Window-1: [ Self-Assessment Exercise

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Setting internal Quality Assurance systems
Advertisements

1 Dr. M. Feroze Ahmed Dr. M. Feroze Ahmed Ph.D., FBAS, FIE, MASCE Vice-Chancellor, Stamford University Bangladesh
Quarry Bay School What is CoIS? The Council of International Schools is an organisation in International Education for the.
Service Agency Accreditation Recognizing Quality Educational Service Agencies Mike Bugenski
MOOCs and the Quality Code Ian G. Giles PFHEA Medical Education
National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment Preparation for Developmental Reviews.
ACADEMIC INFRASTRUCTURE Framework for Higher Education Qualifications Subject Benchmark Statements Programme Specifications Code of Practice (for the assurance.
The Academic Assessment Process
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European
 The Middle States Commission on Higher Education is a voluntary, non-governmental, membership association that is dedicated to quality assurance and.
Country Case: Sri Lanka Ensuring Quality in Higher Education Prof. Colin N. Peiris Quality Assurance Specialist QAA Council of the UGC Sri Lanka.
1 National Training Programme for New Governors 2005 Module 3 Ensuring accountability.
Internal Auditing and Outsourcing
AICT5 – eProject Project Planning for ICT. Process Centre receives Scenario Group Work Scenario on website in October Assessment Window Individual Work.
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT
Prof. György BAZSA, former president Hungarian Accreditation Committee (HAC) CUBRIK Workshop IV Beograd, 13 March, 2012 European Standards and Guidelines.
EQARF Applying EQARF Framework and Guidelines to the Development and Testing of Eduplan.
PLACE OF QUALITY ASSURANCE IN ENHANCEMENT OF ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE OF MAKERERE UNIVERSITY BY SAM LUBOGA ACTING DIRECTOR QUALITY ASSURANCE DIRECTORATE 9/23/20151.
GUIDELINES ON CRITERIA AND STANDARDS FOR PROGRAM ACCREDITATION (AREA 1, 2, 3 AND 8)
Vaal University of Technology (formerly Vaal Triangle Technikon ) Ms A.J. GOZO Senior Director: Library and Information Services.
AN OVERVIEW MALAYSIAN QUALIFICATIONS AGENCY. MALAYSIAN QUALIFICATIONS AGENCY (1/11/07 ) MALAYSIAN QUALIFICATIONS AGENCY (1/11/07 ) pzv/09/09/08 2 Malaysian.
Using Electronic Portfolios to Assess Learning at IUPUI. Trudy Banta, et. al. Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis 2007.
Foundation Degrees Foundation Degree Forward Lichfield Centre The Friary Lichfield Staffs WS13 6QG — Tel: Fax: —
IAOD Evaluation Section, the Development Agenda (DA) and Development Oriented Activities Julia Flores Marfetan, Senior Evaluator.
Understanding Meaning and Importance of Competency Based Assessment
Basic Workshop For Reviewers NQAAC Recognize the developmental engagements Ensure that they operate smoothly and effectively” Ensure that all team members.
Quality Assurance of Malaysian Higher Education COPIA – Code of Practice for Institutional Audit COPPA – Code of Practice for Programme Accreditation.
 This prepares educators to work in P-12 schools (1)  It provides direction (1)  It is knowledge-based, articulated, shared, coherent, consistent with.
Accreditation in the higher education
National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment Developmental Reviews at King Saud University and King Faisal University.
Peer reviewer Basic Workshop Prof. Dr. Gamalat M. Ali Director of Tanta Quality Assurance Center, Tanta University.
The Quality Standards for resource provisions For deaf children and young people in mainstream school.
WHO Global Standards. 5 Key Areas for Global Standards Program graduates Program graduates Program development and revision Program development and revision.
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT ON AREA 1, 2 AND 3 Prepared By: Nor Aizar Abu Bakar Quality Academic Assurance Department.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Some examples of quality standards and their use for self assessment and planning CINDA Workshop for TEIs Ramallah, May 2007.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
July 2007 National Quality Assurance and Accreditation Committee & Quality Assurance and Accreditation Project Role of Action Planning in The Developmental.
Continuous Improvement. Focus of the Review: Continuous Improvement The unit will engage in continuous improvement between on-site visits. Submit annual.
Development of the Egyptian Code of Practice for Student Assessment Lamis Ragab, MD, MHPE Hala Salah, MD.
Project financed under Phare EUROPEAN UNION QUALITY EXTERNAL MONITORING IN THE SCHOOL YEAR 2007 – 2008 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Material produced.
Workshop For Reviewers Operating the Developmental Engagements Prof. Dr. Hala SalahProf. Dr. Hoda ELTalawy.
Dr. Salwa El-Magoli Chairperson of the National Quality Assurance and Accreditation Committee. Former Dean of the Faculty of Agricultural, Cairo university.
Organizational Process The activities conducted by an educational institution or school is called organizational process Which consist of series of steps.
Introduction to the quality system in MOHE Prof. Hala Salah Consultant in NQAAP.
February, MansourahProf. Nadia Badrawi Implementation of National Academic Reference Standards Prof. Nadia Badrawi Senior Member and former chairperson.
SZABIST INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH DEPARTMENT QUALITY ENHANCEMENT CELL.
QA in HEIs: ZIMCHE’s Perspectives Workshop on trends in HE for BUSE Administrators 8-9 April 2016 Evelyn Garwe, Deputy CEO.
Denise Kirkpatrick Pro Vice-Chancellor The Open University, UK Quality Assurance in Distance Education.
Introduction to IQAC Khawza I Ahmed, Director IQAC.
1 Institutional Quality and Accreditation: A Workshop on the Basics.
Self-Assessment Exercise: Concept & Procedure
The British Accreditation Council: ensuring standards
Dutchess Community College Middle States Self-Study 2015
Quality Assurance in Higher Education
Introduction to evaluating and measuring impact in career development Presented by – Date – Doubt, the essential preliminary of all improvement and.
Workshop 1 Self-Assessment Committee (SAC)
Department of Political Science & Sociology North South University
Assessment and Feedback – Module 1
Quality Assurance and Enhancement at The University of Edinburgh
DRAFT Standards for the Accreditation of e-Learning Programs
Programme Review Dhaya Naidoo Director: Quality Promotion
Guidelines for Self-Assessment at Program Level
NATSPEC Governor Seminars 2009
Understanding and Preparing for Accreditation
External Examiner Reports
Self-Assessment Exercise
AICT5 – eProject Project Planning for ICT
Providing feedback to learners
Presentation transcript:

Window-1: [ Self-Assessment Exercise Dr. Md. Mozahar Ali Professor, GTI, BAU, Mymensingh & AIF Management Consultant HEQEP, UGC mail:mozahar55@yahoo.co.uk; Cell No.:88-01711391190

Self-Assessment Exercise Discussion points: Concept & definition Objectives & purpose Procedure & process schedule Components/Criteria at program level SA Lay-out of SA report

Accreditation Council (Auto) QAA / Dept. (Govt./NGovt.) Ministry of Education Accreditation Council (Auto) U G C QAA / Dept. (Govt./NGovt.) University QA Cell Academic Units (Program/Degree) Self-Assessment

Self-Assessment (SA): Definition SA is a systematic process of gathering, reviewing and using important quantitative and qualitative data and information from multiple and diverse sources about educational programs, for the purpose of improving student learning, and evaluating whether academic and learning standards are being met. SA is an assessment conducted by the institution to evaluate whether programs meet their educational objectives and outcomes with the purpose to improve program’s quality and enhancing students learning.

Self-Assessment (SA): Definition Self-Assessment … refers to a comprehensive, systematic and regular review of a ….. study program’s activities and results. The SA process allows the organization to discern clearly its strengths and areas in which improvements are required and culminates in planned development actions which are then monitored for progress and achievement.

SELF –ASSESSMENT/Evaluation SA/SE of a study programme (undergraduate/postgraduate) is the first step in the process of external quality assurance & accreditation. Training Workshop for Self Assessment - Prof. Colin N. Peiris

Self-Assessment & Accreditation Quality Self-Assessment

Self Assessment: Desired Outcome To be proactive than reactive. Initiate improvements to achieve academic excellence. Systematize the process of Self-Assessment. To be current and take a leadership role in the country. Assist in preparing professionals of tomorrow.

