Extreme Flooding, Policy Development, and Feedback Modelling Evan Davies and Slobodan Simonovic Civil and Environmental Engineering The University of Western.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Model Comparison: Top-Down vs. Bottom-Up Models
Advertisements

Scenario 2 "Future water use and the challenge of hydropower development in Western Balkan" February 2013, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
WP7: Environmental impact assessment of present and potential future lifestyle and economic alternatives
Economy-Energy-Environment (E3)Model: Energy Technology and Climate Change Youngho Chang Division of Economics and Nanyang Technological University.
The water-food-energy nexus from an energy system modelling perspective Paul Dodds.
Towards an integrated South African Green Economy Model (SAGEM)
1 The Economics of Climate Change: Costs and Benefits of Reducing GHG Emissions Maureen Cropper University of Maryland and Resources for the Future August.
A stocks and flows approach An Integrated Assessment Framework for Considering Climate Change: 1. the principal domains Society and Economy Greenhouse.
QbQb W2W2 T IPIP Redistribute W 0 W 1 and W 2 to Crop layers Q W1W1 ET 0, W 0, W 1, W 2 I T from 0, 1 & 2, I P A Coupled Hydrologic and Process-Based Crop.
Environmental Sustainability in the Extractive Industry: The Case for Climate Change Mitigation Dr Uwem E. Ite.
impacts on agriculture and water resources
OECD Model simulations for OECD’s Environmental Outlook: Methods and Results Presentation at the Fourth Annual Conference on Global Economic Analysis Purdue.
Hydrologic Cycle (in 10 3 km 3 ). Distribution on Earth “Water, water everywhere, nor any drop to drink.” – Coleridge, Rime of the Ancient Mariner.
Crop Physical System of Dams and Reservoirs Climate change impacts on water supply and irrigation water demand in the Columbia River Basin Jennifer Adam.
Professor John Agard UWI Environment in Development.
SEEA as a framework for assessing policy responses to climate change Prepared for the IAOS conference Sjoerd Schenau and Roel Delahaye Statistics Netherlands.
RegIS2: Regional Climate Change Impact & Response Studies RegIS2: Regional Climate Change Impact & Response Studies
The challenge of sustainable
1 Water in Bioenergy Agroecosystems Workshop Industry perspective on water for bioenergy production Alistair Wyness, BP International Group Water Expert.
Green Economy Initiative Derek Eaton UNEP UNCEEA, June 2010.
Technology, innovation and sustainable production Course presentation And Introductive concepts.
A SYSTEMS APPROACH TO MODELLING WATER-ENERGY-FOOD NEXUS
1 Economics and the Geosciences William D. Nordhaus AAAS Annual Meetings Yale University February 18, 2011.
Development vs. Environment
Introduction to the Session 6 - Theme 4 – on “Water Resources Management and Governance”
IWRM as a Tool for Adaptation to Climate Change
The Challenge of Climate Change and Future Water Or: water we going to do about carbon? 23 April 2009 Institute of Water Officers Annual Conference Mike.
The Impact of Climate Change and Climate Policy on the Canadian Economy Jim Davies Jim MacGee Jacob Wibe.
Policy ramp versus big bang: optimal global mitigation policy.
Introduction to AIM/Impact model Kiyoshi Takahashi National Institute for Environmental Studies.
ICTs Tackling Climate Changes Dr. Amr Badawi Executive President NTRA.
1 William D. Nordhaus Yale University Public Lecture Becker-Friedman Institute April 2014 Economic Perspectives on Climate Change.
Climate Change Mitigation and Sustainable Development: A Framework for Integration John Robinson CLA, WGIII July 18, 2001.
Page 1 Met Office contribution to RL5 Task ‘Large-scale interactions between atmospheric moisture and water availability - coupling of atmospheric.
