The Relationship between Nuclear Safety, Security and Safeguards

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
E.g Act as a positive role model for innovation Question the status quo Keep the focus of contribution on delivering and improving.
Advertisements

PP4SD & Science Council Workshop 27th November 2006 Skills for Sustainability. Skills Needs: An Employers perspective Richard Howell Sustainable Development.
Pakistan Nuclear Regulatory Authority
Presented by: Muhammad Ayub Pakistan Nuclear Regulatory Authority Safety Enhancement at Nuclear Power Plants in Pakistan Prospects of Nuclear Energy in.
RISK INFORMED APPROACHES FOR PLANT LIFE MANAGEMENT: REGULATORY AND INDUSTRY PERSPECTIVES Björn Wahlström.
MODULE “PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL” PHYSICAL PROTECTION AND SAFEGUARDS SAFE DECOMMISSIONING OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS Project BG/04/B/F/PP , Programme.
MODULE “PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL” EMERGENCY PLANNING SAFE DECOMMISSIONING OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS Project BG/04/B/F/PP , Programme “Leonardo.
INSAG DEVELOPMENT OF A DOCUMENT ON HIGH LEVEL SAFETY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR NUCLEAR POWER Milestone Issues: Group C. Nuclear Safety. A. Alonso (INSAG Member)
June 1, 2004Computer Security: Art and Science © Matt Bishop Slide #18-1 Chapter 18: Introduction to Assurance Overview Why assurance? Trust and.
Brief History of Nuclear Regulation 1946 Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) by Congress. Strict control of nuclear materials used or produced in a reactor.
1 Regulatory Challenges During and Following a Major Safety or Security Event Muhammad Iqbal Pakistan Nuclear Regulatory Authority Presentation at General.
Wenxin Zhang Department of Civic Design University of Liverpool
Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board
Nuclear Energy in the 21 st Century BEIJING 2009 International Ministerial Conference April 2009.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency International Cooperation in Nuclear Security David Ek Office of Nuclear Security.
Technical Meeting on Evaluation Methodology for Nuclear Power Infrastructure Development December, 2008 Nuclear Safety in Infrastructure Building.
Module 3. Session DCST Clinical governance
A Proposed Risk Management Regulatory Framework Commissioner George Apostolakis Presented at the Organization of Agreement States 2012 Annual Meeting Milwaukee,
Anita Nilsson Director, Office of Nuclear Security
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Reviewing Management System and the Interface with Nuclear Security (IRRS Modules 4 and 12) BASIC IRRS TRAINING.
Imperial Ship Management AB “2.0”
Decision making process / basic options assessment Mercury Storage and Disposal LAC Two Countries Project Gustavo Solórzano Ochoa, Consultan t Montevideo,
1 THE NUCLEAR ENERGY POLICY FOR SOUTH AFRICA ELSIE MONALE ICRP WORKSHOP.
Directorate For Licensing of Nuclear Installation and Material Nuclear Energy Regulatory Agency Regulatory Control of Ageing Research Reactor In Indonesia.
School for drafting regulations Nuclear Safety Operation Vienna, 26 November -7 December 2012 Tea Bilic Zabric.
Accident Investigation Board (AIB) for the Test Site 9920 Event 1 SAND P.
Main Requirements on Different Stages of the Licensing Process for New Nuclear Facilities Module 4.1 Steps in the Licensing Process Geoff Vaughan University.
Main Requirements on Different Stages of the Licensing Process for New Nuclear Facilities Module 4.5/1 Design Geoff Vaughan University of Central Lancashire,
MODULE “PREPARING AND MANAGEMENT OF DOCUMENTATION” SAFE DECOMMISSIONING OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS Project BG/04/B/F/PP , Programme “Leonardo da Vinci”
Nuclear Security Culture William Tobey Workshop on Strengthening the Culture of Nuclear Safety and Security, Sao Paulo, Brazil August 25-26, 2014.
© 2012 Rolls-Royce plc The information in this document is the property of Rolls-Royce plc and may not be copied or communicated to a third party, or used.
Responsible Care® Health & Safety Task Force – 06 H&S.
Introduction to a Safe Workplace
INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL LAW Nuclear energy. OECD Convention on Third Party Liability in the Field of Nuclear Energy (Paris 1960) Convention on Civil.
CHAPTER 14 – OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
International Atomic Energy Agency Regulatory Review of Safety Cases for Radioactive Waste Disposal Facilities David G Bennett 7 April 2014.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Milestones in the development of a national infrastructure for nuclear power The Nuclear Security dimension Technical.
ASPEC Damaging Energies New Staff Induction What is this course about? This course is designed to talk through the major damaging energies on site. It.
International Atomic Energy Agency School for Drafting Regulations on Radiation Safety RER/9/096 Vienna, 3 May, 2010 Adriana Nicic, Regulatory Activities.
JORDAN ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (JAEC) Building of National Safeguards Capabilities in Jordan IAEA’s Technical Meeting/Workshop on National Infrastructure.
MEKONG RIVER COMMISSION PROGRAMMES FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT.
Milestones for Nuclear Power Infrastructure Development Establishment of A Regulatory Framework Gustavo Caruso, Section Head, Regulatory Activities Section.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency PGEC Part IV The International System of Radiation Protection and the Regulatory Framework Module IV.4 IAEA’s Fundamental.
Romanian Nuclear Safety Authority Experiences on Building the National Capability for Nuclear Security Dr. Lucian Biro Director General TM/WS Topical Issues.
Safety and Security culture C. Almeida National Commission for Nuclear Energy - Brazil September 2014.
3-MINUTE READ THE PREVENT DUTY. What is it and what does it mean for me? This 3-Minute Read summarises the DfE’s document: ‘The Prevent duty: Departmental.
By Annick Carnino (former Director of IAEA Division of Nuclear Installations Safety) PIME, February , 2012.
IAEA TSO-Conference, April 2007, Aix en Provence 1 Independent technical and scientific advice for regulatory decision making L. Hahn, GRS International.
WORKSHOPS AND OTHER ACTIVITIES IMPLEMENTED BY WINS TO SUPPORT THE STRENGTHENING OF RADIOLOGICAL SECURITY WORLDWIDE Pierre Legoux, WINS 05 March Mumbai,
AAEA Role in Improving EPR Coordination Interventions among Arab Countries Abdelmajid Mahjoub Arab Atomic Energy Agency
Module 1 IAEA Safety Standards on Management Systems.
Chapter 18: Introduction to Assurance
Ensuring Nuclear Safety Culture in Ghana: Regulatory Perspective
HUMAN RESOURCE GOVERNANCE, RISK MANAGEMENT AND COMPLIANCE
Assist. Prof. Magy Mohamed Kandil
SCSC April 2018 A model for including cyber threat in safety cases
Communication and Consultation with Interested Parties by the RB
National Arrangements for Response to Transport Emergencies.
Leadership and Management for Safety
Regulatory Oversight of HOF in Finland
OBSERVE ETHICAL PRACTICES
Gem Complete Health Services
Development of Capable Owner/Operator
Stakeholder Involvement in Nuclear issues Workshop: Milestones for Nuclear Power Infrastructure Development November 5-9, 2007 Why Stakeholders are.
Anni Podimata, Vice President ITRE
Disaster Preparedness and Resilience
SAFEGUARDS CAPACITY BUILDING ARGENTINE EXPERIENCE
Interfaces of Nuclear Safety and Security
CEng progression through the IOM3
Presentation transcript:

