Three cornerstones: Student Achievement Developing Teachers When students achieve, we all win.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Advertisements

North Carolina Educator Evaluation System. Future-Ready Students For the 21st Century The guiding mission of the North Carolina State Board of Education.
Supporting the Art & Science of Teaching Supporting the Art & Science of Teaching Robert J. Marzano.
C OLLABORATIVE A SSESSMENT S YSTEM FOR T EACHERS CAST
1 Triangulated Standards-based Evaluation Framework Kathleen J. Skinner, Ed.D. Director, MTA Center for Education Policy & Practice Kansas Evaluation Committee.
Update: January 24, 2012 SIS Meeting.  Effective Teacher: An effective teacher consistently uses educational practices that foster the intellectual,
Woodland Park School District Educator Effectiveness 101 August 2014.
Measuring Educator Effectiveness Pennsylvania’s Educator Effectiveness Project Specialist Effectiveness October 15, 2013.
When students succeed, we all win Working together for meaningful change School Board Union Superintendent.
Teacher: Decide what to teach Decide what to assign Decide how to assess Decide how to grade In the end, convey how the kids did compared to each.
Student Learning Objectives Part 2: A Deeper Dive Leading Change 2014 Virginia Stodola Susan Poole Effective Teachers and Leaders Unit.
District and Charter Evaluation Plan Feedback Webinar November 17, 2014 Lisa Colón, Educator Effectiveness Coordinator Idaho State Department of Education.
Administrator Information AEA 267’s Mentoring and Induction Program.
Guidance Evaluation SY12/13 Governing Board Presentation September 13, 2012.
Today’s Agenda 1.Professional Day 2.Assignment A - Schedule and Honorarium 3.Assignment B - SMART Goal and Improvement Plan 1.Professional Day 2.Assignment.
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
Measuring Educator Effectiveness Pennsylvania’s Educator Effectiveness Project Specialist Effectiveness October 15, 2013.
Creating System-Wide Support for Learning Coaches with Joellen Killion
Your Mentoring Program: Step by Step including the Danielson Framework North Palos #117 Presenters: Marilyn Marino, NBCT – Mentor Coordinator David Creagan.
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
Session Materials  Wiki
Central Kentucky Partnership in Mathematics and Science (CKPIMS) Central Kentucky Partnership in Mathematics and Science (CKPIMS) Central Kentucky Education.
Agenda Overview of evaluation Timeline Next steps.
1 Peer Assistance and Coaching (PAC) Race to the Top – Early Learning Challenge Grant.
Growth, Not Gotcha: Evaluating and Supporting Beginning Teachers INTC 8 th Annual Induction and Mentoring Conference February 26, 2013 Liam Goldrick Director.
CAMBRIDGE CERTIFICATE IN TEACHING ENGLISH TO SPEAKERS OF OTHER LANGUAGES CELTA.
Performance and Development Culture Preparing for P&D Culture accreditation April 2008.
Today’s Agenda 1.Professional Day 2.Assignment A - SMART Goal and Improvement Plan 3.Assignment B - Honorarium and Schedule 1.Professional Day 2.Assignment.
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
Marco Ferro, Director of Public Policy Larry Nielsen, Field Consultant With Special Guest Stars: Tammy Pilcher, President Helena Education Association.
Empowering Effective Teachers: Overview Supporting teachers as professionals Leadership and working conditions Human resource capabilities Priority: Employee.
Introduction to Working Portfolios Educator Effectiveness System Training.
OVERVIEW OF SB 290 SOESD’S IMPLEMENTATION STAFF EVALUATION: LICENSED ADMINSTRATOR WHAT IT MEANS TO YOU SOESD’s Teacher Evaluation & Support System.
TAP TAP Basics (Preparing for Success in a TAP School) [PSTS]
To copy or adapt this material, see OpportunityCulture.org/terms-of-use Multi-Classroom Leadership Reviewing Instructional Practices.
NEW TEACHER PRINCIPAL EVALUATION. RACE TO THE TOP AND ESSB 5895  The principles guiding the change  Quality teaching and leading is critically important.
Professional Development Plan Erin Schwartzberg, Courtney Mancuso, Vanessa Denham, and Gail Blouin.
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
Final Reports from the Measures of Effective Teaching Project Tom Kane Harvard University Steve Cantrell, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.
CAIU 15 October 14,  Introductions ◦ Name, District, School(s), Years as a coach  Announcements ◦ Schedule of network meetings for this year ◦
Woodland Park School District Educator Effectiveness 101 September 2015.
The Why (Waiver & Strategic Plan) Aligned to research: MET Study Components: Framework/Multiple Measures Pilot Requirements Timeline.
Copyright © 2009 National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality. All rights reserved. Evaluating Teacher Effectiveness: Some Models to Consider Laura.
Teacher Induction Program Why you are here The Allegheny Intermediate Unit offers this program for our teachers and those in school districts,
Today’s Agenda 1.Professional Day 2.Assignment A - SMART Goal and Improvement Plan 3.Assignment B - Honorarium and Schedule 1.Professional Day 2.Assignment.
Evaluation School Year Review. Evaluation Intent  Collaborative process to support professional growth  Conversations and reflection should.
Developing Effective Mentors and Supervising Practitioners Districts and Educator Preparation Programs Working Together to Support Novice Teachers November.
Mentoring Moments: Powerful Designs for Mentoring Teaching Policy and Standards Branch Issue 12 / Nov 2012.
Educator Development Suite. Kentucky Department of Education Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Teacher Effectiveness Observation Peer Observation.
Teacher Leader Endorsement Programme Designing Professional Development Session 1 – Introduction to Instructional Rounds Facilitator: Rebeka Matthews Sousa.
Roxanne M. Williams Ed.D. Michelle Hellman.  Baby Boomer Exodus  New Generation of Teachers  Concerns about classroom management  Concerns about the.
CFN 609 Principals’ Meeting December 6, 2012 Providing Effective Feedback Domain 1: Planning and Preparation Component 1e: Designing Coherent Instruction.
Kentucky’s Professional Growth and Effectiveness System.
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
Peer Assistance and Review Program Volusia County Schools “ I couldn’t have done it without you!”
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
District State of the Schools. AIM I: Unity-Bringing together students, parents, staff, and community 1.Increase the number of website hits by 50%, increase.
Professional Development: Imagine Difference Shapes and Sizes
SOESD’s Teacher Evaluation & Support System
Student Teaching Orientation Dec 13, 2017
Overview of the Teacher Work Sample (TWS)
Professional Development Assistance Plan
Who We Are For more than 20 years, we have believed the key to preparing student for a successful future is providing rigorous and relevant instruction.
Introduction to Core Professionalism
Creating Coaching Cycles that Move Coach Practice Forward
The best way to predict the future is to create it.
Why do we have to change? Every student is taught by an effective teacher and every school is led by an effective principal. Fair and equitable statewide.
Presentation transcript:

Three cornerstones: Student Achievement Developing Teachers When students achieve, we all win

Teacher Evaluations: Multiple Measures Increase Accuracy Teacher evaluations more balanced, meaningful Principal's Written Evaluation Based Upon Charlotte Danielson’s Frameworks Gains in Student Achievement Based Upon the Calculation of an Experienced Consultant Mentor/Peer Evaluator's Written Evaluation Based Upon Charlotte Danielson’s Frameworks 30% Before Before 0% 30 % 40% 100% Principal’s Written Evaluation After

Induction for New Teachers….our most significant change Provide more mentoring support to new teachers –Goal: keep promising new teachers in the district and help them accelerate their professional development. 86% of last year’s first year teachers returned compared to 72% the year before! Mentors are being selected from among the district’s most effective teachers Mentors will work with and guide new teachers on a weekly basis for their first two years Close partnership with the New Teacher Center has accelerated our effectiveness Supporting teachers as professionals

After two years…… Provided more mentoring support to new teachers: 86% of last year’s first year teachers returned, compared to 72% the year before! Successfully implemented new teacher and principal evaluations. Peer evaluators received largely positive input from teachers. Better aligned professional development with the Danielson Framework. Made changes as needed with input from teachers. Supporting teachers as professionals

Lessons learned, Modifications made along the way Expanded the evaluation process to include new groups such as counselors, media specialists, adult education teachers, pre-K teachers, and technology resource specialists. Increased the number of mentors to 70 so that second year teachers would receive support. Increased the number of peers to 123 in order to lower their caseloads. Reviewed and modified the teacher evaluation rubric. Changed the observation schedule to include informal observations. Changed weighting of peer and principal evaluations. Supporting teachers as professionals

New Directions from the MET Project Measures of Effective Teaching Video Captures and Teacher Reflections Student Surveys for Professional Development

us at: Or visit us on the website: empoweringteachers.mysdhc.org When students succeed, we all win