UK Offshore Wind 2002 17 th April 2002 Gunfleet Sands- A Progress Report Presented by Nigel Crowe Enron Wind.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The first floating wind turbines Martin Jakubowski Technology Architect Blue H Technologies BV, The Netherlands Brindisi, Italia 23rd of May
Advertisements

Offshore Wind 2004 From Vindeby to Nysted A Manufacturer’s Experience Henrik Stiesdal Bonus Energy A/S.
Presentation to 2007 Tidal Energy Conference Ketchikan, AK January 24, 2007 Providing Diversity for Alaska’s Energy Future A New Source of Emission-Free.
Optimising Site Investigations for Offshore Wind Farm Projects Mark Finch Geotechnical Engineering Manager Hydrosearch Associates, Aberdeen UK Offshore.
SkyPower Corp. PRESENTATION.
Ilinca Julian, Heikki Ojanen, Juha - Matti Lukkari.
HYDROGRAPHIC SOCIETY 4 DECEMBER 2007 NICK HARRINGTON, BSc, MRICS.
Louisiana Offshore Wind Energy Wind Energy Systems Technologies, LLC New Iberia, Louisiana, USA Presented By: Herman J. Schellstede W.E.S.T.
NNMREC National Marine Renewable Energy Centers Hawaii National Marine Renewable Energy Center (HINMREC) University of Hawaii Wave, OTEC Southeast National.
Arklow - GEWE 3.6 MW Offshore Project Lessons Learned
Offshore Wind Farm Survey Requirements by by Mr Euan McNeill Business Development Manager (Coastal Surveys) and Senior Geophysicist Titan Environmental.
Birds & Wind Farms - high fliers? Rowena Langston Assessing the impacts offshore.
© Siemens AG 2011 Hull Offshore Wind Workshop Siemens Wind Power A/S, Thomas Mousten, Offshore Wind Americas.
North Hoyle Offshore Wind Farm 17th April 2002 BONUS Energy A/S.
The Wider Offshore Industry - Introduction. Why Renewables? Mb/doe Gas Nuclear Oil Renewables Coal Incremental.
Scroby Sands Offshore Wind Farm Update 18 April 2002 Anne-marie Coyle.
Private-private partnership for the future turbine technology REpower 3.2M114 Michael Baranowski EWEA ( Copenhagen) 17. April 2012.
UK’s First Commercial Scale Offshore Wind Farm 26th March 2003 NWP Offshore Ltd.
Tidal and Wave Energy By: Patrick Blomberg Adam Womack.
Energy From the Severn Estuary Trinity College, Bristol, March 10 th 2007.
Patrick Kearon The Bristol Port Company
Beyond stereotypes – ecological and landscape solutions for offshore wind farms Dr Maggie Hill Countryside Council for Wales.
Science requirements to support licensing of marine renewable Ian Davies Marine Scotland.
Deep Water Offshore Wind Energy By Paul D. Sclavounos Horns Rev Wind Farm (Denmark) - Rated Power 160 MW – Water Depth 10-15m.
Environmental Assessment of Marine Renewable Energy Presentation to Pre-BIC meeting 24 th June 2010 Andrew Casebow Chris Green.
Environmental issues faced across the project lifecycle Sue Barr Open Hydro.
GE Wind Energy 3.6s Offshore Martin Berkenkamp June 2003 GE Company Proprietary.
C-Power NV is a Belgian company established for the development and implementation of a farshore wind farm on the Thorntonbank. Welcome Objective Partners.
SW England testbed opportunities for marine renewable energy & offshore engineering Prof Martin J Attrill Director, Plymouth University Marine Institute.
1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Offshore Wind Energy Overview Patrick Gilman Environmental & Siting Specialist Wind and Water Power Program.
Centrica – An Energy Utility Perspective Gearόid Lane Director, British Gas New Energy 29 th April 2009.
Claire Gibson, Wave Hub General Manager 19 February 2013
Fair Head Tidal & West Islay Tidal An overview of the consenting process Fourth Annual HMRC Forum 24 th April 2013 Clodagh McGrath: Environmental Manager.
NaREC Andrew Mill CEO Ocean Energy For New England Conference 6 th October 2008 Sate of the Ocean Power Industry An Industry Perspective.
Current Obstacles to Wide Implementation of Wave Energy Alex Ruane 10/27/05.
