S3 Project aim The main goal, thus expected result, of the S3 project would be to strengthen tools used for Structural Fund policies (SF), through the.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
State University – Higher School of Economics
Advertisements

Strengthening statistical capacity in support of progress towards the Internationally Agreed Development Goals in countries of South Asia United Nations.
Financing of OAS Activities Sources of cooperation Cooperation modalities Cooperation actors Specific Funds management models and resources mobilization.
1 Open Days 2008 Communicating Cohesion Policy Together Bruxelles, 10/07/2008 The experience of the Italian ED network in Cohesion Policy Communication.
This project is funded by the EUAnd implemented by a consortium led by MWH Amman – 23 April 2012 RCBI ‘handover’ meeting Jordan.
MINISTRY OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS DG “PROGRAMMING OF THE REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT” OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME “REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT” EVALUATION.
Programme Presentation GREECE-ALBANIA IPA CROSS BORDER COOPERATION PROGRAMME Ioannina 16 th of October 2012.
Identification of critical success factors for implementing NLLS, through collaboration and exchange of expertise IDENTIFY LLP-2008-RO-KA1-KA1NLLS.
EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND Event – date, place About INTERREG EUROPE INTERREG EUROPE INTERREG IVC Joint Technical Secretariat Iruma Kravale, The.
Ⓒ Olof S. Leader as part of “community-led local development” under the CSF; networking aspects.
EVALUATION AND QUALITY ASSURANCE STRATEGY PRESENTED BY DR SHYAM PATIAR.
European Union | European Regional Development Fund Zooming in Interreg Europe National Info Day 12 May 2015, Paris Nicolas Singer | Senior Project Officer.
EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND GreenInfraNet/Smart Europe final conference, 4 November 2014, Almere EU Interregional Cooperation State of play and.
The URBACT II Programme General Presentation Vilnius, 20 January 2011.
EUROPEAN COHESION POLICY AT A GLANCE Introduction to the EU Structural Funds Ctibor Kostal Sergej Muravjov.
Low Carbon South East Europe Daniele Vettorato – European Research Academy of Bolzano Verona – Smart Energy, 08/10/2014 Project introduction.
1 EU Funds for Improvement of Servcies Provided by the Municipalities Future scope of co-operation with EU Structural Funds Thomas Wobben Representation.
Riga – Latvia, 4 & 5 December 2006
Strasbourg 05/06/07 Strasbourg 31/07/07 EUROPEAID Non-State Actors and Local Authorities in Development WTD: WORKING TOGETHER FOR DEVELOPMENT.
EUROCHAMBRES The Association of European Chambers of Commerce and Industry Connecting European Chambers: International Markets Birgit ARENS Brussels, 27.
Enterprise Directorate General European Commission Innovating Regions in Europe (IRE) network and Innovation Relay Centres (IRC) : regional tools for.
Innovation in the Rural Development Networks Directorate General for Agriculture and Rural Development Matthias Langemeyer & Iman Boot.
INTOSAI Public Debt Working Group Updating of the Strategic Plan Richard Domingue Office of the Auditor General of Canada June 14, 2010.
IPA Funds Programme Management sept Bölgesel Rekabet Edebilirlik Operasyonel Programı’nın Uygulanması için Kurumsal Kapasitenin Oluşturulmasına.
Implementation Section Romania-Bulgaria Cross-Border Cooperation Operational Programme Joint Approval Committee, Bucharest, 3 April 2007.
OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME “DEVELOPMENT OF THE COMPETITIVENESS OF THE BULGARIAN ECONOMY” Republic of Bulgaria Ministry of Economy and Energy April 2006.
1 Women Entrepreneurs in Rural Tourism Evaluation Indicators Bristol, November 2010 RG EVANS ASSOCIATES November 2010.
1st Meeting of the partnership 18 November 2009, Brussels INTERREG IVC Capitalisation projects Overview and guidelines for their preparation.
Regulatory requirements in the current programming period Funchal, 18 November 2010.
European Commission Introduction to the Community Programme for Employment and Social Solidarity PROGRESS
Leonardo da Vinci Partnerships: an opportunity to work together Italian National Agency for LLP - Leonardo da Vinci Sectoral Programme.
EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND RECOMMEND Final Event, 11 September 2014, Varna EU Interregional Cooperation State of play and perspectives Jason Martinez.
National Rural Network Poland. Main Objectives  The aim of the National Network of Rural Areas is to support the implementation and evaluation of the.
Institutional structures for Structural Funds assistance Ministry of Finance September 10, 2003.
Leader subcommittee meeting- 26/11/ THE CONTACT POINT OF THE EUROPEAN NETWORK FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT Main tasks of the Contact Point in relation to.
Jean-Michel Courades, DG AGRI F3 European Rural Development Network
Leader subcommittee – 26/11/2008 European Network for Rural Development : organisation and specific activities by Gaelle Lhermitte,
European Dialogue on Future Interregional Co-operation The main outcomes of the CENTURIO project within the partnership co-ordinated by Jász-Nagykun-Szolnok.
ROMANIA MINISTRY OF EDUCATION, RESEARCH AND INNOVATION National Centre for Development of Vocational Education and Training Implementation Unit of Phare.
Experience of Accessing EU Financial Support in Lithuania 4th PG Funding Meeting , Paris.
Ministry of Education, Research and Religious Affairs General Secretariat for Research and Technology EEA Financial Mechanism GR07 Research within.
TEN-T Executive Agency and Project Management Anna LIVIERATOU-TOLL TEN-T Executive Agency Senior Programme and Policy Coordinator European Economic and.
Information Overview SF: Planning & Programming Workshops for EC Delegation Patrick Colgan & Ján Krištín PROGRAMMING PROCEDURES in Support of Regional.
Jela Tvrdonova, The EU priorities:  Use the Leader approach for introducing innovation in the thematic axis  better governance at the local level.
The EGTC, a suitable instrument for Article 37(6)b? Background and main questions 17 March 2011 | Paris.
Polish National Rural Network Bureau of Technical Assistance Responsible for: -Technical Assistance in Programs of Rural Development for period.
Future outlook and next steps for ESPON The ESPON 2013 Programme OPEN DAYS Bruxelles, 10 October 2007.
1 The Italian “National Rural Network” Workshop on Successful Work of Managing Authorities Budapest – 15th April 2008 Riccardo Passero
Interreg IIIB Trans-national cooperation: Budget comparison : 440 million EURO 420 m EURO (Interreg IIC prog.) + 20 m EURO (Pilot Actions)
EVALUATION OF THE SEE SARMa Project. Content Project management structure Internal evaluation External evaluation Evaluation report.
The EU Water Initiative and the EU ACP Facility New Instruments to promote sustainable development of water resources and affordable access Antonio Garcia-Fragio.
Statistical Cooperation with ENP-South Twelfth meeting of the Management Group on Statistical Cooperation March 2010 Luxembourg Agenda item 6.1.
1 Project Coordinators’ meeting March 2010 NATIONAL TEMPUS OFFICES (NTOs) & HIGHER EDUCATION REFORMS.
The 7th Framework Programme for Research: Strategy of international cooperation activities Robert Burmanjer Head of Unit, “International Scientific Cooperation.
URBACT IMPLEMENTATION NETWORKS. URBACT in a nutshell  European Territorial Cooperation programme (ETC) co- financed by ERDF  All 28 Member States as.
"The role of Rural Networks as effective tools to promote rural development" TAIEX/Local Administration Facility Seminar on Rural Development Brussels,
Coordination committee meeting – 01/10/2008 Presented by: John Lougheed European Network for Rural Development : Legal framework and structures.
Project: EaP countries cooperation for promoting quality assurance in higher education Maria Stratan European Institute for Political Studies of Moldova.
EN Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION Information and Publicity in programming period
EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND CLUE final conference, 24 September 2014, Turin EU Interregional Cooperation State of play and perspectives Johanna.
Interreg Europe Elena Ferrario
WORKING PRINCIPLES ECONOMIC COOPERATION ORGANIZATION REGIONAL COORDINATION CENTRE FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ECO/FAO REGIONAL PROGRAMME FOR FOOD SECURITY.
Civil Protection Financial Instrument – Prevention Projects
Regions for Sustainable Change Project
The Learning Networks under the ESF
Technical Working Group meeting 21 March 2012 Brussels
European Network for Rural Development : organisation and specific activities by Gaelle Lhermitte, DG AGRI (1) Legal framework.
NDPHS Work Plan for 2012 NDPHS 8th Partnership Annual Conference
- Kick-off meeting - ERANET Cofund BlueBio WP4 (Leader: AEI)
XVII PA7 Steering Group Meeting
Presentation transcript:

S3 Project aim The main goal, thus expected result, of the S3 project would be to strengthen tools used for Structural Fund policies (SF), through the access to the experiences of others.

The S3 Partners 1. Emilia- Romagna Region, GD industry, trade and tourism (IT) 2. Ostrava Regional Development Agency (CZ) 3. Office of the Košice Self-Governing Region (SL) 4. Regional Development Agency of North Great Plain (HU) 5. Region Madrid, Directorate generale of state cooperation & European affairs (SP) 6. Development Bank of Saxony-Anhalt (DE) 7. Ignalina regional development agency (LT) 8. Regional Government of Campania (IT) 9. Centre for Innovation and Business Development – CIDEM (SP) 10. Latium Region (IT) 11. Finlombarda Ltd (IT) 12. Region of Western Greece (GR) 13. Objective 1 Programme Directorate South Yorkshire (UK) 14. E.C. Business and Innovation Centre (BIC) of Western Greece GR)

The S3 Partners SF functional identity The partnership is made of 9 countries, and 14 partners (4 of which new Member States). In 9 cases, the participating institutions are public authorities, part of regional governments. In 5 cases, being development agencies at regional level, they act as intermediate bodies. As far as regional governments are concerned they act as either Managing Authorities/Intermediate bodies of SPD (Spain, Latium, Emilia Romagna) of objective 2 programmes, or as Managing Authority of objective 1 operational programmes ( Western Greece, South Yorkshire, Campania). As far as Public Equivalent Bodies are concerned they either act as Intermediate Body (Saxony-Anhalt) or will be in charge of objective 1 operational programmes as Intermediate bodies (Ostrava, Kosice, North Great Plain, Ignalina).

