Feedback on the ESETA Performance Analysis 28 th November 2007 Performance Assessment, Achievements & Challenges

28/11/20072 NSDS : 5 Objectives X 20 Success Indicators with 16 Specific for SETAs Prioritising and communicating critical skills for sustainable growth, development and equity (SI 1.1 and SI 1.2) Promoting and accelerating quality training for all in the workplace (SI 2.1, SI 2.2, SI 2.3, SI 2.4, SI 2.5, SI 2.6, SI 2.7 & SI 2.8) Promoting employability and sustainable livelihoods through skills development (SI 3.1, SI 3.2 & SI 3.3) Assisting designated groups, including new entrants to participate in accredited work, integrated learning and work-based programmes to acquire critical skills to enter the labour market and self-employment (SI 4.1, SI 4.2 & SI 4.3) Improving the quality and relevance of provision (SI 5.1, SI 5.2, SI 5.3 & SI 5.4)

28/11/20073 Other Key Result Areas NSDS Equity Principles NSDS Governance NSDS Funds Management NSDS Provincial Linkages Reported for 2005 – 2006 Measured for

28/11/20074 Pillars of the Current Performance Management System Mandate as defined by Skills Development Act as amended The NSDS relevant to SETAs Service Level Agreement Regulatory Framework Performance Assessment Scorecard (5 KRAs) Governance and Performance Management Procedures

28/11/20075 Percentage 0% - 60% 61% - 80%81% - 100% 101% - 120% >120% Score Rating Performance Description Performance is Poor Performance is Below Requirements Performance Meets Requirements Performance is Above Requirements Performance is Excellent 2005 – 2010 SETA PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT RATING SCALE

28/11/20076 SETA overall performance First SLA + Scorecard Results = SETA Acronym Final Score AchievedSETA Acronym Final Score Achieved BANKSETA5ISETT3 FOODBEV5THETA3 CHIETA4MAPPP3 FASSET4MERSETA3 INSETA4CTFL3 AGRISETA4SASSETA3 SERVICES4CETA3 LGSETA4TETA3 W&RSETA4HWSETA3 MQA4ETDPSETA2 FIETA4ESETA2 PSETA1

28/11/20077 Second SLA & Scorecard Results B = 2006 – 2007 SETA Acronym Final Score AchievedSETA Acronym Final Score Achieved FASSET 5 MQA 4 BANKSETA 5 MERSETA 4 FIETA 5 SERVICES 4 ISETT 5 W&RSETA 4 CHIETA 4 LGSETA 3 CTFL 4 THETA 3 ETDPSETA 4 SASSETA 3 FOODBEV 4 CETA 3 INSETA 4 HWSETA 3 AGRISETA 4 TETA 3 MAPPP 4 ESETA 3 PSETA 3

28/11/20078 Scorecard Summary for {ESETA } for Scorecard Page Description (Those coloured in blue will not be measured for and therefore are automatically given a 0% weighting Average Score for Curren t Year Weighting of Scorec ard Page for Curren t Year Weighted Score for Score card Page for Curre nt Year Positive Data Verific ation Positive Impac t Asses s- ment Indicator 1.1 Skills development supports national and sectoral growth, development and equity priorities. 52.0% 0.10 Yes N/A Indicator 1.2 Information on critical skills widely available to learners. Impact of information dissemination researched, measured and communicated in terms of rising entry, completion and placement of learners. 42.0% 0.08 Yes N/A Indicator 2.1 By March 2010 at least 80% of large firms’ employment equity targets are supported by skills development. Impact on overall equity profile assessed % 0.50YesN/A Indicator 2.1 By March 2010 at least 60% of medium firms’ employment equity targets are supported by skills development. Impact on overall equity profile assessed % 0.50YesN/A Indicator 2.2 By March 2010 skills development in at least 40% of small levy paying firms supported and the impact of the support measured % 0.40YesN/A Indicator 2.3 By March 2010 at least 80% of government Departments spend at least 1% of personnel budget on training and impact of training on service delivery measured and reported (Applicable to PSETA only) N/A0.0%N/A

