Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Anne-Marie Magnan Imperial College London CALICE Si-W EM calorimeter Preliminary Results of the testbeams 2006 1 st part On behalf of the CALICE Collaboration.

Published by Modified over 8 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Anne-Marie Magnan Imperial College London CALICE Si-W EM calorimeter Preliminary Results of the testbeams 2006 1 st part On behalf of the CALICE Collaboration."— Presentation transcript:

1 Anne-Marie Magnan Imperial College London CALICE Si-W EM calorimeter Preliminary Results of the testbeams 2006 1 st part On behalf of the CALICE Collaboration

2 June 1st, 2007 LCWS 2007 ----- Hamburg ----- A.-M. Magnan (IC London) 2 Why doing testbeam Calorimetry for ILC: mostly driven by Particle Flow performance to achieve Optimum design addressed by MC simulation  Need to validate the simulation against a realistic detector ! And it allows to discover design/hardware issues in time to solve them. current performance for LDC-like detectors typical LEP-detectors performance see Mark Thomson’s talk today

3 June 1st, 2007 LCWS 2007 ----- Hamburg ----- A.-M. Magnan (IC London) 3 Layout Introduction: the ECAL prototype I.the testbeam setups II.Calibration procedure III.Pedestal and noise and crosstalk issues IV.Electron selection for the analyses V.Tracking resolution at ECAL front face Conclusion

4 June 1st, 2007 LCWS 2007 ----- Hamburg ----- A.-M. Magnan (IC London) 4 200mm 360mm The Electromagnetic Calorimeter prototype ECAL prototype: 3 modules with variable thickness of Tungsten Active slabs with silicon layers+tungsten interleaved Front end chip and readout on PCB board W layers wrapped in carbon fibre or between 2 PCBs Total tungsten thickness = 24 X 0. PCB+Si layers:8.5 mm 62 mm 6x6 1x1cm 2 Si pads Conductively glued to PCB Active area of 12*18 cm 2 completed for 30 layers Last 1/3rd : expected by July 2007, ~50% already completed Detailed implementation in the Geant4-based simulation for ILC: MOKKA (v06-03) Output data format: LCIO.

5 June 1st, 2007 LCWS 2007 ----- Hamburg ----- A.-M. Magnan (IC London) 5 I- Overview of last year TB May DESY TB area, with only 24 layers. 14 days in total ~8 Million triggers, 7 energies (1-6 GeV), 5 angles, 3 positions CERN TB area, with 30 layers. ECAL+AHCAL: 1.7 M triggers, pions beam, 5 energies (30-80 GeV), 3 angles, ECAL alone: 8.6 M triggers, electron beams, 6 energies (10-45 GeV), 4 angles, + 30 Million muons for calibration. Aug 25th Sept 6th CERN TB area. Combined ECAL+AHCAL + TCMT: e+, e-: 3.8 M triggers, 10 energies (6-45 GeV) π+,π-: 22 M triggers, 11 energies (6-80 GeV) + 40 Million muons for calibration. Oct 11th Oct 30th Angle 0 ° (k events) 10 ° (k events) 20 ° (k events) 30 ° (k events) 45 ° (k events) 6 GeV594688200185200 5 GeV304300200325200 4 GeV400224200300200 3 GeV304200 324200 2 GeV400200 300200 1.5 GeV486200 300200 1 GeV400300345200 Total28882112154519341400

6 June 1st, 2007 LCWS 2007 ----- Hamburg ----- A.-M. Magnan (IC London) 6 Testbeam setup in DESY

7 June 1st, 2007 LCWS 2007 ----- Hamburg ----- A.-M. Magnan (IC London) 7 Testbeam setup in CERN - August

8 June 1st, 2007 LCWS 2007 ----- Hamburg ----- A.-M. Magnan (IC London) 8 Testbeam setup in CERN - October 10 GeV pion event, taken Oct 16th 2006

9 June 1st, 2007 LCWS 2007 ----- Hamburg ----- A.-M. Magnan (IC London) 9 Summary of the data taken Size on disk: ~ 40 kB/evt  65M events = 2.5 TB for CERN Physics runs  + 70 M = 3 TB for muon calibration runs August period October period Sept. break μ calib. runs μ calib. All the reconstruction has been done using the GRID !

