Missouri Assessment Program MAP Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Mari Ann Bihr, Health/PE Consultant NGA Meeting, October 29,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Rubrics for Transition IV: for Students with Severe Disabilities by Dr
Advertisements

Dan Ebbert Paul Cicciarelli
NCLB, Highly Qualified and IDEA 2004 How it all fits together and What it means for you. RIDE Spring Leadership Conference May 11, 2006 Grossi/Olsen 2006.
1 New Mexico Standards-Based Assessment New Mexico Standards-Based Assessment New Mexico Standards-Based Assessment.
Assessing student learning from Public Engagement David Owen National Co-ordinating Centre for Public Engagement Funded by the UK Funding Councils, Research.
Common Core Standards and the Edmonds School District November 4, 2013.
Overview of Common Core Testing AEA ELEMENTARY PARENT WORKSHOP MARCH 12, 2015.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Common Core State Standards AB 250 and the Professional Learning.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Standards. New Jersey New Jersey Health and Physical Education Core Curriculum Content Standards FAQ.
PACT Tests Administration Guide. What is the PACT Test? Palmetto Achievement Challenge Test Standards-based accountability For curriculum and teaching.
Standards. New Jersey 2009 Revised 2009 Revised New Jersey Health and Physical Education Core Curriculum Content Standards FAQ.
The State of the State TOTOM Conference September 10, 2010 Jim Leigh Office of Assessment and Information Services Oregon Department of Education.
Physical Education Curriculum Analysis Tool: Overview.
Overview of Gifted Implementation and Advanced Learning Program (ALP)
Technology Use Plan Mary Anderson 7/29/08 EDTECH 571 click to go to each slide.
Differentiated Supervision
JUNE 26, 2012 BOARD MEETING Measures of Academic Progress (MAP)
CAA’s IBHE Program Review Presentation April 22, 2011.
Eight Steps to Effective Nutrition Education Presentation by: Susan Magrann, MS, RD Nutrition Education Consultant Network for a Healthy California Funded.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Health Education Wellness For Grades 3-5. Massachusetts Health State Standards K-12  Growth & Development  Physical Activity & Fitness  Nutrition 
Physical Education Curriculum Analysis Tool “Using the PECAT”
Understanding the Guidance Document
Buckeye Elementary School District’s Curriculum Mapping Initiative
Anne Arundel County Public Schools Presented by Jan Arnold and Kris McNally Office.
Becoming a Teacher Ninth Edition
New York State Education Department Understanding The Process: Science Assessments and the New York State Learning Standards.
1 Making the Case for Federal Support of the National Writing Project (An Evaluator’s Perspective) NWP Spring Meeting 2006 Inverness Research Associates.
NEXT GENERATION BALANCED ASSESSMENT SYSTEMS ALIGNED TO THE CCSS Stanley Rabinowitz, Ph.D. WestEd CORE Summer Design Institute June 19,
From Standards to Transfer. Parkway Mission All students are capable learners who transfer their prior learning to new demands, in and out of school.
Common Core State Standards (CCSS) September 12, 2012.
A Parent’s Guide to Understanding the State Accountability Workbook.
Food Safety Professional Development for Early Childhood Educators Evaluation Plan.
Taking The First Steps Presentation by: Susan Magrann, MS, RD Nutrition Education Consultant Network for a Healthy California Valerie Parsons, MA, M.Ed.
Health Mrs. Haywood-Fleming A-126. Trimester 1- Rotations (Every 3 weeks) HealthRugbyVolleyballFitness.