How to improve the QUALITY? Improvement Plan Self- Assessment QUALITY is improved How to improve the QUALITY? Implementation Data Processing Data Collection Data Analysis Writing the SAR Training Workshop for Self Assessment - Prof. Colin N. Peiris

SELF -ASSESSMENT Institution initially provide Judgments on Academic Standards and the Quality of the Programs, through Self-Assessment. Programs are Judged according to the Intended Aims & Learning Outcomes stated in SAR. Training Workshop for Self Assessment - Prof. Colin N. Peiris

Objectives of Self-Assessment Maintain and continuously enhance academic standards+ Enhance students’ learning Verify that the existing programs meet their objectives and institutional goals Provide feedback for quality assurance of academic programs Prepare the academic program for review by discipline councils

SELF–ASSESSMENT Purpose of SA is Not to Prove, but to Improve Should involve all the Stakeholders Should consider both the Strengths & Weaknesses of Programs. Training Workshop for Self Assessment - Prof. Colin N. Peiris

Impact of Self-Assessment Quality  SA + Teamwork + External Support Expected Condition SA + Teamwork With SA + Own Capacity Present condition Without SA Time  Training Workshop for Self Assessment - Prof. Colin N. Peiris

SA Process Schedule: Phases Preparation Phase Implementation Phase External Validation Phase Final SA Report Orientations for Change Management

Self-Assessment Process Schedule A. Preparation Phase A1. Establishment of an Institutional SA Unit A2. Appointment of the Self-Assessment Committee A3. Training and preparation of the SA Committee A4. Resources necessary for SA implementation Human resources. Definition of time allocation for academic and non-academic staff participating in the SA Committee Support staff. Secretarial, data retrieval and processing, surveyors Material resources. Meeting rooms, computers, e-mail, photocopying, communications

SA Process Schedule ............ A. Preparation Phase A5. Preparation of the SA process Limits of the self-assessment Objectives Areas of intervention Quality criteria and performance indicators Selection of the population and/or sample Preparation of information gathering instruments Steps and chronogram Expected difficulties and consequences; remedial actions

SA Process Schedule ................ A. Preparation Phase A6. Selection and designation of external peer visitors Potential external peer visitors should be prospected and contacted at the beginning of the SA process. Accidental “last minute” peers should be avoided. A7. Information and motivation phase Meetings with all relevant stakeholders that relate to the program The SA plan should be explained clearly and completely Meetings for university officials, academics, undergraduate and post-graduate students, non academic staff and workers The SA plan should be communicated through written & electronic means and a specific Internet web page be designed and provided.

SA Process Schedule ................ B. Implementation Phase B1. Information gathering Crucial in SA, but requires a lot of work and time. Sub-committees will gather information B2. External peer visit planning Contact sufficient time ahead B3. Organization and tabulation of the information Organization of quantitative data Results from structured discussions B4. Analysis of results Usually SWOT analysis is recommended; Validation, analysis of results and exploration of recommendations are sought from the participating academic community.

SA Process Schedule ................ B. Implementation Phase B5. Preparation of the Internal SA Report   The SA Committee will prepare the Internal SA Report B6. Presentation of the Internal SA Report to the authorities  B7. Socialization of SA results   The SA Report should be shared and discussed with the university and academic community; B8. Delivery of the Internal SA Report to the external peers The Internal SA Report should be sent to the institutional SA Unit and external peers at least one month before their site visit.

SA Process Schedule ................ C. External Validation Phase   C1. Planning of the external peer site visit Preparation of the agenda and site visit by SA Unit Discussion of the agenda with the external peers C2. External peer visit   Minimum of three working days visit C3. External SA Validation Report

SA Process Schedule ................ D. Final Self-Assessment Report SA Committee should prepare Final SA Report Final Report will integrate External Validation Report with Internal SA Report E. Orientations for Change Management SA ends with the Final SA Report SA report is considered as a Preliminary Improvement Plan.

Components/Criteria of program level SA 1. Curriculum Design, Content and Review 2. Teaching, Learning and Assessment Methods 3. Quality of Students including Student Progress and Achievements 4. The Extent and Use of Student Feedback 5. Postgraduate Studies 6. Peer Observation 7. Skills Development 8. Academic Guidance & Counseling

SA needs codes of practice

SA Report – Layout Introduction Aims, Learning Outcomes and Program Details Students, Staff and Facilities Curriculum Design, Content and Review Teaching, Learning and Assessment Methods Quality of Students including Student Progress and Achievements The Extent and Use of Student Feedback, Qualitative & Quantitative Postgraduate Studies Peer Observation Skills Development Academic Guidance and Counseling Appendices (if any) [~ 40 pages] Training Workshop for Self Assessment - Prof. Colin N. Peiris

About University, Faculty, Dept Vision & Mission of the Dept/Program 1. INTRODUCTION (~ 1 page) About University, Faculty, Dept Vision & Mission of the Dept/Program Any other relevant information Training Workshop for Self Assessment - Prof. Colin N. Peiris