The Relationship between Nuclear Safety, Security and Safeguards Laurence G Williams FREng Professor of Nuclear Safety & Regulation University of Central Lancashire May I add my welcome to that of the Vice Chancellor and to thank you for sparing the time to attend our conference today. As many of you will know, I have devoted a large proportion of my professional life to ensuring that the nuclear industry is safe and secure. Over the years I have increasingly recognized that the protection of society and our environment from the use of nuclear energy demands a higher level of commitment by those who use the technology that of almost any other industrial activity. Because nuclear is different, the public and politicians expect the nuclear industry to be the very best and to provide for their protection throughout the entire nuclear lifecycle from cradle to grave i.e. from initial design through construction, commissioning, operation, and decommissioning of nuclear facilities; the safe management of radioactive waste including eventual disposal. To provide the public with the “total protection” they expect the industry needs to be able to demonstrate that nuclear power is safe, their facilities and nuclear materials are secure and that their technologies and nuclear materials cannot be diverted to support illicit nuclear weapons programmes This requires effective coordination of all these activities and in the past this has not always been as effective as it could have been. I hope today will enable us to share knowledge and experiences so that government, regulators, the security services and the nuclear industry can better deliver the opportunities from and meet the challenges of a more coordinated approach. I have chosen this picture of a nuclear installation under construction because the advent of a new (and potentially large) nuclear power programme in the UK offers us the opportunity to consider adopting a new approach that will eliminate the silo mentality of the past Ensuring Safety, Security and Safeguards in Nuclear Power: Opportunities and Challenges of an Integrated Approach – Preston 12 June 2013

