1. WORKSHOPS AND OTHER ACTIVITIES IMPLEMENTED BY WINS TO SUPPORT THE STRENGTHENING OF RADIOLOGICAL SECURITY WORLDWIDE Pierre Legoux, WINS 05 March 2015. Mumbai, India. NICSTAR 2015

2. WINS’ Vision and Mission WINS Vision To help improve security of nuclear and high hazard radioactive materials so that they are secure from unauthorised access, theft, sabotage and diversion and cannot be utilised for terrorist or other nefarious purposes. WINS Mission To provide an international forum for those accountable for nuclear security to share and promote the implementation of best security practices.

3. WINS’ Achievements 33 International Best Practice Guides published 33 International Best Practice Guides published 60 International Best Practice Workshops and Round Tables 60 International Best Practice Workshops and Round Tables 10 Published languages 10 Published languages 4 on-line modules Certification programme Blended learning 4 on-line modules Certification programme Blended learning

4. WINS Membership Growth Over 2,600 members in 110+ countries

5. OPERATOR LEADERSHIP STATE AND REGULATORY OVERSIGHT CONTROL OF SOURCES Physical Protection Deterrence Detection Delay Response Transport Tracking Detection & delay Communication Response End of life Return to supplier Recycling & Re-use Interim storage Disposal SECURITY OF SOURCES Front end Security by design (sources, devices and facilities) Alternative technologies

6. WINS PUBLICATIONS ON THE SECURITY OF RADIOACTIVE SOURCES

7. All Guides have a Self Assessment Section THE “RIGHT” ANSWER IS ALWAYS “YES”

8. We Provide a Security Management “Maturity Scale” 1 WORLD CLASS 2 HIGHLY EFFECTIVE 3 GOOD 4 DEVELOPING 5 INEFFECTIVE

10. FACILITATED WORKSHOPS USING INNOVATIVE TECHNIQUES

11. WORKSHOP TYPICAL OBJECTIVES  BETTER UNDERSTAND THE ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE VARIOUS STAKEHOLDERS INVOLVED IN THE SECURITY OF RADIOACTIVE SOURCES  LEARN FROM THOSE WHO HAVE ISSUED REGULATIONS OR IMPLEMENTED SECURITY MEASURES  DISCUSS SPECIFIC SECURITY CHALLENGES  SECURITY BY DESIGN  PHYSICAL PROTECTION  TRANSPORT  EFFECTIVE RESPONSE  DISCUSS WHAT MEANS BEING DEMONSTRABLY COMPETENT  EXPLORE OPTIONS TO REDUCE THE RISK (INVENTORY REDUCTION, ALTERNATIVE TECHNOLOGIES)

12. WORKSHOP TYPICAL DISCUSSIONS  HOW CREDIBLE IS THE THREAT TO TRANSPORT OPERATIONS? WHAT IS THE LEVEL OF AWARENESS IN YOUR ORGANISATION/COUNTRY?  WHAT COULD BE THE POSSIBLE CONSEQUENCES OF A MALICIOUS ACT? HOW DOES IT APPLY TO YOUR FACILITY/SHIPMENT?  WHAT DO WE MEAN BY IMPROVING SECURITY DURING TRANSPORT? WHAT ARE THE LESSONS LEARNED FROM PEOPLE WHO HAVE DONE IT?  HOW DO WE MEASURE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE MEASURES IN PLACE? ARE YOU SATISFIED?  HOW CAN WE REDUCE THE RISK FURTHER? WHAT ARE YOUR SUGGESTIONS FOR STRENGHTHENING SECURITY?

13. PRE-WORKSHOP SURVEYS I believe that adequate transport security can be achieved at a reasonable cost

14. In my country, transport security regulations for radioactive sources are adequate PRE-WORKSHOP SURVEYS

15. Opportunities for improvement: Lack of adequate regulations and infrastructure Technologies – Source container tracking Interim storage – stop overs – Transit phase Strengthen the transport security culture Improve personnel training and commitment Vetting Exercise procedures and contingency plans Verify the actual implementation of procedures Better explain the risk -- Educate the public Recognition of the quality of transport operations – Processes and practices are in place PRE-WORKSHOP SURVEYS

16. SURVEYS DURING THE WORKSHOPS

18. MEMBERSHIP QUESTIONNAIRE IN 2014/2015

19. SECURITY OF RADIOACTIVE SOURCES EXPERIENCES AND LESSONS LEARNED Mr. Chris Englefield, UK Ms. Jodi Ploquin, Canada 02 December 2014 16:00 ( Central European Time) Moderator: Julian Powe

20. SKILLS AND COMPETENCIES “Being demonstrably competent or professionally certified to do your job is the norm in nearly all professions, be it medicine, teaching, engineering, project management or a host of other professional endeavours”

21. What about individuals accountable for the security of radioactive sources?  What do we expect from them?  How do we demonstrate they have proper skills and competencies?  Where can they get such skills and competencies? PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT WORK EXPERIENCE EDUCATION

22. The WINS Academy Online in 2014

23. Design of the Academy

24. WINS ACADEMY MODULE FOR RAM (DRAFT) This module will include: Fundamental issues associated with radioactive materials security Guidance on how to integrate security culture with safety culture A problem-based approach to learning that is practical, hands-on and cross- functional Practical examples on how to increase security within your organisation how to communicate on security matters within and outside your organisation A test of understanding and expertise as a requirement for a certification in Radioactive Materials Management

25. CONCLUSIONS (1/2)  SIGNIFICANT ACHIEVEMENTS BUT STILL A LONG WAY TO GO  MANY COUNTRIES DO NOT YET HAVE (ADEQUATE) REGULATIONS FOR THE SECURITY OF SOURCES  LIMITED PROGRESS IN THE INTEGRATION OF SAFETY AND SECURITY REQUIREMENTS AND OPERATIONAL MEASURES  THERE IS A LOT OF LESSONS LEARNT AVAILABLE. MORE AND MORE FORUM OF EXCHANGES ARE OFFERED TO THE COMMUNITY  THE THREAT IS PERCEIVED AS CREDIBLE AND THE CONSEQUENCES ARE SEEN AS POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT (BOTH FROM RADIOLOGICAL AND OPERATIONS/BUSINESS PERSPECTIVE)

26. CONCLUSIONS (2/2)  IT IS POSSIBLE TO REACH A GOOD LEVEL OF SECURITY AT A REASONABLE COST  TRANSPORT IS PERCEIVED AS THE WEAKEST LINK  SECURITY BY DESIGN OF CATEGORY 1 DEVICE SIGNIFICANTLY CONTRIBUTES TO EFFECTIVE SECURITY  SUSTAINABILITY IS THE NEXT CHALLENGES  END OF LIFE REQUIRES MORE ATTENTION  STRONG FOCUS ON ALTERNATIVE TECHNOLOGIES  INDIVIDUALS ARE AT THE CENTER OF THE SECURITY PROGRAMMES AND NEED TO BE COMPETENT

27. Thank you! WWW.WINS.ORG