10 June 1st, 2007 LCWS 2007 ----- Hamburg ----- A.-M. Magnan (IC London) 10 II- ECAL calibration Using muon runs taken in October: ~18M events Taken with another experiment upstream  wide spread muon beam Procedure: reject noise with a fixed cut at 25 ADC counts (~0.5MIP) selection of MIP-like tracks : 15 ≤N hits ≤ 40, in a 2 cm tower fit with a Landau convoluted with a Gaussian 6471 calibrated channels Mean : 45.5 ADC counts RMS : 2.2 ADC counts  only 9 dead channels: 1.4‰ !!  6403/6471 : 98.9% convergent fit.  18/6471 needed a special treatment because of high noise.  14/6471 have been calibrated thanks to their neighbours.  One wafer (=36 cells) with a relative calibration : appears to be not fully depleted, 0.517×normal signal !!

11 June 1st, 2007 LCWS 2007 ----- Hamburg ----- A.-M. Magnan (IC London) 11 III- Pedestal, noise and crosstalk issues 1- Square events : crosstalk with guard ring

12 June 1st, 2007 LCWS 2007 ----- Hamburg ----- A.-M. Magnan (IC London) 12 2- Pedestal instabilities Ex: Muon run (ECAL threshold : 0.5 MIP) noise A Good PCB A PCB with unstable pedestals pedestal  NEW !! Understood : fake differential in the chip due to instabilities of the power supply not compensated. Is corrected in the EUDET module (SKIROC chip)

13 June 1st, 2007 LCWS 2007 ----- Hamburg ----- A.-M. Magnan (IC London) 13 3- Signal induced pedestal shift: crosstalk @ wafer scale  Not understood yet  under investigation  Correlated with signal intensity  Affects a few wafers randomly in space and time… 1- Pedestal substracted signal of all pads of one PCB 2- Beam hit the second wafer (chips #2 and #3) Total signal in the chip = 350 MIP 4 MIP shift ~ 200 ADC counts 1 chip = 18 channels 2 chips = 1 wafer Pedestal shift (ADC counts) Correlation between pedestal shift and signal recorded signal (ADC counts) The effect 3- Small signal in same wafer

14 June 1st, 2007 LCWS 2007 ----- Hamburg ----- A.-M. Magnan (IC London) 14 Impact on the noise and software correction procedure PCB layer 9 in 6 GeV e- run (DESY) Wafers of the middle row before any corrections = 0.77 ± 0.02 Correlation between 2 channels, per wafer. 0% 50% 80% 100% = 0.66 ± 0.10 = 0.72 ± 0.02 Pedestal instabilities: corrected event by event by iterating on the mean and RMS in wafers without signal = 0.06 ± 0.07 -100% 0% 50% 100% = 0.07 ± 0.04 = 0.32 ± 0.16 36*36 channels Signal Induced Pedestal Shift: corrected event by event by iterating on the channels having no signal but in a wafer recording a signal. position of the signal: less cells to perform the calculation=less correlations… = 0.21 ± 0.09 After all corrections in wafer recording a signal: Wafers of the middle row after corrections = 0.42 ± 0.19 = 0.06 ± 0.02 For completeness : a wafer only affected by signal induced shift:  Corrections are doing their job pretty well !!

15 June 1st, 2007 LCWS 2007 ----- Hamburg ----- A.-M. Magnan (IC London) 15 Noise after all corrections Mean noise @ CERN Extracted from 11 runs at different energies ±3%

16 June 1st, 2007 LCWS 2007 ----- Hamburg ----- A.-M. Magnan (IC London) 16 IV- Electron selection Triggering : coincidence of 3 scintillators along the beam line. Signal threshold: 0.6 MIP Selection of single electron events: CERN: Čerenkov counter to remove pion contamination DESY : shower barycentre in the region expected from the beam profile.

17 June 1st, 2007 LCWS 2007 ----- Hamburg ----- A.-M. Magnan (IC London) 17 Data/MC comparison High energy tails very well reproduced, also up to 1.5 MIP Low energy disagreement not yet understood, under investigation But little influence on the total energy  present analyses based on the energy. Pion 12 GeV not showering in the ECAL  set the global energy scaling for the MC 30 GeV electrons linear scale

18 June 1st, 2007 LCWS 2007 ----- Hamburg ----- A.-M. Magnan (IC London) 18 V- Tracking performances @ ECAL front face In view of extracting the ECAL resolution, need to subtract the tracking resolution Tracking: best linear fit with 4 chambers is considered to give the expected position and direction at ECAL front face. Error matrix contains intrinsic chambers resolution and scattering in front of the ECAL. Systematic errors in extrapolation to ECAL front face directly affects ECAL estimates. For 1 GeV Beam Energy - DESY Source of error Position (mm) On Angle (mrad) Simulation statistic0.02 residual misalignment0.160.02 material modelling0.130.23 Intrinsic resolution0.050.03 Background rate0.050.14 total0.220.27

