Adding electronic noise and pedestals to the CALICE simulation LCWS 19 – 23 rd April 20041 Catherine Fry (working with D Bowerman) Imperial College London.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
6 Mar 2002Readout electronics1 Back to the drawing board Paul Dauncey Imperial College Outline: Real system New VFE chip A simple system Some questions.
Advertisements

November 3rd, 2006 CALICE-UK, Manchester - A.-M. Magnan - 1 Noise studies DESY + CERN TB overview Anne-Marie Magnan Imperial College London.
Digital Filtering Performance in the ATLAS Level-1 Calorimeter Trigger David Hadley on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration.
13/02/20071 Event selection methods & First look at new PCB test Manqi Ruan Support & Discussing: Roman Advisor: Z. ZHANG (LAL) & Y. GAO (Tsinghua))
1 Calice Meeting 20/9/06David Ward What did we learn from DESY 2005 run? DESY run May CERN run August Data/MC comparisons for ECAL.
1 Scintillating Fibre Cosmic Ray Test Results Malcolm Ellis Imperial College London Monday 29 th March 2004.
29 June 2004Paul Dauncey1 ECAL Readout Tests Paul Dauncey For the CALICE-UK electronics group A. Baird, D. Bowerman, P. Dauncey, C. Fry, R. Halsall, M.
20 Feb 2002Readout electronics1 Status of the readout design Paul Dauncey Imperial College Outline: Basic concept Features of proposal VFE interface issues.
1Calice-UK Cambridge 9/9/05D.R. Ward David Ward Compare Feb’05 DESY data with Geant4 and Geant3 Monte Carlos. Work in progress – no definitive conclusions.
28 August 2002Paul Dauncey1 Readout electronics for the CALICE ECAL and tile HCAL Paul Dauncey Imperial College, University of London, UK For the CALICE-UK.
30 th June 2004Daniel Bowerman1 Dan Bowerman Imperial College LCUK Meeting - Lancaster 30 th June 2004 Calice Status For the CALICE-UK groups: Birmingham,
6 June 2002UK/HCAL common issues1 Paul Dauncey Imperial College Outline: UK commitments Trigger issues DAQ issues Readout electronics issues Many more.
ECAL Digitization Rick Wilkinson May 25, ECAL Digitization CaloHitResponse CaloSamples (analog signal) EcalElectronicsSim EBDataFrame EEDataFrame.
A preliminary analysis of the CALICE test beam data Dhiman Chakraborty, NIU for the CALICE Collaboration LCWS07, Hamburg, Germany May 29 - June 3, 2007.
The first testing of the CERC and PCB Version II with cosmic rays Catherine Fry Imperial College London CALICE Meeting, CERN 28 th – 29 th June 2004 Prototype.
17 May 2007LCWS analysis1 LCWS physics analysis work Paul Dauncey.
27 th May 2004Daniel Bowerman1 Dan Bowerman Imperial College 27 th May 2004 Status of the Calice Electromagnetic Calorimeter.
Anne-Marie Magnan Imperial College London CALICE Si-W EM calorimeter Preliminary Results of the testbeams st part On behalf of the CALICE Collaboration.
Anne-Marie Magnan Imperial College London Kobe, May 11th, 2007 Calice meeting --- Anne-Marie Magnan 1 Status of MC reconstruction MC Reconstruction Chain.
1 Calice Analysis Meeting 13/02/07David Ward Just a collection of thoughts to guide us in planning electron analysis In order to end up with a coherent.
6 Mar 2002Readout electronics1 CALICE: Status report Paul Dauncey, Imperial College for Birmingham, Cambridge Manchester, UCL Outline: CALICE and the ECAL.
Thursday, November 7th ECFA meeting - Valencia - A.-M. Magnan 1 CALICE Summary of 2006 testbeam for the ECAL Anne-Marie MAGNAN Imperial College London.
LCWS Apr 2004Paul Dauncey - CALICE Readout1 CALICE ECAL Readout Status Paul Dauncey For the CALICE-UK electronics group: A. Baird, D. Bowerman,
CALICE SiW Electromagnetic Calorimeter Testbeam performance and results Roman Pöschl LAL Orsay IEEE – NSS&MCI '08 Dresden/Germany - October The.
Michele Faucci Giannelli TILC09, Tsukuba, 18 April 2009 SiW Electromagnetic Calorimeter Testbeam results.
06/03/06Calice TB preparation1 HCAL test beam monitoring - online plots & fast analysis - - what do we want to monitor - how do we want to store & communicate.
1 Alessandra Casale Università degli Studi di Genova INFN Sezione Genova FT-Cal Prototype Simulations.
FLC Group Test-beam Studies of the Laser-Wire Detector 13 September 2006 Maximilian Micheler Supervisor: Freddy Poirier.
ECFA Sep 2004Paul Dauncey - CALICE Readout1 CALICE ECAL Readout Status Paul Dauncey For the CALICE-UK electronics group A. Baird, D. Bowerman, P.