Goal Our goal is to provide students with the correct information with hopes that they use this information to make healthy life long choices.
CMC South Conference November 1, 2013 Sacramento City Unified School District Iris Taylor Mikila Fetzer Suzie Craig.
1 Historical Perspective... Historical Perspective... Science Education Reform Efforts Leading to Standards-based Science Education.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
A Curriculum for Excellence Routes for Learning study day February 2007 Jessie Wojciechowski Professional Adviser.
Michigan Educational Assessment Program MEAP. Fall Purpose The Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) is Michigan’s general assessment.
“Achieving wellness now and through a lifetime requires knowledge, self awareness, motivation, and effort.” Paul Insel and Walton Roth Created by Sandra.
Wisconsin Standards for CTE. Timeline New accountability system begins & AYP ends (ESEA waiver) New proficiency benchmarks for WKCE reading & mathematics.
Darla Stynen. The subject matter I am teaching in my classroom, as prescribed by the school district.
West Virginia Achieves Professional Development Series Volume III Curriculum Prioritization and Mapping.
VDOE STANDARDS OF LEARNING: AN OVERVIEW October, 2015.
HEALTH & PHYSICAL EDUCATION IN OHIO: THE NUTS & BOLTS FOR SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS: LEGISLATION, GUIDANCE & BEST PRACTICES Kevin Lorson OAHPERD President-Elect.
Mini-Project #2 Quality Criteria Review of an Assessment Rhonda Martin.
Technology Action Plan By: Kaitlyn Sassone. What is Systemic Change? "Systemic change is a cyclical process in which the impact of change on all parts.
NEASC SITE VISIT SEPTEMBER 30-OCTOBER 3, Standards of Accreditation 4 standards of Teaching and Learning 1- Mission and Expectations for Student.
Project Adventure Program at Mexico Academy and Central School.
Teaching Experience and Qualifications.  Associate of Arts Degree - Oakland Community College  Bachelor of Science Degree - University of Utah  Elementary.
Connecticut Accountability for Learning Initiative District and School Capacity Building Leadership No Child Left Behind Partnerships & Professional Learning.
Office of Service Quality
YOUR STUDENTS CAN BE SUCCESSFUL!. PURPOSE  The purpose of the FCAT Science Lessons Learned report on the Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test* (FCAT)
21 st Century Skills Jason McLaughlin Kean University EMSE
Curriculum Overview May 2011 Travis Bracht Director of Student Learning.
GEORGIA’S CRITERION-REFERENCED COMPETENCY TESTS (CRCT) Questions and Answers for Parents of Georgia Students February 11, 2009 Presented by: MCES.
Garrett Elementary Accountability Report Kids are our Business! October 14,
Using Standards Aligned System to Ensure 21 st Century Teaching and Learning Institute Pennsylvania Department of Education Upper Dublin School District.
East Longmeadow Public Schools SMART Goals Presented by ELPS Leadership Team.
Standards Support System Curriculum Project South Carolina Department of Education Office of Standards and Support S3S3.
Advanced Classroom Technology State funding for implementing technology Professional development for 21 st Century Classrooms One-to-One Mobile Devices.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
Health Education K-12 Curriculum Review
Documented District Support Needs
Smarter Balanced Assessment (SBA) Results for PGUSD
Common Core State Standards AB 250 and the Professional Learning Modules Phil Lafontaine, Director Professional Learning and Support Division.
September 21, 2017 Prepared by Matthew Binder
Presentation transcript:

Missouri Assessment Program MAP Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Mari Ann Bihr, Health/PE Consultant NGA Meeting, October 29, 2001

What is the MAP? A state assessment program based on State Standards. These standards are known as the “Show- Me Standards” and were developed in response to the 1993 Outstanding Schools Act (Senate Bill 380). The “Show-Me Standards” consist of 4 State Goals and Content Standards for 6 curricular areas. Outline what Missouri Students should know and be able to do.

Goal Standards Students of Missouri will acquire the knowledge and skills: To gather, analyze and apply information and ideas. To communicate effectively within and beyond the classroom. To recognize and solve problems. To make decisions and act as responsible members of society.

Health and Physical Education Content Standards 1.Structures, functions of, and relationships among human body systems. 2.Principles and practices of physical and mental health such as personal health habits, nutrition and stress management. 3.Disease and methods for prevention, treatment and control. 4.Principles of movement and physical fitness. 5.Methods used to assess health, reduce-risk factors, and avoid high- risk behaviors (such as violence, tobacco, alcohol and other drug use) 6.Consumer health issues (such as the effects of mass media and technologies on safety and health). 7.Responses to emergency situations.

Curriculum Frameworks A guide to help school districts build curricula to meet the Show-Me Standards. The assessments revolve around these frameworks and will determine the degree to which students are proficient in their knowledge and skills. Results from the statewide program will provide information on how well the students are doing. Data from the results can be used to help districts improve instructional programs.

MSIP Missouri School Improvement Program Part of the “Outstanding Schools Act” which is responsible for accrediting school districts in the State of Missouri. MAP scores are a portion of the information used for accreditation of school districts by the state. All Health and Physical Education Programs are required to have a written curricula that should meet certain specification based on the Frameworks.

Who was involved in the development of the Standards and Frameworks? Teachers, administrators, community leaders and higher education all participated in development.

Development Timeline SubjectField TestAvailableRequired MathFall Fall ‘96Spring ’97Spring ’98 Comm. ArtsFall ’97Spring ’98Spring ’99 ScienceFall ’97Spring ’98Spring ’99 Social St.Fall ’98Spring ’99Spring ‘00 Health/PEFall ‘99Spring ’00Spring ‘0l Fine ArtsFall ’00Spring ’01On hold

Test Development Process Includes: Test and item specifications (CTB ) Content meetings Parent/community person review meeting Item development workshops Content review Bias/sensitivity review Field test Field test scoring Administration of voluntary assessment and scoring Achievement level setting

Grade Levels To Be Assessed Math – 4 th, 8 th & 10 th Comm. Arts – 3 rd, 7 th & 11 th Science – 3 rd, 7 th & 10 th Social Studies –4 th, 8 th & 11 th Health/PE – 5 th & 9 th Fine Arts – 5 th

Written Test Design for Health/PE Given at Grades 5 and 9 Takes 2 days – each day takes approximately 1 – 1 ½ hours to give. Session One: 40 score points Session Two: 30 score points Session Three: 12 score points of embedded field test items (Session 1 is given on day 1 & sessions 2 and 3 are given on day 2.)

Test Items Selected Response (Multiple Choice) Constructed Response (Short Answer)

Test Development CTB McGraw Hill is contracted by the State of Missouri to develop and score the test. Hundreds of Missouri teachers have been involved in item writing, achievement level setting, scoring and reviewing for content and bias as a result of this Assessment Program. Outstanding School Act provided money to districts for professional development and much of what was learned was carried back to school districts through district Professional Development

How the Test is Scored Scoring is done by CTB McGraw Hill in Indianapolis, Indiana. Approximately 10% of the items will be re-scored by Missouri teachers trained to use the same procedures as the scorers hired by CTB McGraw Hill. Next year we will have 9 instate scoring sites for 3 subjects (HPE is not one)

Local Component of Health/PE MAP Physical fitness scores are turned into Core Data during the June Cycle. 4 components of fitness are assessed (Aerobic Capacity, Flexibility, Abdominal Strength, Upper Body Strength). The Missouri Physical Fitness Manual gives the test criteria and test specifications for reaching the Healthy Fitness Range.

State Results from the First Operational Test 5 th Grade LEVEL % in# in change Advanced 9.64% 6, % Proficient33.51%23, % Near Pro.38.60%27, % Progressing15.84% % Step One 2.42% 1, %

State Results from the First Operational Test 9 th Grade LEVEL% in#in% change Advanced6.96%4, % Proficient31.61%21, % Near Prof.36.36%25, % Progressing14.83%10, % Step One10.23%7, %

How has MAP helped Health/PE in Missouri? It has forced many districts to actually create a written curriculum for health and PE and make teachers more accountable for what they teach. It has provided many hours of in-service and professional development training for health and PE teachers. It has enhanced the development of Coordinated School Health in many districts. It has ranked up there with the “big guys” - Math, Science, Social Studies and Communication Arts.