28/11/20079 Scorecard Page Description (Those coloured in blue will not be measured for and therefore are automatically given a 0% weighting Average Score for Curre nt Year Weighting of Score card Page for Curre nt Year Weighted Score for Scorecar d Page for Current Year Positive Data Verif icati on Positive Im pa ct As se ss- me nt Indicator 2.5 Annually increasing number of small BEE firms and BEE co-operatives supported by skills development. Progress measured through an annual survey of BEE firms and BEE co-operatives within the sector from the second year onwards. Impact of support measured. 13.0% 0.03 Yes N/A Indicator 2.7 By March 2010 at least workers have entered/achieved at least ABET Levels % 0.03 Yes N/A Indicator 2.8 By March 2010 at least workers assisted to enter and at least 50% successfully complete programmes, including learnerships and apprenticeships, leading to basic entry, intermediate and high level scarce skills. Impact of assistance measured % 0.35YesN/A Indicator 3.2 By March 2010, at least 2000 non-levy paying enterprises, NGOs, CBOs, and community-based co-operatives supported by skills development. Impact of support on sustainability measured with a targeted 75% success rate. 13.0% 0.03Yes N/A Indicator 4.1 By March 2010 at least unemployed people assisted to enter and at least 50% successfully complete programmes, including learnerships and apprenticeships, leading to basic entry, intermediate and high level scarce skills. Impact of assistance measured % 0.45YesN/A

28/11/ Scorecard Page Description (Those coloured in blue will not be measured for and therefore are automatically given a 0% weighting) Average Score for Curre nt Year Weighting of Score card Page for Curre nt Year Weighted Score for Scorecar d Page for Current Year Positive Data Verifi catio n Positive Im pac t As ses s- me nt Indicator % of learners in critical skills programmes covered by sector agreements from FET and HET institutions assisted to gain work experience locally or abroad, of whom at least 70% find placement in employment or self- employment. 13.0% 0.03YesN/A Indicator 4.3 By march 2010, at least 10,000 young people trained and mentored to form sustainable new ventures and at least 70% of new ventures in operation in operation 12 months after completion of programmed. 13.0% 0.03YesN/A Indicator 5.1 By March 2010 each SETA recognises and supports at least five Institutes of Sectoral or Occupational Excellence (ISOE) within public institutions and through Public Private Partnerships (PPPs) where appropriate, spread as widely as possible geographically for the development of people to attain identified critical occupational skills, whose excellence is measured in the number of learners successfully placed in the sector and employer satisfaction ratings of their training. 13.0% 0.03YesN/A Indicator 5.2 By March 2010, each province has at least two provider institutions accredited to manage the delivery of the new venture creation qualification. 70% of new ventures still operating after 12 months will be used as a measure of the institutions’ success 13.0% 0.03YesN/A Indicator 5.3 By March 2010 there are measurable improvements in the quality of the services delivered by skills development institutions and those institutions responsible for the implementation of the NQF in support of the NSDS. 53.0% 0.15 Yes N/A

28/11/ Scorecard Page Description (Those coloured in blue will not be measured for and therefore are automatically given a 0% weighting)( Average Score for Curre nt Year Weighting of Score card Page for Curre nt Year Weighted Score for Scorecar d Page for Current Year Positive Data Verif icati on Positive Im pa ct As se ss- me nt NSDS 2005 – 2010 Equity Principles 25.0% 0.08YesN/A NSDS 2005 – 2010 Governance 35.0% 0.16Yes N/A NSDS 2005 – 2010 Funds Management 310.0% 0.33Yes N/A NSDS 2005 – 2010 Provincial Linkages 42.0% 0.08 Yes N/A SUB TOTAL SETA Quantitave Score100.0% 3.40 Total percentage of scorecard pages for which SETA data is verified as current and accurate100%19 out of 19 Yes SUB TOTAL SETA Score as moderated by Verification Results 3.40

28/11/ Achievements WSP – payment of mandatory grants to employers Learners and unemployed assisted in learning programmes (focus on completions) Provincial Linkages DoL has good working relations with SETA Staff SETA responds timorously with regards investigations (Ministerial enquires etc.)

28/11/ Challenges Performance poor in certain areas of NSDS, governance, Equity, Audit (qualification) Policies, procedures and strategies SSP (critical and scarce skills) Internal capacity MIS Reporting (quality of data) Support from Sector / Industry to Implement SLA Feedback to Stakeholders Re-naming

28/11/ Discussions (Q&A) Action Plan / Way Forward Need to address Audit Report – qualification, MoE, other matters SLA 2008 / 2009