1 Calice UK Meeting 27/03/07David Ward Plans; timescales for having analysis results for LCWS Status of current MC/data reconstruction Reconstruction status;
Preparation of Module Assembly and Stringtest Haridas, Heinz, Marge One possibility for an assembly and test line? Preparation of a full string test –aim.
26 Apr 2009Paul Dauncey1 Digital ECAL: Lecture 1 Paul Dauncey Imperial College London.
1 Energy loss correction for a crystal calorimeter He Miao Institute of High Energy Physics Beijing, P.R.China.
CALICE Digital Hadron Calorimeter: Calibration and Response to Pions and Positrons International Workshop on Future Linear Colliders LCWS 2013 November.
January 21, 2007Suvadeep Bose / IndiaCMS - Santiniketan 1 Response of CMS Hadron Calorimeter to Electron Beams Suvadeep Bose EHEP, TIFR, Mumbai Outline:
1 Performance of a Magnetised Scintillating Detector for a Neutrino Factory Scoping Study Meeting Rutherford Appleton Lab Tuesday 25 th April 2006 M. Ellis.
© Imperial College LondonPage 1 Tracking & Ecal Positional/Angular Resolution Hakan Yilmaz.
1ECFA/Vienna 16/11/05D.R. Ward David Ward Compare these test beam data with Geant4 and Geant3 Monte Carlos. CALICE has tested an (incomplete) prototype.
HEP Tel Aviv University LumiCal (pads design) Simulation Ronen Ingbir FCAL Simulation meeting, Zeuthen Tel Aviv University HEP experimental Group Collaboration.
SPIROC update Felix Sefkow Most slides from Ludovic Raux HCAL main meeting April 18, 2007.
26 Apr 2009Paul Dauncey1 Digital ECAL: Lecture 3 Paul Dauncey, Imperial College London.
The experimental setup of Test Beam HE EE ES BEAM  A slice of the CMS calorimter was tested during summer of 2007 at the H2 test beam area at CERN with.
LCWS Apr 2004Paul Dauncey - CALICE Readout1 CALICE ECAL Readout Status Paul Dauncey For CALICE-UK electronics group: A. Baird, D. Bowerman, P. Dauncey,
5-9 June 2006Erika Garutti - CALOR CALICE scintillator HCAL commissioning experience and test beam program Erika Garutti On behalf of the CALICE.
Custom mechanical sensor support (left and below) allows up to six sensors to be stacked at precise positions relative to each other in beam The e+e- international.
ScECAL Beam FNAL Short summary & Introduction to analysis S. Uozumi Nov ScECAL meeting.
August DESY-HH VFCAL Report W. Lohmann, DESY Infrastructure for sensor diagnostics FE Electronics Development Sensor test facilities Laser Alignment.
11 October 2002Paul Dauncey - CDR Introduction1 CDR Introduction and Overview Paul Dauncey Imperial College London.
Predicting the In-System Performance of the CMS Tracker Analog Readout Optical Links Stefanos Dris CERN & Imperial College, London.
SRS Calibration Michael Phipps, Bob Azmoun, Craig Woody 1.
5 May 2006Paul Dauncey1 The ILC, CALICE and the ECAL Paul Dauncey Imperial College London.
DHCAL Jan Blaha R&D is in framework of the CALICE collaboration CLIC08 Workshop CERN, 14 – 17 October 2008.
A. SarratILC TPC meeting, DESY, 15/02/06 Simulation Of a TPC For T2K Near Detector Using Geant 4 Antony Sarrat CEA Saclay, Dapnia.
Testbeam analysis Lesya Shchutska. 2 beam telescope ECAL trigger  Prototype: short bars (3×7.35×114 mm 3 ), W absorber, 21 layer, 18 X 0  Readout: Signal.
CM correction algorithm. Observations: Looking at the data for one analog link, a large fraction of the 32 strips are affected by the large signal deposit.
Energy Reconstruction in the CALICE Fe-AHCal in Analog and Digital Mode Fe-AHCal testbeam CERN 2007 Coralie Neubüser CALICE Collaboration meeting Argonne,
Front-end Electronic for the CALICE ECAL Physic Prototype Christophe de La Taille Julien Fleury Gisèle Martin-Chassard Front-end Electronic for the CALICE.
Rainer Stamen, Norman Gee
Analysis of LumiCal data from the 2010 testbeam
Beam test of Silicon-Tungsten Calorimeter Prototype
Resolution Studies of the CMS ECAL in the 2003 Test Beam
96-channel, 10-bit, 20 MSPS ADC board with Gb Ethernet optical output
Panagiotis Kokkas Univ. of Ioannina
Detection of muons at 150 GeV/c with a CMS Preshower Prototype
Interactions of hadrons in the Si-W ECAL
Calice Collaboration Meeting Sep. 2009
   Calorimetry et al.    SUMMARY 12 contributions Tile HCAL
Commissioning of the ALICE-PHOS trigger
longitudinal shower profile
Presentation transcript:

Adding electronic noise and pedestals to the CALICE simulation LCWS 19 – 23 rd April Catherine Fry (working with D Bowerman) Imperial College London

CALICE ECAL electronics readout setup Each pad on the silicon wafers is read out by a separate channel, 9720 in total, and the signal is digitised Will apply a threshold cut per channel to reduce data volume Aim to check the effects of analogue noise, digitisation noise and threshold cut on energy resolution LCWS 19 – 23 rd April 20042

The model for adding the noise ADC range: , 16 bits Dynamic range: 200 MeV or 1000 m.i.p.s Generate pedestals and noise Account for saturation effects Digitise the energy in each pad Generate Monte Carlo from Mokka - without noise Set values for average noise and pedestals and their widths (ADC counts) Add noise and pedestals to each pad and digitise, retain truth information Can choose to apply a threshold to the energy read out from each pad Output in same ASCII format as original Mokka files Not yet added in other electronics effects e.g. crosstalk, common mode, unique pedestal and noise for each channel… LCWS 19 – 23 rd April 20043

10,000 electrons at 5, 10, 15 and 20GeV were generated with Mokka Plot distribution of energy measured Make calibration curve Calculate resolution of electron energy For 6GeV electrons: energy resolution = 8.9±1.0 % LCWS 19 – 23 rd April Energy resolution without noise

Noise studies performed Measure the actual electronic noise and pedestals of the prototype detector Using Mokka version and the “ProtoEcalHcalScintillator” option, generate GeV electrons (DESY test-beam) To this sample, the following noise scenarios were applied (ADC range 0 – 65535): –DESIGN: ped = 500 ADC noise = 16 ADC (48 keV) –PRESENT: ped = ADC noise = 10 ADC (60 keV) –HOPEFUL: ped = 500 ADC noise = 10 ADC (30 keV) –WORST: ped = ADC noise = 25 ADC (150 keV) The pad readout threshold was varied from 0.0 – 0.4 MeV Plot energy resolution as a function of the threshold Plot energy resolution as a function of average ADC noise LCWS 19 – 23 rd April 20045

LCWS 19 – 23 rd April Measurement of the actual noise Two chips, each reading out 18 channels (pads), were connected to a silicon wafer Pedestals ~ few hundred ADC counts –range: –32768 to ADC counts → only upper half usable Noise ~ 10 – 12 ADC counts (60 – 72 keV) –The low noise channels are dead and so were not included in this study

Digitized noise distribution (‘present’ scenario shown above) is Gaussian Measured energy distribution with average noise = 10 ADC counts (60 keV) and average pedestal = ADC counts is also a Gaussian distribution, width = 11.9 ± 0.3 MeV (energy resolution ~ 11%) LCWS 19 – 23 rd April Noise distribution and energy measured in ECAL

LCWS 19 – 23 rd April Resolution as a function of noise The above plot shows the width of the total energy distribution measured Adding more noise only makes the resolution slightly worse Combining ~10,000 channels gives a noise about 100 times the individual noise, which for 10 ADC counts or 30keV is around 3MeV and significantly less than the energy width from the electromagnetic shower process of around 10MeV 6 GeV electrons threshold cut = 0MeV per pad pedestal = ADC counts Resolution of measured energy / MeV

LCWS 19 – 23 rd April Resolution as a function of threshold Resolution hardly affected by threshold on energy read out per pad –Only around 2% of the energy is in pads whose energy recorded is less than 0.2MeV, so cutting these out hardly affects the total energy measured Resolution ~ 9-10% - very close to that with no noise (8.9%)!

Summary of results Worst case (ped = 32750, noise = 25 ADC counts or 75 keV): –Energy resolution around 12% –Hardly changes as pad threshold is increased Present day (ped = 32750, noise = 10 ADC counts or 30 keV): –Energy resolution around 9-10% –Hardly changes as pad threshold is increased As noise is increased from 0 to 15 ADC counts, the resolution only worsens slightly LCWS 19 – 23 rd April

Next steps Accurate measurements of noise and pedestals for each channel Additional features: –Crosstalk between readout channels –Common noise –Unique noise and pedestals for each pad of real silicon wafers LCWS 19 – 23 rd April