S3 Objectives networking experiences/best practices on regional development programmes in view of the potential application in the new programming period of Structural Funds and of the EU enlargement, networking people in order to strengthen and exchange know-how and skills, networking results in order to disseminate information EU-wide and in new member states regional institutions,' making the network a reliable counterpart for EU institutions in the process of revision of Structural Funds policies

S3 Methodology The networking structure will facilitate the discussion and comparison among EU regions, the following main aspects will be promoted: identification of functioning modalities as far as programming, managing, monitoring and evaluating, assessment of the added value of experienced instruments in terms of their capacity to achieve results, evaluation of possible difficulties in combining innovative instrument with EU regulations.

WP1 Management & Co-ordination Emilia- Romagna Region Strategic Focus: This component aims at guaranteeing an effective management and co-ordination of activities that will be developed throughout the project. The goal is to adopt a common working methodology that will facilitate the work of the 14 members of our network and guarantee that all rules have been respected. expected out puts: Three progress reports and one final report One kick-off meeting and one final meeting Four meetings of TAC and SC

WP2 Networking experiences: analysis and share of best practices. Centre for Innovation and Business Development – CIDEM (SP) Strategic Focus: This component focuses on the analysis, discussion and sharing of best practices in order to identify innovative tools of programming, managing and monitoring structural funds programmes. Managing Authorities will be grouped in 3 transnational thematic working groups and will share and discuss successful experiences expected out puts: papers, reports and recommendations on the experiences analysed, set up of Thematic Working Groups

WP3 Networking people: hands-on experience of best practices. South Yorkshire (UK) Strategic Focus: Activities aim at making people of different EU regions co-operate with each other through an exchange of staff. Staff with relevant experience on SF will contribute by sharing it with colleagues from other regions. A one-week study will allow staff from interested regions and colleagues of hosting regions to work closely together. expected out puts: exchange of staff and study visits, in-house training seminars, meetings for the dissemination of the achieved results;

WP4 Networking results: dissemination and information activities. Western Greece Region Strategic Focus: This component focuses on networking the results. The project will focus on organising events and workshops in order to share and disseminate the results of the project EU wide. In this way, the added value of the individual Structural Funds interventions in the different regions can be expanded throughout Europe. expected out puts: editorial and graphic line (web-site, newsletters, etc.), meeting at regional and national level and a final meeting at European level, contacts and meetings with existing similar networks and with EU institutions.

Thematic Working Thematic Working Groups (TWG) TWG PARTNERSHIP will deal with experiences, referring to the application of the principle of partnership (art. 8 EC Reg 1260/99), thus the capacity to involve local and public competent authorities, economic and social partners and any other relevant competent bodies in the preparation, financing, monitoring and evaluation of the Programmes TWG ORGANISATION AND MANAGEMENT will deal with experiences promoting innovative tools adopted in the implementation of SF programmes as far as the methodologies adopted and the systems developed. TWG INFORMATION will deal with experiences defining innovative tools and methodologies for accomplishing the requirements of art. 46 of EC Reg. 1260/99 in disseminating information about SF programmes and operations to the potential final beneficiaries and to the general public.

Main objective of the thematic working groups to select, according to a set of commonly shared criteria, the experiences to be discussed - to analyse the experiences according to a methodology focusing on operational modalities, their added value in terms of capacity to achieve results and potential difficulties faced in strictly following the EC related regulations. to disseminate the results of the analysis firstly at network level, then to a wider audience through meetings and events

Management Structure Two main structures have been foreseen to be: the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) and the Steering Group (SG); a Technical secretariat (TS) supporting both structures

Technical Advisory Committee The TAC is made up of a Project Co-ordinator (PC), a Financial Co-ordinator (FC) and Component Co-ordinators (CC). The TAC is the structure dealing with the overall coordination of technical and financial project activities. The TAC will ensure: - co-ordination of activities of different components, - an information flow to the partners, to the SG and to the EC - the fulfilment of the regular technical and financial reports addressed both to the EC (progress and final) and to the SG - the implementation of strategic decisions carried out by the SG. - effective implementation of components through a qualitative and quantitative evaluation of projects' activities and their effectiveness according to project objectives.

Steering Committee The SG is the strategic structure of the project. It is led by the Contract Manager (CM) and made of representative of each project partner. Main task of the SG is the evaluation of the effectiveness of the project activity according to the information provided by the TAC (reports and requested information) and the evaluation and revision of strategic priorities.. In order to satisfy specific items, it will be allowed for external experts or other project structures to be involved in SG meetings.

Financing ERDF funding ,50 National co-financing EU Member States: ,50 TOTAL BUDGET: ,00