Madison County Travel Demand Model Challenges and Innovations Diane B. Zimmerman, PE.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SE Florida FSUTMS Users Group Meeting FDOT Systems Planning Office
Advertisements

Feedback Loops Guy Rousseau Atlanta Regional Commission.
Lexington Area TransCAD Travel Demand Model July 22, 2003 Kentucky Traffic Model Users Group Meeting Kyeil Kim, Ph.D. Bernardin, Lochmueller & Associates,
Introduction TELUM is a land use modeling software package that can be used for evaluating land use impacts of regional transportation improvement projects.
Getting on the MOVES: Using Dynameq and the US EPA MOVES Model to Measure the Air Pollution Emissions TRPC – Smart Corridors Project Chris Breiland Fehr.
Jeannie Wu, Planner Sep  Background  Model Review  Model Function  Model Structure  Transportation System  Model Interface  Model Output.
July 22, Model Objectives Forecast ADT on the Rural State Highway System Autos & Trucks Autos & Trucks Arterial System Arterial System Complement,
Determining the Free-Flow Speeds in a Regional Travel Demand Model based on the Highway Capacity Manual Chao Wang Joseph Huegy Institute for Transportation.
Implementing Soak-Time Distribution Models in a GIS Framework Aruna Sivakumar Department of Civil Engineering (Transportation) University of Texas at Austin.
ISTEA is Now 20 Years Old and We are Still Searching for the Land Use-Transportation Connection. Actually, Analysis of that Connection Has Been Sought.
Transportation leadership you can trust. FDOT Systems Planning White Paper A Recommended Approach to Delineating Traffic Analysis Zones in Florida.
Simpson County Travel Demand Model July 22, 2003.
What is the Model??? A Primer on Transportation Demand Forecasting Models Shawn Turner Theo Petritsch Keith Lovan Lisa Aultman-Hall.
3680 Avalon Park Blvd E Orlando, FL Phone: Fax: Future Land Use Allocation Model (FLUAM)
FBRMPO Data Gathering Process : Population, Employment and Land Use November 2012.
SCAG Region Heavy Duty Truck Model Southern California Region Heavy Duty Truck Model.
Intercity Person, Passenger Car and Truck Travel Patterns Daily Highway Volumes on State Highways and Interstates Ability to Evaluate Major Changes in.
2012 Citilabs Asia User Conference
GEOG 111 & 211A Transportation Planning Traffic Assignment.
Junction Modelling in a Strategic Transport Model Wee Liang Lim Henry Le Land Transport Authority, Singapore.
Session 11: Model Calibration, Validation, and Reasonableness Checks
Evaluation Tools to Support ITS Planning Process FDOT Research #BD presented to Model Advancement Committee presented by Mohammed Hadi, Ph.D., PE.
Agenda Overview Why TransCAD Challenges/tips Initiatives Applications.
TransCAD Network Settings 2017/4/17.
Luci2 Urban Simulation Model John R. Ottensmann Center for Urban Policy and the Environment Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis.
Amar Sarvepalli. 500 projects in 6-8 weeks Need VMT, VHT and More.
TRANSPORTATION ECONOMIC AND LAND USE SYSTEM (TELUS) T E L U M Interactive Software for Integrated Land Use and Transportation Modeling.
SourceHess, D.B Reconciling Incompatible Zone Systems in Metropolitan Planning. Ann Arbor, Mich.: ProQuest Dissertation Publishing. ContactDaniel.
An Experimental Procedure for Mid Block-Based Traffic Assignment on Sub-area with Detailed Road Network Tao Ye M.A.Sc Candidate University of Toronto MCRI.
Milton-Madison Bi-State Travel Demand Model Rob Bostrom Planning Application Conference Houston, Texas May 19, 2009.
Challenge 2: Spatial Aggregation Level Multi-tier Modeling in Ohio Attempts to Balance Run Time and Forecast Granularity Gregory Giaimo, PE The Ohio Department.
Source: NHI course on Travel Demand Forecasting (152054A) Session 10 Traffic (Trip) Assignment Trip Generation Trip Distribution Transit Estimation & Mode.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Development of a Hybrid Freight Model from Truck Travel.
Developing Travel Models in Rural Areas Based on Actual, Current, Local Data Cy Smith, CEO Sashi Gandavarapu, Data Services Manager AirSage.
Creating a GIS Based Traffic Control Planning Tool for the Dallas District Andrew Karl Dr. Maidment CE 394K.3 GIS in Water Resources Term Project Due:
Kip Billings, P.E. Andy Li, Phd Wasatch Front Regional Council October 14, 2010.
Knoxville Regional Travel Demand Model Upgrade Program May 6, 2004 Knoxville Regional Travel Demand Model Upgrade Program May 6, 2004.
1 BENEFITS OF A MULTI-YEAR TRAVEL MODEL NETWORK CODING ENVIRONMENT TRB Planning Applications Conference Monday, May 7, 2007.
How to Put “Best Practice” into Traffic Assignment Practice Ken Cervenka Federal Transit Administration TRB National Transportation.
Montgomery County Travel Forecasting Model Validation — Status Report — Status Report Presented To: TPB Travel Forecasting Subcommittee By: Montgomery.
Travel Demand Forecasting: Trip Distribution CE331 Transportation Engineering.
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY San Francisco’s Dynamic Traffic Assignment Model Background SFCTA DTA Model Peer Review Panel Meeting July.
Traffic Parameters for use with MOBILE6 in Ky. - Update by Jesse Mayes, P.E. Division of Multimodal Programs July 22, 2003.
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY San Francisco DTA Model: Working Model Calibration Part 1: Process Greg Erhardt Dan Tischler Neema Nassir.
Laurence Brown Indiana DOT John Ottensmann Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis Jon Fricker Purdue University Li Jin Kittelson & Associates,
The Iowa Travel Analysis Model Civil Engineering 451/551 Fall Semester 2009 Presented by: Phil Mescher, AICP Office of Systems Planning, Iowa Department.
ECIA A Regional Response to Local needs Travel Demand Forecasting Model for DMATS Area Chandra Ravada.
Using GIS Networks to Represent Model Networks May 19, 2009 Hoyt Davis & Chunyu Lu Gannett Fleming, Inc.
Integrated Travel Demand Model Challenges and Successes Tim Padgett, P.E., Kimley-Horn Scott Thomson, P.E., KYTC Saleem Salameh, Ph.D., P.E., KYOVA IPC.
Calibrating Model Speeds, Capacities, and Volume Delay Functions Using Local Data SE Florida FSUTMS Users Group Meeting February 6, 2009 Dean Lawrence.
Tennessee Statewide Model Subarea Model Development and Analysis Tennessee Model Users Group Meeting October 24, 2007 Presented by: Dean Munn Senior Transportation.
Southeast Michigan Council of Governments. Brian D. Mohr, Li-yang Feng, and Tom Bruff Southeast Michigan Council of Governments 11 th TRB Applications.
11 th National Planning Applications Conference Topic: Statewide Modeling Validation Measures and Issues Authors: Dave Powers, Anne Reyner, Tom Williams,
May 8, 2009 SERPM65 Subarea Model-Corradino 1 SERPM65 Highway-Only Subarea Modeling Process Southeast Florida FSUTMS Users Group Meeting Ft. Lauderdale,
CE Urban Transportation Planning and Management Iowa State University Calibration and Adjustment Techniques, Part 1 Source: Calibration and Adjustment.
TRAVEL TIME ANALYSIS Use of Data IN-KY-OH Traffic Incident Management Conference October 9, 2015 Dayton, OH.
Travel Model Validation - Key Considerations - Presented to Iowa DOT Peer Review 31 March 2004.
Travel Demand Forecasting: Traffic Assignment CE331 Transportation Engineering.
Transportation Modeling Options for City Departments LSA Associates, Inc. City of Fort Collins January 2001.
Evaluation of Hard Shoulder vs
16th TRB Transportation Planning Application Conference
TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL UPDATE
Transportation Planning Applications Conference Sheldon Harrison
Using Themes to Present Information
Maryland Unconventional Intersection Design Analysis Tool
Johnson City MPO Travel Demand Model
One-way travel to two-way travel conversion.
Buffer-based Area Type Determination for Travel Demand Model Network Links Lee Klieman, P.E., PTOE.
TRB Application Conference
Ohio Traffic Forecasting Manual
Presentation transcript:

Madison County Travel Demand Model Challenges and Innovations Diane B. Zimmerman, PE

Location Map

Madison County Base Year 2000 Base Year 2000 –2000 Population = 70,872 –2000 Employment = 36,200 Future Year 2025 Future Year 2025 –2025 Population =105,000 –2025 Employment = 57,000

TAZ Map Combined the areas from the previous Richmond and Berea Models Combined the areas from the previous Richmond and Berea Models 176 Internal Zones 176 Internal Zones 16 External Stations 16 External Stations

Richmond and Berea

Highway Network Imported from KY GIS coverage the Traffic Flow layer Imported from KY GIS coverage the Traffic Flow layer Added the Federal Functional Class Layer Added the Federal Functional Class Layer Added the Local Layer Added the Local Layer Traced Interstates and ramps from the DOQQ Traced Interstates and ramps from the DOQQ

Highway Network Coded signal locations Coded signal locations Coded g/c ratios from sketch planning of signal timing Coded g/c ratios from sketch planning of signal timing Capacity was computed link by link rather than by area/facility by TransCAD using procedures from NCHRP Capacity was computed link by link rather than by area/facility by TransCAD using procedures from NCHRP Default properties were by area, then location specific data was added Default properties were by area, then location specific data was added

Trip Generation Population Data from Census Block data Population Data from Census Block data Employment Data from Employment Services, supplemented by phone calls to non-profit organizations and missing employers Employment Data from Employment Services, supplemented by phone calls to non-profit organizations and missing employers NCHRP 365 procedures were used NCHRP 365 procedures were used E-I trips were converted to Productions at the External stations and Attractions to Internal zones E-I trips were converted to Productions at the External stations and Attractions to Internal zones Student Trip rates were initially taken from the Lexington study and increased during calibration Student Trip rates were initially taken from the Lexington study and increased during calibration A separate trip rate was used for Urban and Rural zones to reflect trip chaining in the urban areas A separate trip rate was used for Urban and Rural zones to reflect trip chaining in the urban areas

Challenges Two distinct small urban areas Two distinct small urban areas Two Universities – Eastern Kentucky University and Berea College Two Universities – Eastern Kentucky University and Berea College Interstate 75 Interstate 75 Army munitions base Army munitions base Major improvement to KY 52 west Major improvement to KY 52 west New interchange on I-75 New interchange on I-75

Innovations User Interface User Interface –Allows user to exactly replicate run made by JJG, similar to the MINUTP 00.bat file –Changes are made to the GISDK code or to the input files

User Interface

Calibration Results Overall RMSE = 26.0% Overall RMSE = 26.0% VMT Difference = -0.9% VMT Difference = -0.9% –Urban -5.3% –Rural 2.8%

RMSE Comparison

VMT Comparison

Special Thanks to Nick Uhren for all his work!