Power from the wind. Sailcloth turbines for water pumping, Lasithi plateau, Crete.
1 IPEK energy GmbH Development and Implementation of a Wind Farm 3rd International Conference on Alternative Energy & Power ICAEP 28 March 2009.
Off-Shore Wind Energy Technologies
Page 1 CONSULTANCY AND RESEARCH IN AQUACULTURE AND THE AQUATIC ENVIRONMENT A Company in the NIVA-group Methodology for Environmental monitoring of aquaculture.
WIND POWER. Introduction  Energy is a major input for overall socio- economic development of any society  The prices of the fossil fuels steeply increasing.
© Offshore Wind A big opportunity? GA-EMA Conferences 22 October 2014.
Potential hazards and risks in the offshore wind park development process in Poland Stefan Simon, CEO Green Energy World.
Prof. R. Shanthini 02 Feb 2013 Module 06 Renewable Energy (RE) Technologies & Impacts (continued) - Use of RE sources in electricity generation, in transport,
Cost trends for Offshore Wind - and a look at the resources David Milborrow
1.  Offshore Siting Process / Guidelines – Macro View  Offshore Siting Example – VA  Offshore Development Example – VA Virginia Offshore Wind Technology.
Development and Construction of On- Shore Windfarms Andrew Aveyard Green Cat Renewables Jim Wilkinson CA Blackwells.
Spatial Fisheries Values in the Gulf of Alaska Matthew Berman Institute of Social and Economic Research University of Alaska Anchorage Ed Gregr Ryan Coatta.
Renewable Energy Research Laboratory University of Massachusetts Wind Energy: State-of-the Art and Future Trends Southwest Renewable Energy Conference.
 Large Blade Testing Facility LARGE WIND TURBINES Rahul Yarala Executive Director, Wind Technology Testing Center May 12, 2011.
Offshore Wind Energy Deployment in the European Union Concerted Action for Offshore Wind Energy Deployment (COD) Environmental Issues Ruud de Bruijne (SenterNovem)
EWEC 2006, Athens1Jan Rispens Wind Energy Agency Bremerhaven/Bremen (Bild: Enron Wind) The WAB Industry Network in Northwest-Germany Profile and R&D-Activities.
Dan Finch Moray Offshore Renewables Ltd. DELIVERING ROUND 3 Inverness 2nd February 2010 MORAY FIRTH OFFSHORE RENEWABLES Ltd.
NAVITUS BAY UPDATE Sean Matthews Project Engineer 20 March 2013.
ECOTECNIA 100: On-shore Multi Mega-Watt Windturbine Juan Mª Cámara 28th February 2006.
An Overview of the Technology and Economics of Offshore Wind Farms
Main risks for Divers Noise Environmental Pollution Marine Craft Collision Diver Entanglement Dropped Objects.
Restricted © Siemens AG 2014 All rights reserved.siemens.com/answers Passion for Offshore - Frank Zimmermann, Head of Sales - 5 th British Chamber Conference.
Marine Planning since 2011 Linda Rosborough – Director of Marine Scotland.
Energy System Investment Models Paul Rowley & Simon Watson CREST Loughborough University.
__________________________ © Cactus Moon Education, LLC. CACTUS MOON EDUCATION, LLC ENERGY FROM THE WIND WIND TECHNOLOGIES.
15ELP044 – Unit 4 Uncertainty, Risk & Energy Systems Paul Rowley & Simon Watson CREST Loughborough University.
This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No Overview of.
Life Cycle Assessment Assessing local impacts María del Mar Pintor
Planning and Realisation of Wind Farms
Structural Reliability Aspects in Design of Wind Turbines
PROJECT GRANTED UNDER INDO-EUROPEAN COOPERATION ON RENEWABLE ENERGY
Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy The best technology for your wind projects in Brazil 30 August 2017 © Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy.
DG MARE Study to support Impact Assessment on the Marine Knowledge 2020 Interim report Michael Munk Sørensen 11 december 2012 COWI POWERPOINT PRESENTATION.
The supply chain’s role in the journey to ‘subsidy free’
Hybrid Offshore Wind and Tidal Systems
Presentation transcript:

UK Offshore Wind th April 2002 Gunfleet Sands- A Progress Report Presented by Nigel Crowe Enron Wind

Where are we today ? Planning Financing Construction Operation

Planning Hydrosearch Associates Ltd. have been engaged to project manage the Environmental Impact Assessment process Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) to be circulated to all consultees for comments around May/June 2002

Environmental Impact Assessment Geophysical Survey Environmental Survey Bird & Marine Mammal Survey MetOcean Data Acquisition Coastal Processes Model Collision Risk Assessment Study Commercial Fisheries Study Other Studies in progress

GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY Completed October 2001 by Titan Environmental Surveys Ltd. Equipment utilised included Echosounder, Side Scan Sonar, Tow Boomer, Magnetometer Parameters measured for licence area and cable route: - detailed bathymetry - seabed features & magnetometer contacts - shallow geology - shallow gas - sub-bottom geological profiles - isopachyte (seabed to base sands contours)

Environmental Survey

Sea based observations and aerial transects 15 day surveys have been completed to date with monitoring planned after installation of turbines GPS referenced transects Bird & Marine Mammal Survey

Metocean Data Acquisition 2 MetOcean Instruments mounted in seabed frames with surface Dan buoys in water depths of approx. 12m Parameters to be measured include: - Current velocity - Tidal height - Directional wave parameters - Turbidity Instrumentation has been calibrated with Water Samples Deployed by Thales Geosolutions on 17 January 2002 for 6 month duration Service visits every 2 months Data to feed into Coastal Processes Model, Design Layout & Foundation Design

Coastal Processes Model ABP Research are assessing the baseline coastal processes Then potential impacts of the development can be quantified over the life of the development Model will include tides, waves, currents, sediment mobility beyond 1 tidal excursion of the licence area Utilisation of Remotely Sensed Imagery

Collision Risk Assessment Study 99% of traffic passes at least 3.7 nm from development area Collision risk assessed for powered and drifting vessels Highest risk around NE corner - collision return period of 34,013 years.

Commercial Fisheries Study In consultation with local fishermen, study has identified: Ports, Fishing Associations & Individual Fishermen Fish species Fishing methods Importance of Gunfleet Sands Sensitivities through the year Spawning grounds

Commercial Fisheries Study Most important species include: Sole (main summer + autumn) Bass (important summer +autumn) Cod (normally main winter species) Thornback (caught all year) Grey Mullet (inshore - summer) Whiting

Marine Archaeology Landscape & Seascape Assessment Radar Interference Assessment Terrestrial Ecology along the cable route Socio Economic Study Noise Study Comprehensive Consultation Exercise with Open Days in Clacton Web site Other Studies In Progress

Financing Primary objective at present to ensure bankability of Project NFFO 4 for 30 MW of total 108MW Watertight PPA agreement for remainder of off take Reliable Wind Data – Initial data from Gunfleet Lighthouse Considered onshore data to supplement this but decided on offshore metmast to avoid any uncertainty 60m lattice mast founded on a 32m monopile with measurements taken at 3 levels with GPS data collection

60m Met Mast

Construction 30 no. EW 3.6MW Turbines – 100m rotor diameter, 70-90m tower giving 108MW Integrated Foundation Solution Connection 10Km (7km offshore, 3km Onshore) at 132Kv to Holland–on–Sea

EW 3.x platform= Onshore: EW 3.2s + Offshore: EW 3.6 EW 3.2sEW 3.6 Rotor Power Site Ø 104 m 3.2 MW onshore Ø 100 m 3.6 MW offshore Vrated Rot. speed Hub height 14.3 m/s 8.1 – 13.5 rpm 100 – 140 m 15 m/s 9.2 –15.3 rpm site specific: > 70 m Design class IEC II-A DIBt WZ III / II (HH 100 / 140 m) IEC I-A T.top mass240 t268 t Tip speed Noise 73.5 m/s < 106 dB(A), red. 104 dB(A) 80.1 m/s 109 dB(A)

EW 3.6 offshore Proven elements concept analogous to more than 880 EW 1.5 since 1996 separated drive train variable-speed, variable-pitch double-fed asynchronous generator frequency converter recommended suppliers New elements experience EW 1.5 offshore at Utgrunden annual maintenance over-specified design crane system E-container at nacelle 3.3 kV generator external heat exchanger helicopter hoisting platform (optional)

Layout EW 3.x: Separated drive train & crane system 14 m 4.5 m

Testing & pre-commissioning at factory

Prototype EW 3.6: 100 m hybrid tower in Spain Barrax site, close to Madrid Transport restrictions  prototype for inland sites and hub height up to 140 m 70 m pre-stressed concrete plus 26.5 m steel segment

Transport of rotor blades EW 3.6

Operation Efficient Operation is critical to financial viability Reliability, Availability,Maintainability, Serviceability proven technology (see EW 1.5) next offshore generation: i.e. new offshore design rather than marinised MW-class larger & proven turbines  lower O&M costs

40 t slewing crane (activated on-demand) - container - generator - gear box - main shaft - hub - blades 2 t gantry crane (hoisting inside and outside nacelle) Enron Wind 3.x: Internal crane system capable of all main components

Gunfleet Sands Progress Summary Environmental Impact Assessment approaching completion Comprehensive consultation process underway Data collection being taken seriously to inhance funding opportunities Construction programme is underway now with excellent progress being made with the EW3.6 Operation and maintenance strategy being considered upfront and given necessary importance