The Relationship between Nuclear safety, Security and Safeguards What is nuclear safety? Nuclear safety is about protecting people and the environment from plant malfunction and human error Nuclear Safety Potential Hazards From Normal Operations & Accidents Workers Public Environment

What is nuclear security? The Relationship between Nuclear safety, Security and Safeguards What is nuclear security? Nuclear security is about protecting people and the environment from malicious acts Nuclear Security Potential Hazards From Malicious Acts Workers Public Environment

What is nuclear safeguards? The Relationship between Nuclear safety, Security and Safeguards What is nuclear safeguards? Nuclear safeguards is about protecting people and the environment from the theft or diversion of nuclear materials and technologies that could be used to proliferate nuclear weapons Nuclear Security Potential Hazards from loss of Safeguards Workers Public Environment

Why have a coordinated approach to the 3 “S”s? The Relationship between Nuclear safety, Security and Safeguards Why have a coordinated approach to the 3 “S”s? Workers, the public and the environment require protection from plant malfunction, human error, malicious acts and proliferation of nuclear materials and technologies Potential Hazards From Malicious Acts Security Potential Hazards From Normal Operations & Accidents Safety Workers Public Environment Safeguards Potential Hazards from loss of Safeguards

The Relationship between Nuclear safety, Security and Safeguards Malfunction, human errors Malevolent acts by non-State actors Prevent Misuse by State

Why have a coordinated approach to the 3 “S”s? The Relationship between Nuclear safety, Security and Safeguards Why have a coordinated approach to the 3 “S”s? Nuclear security is necessary but not sufficient for the protection of people and the environment

Why have a coordinated approach to the 3 “S”s? The Relationship between Nuclear safety, Security and Safeguards Why have a coordinated approach to the 3 “S”s? Nuclear security is necessary but not sufficient for the protection of people and the environment Similarly nuclear safety is necessary for the protection of people and the environmental but again it is not sufficient

Why have a coordinated approach to the 3 “S”s? The Relationship between Nuclear safety, Security and Safeguards Why have a coordinated approach to the 3 “S”s? Nuclear security is necessary but not sufficient for the protection of people and the environment Similarly nuclear safety is necessary for the protection of people and the environmental but again it is not sufficient The effective application of non-proliferation safeguards is again necessary but not sufficient

The Relationship between Nuclear safety, Security and Safeguards Total Protection: The Case for an Integrated Approach to Nuclear Safety Nuclear Security and Safeguards Potential Hazards From Normal Operation & Accidents Potential Hazards From Malicious Acts Potential Hazards from Diversion of Nuclear Materials & Technologies Many nuclear safety, nuclear security and safeguards issues are not mutually exclusive

The Relationship between Nuclear safety, Security and Safeguards Total Protection: The Case for an Integrated Approach to Nuclear Safety Nuclear Security and Safeguards Potential Hazards From Normal Operation & Accidents Potential Hazards From Malicious Acts Potential Hazards from Diversion of Nuclear Materials & Technologies In these areas it is necessary to have an integrated approach to ensure that the solutions for one do not adversely affect the other

Why have a coordinated approach to the 3 “S”s? The Relationship between Nuclear safety, Security and Safeguards Why have a coordinated approach to the 3 “S”s? All 3 are needed to provide the Continuum of Protection society needs

Why have a coordinated approach to the 3 “S”s? The Relationship between Nuclear safety, Security and Safeguards Why have a coordinated approach to the 3 “S”s? Many examples of either nuclear safety or nuclear security have been compromised by through a lack of coordination Fences Plant configuration controls Armed protection forces Safety access points Etc.

