A draft introduction to WP 5 Dr. Algirdas Šakalys.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WP 5 Logistics and Infrastructure B Umeå
Advertisements

IEE/10/380/SI CONURBANT Kick off meeting, Vicenza May 30/31, 2011 CONURBANT An inclusive peer-to-peer approach to involve EU CONURBations and wide.
WP4 – 4.1 and 4.2 Preparatory activities for the creation of the WATERMODE permanent network 1 Technical Committee Meeting Venice, June 24-25, 2010 VENETO.
Part-financed by the European Union (European Regional Development Fund) From expectations to contributions towards Rail Baltica development in Kaunas.
Project part-financed by the European Union Stockholm 18 May 2010 Bengt GUSTAFSSON Region Blekinge Project part-financed by the European Union BSR Interreg.
Institute for Transportation and Logistics, TUHH TransBaltic Kick-Off, Sep 2009 in Malmö WP 5.2 Empty Container Management Facing the ‚empty container.
Ministry of Enterprise, Energy and Communications Sweden Green Corridors 2030 Jerker Sjögren South Baltic Foresight Debate St Petersburg 29 April 2010.
Source: Swedish Road Administration, Vägverket. Artist: Anders Suneson.
Towards an integrated transport system in the Baltic Sea Region Project implementation plans in the second period SC meeting, Kittilä, 6-7 May 2010 Wiktor.
Ministry of Enterprise, Energy and Communications Sweden Getting a grip on the Green Corridors Jerker Sjögren Green Corridors Stakeholders Forum Tallinn.
New market instruments for RES-E to meet the 20/20/20 targets Sophie Dourlens-Quaranta, Technofi (Market4RES WP4 leader) Market4RES public kick-off Brussels,
1 st Review Meeting, Brussels 5/12/12 – Technical progress (P. Paganelli, Bluegreen) iCargo 1st Review Meeting Brussels 5/12/12 Technical.
Ministry of Enterprise, Energy and Communications Sweden Green Corridors Jerker Sjögren TransBaltic WP3 Seminar Stockholm
GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA CENTRAL PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REFORM ( ): concept and results December 2007 Chisinau.
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Transport Division UNDA project on CO 2 emissions in inland transport For Future Inland Transport Systems.
NECL II in short  Budget: approx. 2,7 M€  Duration:  Partnership: 22 partners from Sweden, Norway and Finland - Leadpartner: County Administrative.
Part-financed by the European Union (European Regional Development Fund) AGENDA 1) Coordinator’s presentation on the draft of Action plan (time-schedule)
The JISC vision of research information management Dr Malcolm Read Executive Secretary, JISC.
CENTRAL EUROPE PROGRAMME SUCCESS FACTORS FOR PROJECT DEVELOPMENT: focus on activities and partnership JTS CENTRAL EUROPE PROGRAMME.
INTERREG IIIB North Sea Northern Periphery. INTERREG IIIB North Sea Northern Periphery Vision The Northern Maritime Corridor - a means of efficient, safe.
CLEANSHIP 5th Partner Meeting HELSINKI Status of study 4.1 Maritime Institute in Gdansk (MIG) By: Urszula Kowalczyk, Jakub Piotrowicz.
1 Transport sustainability and green corridors TransBaltic Project 1-2 February 2010, Gdańsk Prepared by: Urszula Kowalczyk, Marcin Burchacz Maritime Institute.
The Knowledge Resources Guide The SUVOT Project Sustainable and Vocational Tourism Rimini, 20 October 2005.
WP5.3. Deployment of ICT Toolbox Milestone 1 - Action Plan Leszek Andrzejewski Institute of Logistics and Warehousing Kick - off Meeting – Malmoe 15th.
Auditing and Certification Scheme to increase the quality of Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans in Cities Organisation Surname, Name Meeting / Conference.
This project is implemented through the CENTRAL EUROPE Programme co-financed by the ERDF. O Transnational strategy for „Airport City‟ development,
Project Part-financed by the European Union Towards an integrated transport system in the Baltic Sea Region Project presentation July 2009 Wiktor Szydarowski.
Baltic Sea Region Programme EU:s strategi för Östersjöregionen, hur nära relation? -Större vikt, mer medel? -Ryssland, Vitryssland -Större roll,
Project Part-financed by the European Union Towards an integrated transport system in the Baltic Sea Region Project presentation at the StratMoS conference,
Towards an integrated transport system in the Baltic Sea Region Project presentation at the TransBaltic foresight debate, Stockholm, 18 May 2010 Wiktor.
