2010 California Standards Test (CST) Results Lodi Unified School District Prepared by the Assessment, Research, and Evaluation August 17, 2010 Board Study.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Illinois. Graduating Class Of 2002 Demographics State And National Test Volume Source: State, National ACT Profile, 2002, Executive Summary.
Advertisements

Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.
NCLB and MSIP Accountability for End-of-Course Assessments DRAFT – October 2008 Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Becky Odneal.
State Accountability Overview 2014 Strozeski – best guess.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report September 6, 2011.
Accountability Update Ty Duncan Coordinator of Accountability and Compliance, ESC
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report September 20, 2011.
+ Utah Comprehensive Accountability System (UCAS) 1 Hal Sanderson, Ph.D. Research and Assessment August 21,
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) & CAHSEE Results Update Prepared for the September 21, 2010 Board of Education.
2013 State Accountability System Allen ISD. State Accountability under TAKS program:  Four Ratings: Exemplary, Recognized, Academically Acceptable, Academically.
2013 Accountability Report Jurupa Unified School District Board of Education Meeting.
1 Utah Performance Assessment System for Students U-PASS Accountability Plan Judy W. Park Assessment & Accountability Director Utah State Office of Education.
A few of the Achievement Outcomes for San Francisco Unified School District’s California Math and Science Partnership Grant- Working together to Improve.
1 Cold Water Elementary English Language Arts Standard Status: Approaching (2010) MAP Performance Index Status Targets (2011)
Delaware’s Accountability Plan for Schools, Districts and the State Delaware Department of Education 6/23/04.
Fontana Unified School District Student Achievement Data September 17, 2008 Instructional Services Assessment & Evaluation.
Cambrian School District Academic Performance Index (API) Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Program Improvement (PI) Report.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress Fresno Unified School District 2005 Data Review.
San Leandro Unified School Board Looking Closely About Our Data September 6, 2006 Presented by Department of Curriculum and Instruction Prepared by Daniel.
District Assessment & Accountability Data Board of Education Report September 6, 2011 Marsha A. Brown, Director III – Student Services State Testing and.
SCHOOL ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT ALBUQUERQUE PUBLIC SCHOOLS RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND ACCOUNTABILITY DEPARTMENT.
Timmerman Public Hearing September 16, :00-7:00.
Department of Research and Evaluation Santa Ana Unified School District 2011 CST API and AYP Elementary Presentation Version: Elementary.
MARTINEZ UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT CST DATA ANALYSIS STAR RESULTS Presented by Audrey Lee Director, Curriculum & Educational Technology 10 September.
1 Paul Tuss, Ph.D., Program Manager Sacramento Co. Office of Education August 17, 2009 California’s Integrated Accountability System.
1 STUDENT PROGRESS AND ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT 2013 September 10, 2013 HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT.
Academic Achievement Highlights San Francisco Unified School District August 2010.
School Report Card ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS REPORT: ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS, MATHEMATICS, SCIENCE, AND GRADUATION RATE For GREENVILLE CSD.
State and Federal Testing Accountability: Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) SAIT Training September 27, 2007.
Cambrian School District CST Overview August, 2012 Exploring Infinite Possibilities for Learning.
End of Course Assessments School Year English Language Arts, Math, Biology, and Government.
College and Career Preparation 1 College and Career Preparation Lodi Unified School District September 2, 2008 Prepared by the Assessment,
End of Year Report_ DataSet 1 Lodi Unified School District Year-End Benchmark Assessment Results (Student Achievement Monitoring)
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 10, 2007.
LOMA PARK ACCOUNTABILITY PARENT PRESENTATION September 24, 2015.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) Results Update Prepared by the LUSD Assessment, Research & Evaluation Department.
CAHSEE Results Board Report 1 Lodi Unified School District 2009 California High School Exit Examination Results September 15, 2009.
Your High School Name 3-Year Achievement Results Analysis September 2013.
Raytown C-2 School District 2010 MAP/EOC Results Core Curricular Areas September 27, 2010.
Santa Ana Unified School District 2011 CST Enter School Name Version: Intermediate.
Adequate Yearly Progress The federal law requires all states to establish standards for accountability for all schools and districts in their states. The.
Academic Excellence Indicator System Report For San Antonio ISD Public Meeting January 23, 2006 Board Report January 23, 2006 Department of Accountability,
1 Mitchell D. Chester Commissioner of Elementary and Secondary Education Report on Spring 2009 MCAS Results to the Massachusetts Board of Elementary and.
2012 MOASBO SPRING CONFERENCE Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 1 April 26, 2012.
California Standards Test (CST) and California High School Exit Exam (CAHSEE) Results, Oakland Unified School District Division of Student Achievement.
Department of Research and Evaluation Santa Ana Unified School District 2011 CST High School.
NHCS READY Report October READY Annual Report Contents Growth Proficiency: Detail for Grades 3- 8 and High School Progress: Annual Measurable Objectives.
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
No Child Left Behind California’s Definition of Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) July 2003.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez January 2010.
Sample Elementary School 3-Year Achievement Results Analysis September 2013.
Ross Valley School District STAR, API and AYP Summary Toni Beal, Director of Student Services September 27, 2011.
091 Equity Initiative Status Indicators_March Lodi Unified School District Equity Initiative Status Indicators Prepared by the Assessment, Research,
WCPSS Student Achievement Evaluation and Research Dept. August 19, 2008.
- 0 - OUSD Results MSDF Impact Assessment State Accountability Academic Performance Index (API) The API is a single number, ranging from a low.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 1, 2008.
Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC RESULTS: YEAR ONE Somerset Hills School District ____________.
Updates on Oklahoma’s Accountability System Jennifer Stegman, Assistant Superintendent Karen Robertson, API Director Office of Accountability and Assessments.
Adequate Yearly Progress [Our School District]
Q2 Benchmark Report1 Lodi Unified School District Benchmark Assessment Results (Mid-Year Student Achievement Monitoring) Prepared by.
Illinois.
Accountability in California Before and After NCLB
Sustaining and building on the excellence of LCPS
Metropolitan Nashville Public Schools
76% African American 14% Latino 9% Asian 1% White 51% Low-Income
Mesa Union School District “A Day in the Life of Data”
What is API? The Academic Performance Index (API) is the cornerstone of California's Public Schools Accountability Act of 1999 (PSAA). It is required.
2009 California Standards Test (CST) Results
Academic Achievement Alameda County School Districts
Presentation transcript:

2010 California Standards Test (CST) Results Lodi Unified School District Prepared by the Assessment, Research, and Evaluation August 17, 2010 Board Study Session

ARE Release of 2010 CST Results 2 Executive Summary  For the third consecutive year….. –There was an increase in the percent of students meeting or exceeding standards in:  English Language Arts  Mathematics  Grade Level Science  History-Social Science –The percent of students meeting or exceeding English Language Arts and Mathematics standards increased for each of these numerically significant student groups:  Economically Disadvantaged students  Asian students  White students

ARE Release of 2010 CST Results 3 Executive Summary  From 2007 to 2010, there have been mixed results regarding the district’s efforts in closing the ethnic achievement gaps in English Language Arts and Mathematics. –English Language Arts  Since 2007, the achievement gap in English Language Arts between White and African American students, regardless of economic status, has widened.  During this same period, the achievement gap in English Language Arts between White and Hispanic or Latino students has narrowed for non-economically disadvantaged students and widened for economically disadvantaged students. –Mathematics  Since 2007, the achievement gap in mathematics between White and African American students, regardless of economic status, has widened.  During this same period, the achievement gap in mathematics between White and Hispanic or Latino students, regardless of economic status, has widened.

ARE Release of 2010 CST Results 4 Executive Summary: Focus Areas for Elementary Education –English Language Arts  Grades 3 and 6 –Mathematics  Grades 2 and 3 Secondary Education –English Language Arts  Grade 11 –Mathematics  Algebra I and Geometry –Science  Physics –History-Social Science  Grade 11

ARE Release of 2010 CST Results 5 CST Content Areas Assessed  English Language Arts: Grades 2-11  Mathematics: Grades 2-7, General Math, Algebra I, Geometry, Algebra II, and Summative High School Math  Science: Grades 5, 8, and 10 Life Science, Earth Science, Biology, Chemistry, and Physics  History-Social Science: Grade 8, and Grade 11 U.S. History, World History

ARE Release of 2010 CST Results 6 Summary Findings – English Language Arts  Overall, 45% of our students met or exceeded grade level English Language Arts standards. –This represents a 2 percentage point increase from 2009, and a 9 percentage point increase since  For the third consecutive year, the percent of students meeting or exceeding standards in English Language Arts increased for four of the grade levels tested. –Three-year consecutive percent proficient increase: Grades 4, 7, 8, and 10 –Two-year consecutive percent proficient increase: Grade 2 –One-year percent proficient increase: Grades 5 and 9 –Percent proficient no change/decrease: Grades 3, 6, and 11

ARE Release of 2010 CST Results 7 CST English Language Arts – By Grade

ARE Release of 2010 CST Results 8 Summary Findings – English Language Arts By Other Subgroup  From 2007 to 2010, the percent of students meeting English Language Arts standards steadily increased for one of the three other subgroups.

ARE Release of 2010 CST Results 9 Summary Findings – English Language Arts By Ethnic Subgroup  From 2007 to 2010, the percent of students meeting English Language Arts standards has steadily increased for six of our ethnic subgroups.

ARE Release of 2010 CST Results 10 Summary Findings – English Language Arts By Economic Status By Ethnic Subgroup  Since 2007, the achievement gap in English Language Arts between White and African American students, regardless of economic status, has widened.  During this same period, the achievement gap in English Language Arts between White and Hispanic or Latino students has: –narrowed by 4 percentage points for non- economically disadvantaged students; and –widened by 3 percentage points for economically disadvantaged students.

