Introduction to SHRP 2 Naturalistic Driving Study and Roadway Information Databases CUTC Summer Meeting May 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Privacy By Design Sample Use Case
Advertisements

Design Vehicles and Turning Radii
Interactive Highway Safety Design Model (IHSDM)
1 Element 1: The Systemic Safety Project Selection Process Element 1: 4-Step Project Selection Process.
DIGITAL HIGHWAY MEASUREMENTS TURNER-FAIRBANK HIGHWAY RESEARCH CENTER David Gibson Milton (Pete) Mills Morton Oskard ADVANCED RESEARCH PROJECT 1.
FOT-Net Final Event First FOT-Net Data Workshop Amsterdam, March 2014 Research Data Exchange (RDE) and Safety Pilot Model Deployment Data Dale Thompson.
HERO UNIT Training Module Work Zone Traffic Control And Incident Management Operations.
EX-1 Intersections & Interchanges Improved Traffic Signal Control Ramp metering Intersection Collision Avoidance Systems Automated Enforcement.
Maintenance and Protection of Traffic (MPT) – HDM Ch 16.
SHRP 2 Naturalistic Driving Study [Presenter’s Organization] [Presenter’s Name] [Presenter’s Title] Accelerating solutions for highway safety, renewal,
Greatest factor in fatal motor vehicle accidents Alcohol.
Human Factors and VII Enabled Applications A Role for Naturalistic Data Jim Sayer University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute.
Module 13: Highway-Rail Grade Crossings (HRGC)
WVDOT GTI SECTION Status Update for Districts. AGENDA Introduction. Introduction. Status Update. Status Update. How to Spatially Enable Database. How.
Design Exceptions 101 Ed Fischer, State Traffic-Roadway Engineer Mike Morrow, FHWA Field Operations Engineer Kent R. Belleque, Senior Interchange Engineer.
Naturalistic Driving Assessments of Driver Distraction and Fatigue Presented by: Thomas A. Dingus, Ph.D., CHFP Director Virginia Tech Transportation Institute.
Origins, Characteristics, and Uses of Crash Data.
October 9 th COMPLETE pg. 26 #2-4 Have Rules of the Road book out on desk BE PREPARED TO TAKE NOTES in 5 min.
SHRP 2 Safety Implementation: Strategic Planning Using the Data Meeting with AASHTO Safety Management August 30, 2012 Accelerating solutions for highway.
Driver Distraction: Results from Naturalistic Teenage Driving Studies Charlie Klauer, Ph. D. Research Scientist Group Lead: Teen Risk and Injury Prevention.
As this car lane changes in front of you, what should you do?
SHRP 2 Naturalistic Driving Study [Presenter’s Organization] [Presenter’s Name] [Presenter’s Title] Accelerating solutions for highway safety, renewal,
ITS America – April 2004 The Naturalistic Driving Study: Why are Crashes Occurring? Suzie Lee Research Scientist, Center for Crash Causation and Human.
Charles Fay, Sr. Program Officer Big Data Meets Computer Vision Dec. 7, 2012 Accelerating solutions for highway safety and performance SHRP 2 Strategic.
Analysis of the SHRP 2 Naturalistic Driving Study Data [S08(B)] Evaluation of Offset Left-Turn Lanes Jessica M. Hutton Presentation to MCTRS August 15,
1 John L. Campbell June 10, 2013 Managing a SHRP2 Naturalistic Driving Study in the Puget Sound Region Presentation at the 2013 ITE-WA Annual Meeting &
Driving Simulator Performance Variables: An Overview Ronald R. Mourant – Northeastern University –
A Data Model for University-based Traffic Safety Research 29 th International Forum on Traffic Records July , 2003 Zachary Hans, P.E.
THE HISTORY OF MOBY-DICK David J Russell II. GEOMETRIC DESIGN AND OPERATIONAL FACTORS THAT IMPACT TRUCK USE OF TOLL ROADS David J Russell II.
Roadway Safety Panel How can ITS assist in bridging vehicle technology with roadway design and function?
CICAS Coordination Meeting September 27 th, 2004 Virginia Overview.
Wyoming’s Approach to Safety Using the New SHRP2 Data Martin Kidner, State Planning Engineer Wyoming DOT July 22, 2015.
SHRP2 Safety Implementation 2013 Mid-Continent Transportation Research Symposium – August 15, 2013 Gateway Hotel and Conference Center – Ames, IA Monique.
C ONSIDERING L ARGE T RUCKS IN THE D EVELOPMENT OF T RAFFIC M ANAGEMENT P LANS Neil Boudreau, MassDOT State Traffic Engineer April 13, 2015.
Evaluating Remotely Sensed Images For Use In Inventorying Roadway Infrastructure Features N C R S T INFRASTRUCTURE.
Jason Chapman Data Collection & Management Systems.
Data Palooza Workshop May 9, 2013 Rabinder Bains, FHWA – Office of Policy and Government Affairs.
Limited Access Highways Driver Risk Prevention Curriculum State of New Hampshire Departments of Education and Safety Division of Program Support State.
Status of ITS research May Peter Sweatman David Kapp.
AASHTO Standing Committee on Research July 26, 2011 Accelerating solutions for highway safety, renewal, reliability, and capacity Update.
Design Criteria CTC 440. Objectives Know what “design criteria” means Determine design criteria for various types of facilities.
Putting Together a Safety Program Kevin J. Haas, P.E.—Traffic Investigations Engineer Oregon Department of Transportation Traffic—Roadway Section (Salem,
Fall  The central goal of SHRP 2 Safety research is to address the role of driver performance and behavior in traffic safety. This includes developing.
Seat belt law New Jersey seat belt laws require the following people to always be in seat belts while driving in a vehicle. 1 The motorist (driver) 2 All.
Safety Data and Analysis Center (STAC) Traffic Records Forum 10/27/2015 Carol H. Tan, PhD Team Leader, Safety Data & Analysis Office of Safety Research.
PHASE 1 OF SHRP 2 DATA IMPLEMENTATION & OVERSIGHT WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY BOARD Update on TRB Activities July 29, 2015 PHASE 1 OF SHRP 2 DATA IMPLEMENTATION.
Intersection Design Chapter 7 Dr. TALEB AL-ROUSAN.
Low Cost Safety Improvements Pooled Fund Study Combination Centerline and Edgeline Rumble Strips Dr. Frank Gross, VHB.
5/8/02FHWA Office of Safety1 FHWA Safety Core Business Unit Office-Level Structure Develops and manages programs for the safe operation of roadways, bicycle.
Highway Fatalities A National Health Crisis Highway Designers Can Help Turn Around By Anthony Kane Director, Engineering and Technical Services American.
SHRP 2 Safety Databases: Continuous Observations of Seat Belt Use Jim Hedlund APHA Annual Meeting November 18, 2014 Accelerating solutions for highway.
Highway Safety Analysis: Engineering Kenneth Epstein, P.E. Federal Highway Administration Office of Safety Programs Safety Data and Analysis Tools Workshop.
Strategic Highway Research Program 2 – Safety Component (SHRP2 Safety) 2012 Update Forrest Council.
HSIS Internal Evaluation October, What Is This? Goal – Internal review of strengths and shortcomings to identify critical needs Conducted once each.
Iihs.org Automated enforcement. Number of U.S. communities with speed cameras and red light cameras January 2016 Automated enforcement uses technology.
Geometric Design: General Concept CE331 Transportation Engineering.
TRB Update AASHTO SCOHTS Annual Meeting April 2016.
Overview of SHRP2 Safety Program Standing Committee on Highway Traffic Safety (SCOHTS) Rudy Malfabon, Nevada Department of Transportation April 28, 2016.
Indiana MUTCD: for Operations & Maintenance Issues/Solutions – Part II.
1 The Highway Safety Manual Predictive Methods. 2 New Highway Safety Manual of 2010 ►Methodology is like that for assessing and assuring the adequacy.
Safety Training and Analysis Center (STAC)
Hossein Naraghi Traffic Records Forum August 7, 2017
Shrp2 and safety training and analysis center (stac)
Warhorse Vacuum Services
Connected Vehicle Activities at MnDOT
Geometric Design: General Concept CE331 Transportation Engineering.
Design Criteria CTC 440.
Systematic Identification of High Crash Locations
Hossein Naraghi Traffic Records Forum August 7, 2017
Reduced Datasets from Roadway Information Database (RID)
Presentation transcript:

Introduction to SHRP 2 Naturalistic Driving Study and Roadway Information Databases CUTC Summer Meeting May 2014

Workshop Structure David Plazak, TRB –Overview of the SHRP 2 safety data –Planning for “Phase 1” of data availability Joel Kady, VTTI Virginia Tech University –What’s in the NDS Database? –Introduction to the InSight web portal Zach Hans, INTRANS Iowa State University –What’s in the Roadway Information Database? All –Questions, Answers, Discussion 2

Naturalistic Driving Studies Instrument volunteer drivers’ vehicles and collect data continuously during their normal driving Why?... –What do drivers really do? Speeding, tailgating, cell phone, alcohol… –What were they doing just before they crashed? Usual crash studies can only guess We can see fraction of second by second what happened How did they avoid a crash? –How do the roadway, vehicle, and environment impact driving? Several previous smaller naturalistic driving studies SHRP2 Naturalistic Driving Study: 40 times larger, national scale –SHRP2 data could be used for 20 years or more 3

SHRP 2 Naturalistic Driving Study & Roadway Information Databases NDS Data RID (GIS) Data from 3,147 volunteer drivers in six sites P assenger cars, vans SUVs, pickups New data collected 12,500 centerline miles consistent across six sites Acquired data (DOTs, others) 200,000 centerline miles Roadway, weather, traffic..