SESSION 2 Identifying Synergies Among MEAs Using IEA Tools.
1 Modeling the Economic System and the Environment: An Overview on Different Approaches and a Presentation of the RICE96 Model Francesco Bosello Trieste.
The effects of the financial system and financial crises on global growth and the environment Dr Annela Anger-Kraavi Prof Terry Barker
TOPIC 3.2 ENSURING ADEQUATED WATER RESOURCES AND STORAGE INFRASTRUCTURE TO MEET AGRICULTURAL, ENERGY AND URBAN NEEDS.
Climate Change Vulnerability Projection in Georgia Earth Science and Climate Change Conference June 16-18, 2015 Alicante, Spain J. Marshall Shepherd Department.
Knowledge for development under climate change Habiba Gitay World Bank Institute.
Climate Change and Energy Impacts on Water and Food Scarcity Mark W. Rosegrant Director Environment and Production Technology Division High-level Panel.
So Now What Do We Do? Planning for Climate Change Climate science in the public interest Lara Whitely Binder Climate Impacts Group Center for Science in.
CLIMATE CHANGE AND WATER MAKING RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT PLANS “CLIMATE PROOF” IN SPAIN.
Vulnerability of the Socio-economic Worlds of the IPCC Scenarios to Sea Level Rise & Water Stress  Saskia Werners Alterra, Wageningen University & Research.
Role of Integrated Assessment Modelling (IAM) in climate change policy analysis The Global Integrated Assessment Model (GIAM) An ABARE-CSIRO joint initiative.
The Global Water System Project Dennis P. Lettenmaier for MAGS 10 th Annual Scientific Meeting Vancouver, B.C. November 5, 2004.
Measuring Progress towards Green Growth through indicators OECD work UNCEEA Sixth meeting New York, June 2011.
Chapter 6: Integrating Knowledge and Action Scott Kaminski ME / 9 / 2005.
Principal Investigator: Dr. Amir Muhammed, Director Asianics Agro. Dev. International, Islamabad, Pakistan Countries Involved: Pakistan, India, Nepal,
Climate Risk and Vulnerability Assessment
Vulnerability, Resilience, & Adaptation: Societal Causes and Responses Elizabeth L. Malone Joint Global Change Research Institute CRCES Workshop: Societal.
Climate Change Impacts and Adaptation Implications for Agriculture in the Asia-Pacific Region Andrew Ash Interim Director CSIRO Climate Adaptation.
1 Climate Warming & California’s Water Future Jay R. Lund Civil and Environmental Engineering University of California, Davis
Water and Climate Change Slobodan P. Simonovic Professor, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Director Engineering Studies, Institute for.
Integrated Assessment and IPCC: Links between climate change and sub-global environmental issues presentation at Task Force Integrated Assessment Modelling,
Vulnerability Assessment by Nazim Ali Senior Research Fellow Global Change Impact Studies Centre Islamabad, Pakistan.
Integrated Energy-Environmental Modeling for Regional Scenario Analysis Timothy Johnson U.S. EPA Office of Research and Development Research Triangle Park,
Climate Change and the Three R’s LGA Climate Change Summit Anita Crisp June 2008.
Policy ramp versus big bang: optimal global mitigation policy ESP 165: Climate Policy Michael Springborn Department of Environmental Science & Policy UC.
Bell Work Define what you think an indicator is.
Optimal climate policy
The effect of climate and global change on African water resources
Economics and the Geosciences
Model Summary Fred Lauer
USAEE Conference 2016, October 26, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA
Definitions and data under the SEEA framework
Water Stress in the continental United states
EC Workshop on European Water Scenarios Brussels 30 June 2003
Subjects of Study by Teams
Energy performance and Carbon emissions Assessment and Monitoring tool
Presentation transcript:

Extreme Flooding, Policy Development, and Feedback Modelling Evan Davies and Slobodan Simonovic Civil and Environmental Engineering The University of Western Ontario London ON Canada Flood 2008 Conference

Presentation Outline Introduction Model Description Experimentation Conclusions

Introduction: Goals 1. Develop integrated model and apply to extreme flooding 2. Simulate long-term impacts of extreme flooding on socio-economic and natural systems 3. Stress importance of feedbacks Understanding  better policy Society Economy Environment Introduction Natural ChangeSocio-economic Change Extreme Flood

Rationale Floods are basically natural  Precipitation  Runoff Hazard is of human-origin  Settlement patterns  Land-use patterns  Flood defences Introduction

Feedbacks and Extreme Flooding In flooding, natural and anthropogenic systems interact  Realization underlies IFM Integrated Assessment approach  Feedback is crucial  Simulation modelling! Introduction

Model Structure Model components (8):  Carbon cycle  Climate  Water Quantity  Water Quality  Surface Flow  Population  Land Use  Economy Clearing and Burning Land Use Emissions + Carbon Climate Land Use + + Temperature Atmospheric CO 2 Water Stress Industrial Emissions − Surface Water Availability Water ConsumptionPopulationEconomy Surface Flow Temperature Consumption and Labour + +− GDP per capita + Water Quality Water Quantity Wastewater Treatment Wastewater Reuse Wastewater Treatment and Reuse − − + + − Carbon Absorption Atmospheric [CO 2 ] Temperature Change Water Use Wastewater treatment and reuse Water scarcity Renewable flow in changing climate Population growth = f(water scarcity) Biome coverage Human action GDP change Carbon tax Emissions Model Description

Model Characteristics Number of Model Elements:  740 named variables ‘Variables’: ~1600 (incl. arrays) Constants: ~470 (incl. arrays)  230 Stocks (many in arrays)  2300 total 600 equations (99 are critical) Thousands of feedbacks  Population: 4468 loops  Water stress: 2756 loops  Economic output: 203 loops  Industrial emissions: 47 loops Model Description

Work in Context Other models available:  Integrated Assessment Models IMAGE 2.0 (Alcamo et al., 1994) TARGETS (Rotmans and DeVries, 1997) World3 (Meadows et al., 2004)  Climate-Economy models DICE, RICE (Nordhaus and Boyer, 2000) ICAM-1 (Dowlatabadi and Morgan, 1993)  Water Use/Hydrological Models WaterGAP2 (Alcamo et al., 2003) WorldWater (Simonovic, 2002) Model Description

Simulating Flooding Floods affect:  Water quality  Infrastructure  Agriculture and crops  (Human health) But to different degrees… Experimental Approach

Experiments Run three experiments  Small flood  Medium flood  Large flood One year duration of direct effects Global Resolution Global Resolution Annual Cycle Annual Cycle Compare with Base Case Experimental Approach Capital Irrigated land Wastewater Treatment Water Reuse Agricultural Pollution Impose change on:

Results: Direct Effects After one year, changes in  Available surface water  Capital stock  Irrigated area  Wastewater treatment  Wastewater reuse  Water withdrawals Results

INDIRECT Effects The focus of the exercise… The flooding causes  No behavioural change  Long-lasting damage Results

Indirect Effects Feedback Feedback Effects  Even less-direct effects of flooding… Results Switch (1)(2)

Explanation (1) Why the water stress switch?  Reuse tops out  Agricultural withdrawals  Polluted surface water  Effective Withdrawal Results

Explanation (2) Why the population difference?  Water stress drives population growth Higher stress  lower growth Lower stress  higher growth Results

Conclusions feedback-based Developed feedback-based model  Physical and socio-economic sectors  Closed-loop structure Flood Experiments  Impose direct effects, simulate long-term  Long-term damage to Infrastructure, Water quality  Led to Higher water stress Lower population Illustrate IA modelling framework

Conclusions Cost of the approach:  Sacrifice resolution for completeness Benefits of the approach:  Connect Socio-economic and Physical Systems  Identify and understand causes  Analyze system behaviour

Publications Model structure, behaviour & applications Available from