19 June 1st, 2007 LCWS 2007 ----- Hamburg ----- A.-M. Magnan (IC London) 19 Results for the tracking resolution Track resolutions in x @ ECAL front face EbeamPosition (mm)Angle (mrad) 1 GeV1.68 ± 0.222.48 ± 0.27 2 GeV1.00 ± 0.121.34 ± 0.13 3 GeV0.81 ± 0.090.92 ± 0.09 4 GeV0.72 ± 0.070.73 ± 0.07 5 GeV0.66 ± 0.060.62 ± 0.06 6 GeV0.60 ± 0.060.53 ± 0.05 z beam x,y * σ pos σ angle ECAL front face

20 June 1st, 2007 LCWS 2007 ----- Hamburg ----- A.-M. Magnan (IC London) 20 Introduction’s conclusions Testbeams 2006 have been a complete success: discovery of hardware problems: capacitance issues giving raise to so-called “square events”, Importance of compensating power supplies for the stability of pedestal lines, … and more to come ! Crosstalk issue affecting pedestals at wafer scale ?? exercise real life detectors and data handling: e.g. GRID setup, reconstruction software, simulation and digitisation issues. allowed to improve already the detector simulation models. lots of data taken, with a full spectrum in energy, angle, position Really good training for coming testbeam with a completed prototype : summer 2007, starting in 3 weeks. learning from our mistakes : even more efficient shift organisation + faster analyses and feedback expected. Preliminary results on performance presented by C. Carloganu right now !

21 June 1st, 2007 LCWS 2007 ----- Hamburg ----- A.-M. Magnan (IC London) 21 Thank you for your attention

22 June 1st, 2007 LCWS 2007 ----- Hamburg ----- A.-M. Magnan (IC London) 22 Backup

23 June 1st, 2007 LCWS 2007 ----- Hamburg ----- A.-M. Magnan (IC London) 23 Detailed view of ECAL PCB

24 June 1st, 2007 LCWS 2007 ----- Hamburg ----- A.-M. Magnan (IC London) 24 noise after corrections

Download ppt "Anne-Marie Magnan Imperial College London CALICE Si-W EM calorimeter Preliminary Results of the testbeams 2006 1 st part On behalf of the CALICE Collaboration."

Similar presentations

CALICE Summary of 2006 testbeam for the ECAL

CALICE Summary of 2006 testbeam for the ECAL
SiW ECAL R&D in CALICE Nigel Watson Birmingham University For the CALICE Collab. Motivation CALICE Testbeam Calibration Response/Resolution MAPS Option.

SiW ECAL R&D in CALICE Nigel Watson Birmingham University For the CALICE Collab. Motivation CALICE Testbeam Calibration Response/Resolution MAPS Option.
The CALICE test beam at CERN Fabrizio Salvatore Royal Holloway University of London (on behalf of the Calice Collaboration) SPSC meeting, CERN, Geneva,

The CALICE test beam at CERN Fabrizio Salvatore Royal Holloway University of London (on behalf of the Calice Collaboration) SPSC meeting, CERN, Geneva,
Electromagnetic shower in the AHCAL selection criteria data / MonteCarlo comparison of: handling linearity shower shapes CALICE collaboration meeting may.

Electromagnetic shower in the AHCAL selection criteria data / MonteCarlo comparison of: handling linearity shower shapes CALICE collaboration meeting may.
November 3rd, 2006 CALICE-UK, Manchester - A.-M. Magnan - 1 Noise studies DESY + CERN TB overview Anne-Marie Magnan Imperial College London.

November 3rd, 2006 CALICE-UK, Manchester - A.-M. Magnan - 1 Noise studies DESY + CERN TB overview Anne-Marie Magnan Imperial College London.
Adding electronic noise and pedestals to the CALICE simulation LCWS 19 – 23 rd April 20041 Catherine Fry (working with D Bowerman) Imperial College London.

Adding electronic noise and pedestals to the CALICE simulation LCWS 19 – 23 rd April Catherine Fry (working with D Bowerman) Imperial College London.
1 Calice Meeting 20/9/06David Ward What did we learn from DESY 2005 run? DESY run May 2006. CERN run August 2006. Data/MC comparisons for ECAL.

