GO131: International Relations Professor Walter Hatch Colby College Nuclear Deterrence.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Cold War at Home Entry Slip Write a four sentence summary paragraph that describes the Cold War at home. Sentences should correspond with: 1. Reasons.
Advertisements

Nuclear Club Powers under NPT – U.S., Russia, United Kingdom, France, China Non-NPT – India, Pakistan, North Korea Undeclared – Israel From a high of 65,000.
The Future of Nuclear Weapons More proliferation or further reductions? Keith Hansen February 19, 2015.
Nuclear Disarmament and Arms Control SALT (Strategic Arms Limitation Talks)
Challenge of Nuclear Weapons
Bulletin of atomic scientists
Dangers Big and Small Unconventional Threats to American Security.
 Major nuclear powers have honored a voluntary moratorium since early 1990s.  The U.S. hasn’t conducted a nuclear test since Time Lapse of.
 Nuclear Deterrence during the Cold War.  As a result of the Manhattan project American scientist learned to create nuclear fission explosion splitting.
1 Military Globalization Military power central to globalization –Underwrites empires and territorial expansion –Military technologies shrink globe, permit.
Nuclear Treaties Dennis Silverman, U C Irvine Source:
Military Force and Terrorism CHAPTER SIX Dr. Clayton Thyne PS : World Politics Spring 2009 Goldstein & Pevehouse, International Relations, 8/e Student.
Update on the Nuclear Arms Race: What you can do to end it and make the US and the world more secure Hiroshima – Nagasaki Day Memorial Service.
Anatomy of a decision? Positives Quick end to the war Eventual saving of lives? Negatives: Loss of life Opening up a Pandora’s box Environmental impact.
Nuclear Weapons: At What Cost ? 1.little do we know 2.rough estimates: cost over time 3.recent estimates: cost at a given time 4.nuclear weapon states.
TOPIC LECTURE. RESOLVED: STATES OUGHT NOT POSSESS NUCLEAR WEAPONS. Childree.
The Nuclear Club Who’s in? Who’s out? And where do we go from here?
Lesson 1– The NPT.  Students will differentiate between nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons.  Students will explain the history and purpose of.
March 13—Write an identification for the Brezhnev Doctrine.
NUCLEAR NON-PROLIFERATION TREATY: A REGIME IN NEED OF INTENSIVE CARE International Organizations and Nonproliferation Program Center For Nonproliferation.
Outline for 10/3: Weapons of Mass Destruction Considerations in acquiring WMDs US nuclear force policy ABM Treaty Various WMD regimes with a focus on the.
Lesson 1– The NPT.  Students will differentiate between nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons.  Students will explain the history and purpose of.
The Cold War International clash of ideologies. What was the Cold War? A conflict between the world’s two super- powers – the U.S. and the Soviet Union.
POSC 2200 – International Security, War and Strife Russell Alan Williams Department of Political Science.
Nuclear Proliferation. Categories ► Declared Nuclear Powers: signed nuclear treaties.  Rules and regulations 1. U.S Russia Britian 1952.
# of Nuclear Weapons In China 180 Active 240 Total.
 Midterm Essay Question  Review of midterm evaluation of teaching feedback  Reading takehomes  Review nuclear weapons survey (extra credit)  Facts.
HOW DID THE RACE FOR ARMS AFFECT THE TENSIONS BETWEEN THE WEST AND THE SOVIET UNION? THE ARMS RACE.
First Nuclear Age, s Bipolarity – balance Deterrence – vulnerability Arms Control – Managing rivalry Rationality Second.
Nuclear Weapons By: Max Hein Hiroshima & Nagasaki The first atomic bomb was set off on August 6, 1945 at 8:15 A.M. above the Japanese city of Hiroshima.
The Cold War as Total (Virtual) War: Prospect of Nuclear War The Post-World War Two Condition for Almost Fifty Years.
Nuclear Terrorism: The Ultimate Preventable Catastrophe.
Lesson 1– The NPT.  Students will differentiate between nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons.  Students will explain the history and purpose of.
Lesson 2 – Disarmament.  Review goals of NPT treaty.  Compare different types of weapons.  Identify key treaties regulating nuclear arsenals.  Describe.
IS ARMS CONTROL THE ANSWER? What makes WMDs different? Chem, bio, & nuke vs. conventional weapons They seem.
Antwon Dauzart Mr. Clawson Period 6 Though they give us a major advantage in the arms race, should we continue to use nuclear weapons or disarm them?
IS ARMS CONTROL THE ANSWER? What makes WMDs different? Chem, bio, & nuke vs. conventional weapons They seem.
BACKGROUND ON ATOMIC WEAPONRY. WHAT IS AN ATOM BOMB? “A general name given to any weapon in which the explosion results from the energy released by a.
Nuclear Proliferation Theo Farrell, CSI Lecture 4, 2011.
April 27 th  Learning Target  I can understand the threat of nuclear proliferation.  Opener  Name all the countries you can think of that have nuclear.
Chapter 30 – New Directions Section 2 – The Post-Cold War World.
TEKS 8C: Calculate percent composition and empirical and molecular formulas. Terrorism and Global Security.
The Cold War Unfolds Section 1. MAD (Mutually Assured Destruction) Explain what this comic represents.
Good Morning!!!! 1.NVC 2.HOT ROC: Korean War 3.Nuclear Weapons During the Cold War Essential Question: What threat did nuclear weapons pose during the.
Nuclear Weapons Part I.
HISTORY 103 The Global Cold War.
Bipolarity Deterrence Arms Control Rationality Multipolarity
GOVT Module 16 Defense Policy.
Nuclear Proliferation and Arms Control (Part 2)
What is required for nuclear disarmament?
Bulletin of atomic scientists
Nuclear Proliferation and Arms Control (Part 4)
The Cold War Unfolds 15.1 Notes.
The Spread of nuclear weapons
Threats to World Security Chapter 33 Section 3.
Nuclear Proliferation
Arms Control and Disarmament Prof
Terrorism and Global Security
Outline for today Midterm Review
SSWH20 Demonstrate an understanding of the global social, economic, and political impact of the Cold War and decolonization from 1945 to 1989.
Superpower Rivalries Main Idea Reading Focus
The United States, Russia, and the Coming of the Cold War
Terrorism and Global Security
Who Has the Bomb? US 1945 USSR/Russia 1949 UK 1952 France 1960
Objectives Explain why nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons threaten global security. Analyze the various terrorist groups and why they are becoming.
Causes and Effects of the Cold War
Missile Madness.
IR: The New World of International Relations
Presentation transcript:

GO131: International Relations Professor Walter Hatch Colby College Nuclear Deterrence

Why the Dog Didn’t Bite (and the Cold War Stayed Cold) Balance of power? Or “balance of terror?”

A Puzzle for Realists Classical realism: Superpower Behavior Ideological moderation Fear of escalation Neo-realism: Structure of the System The stability of bipolarity Communication to overcome PD

Balance of Terror

Deterrence Defined: The threat to punish another actor if it takes a particular negative action (such as attacking one’s own state or one’s allies) One conditon: The threat must be credible.

Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD)

Nuclear Technology Atomic bomb (1945): Fission Hydrogen bomb (1952): Fusion Technological “advances”

Delivery Systems (I)

Delivery Systems (II)

Delivery Systems (III)

Scared Straight

U.S.– Soviet Arms Control Limited Test Ban Treaty (1963) ABM Treaty (1972) SALT (1972 and 1979) START (1991)

Star Wars

Here we go again?

Global Arms Control

Proliferation NPT (1968) By then, France, UK and China also had joined nuclear club. In spite of NPT, the technology spread India and Pakistan never signed. Declared nuclear powers in 1970s. Israel never signed. It is undeclared nuclear power, but probably has a hundred warheads Iraq’s nuclear program was dismantled in 1990s.

North Korea Near war in ’94 over plutonium production Left NPT in ‘03 over uranium enrichment 6-8 nukes Diplomatic breakthrough?

Iran Signed NPT But enriching uranium For civilian or military purposes? Israel should be “wiped off the map…”

India’s Special Status 100 nukes? US cooperation Why not Pakistan?

Proliferation for Profit Pakistan –> Iran, Libya, North Korea China –> Iran Dr. A. Q. Khan

Testing CTBT (1996) Won’t take effect until signed and ratified by 44 states India and Pakistan refused to sign; conducted their own tests in late 1990s An attempt to divide world into “nuclear haves” and “nuclear have-nots?” U.S. Senate voted in 1999 against ratification Bush administration opposes it

Nuclear Hypocrisy

US Response We’re taking action … Real threat: Rogue states Non-state actors

Chemical and Biological Weapons