2. AIMS, LEARNING OUTCOMES & PROGRAM DETAILS (~ 3 pages) What the Dept aims to achieve by delivering the Program(s) Learning Outcomes Level of achievement expected from students Brief Summary of Programs to be reviewed Training Workshop for Self Assessment - Prof. Colin N. Peiris

STUDENTS, STAFF & FACILITIES (~ 3 pages) Brief Summaries about - Students (Numbers, Profile on Gender, Geographical Distribution, Z-score etc.) - Staff (Designation, Qualifications, Year Appointed, Responsibilities etc.) - Facilities to support teaching & learning process (Lecture theatres, Lab facilities, Library provision, IT facilities, Office Space etc.) Training Workshop for Self Assessment - Prof. Colin N. Peiris

CURRICULUM DESIGN, CONTENT AND REVIEW Effectiveness of Curriculum in achieving the Learning Outcomes Programs are at a Suitable Academic Level Curriculum facilitates Progress to Employment and/or Further Study Training Workshop for Self Assessment - Prof. Colin N. Peiris

CURRICULUM DESIGN, CONTENT AND REVIEW How often the Curriculum is Reviewed by the Dept.? How Student Feedback, Comments from Examiners and Employer Views are taken into account in Reviewing Curriculum? Training Workshop for Self Assessment - Prof. Colin N. Peiris

TEACHING, LEARNING AND ASSESSMENT METHODS Teaching, Learning & Assessment Strategy Does it enable Students to Achieve Intended Learning Outcomes? Are Learning Outcomes & Assessment Requirements Clear to Students and Staff? Is Student Workload Balanced and Reasonable? Training Workshop for Self Assessment - Prof. Colin N. Peiris

Training Workshop for Self Assessment - Prof. Colin N. Peiris

6. QUALITY OF STUDENTS INCLUDING STUDENT PROGRESS AND ACHIEVEMENT Recruitment & Admission Procedure Progress and Completion Student Achievements Do Statistics show that Aims & Learning Outcomes for the Programs under Review are being achieved? Do Students' First Destinations reflect an Appropriate Level of Achievement? Training Workshop for Self Assessment - Prof. Colin N. Peiris

7. THE EXTENT AND USE OF STUDENT FEEDBACK, QUALITATIVE & QUANTITATIVE How Student Feedback is obtained and at what Intervals? Is there Evidence that action is taken in Response to Issues raised by Students? How do Students know that action is taken in Response to the Feedback they provide? Training Workshop for Self Assessment - Prof. Colin N. Peiris

8. POSTGRADUATE STUDIES What are the Supervisory Arrangements for PG Students? Are Staff Numbers and their Experience sufficient to support them? What Research Facilities exist in the Dept? What are the Funding Arrangements for PG Training Workshop for Self Assessment - Prof. Colin N. Peiris

9. PEER OBSERVATION Do Staff perceive the Peer Observation Process to be helpful in enhancing Teaching Quality? Does the Dept has a Procedure for Observing Teaching? Does this apply to All Staff, including Temporary and Visiting Staff? Any Informal Ways and Means? Training Workshop for Self Assessment - Prof. Colin N. Peiris

10. SKILLS DEVELOPMENT What are the Skills the Dept intends Students to acquire? Are these clearly expressed in Student Learning Outcomes? Does the Dept has a Strategy for Skills Development as Part of the Curriculum? If not, are there Special Modules dedicated to Student Skills Development? Is there Evidence that the Dept. takes account of Employer Feedback in this area? Training Workshop for Self Assessment - Prof. Colin N. Peiris

11. ACADEMIC GUIDANCE & COUNSELING What is the Dept's Strategy for providing Effective Academic Guidance and Counseling to Students? Is there Evidence that Students' Progress & Achievement is enhanced by the Academic Guidance they receive? Are there good Links between the Dept and any Other Student Support Services available in the University? Training Workshop for Self Assessment - Prof. Colin N. Peiris

12. Few more Sections of SA Report Recommendations, including those who should assume responsibility and date of completion for all recommended activities. Included must be a statement on how the same will be monitored. Comments on the usefulness and efficacy of the SA exercise, and in the light of the experience, suggestions on how it might be undertaken in future. Date and period of next SA exercise.

Self-Assessment Exercise What is SA? Why should we conduct SA? What are the phases/steps of SA? What are the components/ criteria of SA? What are the contents of a SA report?

40 40

Thank You