1 Calice Meeting 20/9/06David Ward What did we learn from DESY 2005 run? DESY run May CERN run August Data/MC comparisons for ECAL.
Calorimeter1 Understanding the Performance of CMS Calorimeter Seema Sharma,TIFR (On behalf of CMS HCAL)

Calorimeter1 Understanding the Performance of CMS Calorimeter Seema Sharma,TIFR (On behalf of CMS HCAL)
31 May 2007LCWS R&D Review - Overview1 WWS Calorimetry R&D Review: Overview of CALICE Paul Dauncey, Imperial College London On behalf of the CALICE Collaboration.

31 May 2007LCWS R&D Review - Overview1 WWS Calorimetry R&D Review: Overview of CALICE Paul Dauncey, Imperial College London On behalf of the CALICE Collaboration.
1 Study of the Tail Catcher Muon Tracker (TCMT) Scintillator Strips and Leakage with Simulated Coil Rick Salcido Northern Illinois University For CALICE.

1 Study of the Tail Catcher Muon Tracker (TCMT) Scintillator Strips and Leakage with Simulated Coil Rick Salcido Northern Illinois University For CALICE.
March 6th, 2006CALICE meeting, UCL1 Position and angular resolution studies with ECAL TB prototype Introduction Linear fit method Results with 1, 2, 3,

March 6th, 2006CALICE meeting, UCL1 Position and angular resolution studies with ECAL TB prototype Introduction Linear fit method Results with 1, 2, 3,
1Calice-UK Cambridge 9/9/05D.R. Ward David Ward Compare Feb’05 DESY data with Geant4 and Geant3 Monte Carlos. Work in progress – no definitive conclusions.

1Calice-UK Cambridge 9/9/05D.R. Ward David Ward Compare Feb’05 DESY data with Geant4 and Geant3 Monte Carlos. Work in progress – no definitive conclusions.
A preliminary analysis of the CALICE test beam data Dhiman Chakraborty, NIU for the CALICE Collaboration LCWS07, Hamburg, Germany May 29 - June 3, 2007.

A preliminary analysis of the CALICE test beam data Dhiman Chakraborty, NIU for the CALICE Collaboration LCWS07, Hamburg, Germany May 29 - June 3, 2007.
The first testing of the CERC and PCB Version II with cosmic rays Catherine Fry Imperial College London CALICE Meeting, CERN 28 th – 29 th June 2004 Prototype.

The first testing of the CERC and PCB Version II with cosmic rays Catherine Fry Imperial College London CALICE Meeting, CERN 28 th – 29 th June 2004 Prototype.
Simulation of the CALICE Test Beams with MOKKA Fabrizio Salvatore Royal Holloway University of London.

Simulation of the CALICE Test Beams with MOKKA Fabrizio Salvatore Royal Holloway University of London.
27 th May 2004Daniel Bowerman1 Dan Bowerman Imperial College 27 th May 2004 Status of the Calice Electromagnetic Calorimeter.

27 th May 2004Daniel Bowerman1 Dan Bowerman Imperial College 27 th May 2004 Status of the Calice Electromagnetic Calorimeter.
Anne-Marie Magnan Imperial College London Kobe, May 11th, 2007 Calice meeting --- Anne-Marie Magnan 1 Status of MC reconstruction MC Reconstruction Chain.

Anne-Marie Magnan Imperial College London Kobe, May 11th, 2007 Calice meeting --- Anne-Marie Magnan 1 Status of MC reconstruction MC Reconstruction Chain.
1 Calice Analysis Meeting 13/02/07David Ward Just a collection of thoughts to guide us in planning electron analysis In order to end up with a coherent.

1 Calice Analysis Meeting 13/02/07David Ward Just a collection of thoughts to guide us in planning electron analysis In order to end up with a coherent.
Thursday, November 7th ECFA meeting - Valencia - A.-M. Magnan 1 CALICE Summary of 2006 testbeam for the ECAL Anne-Marie MAGNAN Imperial College London.

Thursday, November 7th ECFA meeting - Valencia - A.-M. Magnan 1 CALICE Summary of 2006 testbeam for the ECAL Anne-Marie MAGNAN Imperial College London.
Tail Catcher/Muon Tracker at DESY & FNAL TB Facilities Northern Illinois Center for Accelerator and Detector Development Northern Illinois University and.

Tail Catcher/Muon Tracker at DESY & FNAL TB Facilities Northern Illinois Center for Accelerator and Detector Development Northern Illinois University and.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google