University of Peshawar 13 th QEC Meeting August 18-19,2009, Karachi.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Assessment Report Computer Science School of Science and Mathematics Kad Lakshmanan Chair Sandeep R. Mitra Assessment Coordinator.
Advertisements

THIS WORKSHOP WILL ADDRESS WHY THE FOLLOWING ARE IMPORTANT: 1. A comprehensive rationale for funding; 2. Measurable objectives and performance indicators/performance.
How to Use SBP Curricular Criteria for public health bachelor’s degrees in PHP and SPH Reviews March 2015 Arlington, VA.
Results of the Faculty Survey on Internationalization at Villanova: A Preliminary Report Prepared for the International Leadership Committee Prepared by.
Gateway Engineering Education Coalition Engineering Accreditation and ABET EC2000 Part II OSU Outcomes Assessment for ABET EC200.
David S. Adegboye, PhD Professor of Biology Associate Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs & SACS Liaison University Professional Conference August 18,
Quality Enhancement Cell Dr. Dawar Hameed Mughal Director.
Laboratory Personnel Dr/Ehsan Moahmen Rizk.
Accreditation Strategy for the BYU CE En Dept. Presentation to External Review Board October 20, 2000.
Process Management Robert A. Sedlak, Ph.D Provost and Vice Chancellor, UW-Stout Education Community of Practice Conference At Tusside in Turkey September.
College Strategic Plan by
SEQUENCE OF MEETING  Welcome Note by the Rector  Confirmation of Minutes of 1st Meeting  Progress on Agenda Items of 1st Meeting  Discussion on Fresh.
Computer Science Accreditation/Assessment Issues Bolek Mikolajczak UMass Dartmouth, CIS Department Chair IT Forum, Framingham, MA January 10, 2006.
College Strategic Plan by Strategic Planning and Quality Assurance Committee.
Program Assessment Team Visit Exit Meeting. Mechanical Engineering Program.
University of Health Sciences, Lahore 2nd Meeting of Phase-III QECs [Reporting Period: July – Nov 2010 Presented By: Prof. Dr. Arif Rashid Khawaja FRCS(Ed),
Graduate Program Review Prof. Emad Ali. Major Review Steps Self-study Report External evaluation Apply actions for improvement.
University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore 12 th Meeting of QECs Heads By Dawar Hameed Mughal Deputy Director QEC
QUALITY ASSURANCE IN HIGHER EDUCATION
Assessment College of Engineering A Key for Accreditation February 11, 2009.
وحدة الاعتماد الأكاديمي 8/16/2015. ACCREDITATION Dr. ABD EL-SLAM HEMAID BADR A.A.U. DIRECTOR COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING JAZAN UNIVERSITY 8/16/2015.
Academic Assessment Report for the Academic Year Antioch University New England Office of Academic Assessment Tom Julius, Ed.D., Director Submitted.
Enhancing the Quality of Education through Self Assessment Procedures
QEC initiates SA through the dean one semester prior to the assessment Department forms the PT that will be responsible for preparing SAR QEC reviews.
Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges of the Western Association of Schools and Colleges.
The Program Review Process What is Instructional Program Review?
Periodic Program Review for Academics Affirming Excellence in Education LaMont Rouse Executive Director of Assessment, Accreditation & Compliance.
AL-QADISIYIA UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT Submitted by SAR committee.
Prof. György BAZSA, former president Hungarian Accreditation Committee (HAC) CUBRIK Workshop IV Beograd, 13 March, 2012 European Standards and Guidelines.
SELF ASSESSMENT CRITERIA 1.Program Mission Objectives and Outcomes 2.Curriculum Design and Organization 3.Laboratories and Computing Facilities 4.Student.
