ARISTOTELION UNIVERSITY OF THESSALONIKI SCHOOL OF TECHNOLOGY FACULTY OF RURAL AND SURVEYING ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Intermodality in the area of Záhony Judit Thomka Regional Development Holding Ltd. Usti Nad Labem 17th April 2009.
Advertisements

Joint presentation by respective units in DGs AGRI, EMPL and REGIO IPA Components III, IV and V: Conditions for successful preparation and absorption of.
Sustainable development of inland waterways transport Tamás Marton – Ministry of Transport, Communications and Energy – Hungary
OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME ON TRANSPORT Nelly Yordanova Head of Managing Authority Structural Funds in Bulgaria: Possibilities in Environment, Infrastructure,
Role of State Role of State in implementation of major PPP road projects Panagiotis Patsiadas Deputy Head of Contracts & Bids Unit, International Project.
Kosovo Ministry of Transport & Communications Department of Railways, Civil Aviation and Maritime Transport Pristina, June 2004.
Transport and Trade Linkages: Central Asia & Eastern Europe
ARISTOTELION UNIVERSITY OF THESSALONIKI SCHOOL OF TECHNOLOGY FACULTY OF RURAL AND SURVEYING ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING.
Ministry of Regional Development MINISTRY OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT 14 Ministerial Conference of European Conference of Ministers Responsible.
THE TRANS-AFRICAN HIGHWAY NETWORK
Integration of Pan-European Corridor X to the Network of Rail Freight Corridors How to Convert Pan-European Corridor X into a Railway Axis of Prosperity.
ZÁHONY: STRATEGIC POSITION IN THE NEW EUROPE. MAJOR TRANSPORT ROUTES THROUGH ZÁHONY LOCATED ON A MAJOR TRANSPORT CORRIDOR (No.5 Pan- European corridor)
11th meeting of the Steering Committee for Pan-European Corridor X Belgrade, Republic of Serbia
Chairman: G. Patsiavos, Head of International Affairs Division, Greek Ministry of Transport and Communications Secretary: Ch. Taxiltaris, Professor Members:
8th Meeting of the Working Group for the improvement of border crossings along the Pan-European Corridor X Belgrade, Republic of Serbia
ARISTOTELION UNIVERSITY OF THESSALONIKI SCHOOL OF TECHNOLOGY FACULTY OF RURAL AND SURVEYING ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING.
ARISTOTELION UNIVERSITY OF THESSALONIKI SCHOOL OF TECHNOLOGY FACULTY OF RURAL AND SURVEYING ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING.
MTF Rail Development Forum
PAN-EUROPEAN TRANSPORT CORRIDOR PRODEXPO 2007 Athens, October M. Miltiadou, Transport Engineer Technical Secretariat Pan-European Transport Corridor.
World Bank Transport Team April 16,  Background  World Bank assistance program  Opportunities and way forward 2.
ARISTOTLE UNIVERSITY OF THESSALONIKI SCHOOL OF TECHNOLOGY FACULTY OF RURAL AND SURVEYING ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING.
MINISTRY OF TRANSPORT OF THE REPUBLIC OF LATVIA Implementation of Cohesion Fund Projects in Transport Sector Cohesion Fund Monitoring Committee 11 April.
TRACECA PROJECT EVALUATION. Mark the location of the project on the map with a plain, black line or dot. Constanta – Vama Veche Motorway section.
Challenges and the benefits of interoperability for the railway industry and the rail transport Eric Fontanel UNIFE General Manager.
International Road Transport Facilitation Results from a survey in the League of Arab States based on driver records Riyadh, November 13, 2013.
June 2013 Building the New Silk Road: EBRD transport infrastructure investments in Central Asia Askar Namazbayev, Infrastructure Russia and Central Asia.
1 Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management.
TRACECA PROJECT EVALUATION. LEVEL CROSSINGS ON GEORGIAN RAILWAY TRACECA ROUTE AUTOMATION OF 39 LEVEL CROSSINGS ON THE MAIN LINE FROM AZERBADJAN BORDER.
The Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance
Runways – 7 July Paul Harwood
Introduction to JASPERS and reflections on Sustainable Roads Kristian DUUS, JASPERS Roads Division, Vienna Regional Office.
RAIL TRANSPORT SEMINAR: RAILWAY INFRASTRUCTURE – KEY TO ACHIEVE SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORT Operation on the Bulgarian railway market – current situation and.