SHRP 2 NDS Study Design Largest naturalistic driving study ever undertaken –3,147 drivers, all age/gender groups. –3,958 data years; 5 M trip files; 49.7 M vehicle miles –3 years of data collection Most participants 1 to 2 years –Vehicle types: All light vehicles Passenger Cars Minivans SUVs Pickup Trucks –Six data collection sites 5

NDS Data Quick Overview Driver demographics, assessments Vehicle descriptors TRIP DATA Multiple Videos Machine Vision –Eyes Forward Monitor –Lane Tracker Accelerometer Data (3 axis) Rate Sensors (3 axis) GPS –Latitude, Longitude, Elevation, Time, Velocity Forward Radar –X and Y positions –X and Y Velocities Cell Phone Records –Beginning and end of calls on major carriers Passive Alcohol Sensor Illuminance sensor Infrared illumination Incident push button –Audio (only on incident push button) Turn signals Vehicle network data –Accelerator –Brake pedal activation –ABS –Gear position –Steering wheel angle –Speed –Horn –Seat Belt Information –Airbag deployment –Many more variables… 6

NDS Example Data from InSight Website (not an actual participant) 7

NDS Data Key Issues Size: the file is huge –2 petabytes = 2 million 1 GB flash drives (1.2 PB video, 0.8 PB sensor) –“Give me the whole raw data file” isn’t possible or sensible Complexity: different data types –Categorical data constant over a trip: driver age, vehicle type –Sampled data: collected at original resolution (once a trip up to 640 Hz during a crash): speed, acceleration, GPS position, radar, vehicle network information –Video data from 4 cameras; must be coded Automated reduction: lane tracker Manual reduction: all other items for specific analyses Privacy considerations: personally-identifying data (PII) –Face video and other personal information access only with Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval for qualified researchers in a secure location 8

Mobile Van Data New data SHRP 2 collected Quality assured to meet project specs 25,000 driven/ 12,500 centerline miles across the six NDS sites All data (mobile van data and acquired data) are referenced to a common basemap that covers the continental US Acquired Roadway Data Acquired Roadway Data Horizontal Curvature: Radius, Length, PC, PT, Direction Grade Cross Slope Lane in terms of the number, width, and type ( turn, passing, acceleration, car pool, etc…) Shoulder type/curb; paved width if exists Intersection location, number of approaches, and control (uncontrolled, all-way stop, two-way stop, yield, signalized, roundabout). Ramp termini are considered intersections All MUTCD signs Barriers Median presence (Y/N), type (depressed, raised, flush, barrier) Rumble Strip presence (Y/N) location (centerline, edgeline, shoulder) Lighting presence(Y/N) Types of Mobile Van Data Existing roadway inventory data acquired from agencies such as the six State DOTs (Data items not consistent) ~ 200, 000 centerline miles Includes HPMS files for the six states plus: Functional Classification Signals Intersections Access Control Pavement Condition Bridge Location Vertical Alignment Interchanges Rest Areas Terrain Tunnels FRA grade crossings Acquired Supplemental Data Site Total miles collected % Rural/ Urban Routing purposes only FL4,366 Rural: 45% Urban: 55% IN4,635 Rural: 64% Urban: 36% NC4,558 Rural: 59% Urban: 41% NY3,570 Rural: 68% Urban: 32% PA3,670 Rural: 83% Urban: 17% WA4,277 Rural: 31% Urban: 69% Total 25, 076 Existing data and information from State DOTs, Public Agencies, and Private Sources: ~ 200, 000 centerline miles Crash history data Traffic information – AADT Traffic Data - continuous counts (ATR) Traffic Data -short duration counts Aerial imagery Speed limit data Speed limit laws Cell phone and text messaging laws Automated enforcement laws Alcohol-impaired and drugged drivers laws Graduated driver licensing (GDL) laws State motor cycle helmet use laws Seat belt use laws Local climatological data (LCD) NOAA Cooperative weather observer/other sources Winter road conditions (DOT) Work zone 511 information Changes to existing infrastructure condition Roadway capacity improvements

NDS Tools for Data Users Trip summary files Crash, near-crash, and baseline event and epoch files InSight web portal Linked roadway information data (RID) 10

Planning for “Phase 1” Operations During 2014, data are still being assembled or 2019 is known as “Phase 1” of operations Operations will emphasize making data widely available to qualified researchers Phase 1 will also allow for testing and evaluation of access technologies and for planning for the 15 or so years beyond that Necessary agreements such as MOUs and contracts and funding are now being put in place TRB will establish an Oversight Committee (to work out policy issues) and Expert Task Groups (to provide technical advice to the OC) Some data will be available in

Where to Find More Information About the NDS: On the InSight website In the recorded NDS webinar About the RID: In the recorded RID webinar About potential research topics and example work plans: In the S02 report, Integration of Analysis Methods and Development of Analysis Plan About the three current analysis projects: In the S08 summary report, Initial Analyses from the SHRP 2 Naturalistic Driving Study

Questions, Answers, Discussion 13