Factors to consider when Evaluating Research. Is the research hypothesis...  sufficiently specific?  clearly stated?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Assessment II. 2 The Research Cycle Formulation Generate Hypothesis/Questions Model Design Research Collect Data Sell Solution Assess Reliability/Validity.
Advertisements

Chapter 22 Evaluating a Research Report Gay, Mills, and Airasian
RESEARCH CLINIC SESSION 1 Committed Officials Pursuing Excellence in Research 27 June 2013.
COMPOSING RESEARCH PROPOSAL Meeting 3 Subject: G-1342 Research Seminar Year: 2008/2009.
Statistical Issues in Research Planning and Evaluation
NIPRL 1 Chapter 9. Comparing Two Population Means 9.1 Introduction 9.2 Analysis of Paired Samples 9.3 Analysis of Independent Samples 9.4 Summary 9.5 Supplementary.
Introduction to Research Methodology
Educational Research by John W. Creswell. Copyright © 2002 by Pearson Education. All rights reserved. Slide 1 Chapter 10 Reporting and Evaluating Research.
Causal-Comparative Research
Factors to consider when Evaluating Research. Is the research hypothesis...  sufficiently specific?  clearly stated?
Research Proposal Development of research question
Business research methods: data sources
Topics - Reading a Research Article Brief Overview: Purpose and Process of Empirical Research Standard Format of Research Articles Evaluating/Critiquing.
1 Writing the Research Proposal Researchers communicate: Plans, Methods, Thoughts, and Objectives for others to read discuss, and act upon.
Reporting and Evaluating Research
Mgt2700: Theory continued Science, Scientific Method, and Truth and Truth.
Sampling and Data Collection
WRITING A RESEARCH PROPORSAL
Chapter 2 Understanding the Research Process
WRITING A RESEARCH PROPOSAL
Research Methods for Computer Science CSCI 6620 Spring 2014 Dr. Pettey CSCI 6620 Spring 2014 Dr. Pettey.
Proposal Writing.
Writing a Research Proposal
Copyright © 2008 by Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey All rights reserved. John W. Creswell Educational Research: Planning,
1 Doing Statistics for Business Doing Statistics for Business Data, Inference, and Decision Making Chapter 8 Hypothesis Testing : An Introduction.
McGraw-Hill © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. The Nature of Research Chapter One.
Literature Review and Parts of Proposal
Formulating a Research Proposal
Section A Experiments.
Understanding Statistics
Writing research proposal/synopsis
Undergraduate Dissertation Preparation – Research Strategy.
Nursing Research Prof. Nawal A. Fouad (5) March 2007.
Evaluating a Research Report
The Scientific Method in Psychology.  Descriptive Studies: naturalistic observations; case studies. Individuals observed in their environment.  Correlational.
Correlational Research Chapter Fifteen Bring Schraw et al.
Is research in education important?. What is the difference between Qualitative and Quantitative Research Methods?
The Research Design. Experimental Design Definition A description of what a researcher would like to find out and how to find it out. Pre-requisites 1.Identification.
Evaluating Research Articles Approach With Skepticism Rebecca L. Fiedler January 16, 2002.
1 f02kitchenham5 Preliminary Guidelines for Empirical Research in Software Engineering Barbara A. Kitchenham etal IEEE TSE Aug 02.
How to write a professional paper. 1. Developing a concept of the paper 2. Preparing an outline 3. Writing the first draft 4. Topping and tailing 5. Publishing.
Evaluating Impacts of MSP Grants Hilary Rhodes, PhD Ellen Bobronnikov February 22, 2010 Common Issues and Recommendations.
1 The Theoretical Framework. A theoretical framework is similar to the frame of the house. Just as the foundation supports a house, a theoretical framework.
Research Project Title Researcher Name #1 Researcher Name #2 Researcher Name #3 Researcher Name #4 Date of Presentation Name of Conference Presenting at.
The Research Process. 1. Problem Identification Identification 2. Hypothesis Formulation 3. Review of Related Literature 4. Research Design Preparation.
Question paper 1997.
Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2008 Intelligent Consumer Chapter 14 This multimedia product and its contents are protected under copyright law. The following.
Evaluating Impacts of MSP Grants Ellen Bobronnikov Hilary Rhodes January 11, 2010 Common Issues and Recommendations.
Anatomy of a Research Article Five (or six) major sections Abstract Introduction (without a heading!) Method (and procedures) Results Discussion and conclusions.
TITLE OF THE STUDY. General Instructions 12/7/  Presentation Time: 15 minutes  Questions & Answers: 05 minutes  Each slide should not contain.
4 Writing Academic Proposals Research Methods – Bazara Barry.
The Effect of on By:. Purpose The purpose of this project was to.
Evaluation Requirements for MSP and Characteristics of Designs to Estimate Impacts with Confidence Ellen Bobronnikov February 16, 2011.
Principals of Research Writing. What is Research Writing? Process of communicating your research  Before the fact  Research proposal  After the fact.
WRITING A RESEARCH PROPORSAL
Research Design Prof Dr. Remzi ALTUNIŞIK. Questions to be answered in research design? O What is the study about? O (ii) Why is the study being made?
Copyright © 2011, 2005, 1998, 1993 by Mosby, Inc., an affiliate of Elsevier Inc. Chapter 13: Boundary Setting in Experimental-Type Designs A deductive.
What Is Science?. 1. Science is limited to studying only the natural world. 2. The natural world are those phenomena that can be investigated, discovered,
Manuscript Review: A Checklist From: Seals, D.R and H Tanaka Advances in Physiology Education 23:52-58.
Copyright © 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 1 Research: An Overview.
Selection and Formulation of Research Problem DR NORIZA MOHD JAMAL DEPT OF MANAGEMENT, FPPSM.
Critiquing Quantitative Research.  A critical appraisal is careful evaluation of all aspects of a research study in order to assess the merits, limitations,
Dr. Aidah Abu Elsoud Alkaissi An-Najah National University Employ evidence-based practice: key elements.
CHAPTER OVERVIEW The Format of a Research Proposal Being Neat
IB Chemistry Internal Assessment.
ECON 105 Research Methods and Project Design
Chapter 21: Completing the Research Process
NAMRATA TIWARI-12 NISHANT KUMAR-06 Research Problem 1.
CHAPTER OVERVIEW The Format of a Research Proposal Being Neat
Presentation transcript:

Factors to consider when Evaluating Research

Is the research hypothesis...  sufficiently specific?  clearly stated?

Inspect for deliberate bias / distortion when  investigator has vested interest in results supporting a particular viewpoint  highly emotional issues are involved  states "this study was conducted to prove”  number of cases upon which percentages are based is either not indicated or is low

Inspect for deliberate bias / distortion when  figures are calculated to several decimal places  surprising or newsworthy findings reward the researcher with career-making publicity  objective findings are distorted by mass media to make them "more newsworthy"  only a few key studies are cited

Inspect for sampling bias when  the research is based on volunteers  there is high subject mortality  group selection criteria may be inappropriate

Inspect for sampling bias  in causal-comparative studies  experimental vs. control group  when subjects may not be representative of the population

Undertake critical evaluation of measurement techniques  reliability  validity

Developing the Research Proposal  Introduction & research problem statement Literature review Identify problems State significance of problems Research ideas Contribution to knowledge and practice  Formulating hypothesis  Selecting possible measures  Selecting research sources  Specifying research design  Selecting analysis procedures  Specifying research activities