2. SELF ASSESSMENT CRITERIA 1.Program Mission Objectives and Outcomes 2.Curriculum Design and Organization 3.Laboratories and Computing Facilities 4.Student Support and Guidance 5.Faculty 6.Process Control 7.Institutional Facilities 8.Institutional Support

3. Criterion-3: Laboratories & Computing Facilities Intent: Laboratories and computing facilities must be adequately available and accessible to faculty members and students to support teaching and research activities. In addition departments may benchmark with similar departments in reputable institutions to identify their shortcomings if any. Criterion-4: Student Support & Advising Intent: Student must have an adequate support to complete the program in a timely manner and must have ample opportunity to interact with their instructors and receive timely advice about program requirements and career alternatives.

4. Criterion-5: Process Control Intent: The processes by which major functions are delivered must be in place, controlled, periodically reviewed and continuously improved. To meet this criterion a set of standards must be satisfied. Criterion-6: Faculty Intent: Faculty members must be current and active in their discipline and have the necessary technical depth and breadth to support the program. There must be enough faculty members to provide continuity and stability, to cover the curriculum adequately and effectively, and to allow for scholarly activities.

5. Criterion-7: Institutional Facilities Intent: Institutional facilities, including library, computing facilities, classrooms and offices must be adequate to support the objective of the program. Criterion-8: Institutional Support Intent: The institution’s support and the financial resources for the program must be sufficient to provide an environment in which the program can achieve its objectives and retain its strength.

6. 6 Latest Status of Faculty of Economics & Management Sciences DepartmentProgram TeamsSAR received Sent back for changes SAR received after improvement Audit completed Executive Summary Implementa tion Plan Department of Economics √ Prof. Dr. Khuda Dad Dr. Hafiz Khalil Ahmad xxxxxx Department of Library & Information Sciences √ Prof. Dr. Kanwal Amin Dr. Nousheen Fatima Warriach Ms. Syeda Hina Batool √√√√√√ Institute of Administrative Sciences √ Ms. Ayesha Hanif Ms. Saba Yaseen Mr. Ali Rehman √√√√√√ Institute of Business Administration √ Prof. Dr. M. Ehsan Malik Ms. Saba Latif xxxxxx Institute of Business & Information Technology √ Mr. Mansoor Mahmood Ashiq Mr. Asim Tanveer √√xxxx

7. SURVEY FORMS Teacher & Course Evaluation Form Proforma - 1 Student Course Evaluation Questionnaire Proforma - 2 Faculty Course Review Report Proforma - 3 Survey of Graduating Students Proforma - 4 Research Student Progress Review Form Proforma - 5 Faculty Survey Proforma - 6 Survey of Department Offering Ph.D. Programs Proforma - 7 Alumni Survey Proforma - 8 Employer Survey Proforma - 9 Faculty Resume Proforma - 10 Teacher Evaluation Form Teaching / Learning Process Survey Form

8. REVIEW Meeting for Expediting Self Assessment Activities of Faculty of Economics and Management Sciences held on 30-09-2010 (Tuesday) in the committee room of Dean Faculty of Economics & Management Sciences, University of the Punjab. PROGRESS: Follow up with the Faculty of Economics and Management Sciences for the submission of their SARs is done but overall response rate is very slow.

9. LATEST STAUTS OF QEC Program Teams for most of the departments/ institutes/ colleges/ centers have been formed. Self Assessment Reports of 38 departments/ institutes/ colleges/ centers have been received and reviewed by QEC according to Self Assessment Manual (SAM). At the same time, executive summaries & implementation plans of 19 audited departments/ institutes/ colleges/ centers have been sent to the respective departments, HEC and Worthy Vice Chancellor of the University for further necessary action to enhance the quality of education.

10. TEACHERS & COURSES EVALUATION In order to enhance the quality of education, QEC has already circulated newly developed survey forms related to the teachers and courses evaluation. HODs will interact & coordinate with QEC staff to conduct survey at the end of each semester and also bring any change if required.

11. FUTURE PLAN To motivate the program team members for the implementation of Self Assessment Manual (SAM) by carrying out the meetings at departmental level. It may also include the visits of individual departments by QEC team if found necessary. Follow up of changes suggested by QEC with departments who have sent their SARs is also underway. Follow up for the submission of SARs has already done and will continue as well. Follow up of the Teachers and Courses Evaluation survey forms is also underway. Implementation plans submitted by different departments will also be followed up.

12. THANK YOU