Carbon Artifact Adjustment in IMPROVE Lowell Ashbaugh Crocker Nuclear Lab University of California, Davis January 22, 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Report of the IMPROVE/CSN Organic Carbon Artifact Adjustment Committee Ann M. Dillner, Mark Green Marc Pitchford, Bret Schichtel, Bill Malm, Warren White,
Advertisements

STN Carbon Field Blank Analysis, Derived Organic Carbon Analysis and IMPROVE blank corrected artifact analysis Bret Schichtel.
PM 2.5 Carbon Measurements in EPA Region 10 Robert Kotchenruther, Ph.D. NW-AIRQUEST June, 2011.
Ambient Air Monitoring for the Revised Lead NAAQS Daniel Garver US EPA Region 4.
Chemical Composition of Organic Carbon Fractions Barbara Zielinska.
Example Conceptual Models for Organic Sampling Artifacts on Quartz Fiber Filter Prepared by Marc Pitchford for the IMPROVE/CSN Carbon Monitoring Workshop.
Carbon artifact adjustments for the IMPROVE and CSN speciated particulate networks Mark Green, Judith Chow, John Watson Desert Research Institute Ann Dillner.
Gas/Particle Partitioning. Why is gas/particle partitioning important? Dispersion of Pollutants Introduced into the Atmosphere as Determined by Residence.
Prototype Compact Denuders for Ambient Air Sampling Misha Schurman(1), Jeffrey L. Collett, Jr. (1), Susanne V. Hering (2), Derek E. Day (3), William C.
Modification of Network Sampling Systems for Measurement of NH 3 Derek Day, Misha Schurman, Katie Beam, Jeff Collett, William Malm MOTIVATION Ammonia (NH.
EPA Precursor Gas Training Workshop PM 2.5 Chemical Speciation Network (CSN) Carbon Conversion Joann Rice.
STN/IMPROVE Comparison Study Preliminary Results Paul Solomon, ORD Tracy Klamser-Williams, ORIA Peter Egeghy, ORD Dennis Crumpler, OAQPS Joann Rice, OAQPS.
Prepared by Farid Khalaf.  Protect the worker.  Protect the sample being analyzed.  Protect the environment.
Overview of CSN Data Relevant to OC/EC Artifact Adjustments presented by James Flanagan RTI International Davis, CA January 22-23, 2008.
Evidence for Positive and Negative Organic Sampling Artifacts John G. Watson Judith C. Chow L.-W. Antony Chen Desert Research Institute,
Mulciber Stove. Taylor Myers CTO Ryan Fisher COO.
Carbon Measurements and Adjustments Measurement of organics by IMPROVE & STN networks, Use of blank data to correct carbon concentration measurements,
Source apportionment of Swiss carbonaceous aerosols using radiocarbon analyses of different fractions References: S. Szidat et al., 2007: Dominant impact.
Organic Carbon and Elemental Carbon in Atlanta Area Chao Wu.
Insights from Thermal Analysis of Individual Organic Compounds, Mixtures, Black Carbon Surrogates, Airborne PM and Extracts Lara Gundel, R.L. Dod, T.W.
Effects of Iron Oxides on the Determination of Organic and Elemental Carbon using Thermal Optical Techniques Kochy Fung AtmAA, Inc., Calabasas, CA, USA.
Carbon Meeting Joann Rice Sacramento, CA January 22-23, 2008.
6 City CSN/IMPROVE Comparison. IMPROVE/CSN Organic Carbon URG MASS – 16.7 LPM; IMPROVE ~22 LPM; Other STN 6-7 LPM IMPROVE OC un-adjusted for blank IMP.
Air pollution – Local and Global Concerns Many atmospheric pollutants are naturally occurring compounds. What are the key human activities that cause levels.
Personal Monitoring for Air Pollution Exposure Philip M. Fine, Ph.D. Atmospheric Measurements Manager South Coast Air Quality Management District CAPCOA.
Dalton’s Law Mixtures of Gases. Introduction From the kinetic theory of gases, at a given temperature and in a given volume gas pressure depends only.
ACADs (08-006) Covered Keywords Suspended particulate matter, pollutants, SO 2, NO x, CI 2, H 2 S, NH 3, lapel. Description Supporting Material
Air-Surface Exchange of Persistent Substances by Michael McLachlan ITM, Stockholm University for the summer school The Advances.
Comparison of gravimetric PM data from the Harvard Impactors and Gent Stacked Unit PM 10 Samplers in Prague 2004 M. CIVIŠ 1, J. HOVORKA 1 and J. SCHWARZ.
1 Saxony-Anhalt State Environmental Protection Agency Wolfgang Garche Bukarest EU-Twinning Project RO 2006 IB EN 09 Wolfgang Garche Saxony-Anhalt.
IMPROVE Particle Monitoring Network: Quality Assurance – Field Audits Chuck McDade Crocker Nuclear Laboratory University of California, Davis Presented.
Particles, your health & your lungs. Why care about air pollution? Sonoma County air is clean compared to other areas, but SF air blows here Sonoma County.
Model Evaluation Comparing Model Output to Ambient Data Christian Seigneur AER San Ramon, California.
AoH Conference Call October 8, 2004 Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
Regional Air Quality Modeling Results for Elemental and Organic Carbon John Vimont, National Park Service WRAP Fire, Carbon, and Dust Workshop Sacramento,
Eric Edgerton, ARA, Inc. PM Model Performance Workshop Chapel Hill, NC February 10, 2004 SEARCH: Overview of Data for Model Performance Evaluation Photo.
SEARCH & VISTAS Special Studies RPO National Technical Meeting St. Louis, MO November 5, 2003.
Notes Over 8 – 5 Add. + Add the whole numbers. Add the fractions and reduce if needed.
Chris Curran, Jon Czuba, and Raegan Huffman USGS-Sequoia WebEx Workshop January 30, 2012.
Vapour Pressure - All volatile liquids spontaneously evaporate. When they do the vapour produces a pressure. This pressure depends on temperature. The.
California Ambient Dioxin Air Monitoring Program (CADAMP) Kathy Gill Air Resources Board Monitoring and Laboratory Division California Environmental Protection.
1 Urban Community Air Toxics Monitoring Project, Paterson City, NJ UCAMPP Update 5/07 Charlie Pietarinen (609)
Bingo
IMPROVE/STN Comparison & Implications for Visibility and PM2.5
Ann M. Dillner, Mark C. Green
Matteo Reggente Giulia Ruggeri Gözde Ergin Christophe Delval
National Wildlife Refuge
Speciation Update: URG 3000N Carbon Sampler
Fractions: Adding and Subtracting Like Denominators
Brian Timin- EPA/OAQPS
Field Testing ASHRAE Guideline
“all you ever asked us for, and more”
Unit 3 Lecture 24 Algebraic Fractions
Add and Subtract Mixed Numbers
Fractions: Adding and Subtracting Like Denominators
Add or Subtract? x =.
What causes Air Pollution?
Measuring Atmospheric N Inputs
What causes Air Pollution?
A Review of Time Integrated PM2.5 Monitoring Data in the United States
Adding and subtracting fractions
Rationalizing the differences between thermo-optical OC/EC methods.
Correcting TEOM Measurements using the KCL Volatile Correction Model
Time-Integrated Particle Measurements : Status in Canada
' · · ,.-.., '' !'",. -,..._ ·-.·-...;.· -
Continuous Carbon and NHy Measurements
MEASUREMENT OF PM2.5 SEMI-VOLATILE MATERIAL WITH THE FDMS TEOM MONITOR
Jean-Philippe Putaud, Fabrizia Cavalli
Wednesday, 24 July 2019 Fractions
The UC Davis Semi-Annual Report on Quality Assurance IMPROVE Steering Committee Meeting October 16, 2018 | Fort Collins, Colorado Xiaolu Zhang*, Katrine.
Presentation transcript:

Carbon Artifact Adjustment in IMPROVE Lowell Ashbaugh Crocker Nuclear Lab University of California, Davis January 22, 2008

Sampling Artifacts for Particulate Carbon Passive positive artifact Passive positive artifact Quartz filter adsorbs volatile organic gases passively upon exposure to the atmosphere without airflow Quartz filter adsorbs volatile organic gases passively upon exposure to the atmosphere without airflow Active positive artifact Active positive artifact Quartz filter adsorbs volatile organic gases during sampling Quartz filter adsorbs volatile organic gases during sampling Active negative artifact Active negative artifact Volatile organic particles dissociate into gases during sampling and are lost to the filter Volatile organic particles dissociate into gases during sampling and are lost to the filter

Result of Artifact on Secondary Filter (CS) Passive positive artifact Passive positive artifact CS = CP → Subtract CS from CP CS = CP → Subtract CS from CP Active positive artifact Active positive artifact CS = fraction of CP → Subtract CS/(1-eff) from CP CS = fraction of CP → Subtract CS/(1-eff) from CP Active negative artifact Active negative artifact CS = “lost” VOP from CP → Add CS to CP CS = “lost” VOP from CP → Add CS to CP

IMPROVE OC Measurements IMPROVE assumes all positive artifact IMPROVE assumes all positive artifact CP – quartz front filter CP – quartz front filter CS – quartz backup filter (median of monthly values from 6 sites) CS – quartz backup filter (median of monthly values from 6 sites) Particulate OC = CP – CS Particulate OC = CP – CS Field blanks Field blanks All sites All sites A few each year A few each year No air flow through blanks No air flow through blanks In sampler for 7 days In sampler for 7 days Supported by research Supported by research D. Fitz (1990), AS&T 12: D. Fitz (1990), AS&T 12:

IMPROVE sites with CS filters

Time history of carbon artifacts

Histograms for July 2005

Monthly CS measurements by site