QUALITY ENHANCEMENT CELL University of the Punjab Current Location: Institute of Quality & Technology Management.
IN THE NAME OF ALLAH, THE MOST MERCIFUL, THE MOST BENEFICENT.
Quality Enhancement Cell University of Veterinary & Animal Sciences, Lahore 10 th Meeting of QECs Heads By Dr. Muhammad Aleem Director QEC
IN THE NAME OF ALLAH, THE MOST MERCIFUL, THE MOST BENEFICENT.
The Redesigned Elements of Statistics Course University of West Florida March 2008.
 Introduction Introduction  Contents of the report Contents of the report  Assessment : Objectives OutcomesObjectivesOutcomes  The data :
SELF ASSESSMENT CRITERIA 1.Program Mission Objectives and Outcomes 2.Curriculum Design and Organization 3.Laboratories and Computing Facilities 4.Student.
PTEU Conceptual Framework Overview. Collaborative Development of Expertise in Teaching, Learning and Leadership Conceptual Framework Theme:
Venue: M038 Date: Monday Sep 26,2011 Time: 10:00 AM JIC ABET WORKSHOP No.7 How to write the Self-Study Report ? Presented by: JIC ABET COMMITTEE.
WHO Global Standards. 5 Key Areas for Global Standards Program graduates Program graduates Program development and revision Program development and revision.
SHORTER COLLEGE Assessment Week Sponsored by the Office of Institutional Effectiveness and Assessment & the Division of Academic Affairs.
Management in relation to learning processes Proposal Sources: ANECA, CHEA, DETC.
ABET 2000 Preparation: the Final Stretch Carnegie Institute of Technology Department Heads Retreat July 29, 1999.
Columbia University School of Engineering and Applied Science Review and Planning Process Fall 1998.
Dr. Amina M R El-Nemer Lecturer Maternity and Obstetric Nursing Dep. IQAP Manager Program Specification.
ABET is Coming! What I need to know about ABET, but was afraid to ask.
2 LATEST STATUS OF FACULTY OF ISLAMIC STUDIES DepartmentProgram TeamsSAR Received Sent Back For Changes SAR Received After Improvement Audit Completed.
Continuous Improvement. Focus of the Review: Continuous Improvement The unit will engage in continuous improvement between on-site visits. Submit annual.
Peer Reviewer - Basic Workshop 2 Prof Hala Salah Consultant in NQAAP Prof Hussein El-Maghraby Member, NQAAP.
Assessing Student Learning Workshop for Department Chairs & Program Directors Workshop for Department Chairs & Program Directors January 9, 2007.
ABET ACCRIDITATION STATUS AND TASKS AHEAD By Dr. Abdul Azeem.
Criterion 1 – Program Mission, Objectives and Outcomes Weight = 0.05 Factors Score 1 Does the program have documented measurable objectives that support.
Quality assurance and graduate student support Fred L Hall Former Dean of Graduate Studies at University of Calgary, McMaster University,
SZABIST INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH DEPARTMENT QUALITY ENHANCEMENT CELL.
Graduate Program Completer Evaluation Feedback 2008.
1 Department of Plant Protection Submission of initial Draft of Self Assessment Report Initial Draft of Self Assessment Report was returned.
Success in the Online Environment Lawrence C. Ragan, Ph.D., Penn State’s World Campus Mount St. Vincent University April 12th 2005.
Quality Assurance in Higher Education
Workshop 1 Self-Assessment Committee (SAC)
Department of Political Science & Sociology North South University
Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology
Department of Statistics
by Salih O. Duffuaa Professor of Systems Engineering KFUPM
Time Line for Program Reviews
Program Review Workshop
Understanding and Preparing for Accreditation
Time Line for Program Reviews
GC University Lahore Quality Enhancement Cell
Program Modification “Academic Year 2019” Assumption University
Quality Enhancement Cell QEC Progress: An Overview
Presentation transcript:

