Stuart Goldstraw, CBS IOS ET-SBO Chair, 24 th April 2013.
The vertical resolution of the IASI assimilation system – how sensitive is the analysis to the misspecification of background errors? Fiona Hilton and.
AMDAR Global Status, Benefits and Development Plans* WMO CBS ET Aircraft Based Observations Bryce Ford * Adapted from Presentation at WMO Congress XVII,
Page 1 Pacific THORPEX Predictability, 6-7 June 2005© Crown copyright 2005 The THORPEX Interactive Grand Global Ensemble David Richardson Met Office, Exeter.
Page 1© Crown copyright 2004 Quality Management of a European Wind Profiler Network (CWINDE) Tim Oakley TECO-05 Bucharest, 4 th -7 th May.
11 March 2013 Tim Oakley, GCOS Implementation Manager WIGOS TT Metadata Global Climate Observing System.
Development and Implementation of the WIGOS Data Quality Monitoring System (WDQMS) Doc. 4.4 ICG-WIGOS Task Team on the Plan for the WIGOS Pre- operational.
WE Surface-based GOS for Weather January 2008 Up-date.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Accounting for Change: Local wind forecasts from the high-
Lars Peter Riishojgaard WIGOS Project Manager, WMO Chair, OPAG-IOS WMO Commission for Basic Systems 10th Symposium on Environmental Satellites 1.
© Crown copyright Met Office Benefit of high resolution data assimilation and observing systems in the Met Office UK NWP model G.T. Dow and B. Macpherson.
Course Evaluation Closes June 8th.
© Crown copyright 2007 Optimal distribution of polar-orbiting sounding missions John EyreMet Office, UK CGMS-40; Lugano, Switzerland;5-9 Nov 2012.
Weather forecasting by computer Michael Revell NIWA
Slide 1 VAISALA Award Lecture Characterising the FY-3A Microwave Temperature Sounder Using the ECMWF Model Qifeng Lu, William Bell, Peter Bauer, Niels.
WMO AMDAR Programme Overview Bryce Ford - presenting on behalf of WMO and NOAA FPAW Nov 1, 2012.
Omar Baddour Chief World Climate Data and Monitoring WMO, Geneva WMO Climate Watch System Common Alerting Protocol (CAP) Implementation.
Page 1 Developments in regional DA Oct 2007 © Crown copyright 2007 Mark Naylor, Bruce Macpherson, Richard Renshaw, Gareth Dow Data Assimilation and Ensembles,
The Polar Prediction Workshop, Oslo, Norway, 6-8 October 2010.
Sean Healy Presented by Erik Andersson
Model Adjoint Sensitivity Impacts 1. 2 Operational ECMWF system September to December Averaged over all model layers and entire global atmosphere.
1 EUCOS Fourth WMO Workshop on the Impact of Various Observing Systems on Numerical Weather Prediction May 2008, WMO, Geneva, Switzerland Stefan.
World Meteorological Organization Working together in weather, climate and water ICG-WIGOS 5 Progress on WIGOS activities within CBS WMO Dr. Jochen Dibbern.
Atmospheric Reanalyses Background and History: Background and History: “Analysis” for weather prediction (automated for NWP) “Analysis” for weather prediction.
REVIEW OF OUTCOMES FROM THE 2 nd WIGOS Workshop on Quality Monitoring and Incident Management ICG-WIGOS-5 WMO; OBS/WIGOS.
Weather Science and Airport Applications Jonathan Dutton 23 rd June 2015.
Seamless forecasting in time, space and complexity
Assessing ACCESS-G Global Data Assimilation Using Adjoint-Based Forecast Sensitivity to Observations Jin LEE 1 and Paul GREGORY 2 Centre for Australian.
Station lists and bias corrections Jemma Davie, Colin Parrett, Richard Renshaw, Peter Jermey © Crown Copyright 2012 Source: Met Office© Crown copyright.
© Crown copyright Met Office Report of the Chair Stuart Goldstraw, UK Met Office, Chair ET-SBO-1, July 2013.
WMO Polar and High Mountain activities GLOBAL CRYOSPHERE WATCH
GCOS Welcome and Update
Towards the WIGOS Vision 2040: the surface-based component
ET-SBO Report to ICT-IOS-9
From a European Commission perspective
Steps towards evaluating the cost-benefit of observing systems
User Requirements for Climate Monitoring
SFSPA and OPA Document No. 4
OSSEs for Pacific Predictability Josh Hacker, NCAR
The WMO Rolling Review of Requirements
Challenge: High resolution models need high resolution observations
Impact of adjusting the times of radiosonde launches
ICG-WIGOS January 2017 CAeM Report Jitze van der Meulen
Strengthening climate applications in developing countries
Meteorological Observation Center of CMA
The WMO RRR Process and the Role of the Vision Jochen Dibbern, Chair CBS OPAG-IOS Workshop Surface Vision for WIGOS 2040, Geneva, October 2016.
Andrew Charlton-Perez; Sally Wolkowski; R. Giles Harrison
Workshop (… 2016) WIGOS Project Office
European Meteorological Society Annual Meeting 2017 WMO Competency Framework – what does it mean for Weather Broadcasters? Gerald Fleming Head of Forecasting,
Status of Existing Observing Networks
The WMO Global Basic Observing Network (GBON) Lars Peter Riishojgaard
Presentation transcript:

© Crown copyright Met Office Cost benefit studies for observing systems Stuart Goldstraw, Met Office, CBS-RA3-TECO-RECO, 13 th September 2014

© Crown copyright Met Office Contents This presentation covers the following areas Background The cost – benefit chain Introducing the FSO Tool Some results for the Met Office Discussion and Next Steps

© Crown copyright Met Office Background CBS-14 established IPET-OSDE as part of the structure of OPAG-IOS. WIGOS Network Design Principles, as discussed at the CBS-Ext Session include the following: 5. DESIGNING COST-EFFECTIVE NETWORKS Observing networks should be designed to make the most cost-effective use of available resources. This will include the use of composite observing networks. This presentation is based on the paper presented by John Eyre to IPET-OSDE-1 in March 2014 and the subsequent work undertaken John Eyre and Rebecca Reid.