1 Todays Challenges for transport corridors The perspective of the Interreg IVC project PORT Integration Michael Stange.
1 Urban networking and urban-rural initiatives in the Baltic Sea region The screening report by Wiktor Szydarowski VASAB WG1 meeting, Jurmala, 3 September.
Freight flows and infrastructure in the Baltic Sea Region Presentation by Magnus Sundström, Swedish Maritime Administration Workshop on Strategy for sustainability.
Towards an integrated transport system in the Baltic Sea Region Presentation at the IX All-Russian Forum, ‘Strategic Planning in the Regions and Cities.
Central Baltic Area in the EU Baltic Sea Strategy
Regional Integration Cluster Olivier Hartmann - SSATP.
C-P LUS WP3 – C LUSTER M APPING F INAL O UTPUTS Gregor Holst IMU-Institut Berlin GmbH Scientific Board 16 th April 2012 Prague.
Slide 1 Begix Online -Tool Bertelsmann Stiftung Begix Europe Carolin Welzel Bertelsmann Foundation Stefan Friedrichs Public Management Consultant.
Activities of BASt in the area of ITS Dr. Christhard Gelau Bundesanstalt für Straßenwesen/Federal Highway Research Institute (BASt) Department “Automotive.
Perceived Climate Change Impacts and Exposure Units ASTRA Conference May 2006 Klaipeda Jürgen Kropp & Klaus Eisenack Potsdam Institute for Climate.
Result Orientation in Interreg CENTRAL EUROPE Annual Meeting, Luxemburg, 15 September 2015 Monika Schönerklee-Grasser, Joint Secretariat.
ASEM SYMPOSIUM on Eurasia Transport and Logistics Network Seoul th September 2015 Hon.Joe Mizzi, Minister for Transport and Infrastructure - Malta.
O Transnational strategy for „Airport City‟ development Giuseppe Luppino - ITL.
Transport The new TEN-T guidelines Results of the legislative procedure Philippe Chantraine (MOVE B1), 24 June 2013.
WP 5.5 Rail solutions N-S and E-W Market share for rail transport in Norway is fairly high domestic but very low on international transports Identify bottlenecks,
ELOGMAR-M Review Meeting, Shenzhen, 31/03/ First Review Meeting - Web-based and Mobile Solutions for Collaborative Work Environment with Logistics.
BMT Transport Solutions GmbH 1 Third BSR INTERREG III B partner search forum in Gdansk Actors perspective on pan-Baltic transport development Lars Källström.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
Report Baltic Master WP1 – Preparedness and division of responsibility regarding disasters at se Matthias Baier Lund University.
Knowledge Direct Support SMART+ STRATEGIC EXCHANGE SMART+ Methodology for Strategic exchange of GPs for the improvement of SMEs innovation capacity Sevilla,
Gabriela Macoveiu North-East RDA, Romania PP11 – WP responsible Cluster Policy Learning Platform WP3 Description Smarter Cluster Policies for South-East.
Part-financed by the European Union (European Regional Development Fund) LT – MSP Model Case, “state of the game“ 2 nd PartiSEApate Project Partner Meeting.
FHWA Update SHRP2 Implementation and Other Agency TSMO R&D Efforts Tracy Scriba, FHWA 12/8/15 1.
European Community European Regional Development Fund Baltic Sea Region INTERREG III B Programme Area 2000 – 2006.
BALTICOM- BALTIC Transport Communication and Regional Development WP12 Spatial Evaluation of Transport Chains and General Recommendations for Baltic Sea.
Summary of the State of the Art of Programme Implementation CENTRAL EUROPE PROGRAMME Project development seminar Prague, 1-2 February 2010 Monika.
EUROPEAN NEIGHBOURHOOD AND PARTNERSHIP INSTRUMENT - ENPI CROSS-BORDER COOPERATION PROGRAMMES.
Turin Final Conference 25 September 2014 Work Group 1 Cordelia Koenig Ministry of Urban Development and Environment Hamburg Turin Final Conference 25 September.
Developing Transnational Synergies and Cooperation Within the MMWD Project Plenary Session 1st Regional Consultation – Trieste 27th March 2014.
StratMoS Strategic Demonstration Project for Motorways of the Sea StratMoS - An arena for cooperation.
he transport development progress in Slovenia the EASYCONNECTING hint
“MarChain”.
TRT Trasporti e territorio
Mokslo ir verslo tarptautinių konsorciumų formavimas: patirtis ir iššūkiai Dr. Algirdas Šakalys.
EGTC for the Central European Transport Corridor
Oversize Strategy for creation of new oversized transport links in SBR
Projects is financed By South Baltic Cross-border
RECARE set-up Rudi Hessel on behalf of coordination team
Date and venue: 23 September, MSFD PCG, DG Environment, Brussels
Presentation transcript:

A draft introduction to WP 5 Dr. Algirdas Šakalys

WP 5 “Knowledge development”

WP 5 Strategic focus and results Focus: Develop advanced simulation tools and visualization of results to support the decision process Planned results: - description of best practice; - improvement of understanding how multimodal transport system works; - understanding how the performance of corridor transport system responds to system changes (e.g. improvements in infrastructure information exchanges, synchronized planning).

WP 5 shall improve academic cooperation and the business development with high quality recommendations for improvement of intermodal transport concepts in the corridor in line with the overall objective of East-West project

WP5 relations with other WP’s WP 5 – knowledge development WP 4 – business and logistics development WP1 – Intermodal transport corridor development strategy Input to sustainable development strategy Scenario and concepts for simulation Results from simulation and benchmarking Telematic application Requirements on applications Goals WP 2– ITS Input to WP1

Involved partners VGTU; VGTU; Klaipeda University; Klaipeda University; Municipality of Karlshamn; Municipality of Karlshamn; Blekinge County Administration; Blekinge County Administration; Swedish Road Administration; Swedish Road Administration; Blekinge Institute of Technology; Blekinge Institute of Technology; Port of Esbjerg; Port of Esbjerg; University of Southern Denmark; University of Southern Denmark; Vinnova; Vinnova; Kaliningrad State University; Kaliningrad State University; Baltic State Fishing Fleet Academy Baltic State Fishing Fleet Academy

Key tasks of WP5 Task A - Corridor development analysis (Macro level analysis); Task B - Micro level simulation of transport corridor;

Task A - Corridor development analysis Task A 1. Identification of the main hubs, LC’s as well as the main actors along East-West corridor: Task A.1.1. Analysis of infrastructure (networks, terminals, transshipment technologies); Task A.1.2. Analysis of communication networks; Task A.1.3. Identification of the regulative legal framework for development of transport sector along E-W corridor; Task A.1.4. Review of studies on development of existing transport network along the E-W corridor (Others + BTH); Task A.1.5. Analysis and generalization of regional profiles along the corridor; Task A.1.6. Identification and assessment of current technical capacity and administrative and legal bottlenecks along E-W corridor.

Task A - Corridor development analysis Task A.2. Overview of different transport modelling tools: Task A.2.1. Provide overview on status of transport modelling in southern part of BSR (others+BTH); Task A.2.2. Selection of best practice for different types of transport modelling (others+BTH); Task A.2.3. Clarification of the main obstacles in developing and applying transport modelling along the corridor (others + BTH) ; Task A.2.4. Elaboration of the outputs that could be helpful for transport companies (stakeholders) on transport modelling (others+BTH);

Task B - Micro level simulation of transport corridor B.1) Identifying the crucial stakeholders and their objectives; and defining performance metrics relevant for the corridor. Task B.1.1 identification of the crucial stakeholders and their objectives (BTH + others): Task B.1.2 defining performance metrics at operational level relevant for the corridor (BTH+others). Task B.2. Development of micro-level corridor simulator model and scenarios; Task B.2.1 Define architecture of simulator model (BTH+others) Task B.2.2. Define level of detail including characteristics of objects simulated (BTH+others) Task B.2.3. Refine simulation scenarios for micro based simulation (BTH+others) Task B.3 Development of micro-level simulator and verification (BTH+others) Task B.4 Simulation experiments and validation B.4.1 Simulation of scenarios (BTH+others) B4.2. Result visualisaation (BTH+others) B4.3 Result and simulation validations (BTH+others)

Thank you for the attention!