University of Peshawar 13 th QEC Meeting August 18-19,2009, Karachi

Self Assessment Documentation The Department of Geography was the first department selected for Pilot study. The SAR was submitted, AT constituted but the reports of the AT are still awaited. As a result of which further processing of the document is delayed.

Many letters from QEC were sent to the HoD for writing the SARs but no one produced SARs of their programs. Finally the Vice Chancellor and Registrar were requested to intervene and instruct the HoDs to do the needful.

Despite letters sent from the Registrar, only four out of 33 departments namely, Institute of Chemical Sciences, Departments of Psychology, Statistics and History complied and submitted their SARs about three weeks before. The SAR of Department of History was returned for resubmission since it did not follow the manual and was not worth presentation.

The QEC (QEC means only the Director) has just started scrutiny of these documents according to the checklist provided in the workshop on program assessment of quality, held on April 15-16, 2009 in Lahore. Brief description of the status of implementation of these individual SARs is given as follows:

INSTITUTE OF CHEMICAL SCIENCES

Department/Program: INSTITUTE OF CHEMICAL SCIENCES Criteria and associated standardsAddressedNot Addressed Criterion 1- Program Mission, Objectives and Outcomes Standard 1-1Program Measurable Objectives X Table 4.1 Program Objectives assessment X Standard 1-2Program Outcomes X Table 4.2 Outcome vs. Objectives X Employer Survey X Alumni Survey X Graduating Student Survey X Standard 1-3Assessment Results and Implementation Plans X Standard 1-4Overall Performance Using Quantifiable Measures X

Department/Program: INSTITUTE OF CHEMICAL SCIENCES Criteria and associated standardsAddressedNot Addressed Criterion 2- Curriculum Design and Organization Standard 2-1Courses vs. Objectives X Table 4.3 Curriculum course requirement X Table 4.4 Course vs. Outcomes X Standard 2-2 Theory, Problem Analysis/Solution & Design in Program X Table 5.4 Standard 2-2 requirements X Standard 2-3Mathematics and Basic Science s requirements X Standard 2-4Major requirements as specified by Accreditation Body X Standard 2-5Humanities, Social Sciences, Arts, Ethical, Professional & other requirements X Standard 2-6I.T. Content Integration Throughout the Program X Standard 2-7Communication Skills (Oral & Written) X

Department/Program: INSTITUTE OF CHEMICAL SCIENCES Criteria and associated standardsAddressedNot Addressed Criterion 3- Laboratories and Computing Facilities Standard 3-1Lab Manuals/Documentation/Instructions X Standard 3-2Adequate Support Personnel X Standard 3-3Adequate Computing Infrastructure and Facilities X Criterion 4-Student Support and Advising Standard 4-1Sufficient Frequency of Course Offering X Standard 4-2Effective Faculty/Student Interaction X Standard 4-3Professional Advising and Counseling X Criterion 5-Process Control Standard 5-1Admission Process X Standard 5-2Registration and Student X Standard 5-3Faculty Recruitment and Retention Process X Standard 5-4Effective Teaching and learning Process X Standard 5-5Program Requirements Completion process X

Department/Program: INSTITUTE OF CHEMICAL SCIENCES Criteria and associated standardsAddressedNot Addressed Criterion 6- Faculty Standard 6-1Program Faculty Qualification and Number X Faculty resumes in accordance with HEC format X Table 4.6 Faculty distribution by program’s area X Standard 6-2Current Faculty, Scholarly Activities and Development X Standard 6-3Faculty Motivation & Job Satisfaction X Faculty Survey X Criterion 7-Institutional Facilities Standard 7-1New Trends in Learning (e.g.; E-learning) X Standard 7-2Library Collection & Staff X Standard 7-3Class Rooms & Offices Adequacy X Criterion 8- Institutional Support Standard 8-1Support and Financial Resources X Standard 8-2Number & Quality of GSS, RAs, & PhD Students X Standard 8-3Financial Support for Library, Labs & Computing Facilities X

DEPARTMENT OF PSYCHOLOGY

Department/Program: DEPARTMENT OF PSYCHOLOGY Criteria and associated standardsAddressedNot Addressed Criterion 1- Program Mission, Objectives and Outcomes Standard 1-1Program Measurable Objectives X Table 4.1 Program Objectives assessment X Standard 1-2Program Outcomes X Table 4.2 Outcome vs. Objectives X Employer Survey X Alumni Survey X Graduating Student Survey X Standard 1-3Assessment Results and Implementation Plans X Standard 1-4Overall Performance Using Quantifiable Measures X

Department/Program: DEPARTMENT OF PSYCHOLOGY Criteria and associated standardsAddressedNot Addressed Criterion 2- Curriculum Design and Organization Standard 2-1Courses vs. Objectives X Table 4.3 Curriculum course requirement X Table 4.4 Course vs. Outcomes X Standard 2-2 Theory, Problem Analysis/Solution & Design in Program X Table 5.4 Standard 2-2 requirements X Standard 2-3Mathematics and Basic Science s requirements X Standard 2-4Major requirements as specified by Accreditation Body X Standard 2-5Humanities, Social Sciences, Arts, Ethical, Professional & other requirements X Standard 2-6I.T. Content Integration Throughout the Program X Standard 2-7Communication Skills (Oral & Written) X