The Relationship between Nuclear safety, Security and Safeguards Total Protection: The Case for an Integrated Approach to Nuclear Safety Nuclear Security and Safeguards There are important synergies in the measures used to deliver nuclear safety, nuclear security and non-proliferation safeguards For effective protection all three areas need to treated in a coordinated way Nuclear safety, nuclear security and where appropriate safeguards professionals need to work together

The Relationship between Nuclear safety, Security and Safeguards Total Protection: The Case for an Integrated Approach to Nuclear Safety Nuclear Security and Safeguards There needs to be much closer integration of nuclear safety, nuclear security and safeguards approaches in: design, construction, commissioning, operation and decommissioning of nuclear installations the transport of nuclear and radioactive materials the use of radioactive sources

The Relationship between Nuclear safety, Security and Safeguards Challenges Responsibility Licensee responsible for safety & security Responsibility for nuclear safety is more easily discharged Responsibility for security is more problematic Not in complete control Cannot define the Threat Cannot carry out all the actions to reduce the Threat Government is in control of defining the Threat

The Relationship between Nuclear safety, Security and Safeguards Challenges Safety & Security Communities Nuclear safety and security practitioners have had little in common Developed from different communities Nuclear safety community comprised engineers and scientists who undertake detailed design and analysis to demonstrate the behaviour of nuclear plants and processes and to determine risk Nuclear security community has been shrouded in secrecy and operated within a “need to know” culture

The Relationship between Nuclear safety, Security and Safeguards Challenges Risk Evaluation Nuclear safety is about understanding plant failure characteristics and human error providing effective engineered or administrative barriers to counter such failures and mitigation of the consequences using numerical approach to evaluate risk and hence acceptability

The Relationship between Nuclear safety, Security and Safeguards Challenges Risk Evaluation Nuclear security is about protecting against unknown, possibly unquantifiable, malicious acts evaluate risk from specifically defined event

The Relationship between Nuclear safety, Security and Safeguards Challenges Risk Management In the nuclear safety world risk is evaluated through a detailed understanding of plant and process failure mechanisms detailed technical analyses enables defence in depth to be designed in and effectively managed

The Relationship between Nuclear safety, Security and Safeguards Challenges Risk Management In the nuclear security world the nature and probability of the threat is not as easily amenable to calculation risk is more difficult to quantify risk is managed in conjunction with others, possibly including an armed protection force

The Relationship between Nuclear safety, Security and Safeguards Challenges Culture Nuclear safety culture is well established Nuclear security culture is in its infancy World Institute for Nuclear Security (WINS) Guide Culture is about beliefs and values

The Relationship between Nuclear safety, Security and Safeguards Challenges Culture - beliefs In the case of nuclear safety culture Staff believe that accidents can happen For nuclear security it is important for staff to believe that: Nuclear security is important in combating terrorist threats Credible threats nuclear materials exist at all times

The Relationship between Nuclear safety, Security and Safeguards Challenges Culture - Values In the case of nuclear safety culture Staff recognise the nuclear safety is their responsibility For nuclear security it is important for staff to recognise that: Maintaining effective security is the responsibility of everyone in the organisation they should challenge, question and report security concerns

Effective Organizations The Relationship between Nuclear safety, Security and Safeguards Effective Organizations To be effective, nuclear safety and security staff will need to work together to meet the above challenges Nuclear Security must be given the same recognition at Board level as nuclear safety and environmental protection Organization should have an integrated nuclear safety and security culture An effective organization will have an integrated approach to the management of nuclear safety, nuclear security and safeguards

UCLan Contribution to Skills The Relationship between Nuclear safety, Security and Safeguards UCLan Contribution to Skills MSc Nuclear Safety, Security & Safeguards Module 1: Introduction to the Nuclear Fuel Cycle Module 2: Nuclear Safety Law and Regulation Module 3: The Delivery of Nuclear Safety Module 4: Nuclear Security & Safeguards Law and Regulation Module 5: The Delivery of Nuclear Security & Safeguards Module 6: Leadership and Management Module 7: Research Methodology

The Relationship between Nuclear safety, Security and Safeguards Conclusions Protection of workers, the public and the environment depends upon the effective delivery of nuclear safety, nuclear security and non-proliferation safeguards

The Relationship between Nuclear safety, Security and Safeguards Conclusions Nuclear safety, nuclear security and non-proliferation safeguards communities have developed separately for understandable reasons but to deliver a sustainable nuclear programme in the future they need to work together

The Relationship between Nuclear safety, Security and Safeguards Conclusions The risks to society that arise from the use of nuclear energy can be reduced through the effective integration of our approach to nuclear safety, nuclear security and safeguards within Government Regulators Licensees Nuclear supply chain

The Relationship between Nuclear safety, Security and Safeguards Non-Proliferation Agreements and Additional Protocols CULTURE Safeguards Security Safety: Int’l Safety Standards And Conventions SYNERGY Safety Security: Physical Protection, Detection and Response, Information; Conventions and Recommendations Promotes the Peaceful, Safe and Secure use of Nuclear Technology

The Relationship between Nuclear safety, Security and Safeguards Thank You