Presentation WG 2 Managing EU Funds on the Regional Level Republic of Albania Ministry of European Integration (MEI) Regional Conference EU Perspectives.
Activity Report of the Technical Secretariat and the Steering Committee for Pan- European Corridor X Technical Secretariat Pan-European Transport Corridor.
An Introduction to World Bank Organization and Operations Jean-Charles Crochet Senior Transport Economist World Bank.
CER The Voice of European Railways CER view on South East Europe: Balanced investment and financial stability Zagreb, 17 June 2005 Ad Toet Advisor.
REFORMS IN THE ROAD SECTOR IN KENYA Restructuring of Road Sub-Sector: Responding to Future Challenges Eng. Joseph N Nkadayo, MBS Director General, Kenya.
EU ASSISTANCE IN SERBIA: FROM CARDS TO IPA With the support of the European Commission Mrs. Aleksandra Mijalkovic 19 December 2006 Belgrade Open School.
Interstate Statistical Committee of the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS-Stat) Implementing the Global Strategy to Improve Agricultural and Rural.
7th IRU Euro-Asian Road Transport Conference, Ministerial Meeting and C0-ordination Meeting of International Organization and Financial institutions. A.
Directorate-general for Energy and Transport European Commission June rd Expert Group Meeting Transport Euro-Asian Linkages Sanna Kuukka.
TRACECA PROJECT EVALUATION
TRACECA CONSTRUCTION OF INTERMODAL TERMINAL IN THE REGION OF RUSE CITY BULGARIA Infrastructure Working Group Kiev, 11 May 2011.
H\projects\controls\ekdilosi\tecnoman\ ppt Prospects of drafting Prospects of drafting Black Sea Ring Highway Black Sea Ring Highway Master Plan.
SEETO Comprehensive Rail Network Development
Fourth IABIN Council Meeting Support to Building the Inter-American Biodiversity Information Network.
The National Strategy of Slovak Republic
 Contract by Public Authority for provision of asset and/or services  With private entity  Private finance used to fund asset/service  Long-term in.
Sectoral Operational Programme on Transport Coordination of Programmes and Projects Directorate 2 October, 2006 Ministry of Transport.
The Adriatic Sea Partnership: A pilot program for the Mediterranean “Extraordinary Meeting of MAP Focal Points” Side Event Catania, Italy 7 November 2006.
The project is co-funded by the European Union, Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance Project activities realisation: WP4 FB 16 – Faculty of transport.
Transport Integration of cross-border transport infrastructure TEN-T strategy on large cross- border cooperation projects Gudrun Schulze, Team leader,
Key factors in the transport policy to encourage better integration Sixty-Third Session of UNECE, Geneva, 30th March 2009 "Economic Integration in the.
CURRENT PLANS FOR EXISTING AND DEVELOPMENT OF NEW RAILWAYS IN UGANDA PRESENTED BY GRACE JAMES ITAZI DIRECTOR OF TRANSPORT MINISTRY OF WORKS AND TRANSPORT-
Transcarpathian Regional Council Zahony Development Company Beregovo District Administration Municipal government of village Diyda ENPI Cross-border Cooperation.
State of play of Corridor X Technical Secretariat Pan-European Transport Corridor X REPUBLIC OF GREECE MINISTRY OF INFRASTRUCTURE, TRANSPORT AND NETWORKS.
Ms. Nerejda Hoxha, SEETO Transport Planning Manager
SEETO Investment Report 2016
The SEESARI initiative – “From vision to action“
Vice President: Lin Zhonghong Economic & Planning Research Institute
The intermodal logistics capacity in the region of Záhony
Presentation by: Marios Miltiadou Greek Ministry of Transport
Baltic-Adriatic Corridor
European Commission High Level Group
Government of Montenegro Ministry of Transport and Maritime Affairs
Development of Integrated Transport Corridors under Central Asia Regional Economic Cooperation (CAREC) Hong Wang Asian Development Bank IRU 5th Euro-Asian.
Government of Montenegro Ministry of Transport and Maritime Affairs
Road Safety in Azerbaijan: Challenges and Way Forward
Concrete steps towards simplification, harmonisation and digitalisation of border controls Belgrade | 4th December 2018 | Simon Hartl.
European PPP Expertise Centre (EPEC)
Presentation transcript:

ARISTOTELION UNIVERSITY OF THESSALONIKI SCHOOL OF TECHNOLOGY FACULTY OF RURAL AND SURVEYING ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING TECHNICAL SECRETARIAT OF THE STEERING COMMITTEE SUMMARY OF THE T.I.R.S. DRAFT FINAL REPORT April 2002 Note 1: This presentation does not necessarily mean the adoption of the TIRS conclusions by the T.S. Note 2: The FINAL REPORT is being completed these days. Technical Secretariat Pan-European Transport Corridor X

 TIRS (Transport Infrastructure Regional Study for the Balkan Region) is financed by Agence Française de Développement in the context of the Stability Pact and supervised by a steering group including: the European Conference of Ministers of Transport acting as chairman of the Steering Group and monitoring the study the European Commission the European Investment Bank the French Ministry of Transport. The Consultant commissioned to carry out the study is Louis Berger S.A.  The study is a critical review of existing plans and programmes which respective Authorities in the Balkan region have as their basis for infrastructure improvements in response to defined objectives for transport development in their countries. The participating countries are: Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, F.R.Yugoslavia, F.Y.R.O.M., Romania.  The countries individual requests for transport infrastructure investments are of a different nature and refer to substantially different types of projects. The national objectives, which regularly appear are:  Reconstruction of destroyed or damaged facilities,  Rehabilitation of existing facilities severely deteriorated by lack of maintenance,  Upgrading main facilities to offer improved levels of service,  Development of substantial and modern transport infrastructure on the main communication axis to meet expected long-term requirements.  F.R. Yugoslavia has the first two objectives in mind, attempting to upgrade facilities as far as possible; Bulgaria is concerned by the two last objectives whereas Croatia mainly shows concerns of the fourth category of objective. F.Y.R.O.M. is concerned mainly by objective 2 and 3. INTRODUCTION

 The report suggests that at the level of the region as a whole, and in line with the Terms of Reference of TIRS, specific transport infrastructure objectives could be expressed as follows:  Raise or keep the transport communication system between the main economic and demographic centres in the region at technical standards and with the quality of service required by transport demand,  Facilitate, improve and shorten whenever possible the connections between different national transport networks,  Facilitate access to the region and transit through the region, of foreign traffic, with required standards of comfort and safety,  Rationalise, simplify and accelerate the procedures at border crossings throughout the region,  Introduce inter-regional agreements to co-ordinate development of the main transport infrastructure and to improve transport services by jointly operating equipment or rolling stock whenever feasible. TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE OBJECTIVES

 Capacity considerations of existing infrastructure have been examined and have generally concluded that there are no physical bottlenecks on surface transportation networks at present with the exception of a couple of bridges destroyed or damaged in Yugoslavia. ROAD  Traffic congestion is however expected to become a nuisance in the medium term, but only on a few sections of the highway network, namely:  on Corridor IV between Sofia and the Greek border, and on the E 763 road between Belgrade and Cacak, along the roads servicing the Adriatic coast in Croatia, between Zagreb/ Rijeka and Split,  on Corridor X between Belgrade and Hungary and between Leskovac and Kumanovo,  near the largest cities, like Bucharest, Sofia, Belgrade and Sarajevo.  All of the links listed above should require upgrading to four lanes expressway/motorways in the medium term. Other localised congestion throughout the region should largely be reduced by upgrading existing roads to regular 2 lane highway standards, with the addition of crawler lanes, when necessary, in mountainous terrain. RESULTS – COMMENTS OF THE STUDY (1/2)