Department/Program: DEPARTMENT OF PSYCHOLOGY Criteria and associated standardsAddressedNot Addressed Criterion 3- Laboratories and Computing Facilities Standard 3-1Lab Manuals/Documentation/Instructions X Standard 3-2Adequate Support Personnel X Standard 3-3Adequate Computing Infrastructure and Facilities X Criterion 4-Student Support and Advising Standard 4-1Sufficient Frequency of Course Offering X Standard 4-2Effective Faculty/Student Interaction X Standard 4-3Professional Advising and Counseling X Criterion 5-Process Control Standard 5-1Admission Process X Standard 5-2Registration and Student X Standard 5-3Faculty Recruitment and Retention Process X Standard 5-4Effective Teaching and learning Process X Standard 5-5Program Requirements Completion process X

Department/Program: DEPARTMENT OF PSYCHOLOGY Criteria and associated standardsAddressedNot Addressed Criterion 6- Faculty Standard 6-1Program Faculty Qualification and Number X Faculty resumes in accordance with HEC format X Table 4.6 Faculty distribution by program’s area X Standard 6-2Current Faculty, Scholarly Activities and Development X Standard 6-3Faculty Motivation & Job Satisfaction X Faculty Survey X Criterion 7-Institutional Facilities Standard 7-1New Trends in Learning (e.g.; E-learning) X Standard 7-2Library Collection & Staff X Standard 7-3Class Rooms & Offices Adequacy X Criterion 8- Institutional Support Standard 8-1Support and Financial Resources X Standard 8-2Number & Quality of GSS, RAs, & PhD Students X Standard 8-3Financial Support for Library, Labs & Computing Facilities X

DEPARTMENT OF STATISTICS

Department/Program: DEPARTMENT OF STATISTICS Criteria and associated standardsAddressedNot Addressed Criterion 1- Program Mission, Objectives and Outcomes Standard 1-1Program Measurable Objectives X Table 4.1 Program Objectives assessment X Standard 1-2Program Outcomes X Table 4.2 Outcome vs. Objectives X Employer Survey X Alumni Survey X Graduating Student Survey X Standard 1-3Assessment Results and Implementation Plans X Standard 1-4Overall Performance Using Quantifiable Measures x

Department/Program: DEPARTMENT OF STATISTICS Criteria and associated standardsAddressedNot Addressed Criterion 2- Curriculum Design and Organization Standard 2-1Courses vs. Objectives X Table 4.3 Curriculum course requirement X Table 4.4 Course vs. Outcomes X Standard 2-2 Theory, Problem Analysis/Solution & Design in Program X Table 4.5 Standard 2-2 requirements X Standard 2-3Mathematics and Basic Science s requirements X Standard 2-4Major requirements as specified by Accreditation Body X Standard 2-5Humanities, Social Sciences, Arts, Ethical, Professional & other requirements X Standard 2-6I.T. Content Integration Throughout the Program X Standard 2-7Communication Skills (Oral & Written) X

Department/Program: DEPARTMENT OF STATISTICS Criteria and associated standardsAddressedNot Addressed Criterion 3- Laboratories and Computing Facilities Standard 3-1Lab Manuals/Documentation/Instructions X Standard 3-2Adequate Support Personnel X Standard 3-3Adequate Computing Infrastructure and Facilities X Criterion 4-Student Support and Advising Standard 4-1Sufficient Frequency of Course Offering X Standard 4-2Effective Faculty/Student Interaction X Standard 4-3Professional Advising and Counseling X Criterion 5-Process Control Standard 5-1Admission Process X Standard 5-2Registration and Student X Standard 5-3Faculty Recruitment and Retention Process X Standard 5-4Effective Teaching and learning Process X Standard 5-5Program Requirements Completion process X

Department/Program: DEPARTMENT OF STATISTICS Criteria and associated standardsAddressedNot Addressed Criterion 6- Faculty Standard 6-1Program Faculty Qualification and Number X Faculty resumes in accordance with HEC format X Table 4.6 Faculty distribution by program’s area X Standard 6-2Current Faculty, Scholarly Activities and Development X Standard 6-3Faculty Motivation & Job Satisfaction X Faculty Survey X Criterion 7-Institutional Facilities Standard 7-1New Trends in Learning (e.g.; E-learning) X Standard 7-2Library Collection & Staff X Standard 7-3Class Rooms & Offices Adequacy X Criterion 8- Institutional Support Standard 8-1Support and Financial Resources X Standard 8-2Number & Quality of GSS, RAs, & PhD Students X Standard 8-3Financial Support for Library, Labs & Computing Facilities X

