The Undergraduate Ambassador Scheme at Southampton Professor Ray d’Inverno School of Mathematics University of Southampton
Plan of Presentation The origins of the scheme Aims of the scheme Four stage approach Assessment and feedback Selection Partner schools Training and monitoring Outcome Dissemination Second year 2003/4 Third year 2004/5 Issues Conclusion
The origins of the scheme Author, journalist and broadcaster Simon Singh Shortage subjects The current viscious circle Design of a flexible credit bearing course for final year undergraduates
Aims of the scheme Provides a “taste of teaching” Provides pupils with student ambassadors for their discipline Raises pupil aspirations for Higher/Further education Develops transferable skills in students
Transferable Skills Communication skills Understanding the needs of individuals Interpersonal skills Staff responsibilities and conduct The ability to improvise Giving and taking feedback Organising skills Handling difficult situations Public speaking Team work Teaching methods Lesson preparation Employability skills Personal confidence
Four stage approach Classroom observation Classroom assistance Whole class teaching Special project Design of an innovative project Implementation Evaluation
Other activities Revision classes Lunch clubs After school clubs Talks on university life University visit days
Assessment and feedback 20% Weekly journal (open) 30% Final report (2,500 words) 20% Presentation on Special Project 30% Teacher assessment 15 CATs point unit = 150 hours of study Written feedback on all 4 assessments Teacher assessment not moderated
Selection 21 students applied for selection in semester 1 400 word essay requested on why they wanted to take the unit and what they could offer (1-4 rating) 10 minute structured interview (Paul Cooper/RAd’I) Selection: 5 -> 10 -> 13 Interview used to place students Unsuccessful candidates given feedback What makes a good teacher Proactivity in classroom Dealing with pupil blocks Type of placement preferred Did they have a car 12 mathematicians (9 female, 3 male) 1 chemist (female)
Five partner schools [Placements] High achieving girls selective grammar [2] High achieving catholic girls comprehensive (WP) [4] Low aspiration girls technology college (WP) [3] Mixed ability mixed comprehensive including catchment area of social deprivation (WP) [2] Boys catholic comprehensive with some behavioural problems (WP) [2]
Training and monitoring 5 hour “mini-PGCE” training session (Paul Cooper) “Meet the teachers” session 4 tutorials Regular contact Wrap-up meeting (videoed) Initial impressions Journals and planning the Special Project 1 Planning the Special Project 2 Tips on presentations
Training session One of the two half day workshops for 20 students 2004/5
Placement requirements Initial meeting with school to negotiate a timetable 3 / 4 hours a week throughout 12 weeks of semester 2 Minimum of 10 placements required
Outcome Performance on unit (10 I, 3 IIi) Special projects Teacher questionnaires (5/5) Student questionnaires (11/13) Publications (3) PGCE (12/13 eventually) Development of personal confidence
Special projects Development of revision materials (x 4) Starters (x 2) Learning styles Fibonacci numbers extension Developing communication skills in “quiet” pupils Problem solving skills Use of interactive white board and laptops by staff Use of “Autograph” software Use of “Geometer’s sketchpad” software
Teacher questionnaires 5.0 Helpful intro to teaching 4.8 Student preparation for placement 4.7 Working relationships with students 4.0 Benefit to school 3.8 Demands made on school 5/0 Continuation with scheme
Student questionnaires 4.8 Skills development 4.7 Overall rating of unit 4.2 School placement experience 4.2 Training session relevance 4.1 Training session quality 4.0 Unit coordinator 3.8 University support on placement 3.6 Satisfaction with assessment
Dissemination Website 3 publications (Paul Cooper and RAd’I) THES article (6/2/04) TES article Presentation to engineers National UAS conferences Regional meeting of ILT 2 internal seminars National UAS website
Second year 2003/4 Scheme extended to include Chemistry and Physics Schools 27 applicants 22 selected 5 new partner schools (all WP) giving 10 in total Morning meeting/lunch with link teachers Assessment changes Tutorials doubled 15 mathematicians (11 females 4 males) 5 chemists (4 females 1 male) 2 physicists (1 female 1 male) 3 sink comprehensive community schools 1 lower middle class comprehensive community school 1 boys language college Final report 30 -> 30 Weekly journal 20 -> 25 Presentation 20 -> 25 Teacher assessment 30 -> 20
Third year 2004/5 Scheme extended to include Computer Science, Oceanography, Music and Modern Languages 45 applicants 38 selected 7 new partner schools (2 WP) giving 15 in total (2 discontinued) Assessment changes Tutorials trebled 13 mathematicians (9 females, 4 males) 3 chemists (1 female, 2 males) 2 physicists (1 female, 1 male) 2 computer scientists (1 female, 1 male) 10 oceanographers (8 females, 2 males) 7 musicians (6 females, 1 male) 1 linguist (1 female) 2 sixth form colleges 1 ethnically mixed girls comprehensive school 3 mixed (1 high achieving) comprehensive schools 1 boys comprehensive with some behavioural problems Final report 30 -> 35 Weekly journal 25 -> 25 Presentation 25 -> 25 Teacher assessment 20 -> 15
Performance on unit Year 1: Year 2: Year 3: I IIi IIii III
Student questionnaires Yr1 Yr2 Yr Skills development Overall rating of unit School placement experience Training session relevance Training session quality Unit coordinator University support on placement Satisfaction with assessment
Issues Academic approval by School boards Teacher assessment not moderated Standard format vs Project format Resource Course secretary Team consisting of 1 academic and 3 Learning and Teaching Coordinators for Interviews/Training/Tutorials/ support/Assessment Confusion in schools over various mentoring-type schemes Student workload Underperforming students Students with disabilities Convenor not a “champion” of scheme Spreading the scheme internally/externally Credit bearing Paid (UG and PG) Volunteering Initial University grant for WP TTA support from UAS Work harder: Yes; Interfere with other studies: No
Conclusions Flexible scheme Produces PGCE applicants Develops employability skills Develops personal confidence Highly valued by students