RAIL  Railway lines should not experience any noticeable increase in traffic, and those lines which are already close to their capacity could, with some minor adaptations in signalling and crossings, handle higher levels of traffic if necessary. Given the unclear prospects for rail transportation in the region and the generally poor financial situation of the railway companies, rail infrastructure development strategy should remain modest for the moment and concentrate on the most trafficked links, basically those existing along the Pan European Transport Corridors.  Systematic rehabilitation and progressive upgrading of these lines should allow railway transportation to have a chance to play its role and to protect its natural markets.  Major investments, such as those which may lead to a significant increase in the nominal minimum speed, or doubling or electrifying tracks, should be carefully analysed.  The financial situation of the railways has to improve in most cases or be adequately managed before more important and long-term investments may be envisaged. RESULTS – COMMENTS OF THE STUDY (2/2)

IN GENERAL  Corridor X was clearly the most utilized route across the region ten years ago. The stabilization of the situation and the recent political changes have already allowed the Corridor to take back part of its original traffic which had been diverted to other competitive routes. The classification of all projects envisaged along this corridor concur to a systematic rehabilitation and upgrading of this corridor in the middle term, for both road and railway infrastructures, on the main corridor route. ROAD (/…)  At the Southern end of the corridor, the construction of a two-lane carriageway with motorway characteristics on Demir Kapija – Udovo – Gevgelija in F.Y.R.O.M. (project Ma-H-05 – Construction of a 44,5km new carriageway – Estimated cost: 54 million Euro) will allow to handle the expected traffic for some time before completing a fully fledged motorway. SPECIFIC COMMENTS ON CORRIDOR X (1/2)

ROAD (…/)  Upgrading of only one section on the road infrastructure may be postponed for a while, in waiting for higher traffic levels to be reached: Slavonski Brod – Lipovac/ project Cr-H-07 (Construction of a 26km motorway close to the FRY border – Estimated cost: 125 million Euro) in Croatia.  Branch Xb should be completed as a standard motorway.  Conversely, branch Xc (Nis – Pirot – Sofia/ Estimated cost: 15,5 million Euro) should be upgraded to a standard two lane highway, without moving immediately to motorway standards (such perspective should be analysed for branch Xc in a pre-feasibility study to be conducted during TIRS 2).  Branch Xd necessitates only some local upgrading. RAIL  Progressive rehabilitation and upgrading of the railway line is recommended on the trunk corridor, from Yugoslavian/ Hungarian border to Beograd, and on branch Xb on both sides of the border (projects Bu-R-09 – Estimated cost: 147 million Euro and Yu-R- 04/10/11). SPECIFIC COMMENTS ON CORRIDOR X (2/2)

 The full value of many infrastructure projects will only be realised if institutional or bilateral/multilateral arrangements are reached in the meantime. This is the case – inter alia – for:  The recognition of an international status for the Sava river and a distribution of responsibilities among the riparian countries is made for its maintenance and operations,  The facilitation and speeding-up of border crossing operations in general, but in particular for railway transport, with a single control point for cargo and custom control on line for passengers.  The European Commission has prepared the detailed terms of reference for a second phase for TIRS. It is envisaged that Phase 2 will include, amongst other actions, the conduct of some pre- feasibility studies and selective prospective analysis, the development of an appropriate information system at regional level and assistance in the creation of a documentation centre to ensure that the most important information or documentation on the transport system of the Balkans is retained and made accessible for future users. PERSPECTIVES