DEPARTMENT OF GEOGRAPHY

Department/Program: DEPARTMENT OF GEOGRAPHY Criteria and associated standardsAddressedNot Addressed Criterion 1- Program Mission, Objectives and Outcomes Standard 1-1Program Measurable Objectives X Table 4.1 Program Objectives assessment X Standard 1-2Program Outcomes X Table 4.2 Outcome vs. Objectives X Employer Survey X Alumni Survey X Graduating Student Survey X Standard 1-3Assessment Results and Implementation Plans X Standard 1-4Overall Performance Using Quantifiable Measures X

Department/Program: DEPARTMENT OF GEOGRAPHY Criteria and associated standardsAddressedNot Addressed Criterion 2- Curriculum Design and Organization Standard 2-1Courses vs. Objectives X Table 4.3 Curriculum course requirement X Table 4.4 Course vs. Outcomes X Standard 2-2 Theory, Problem Analysis/Solution & Design in Program X Table 4.5 Standard 2-2 requirements X Standard 2-3Mathematics and Basic Science s requirements X Standard 2-4Major requirements as specified by Accreditation Body X Standard 2-5Humanities, Social Sciences, Arts, Ethical, Professional & other requirements X Standard 2-6I.T. Content Integration Throughout the Program X Standard 2-7Communication Skills (Oral & Written) X

Department/Program: DEPARTMENT OF GEOGRAPHY Criteria and associated standardsAddressedNot Addressed Criterion 3- Laboratories and Computing Facilities Standard 3-1Lab Manuals/Documentation/Instructions X Standard 3-2Adequate Support Personnel X Standard 3-3Adequate Computing Infrastructure and Facilities X Criterion 4-Student Support and Advising Standard 4-1Sufficient Frequency of Course Offering X Standard 4-2Effective Faculty/Student Interaction X Standard 4-3Professional Advising and Counseling X Criterion 5-Process Control Standard 5-1Admission Process X Standard 5-2Registration and Student X Standard 5-3Faculty Recruitment and Retention Process X Standard 5-4Effective Teaching and learning Process X Standard 5-5Program Requirements Completion process X

Department/Program: DEPARTMENT OF GEOGRAPHY Criteria and associated standardsAddressedNot Addressed Criterion 6- Faculty Standard 6-1Program Faculty Qualification and Number X Faculty resumes in accordance with HEC format X Table 4.6 Faculty distribution by program’s area X Standard 6-2Current Faculty, Scholarly Activities and Development X Standard 6-3Faculty Motivation & Job Satisfaction X Faculty Survey X Criterion 7-Institutional Facilities Standard 7-1New Trends in Learning (e.g.; E-learning) X Standard 7-2Library Collection & Staff X Standard 7-3Class Rooms & Offices Adequacy X Criterion 8- Institutional Support X Standard 8-1Support and Financial Resources X Standard 8-2Number & Quality of GSS, RAs, & PhD Students X Standard 8-3Financial Support for Library, Labs & Computing Facilities X

SUMMARY OF STATUS OF IMPLEMENTAION (A Comparison)

CRITERIA SUMMARY OF STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION INSTITUTE/DEPARTMENT Institute of Chemical Sciences PsychologyStatisticsGeography FAPANAFAPANAFAPANAFAPANA 1 XXXX 2 XXXX 3 XXXX 4 XXXX 5 XXXX 6 XXXX 7 XXXX 8 XXXX Key: FA= Fully Addressed, PA= Partially Addressed NA= Not Addressed

COMMON PROBLEMS IDENTIFIED Absence of Alumni Associations & No Feedback from Alumni (Survey not conducted) No Feedback from Employers (Survey not conducted) No Feedback from Graduating Students (Survey not conducted) No Feedback from Faculty (survey not conducted)

ACTION PLAN FOR NEXT QUARTER Based on the experience of scrutiny of the selected SARs orientation workshops for the Program Teams on the SAR at the department level will be planned. Assessment Teams for the selected SARs will be constituted More SARs will be produced

THANK YOU