© Crown copyright Met Office Why study cost benefit for observing systems? Society benefits from the Services we provide too them These Services are developed using the outputs obtained from 12 recognised WMO Application Areas Observing Systems are developed and operated to meet the requirements of these Application Areas Observing Systems have costs associated with them The requirements of Society, our Services and Application Areas have evolved and will continue to evolve with time Therefore we need to optimise the investment in observing systems to ensure we meet the changing needs of Society.

© Crown copyright 2007 The cost-benefit chain Observing Systems Impact per cost Services Application Areas Society Indirect users of observations M$ cost M$ societal benefit Benefit per impact Direct users of observations Direct users of Services Direct users of Application outputs Remote users of observations

12 WMO Application Areas Global NWP Regional NWP Nowcasting and VSR Forecasting Sub-seasonal and longer range forecasting Aeronautical Meteorology Atmospheric Chemistry Ocean Applications Agricultural Meteorology Hydrology GCOS Climate Applications Space Weather © Crown copyright Met Office

The four stages to cost benefit impact The costs of Observing Systems The impact of observations on Application Areas The impact of Application Areas on Services The benefit of Services to Society

© Crown copyright Met Office Focus on the first two components The costs of Observing Systems The impact of observations on Application Areas The impact of Application Areas on Services The benefit of Services to Society

© Crown copyright Met Office Simplify the challenge further The costs of UK Observing Systems The impact of observations on Global NWP The impact of Application Areas on Services The benefit of Services to Society

© Crown copyright Met Office Considering the Global NWP Application Area Developments in Data Assimilation methodologies have allowed the community to develop new observations impact tools. The Forecast Sensitivity to Observations (FSO) tool can provide an indication of the relative impact of observations on forecast skill We also understand the costs of the observing systems we operate Therefore we can determine a relative impact per cost of the observing system, the first two steps in the benefit chain.

© Crown copyright Met Office The Adjoint-based FSO Method The change in forecast error at T+24 is entirely due to the assimilation of observations at T+0. Slide courtesy of Richard Marriott

© Crown copyright Met Office FSO evaluation – total impact Total impact of observations by type, period April- July 2013 Negative impacts show an improvement in forecast skill

© Crown copyright Met Office © Crown copyright 2007 FSO Evaluation – impact per observation Impact per observation by type, period April- July 2013 Negative impacts show an improvement in forecast skill

© Crown copyright Met Office Costs of Met Office Observing Programmes in 2013 in US$ AMDAR* ASAP* Drifting Buoys Moored Buoys Ship Obs Surface Synoptic Wind Profilers^ GPS IWV Radiosonde^ $0.47M $0.33M $0.07M $1.53M $0.87M $6.77M $0.27M $0.19M $1.75M

© Crown copyright Met Office Impact of global observations and use of Met Office costs

© Crown copyright Met Office Firstly considering the total impact Radiosonde, AMDAR and Synops are showing largest impact

© Crown copyright Met Office Secondly considering the impact per observation Moored buoys, Ship Obs and Synops showing similar impact

© Crown copyright Met Office Finally considering impact per cost AMDAR and Drifting Buoys show high impact per $

Distribution of buoy observations © Crown copyright Met Office

Distribution of synop and ship obs © Crown copyright Met Office

Interpretation of results Impacts must be taken in the context of the total current ‘system’: the observing system; the Data Assimilation system and the Model version. Impacts should be interpreted as "the effective impact which those observations are having in the presence of all other observations" (RM 2013) Impacts only represent the change in error of our chosen forecast metric – i.e. the global moist energy norm on 24- hour forecasts. Impacts should be averaged over many cases, in this case 4 runs a day for 3 months.

© Crown copyright Met Office Considering the three layers of detail together provides a fuller evaluation of the value of networks Important to avoid misinterpretation of results: e.g. ‘high impact per cost’ does not imply ‘invest here’ Results may help to advise evolutionary changes in network design, if they are considered in full context. They can provide a ‘top level’ analysis, and be considered alongside individual characteristics of the observation types of interest (e.g. data quality, location, etc) This analysis is presented as a first, tentative step at evaluating ‘cost benefit’ of observing networks – remembering the specificity of the metric Discussion Points

© Crown copyright Met Office Improved estimates of the global, or regional costs of component observing systems are required. Results need to be generalised across multiple Global NWP centres. Development of methodologies to determine impacts across the other 11 WMO Application Areas. Development of methodologies to distribute costs of observing systems that serve more than one application area in a weighted manner. Further development of the end to end cost to benefits methodology – building on existing work, some of which has been highlighted this week. What are the next steps

© Crown copyright Met Office Acknowledgement This presentation could not have been made with the ongoing work being undertaken by John Eyre and Rebecca Reid and the previous work and advice of Richard Marriot.

© Crown copyright Met Office Thank you for your time