ARE Release of 2010 CST Results 11 CST English Language Arts By Economic Status By Ethnic Subgroup

ARE Release of 2010 CST Results 12 Summary Findings – Grade Level Mathematics  Overall, 51% of our students met or exceeded grade level mathematics standards. –This represents a 1 percentage point increase from 2009, and a 6 percentage point increase since  For the third consecutive year, the percent of students meeting or exceeding standards in grade level mathematics increased for two of the grade levels tested. –Three-year consecutive percent proficient increase: Grades 4 and 6 –Two-year consecutive percent proficient increase: Grade 7 –One-year percent proficient increase: Grades 5 –Percent proficient no change/decrease: Grades 2 and 3

ARE Release of 2010 CST Results 13 Summary Findings – Grade Level Mathematics

ARE Release of 2010 CST Results 14 Summary Findings – End-of- Course Mathematics  Overall, 24% of our students met or exceeded end-of-course mathematics standards. –This represents a 1 percentage point increase from 2009, and a 2 percentage point increase since  From 2009 to 2010, the percent of students meeting or exceeding standards in end-of-course mathematics increased for two of the subjects tested. –Percent proficient increase: Algebra II and Summative High School Math –Percent percent proficient no change/decrease: General Math, Algebra I, and Geometry

ARE Release of 2010 CST Results 15 Summary Findings – End-of- Course Mathematics

ARE Release of 2010 CST Results 16 Summary Findings – End-of-Course Mathematics - Algebra I By Grade

ARE Release of 2010 CST Results 17 Summary Findings – CST Mathematics By Other Subgroup  For the third consecutive year, the percent of students meeting mathematics standards increased for one of the 3 other subgroups:

ARE Release of 2010 CST Results 18 Summary Findings – CST Mathematics By Ethnic Subgroup  From 2007 to 2010, the percent of students meeting mathematics standards has steadily increased for five of our ethnic subgroups.

ARE Release of 2010 CST Results 19 Summary Findings – CST Mathematics Achievement By Economic Status By Ethnic Subgroup  Since 2007, the achievement gap in mathematics between White and African American students has: –widened by 3 percentage points for non-economically disadvantaged students; and –widened by 5 percentage points for economically disadvantaged students.  During this same period, the achievement gap in mathematics between White and Hispanic or Latino students has: –widened by 1 percentage points for non-economically disadvantaged students; and –widened by 2 percentage points for economically disadvantaged students.

ARE Release of 2010 CST Results 20 Summary Findings: CST Mathematics Achievement By Economic Status By Ethnic Subgroup

ARE Release of 2010 CST Results 21 Summary Findings – Grade Level Science  Overall, 48% of our students met or exceeded grade level science standards. –This represents a 5 percentage point increase from 2009, and a 14 percentage point increase since  For the third consecutive year, the percent of students meeting or exceeding standards in grade level science increased for two of the grade levels tested. –Three-year percent proficient increase: Grades 8 and 10 –One-year percent proficient increase: Grade 5

ARE Release of 2010 CST Results 22 Summary Findings – Grade Level Science

ARE Release of 2010 CST Results 23 Summary Findings – End-of- Course Science  Overall, 38% of our students met or exceeded end-of-course science standards. –This represents a 5 percentage point increase from 2009, and a 6 percentage point increase since  For the second consecutive year, the percent of students meeting or exceeding standards in end- of-course science increased for one of the subjects tested. –Two-year percent proficient increase: Chemistry –One-year percent proficient increase: Biology and Earth Science –Percent proficient no change/decrease: Physics

ARE Release of 2010 CST Results 24 Summary Findings – End-of- Course Science

ARE Release of 2010 CST Results 25 Summary Findings – Grade Level History-Social Science  Overall, 40% of our students met or exceeded grade level history-social science standards. –This represents a 1 percentage point increase from 2009, and a 10 percentage point increase since  For the third consecutive year, the percent of students meeting or exceeding standards in grade level history-social science increased for one of the subjects tested. –Three-year percent proficient increase: Grade 8 –Percent proficient no change/decrease: Grade 11

ARE Release of 2010 CST Results 26 Summary Findings – Grade Level History-Social Science

ARE Release of 2010 CST Results 27 Summary Findings – End-of- Course History-Social Science  Overall, 32% of our students met or exceeded end-of-course World History standards. –This represents a 2 percentage point increase from 2009, and an 8 percentage point increase since 2007.

ARE Release of 2010 CST Results 28 Accountability Timeline  August 18, CST Results released  August 25, Pre-release of Accountability Progress Report (APR): –Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) –Academic Performance Index (API)  August 31, Public release of APR  September 21, APR Update Report presented to the LUSD Board of Education