Base on maximum operating wind capacity at end of planning period

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Hydro Peaking Capacity Analysis & Northwest Regional Forecast Comparison Resource Adequacy Technical Committee July 28, 2010.
Advertisements

Power Supply Adequacy Assessment Model/Methodology Review Steering Subcommittee Meeting January 29, 2010.
Preliminary Review of July 24 th Extreme Temperature Event & Implications for Pilot Capacity Standard Mary Johannis & Wally Gibson PNW Resource Adequacy.
Secure System Scheduling with High Wind Penetrations J. Kennedy March 2009.
BOSTON DENVER LONDON LOS ANGELES MENLO PARK MONTREAL NEW YORK SAN FRANCISCO WASHINGTON Effective Load Carrying Capability of Wind Generation: Initial Results.
Sixth Northwest Conservation & Electric Power Plan Discussion of Proposed Generating Resource Action Items Jeff King Northwest Power and Conservation Council.
Supply and demand: Cemig GT and the National Grid Belo Horizonte, May 28, 2012 Marcus Vinícius de Castro Lobato.
NASUCA Meeting Integration of Intermittent Renewable Resources Panel Michael McMullen MISO June 10, 2013.
© TIER, Inc. 3TIER a renewable energy information services company Bart Nijssen Chief Information Officer AMS Summer Community Meeting August 11.
Announced Coal Unit Retirements: Effect on Regional Resource Adequacy Council Meeting January 16, 2013 Portland, Oregon Boardman Centralia 1.
A Resource Adequacy Standard for the Pacific Northwest Resource Adequacy Technical Committee January 17, 2008 Portland Airport.
Sixth Northwest Conservation & Electric Power Plan Adding Incremental Flexibility to the Pacific Northwest Power System? Maury Galbraith Northwest Power.
B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N 2009 Draft Resource Program Released: September 30, 2009 Accepting Comments until: November 30,
Northwest Power and Conservation Council Slide 1 Accelerating Energy Efficiency To Reduce the PNW Power System's Carbon Footprint Tom Eckman Manager, Conservation.
Adequacy Assessment for the 2017 Pacific Northwest Power Supply Steering Committee Meeting October 26, 2012 Portland, Oregon 1.
Revising the Pacific Northwest Resource Adequacy Standard Resource Adequacy Technical Committee June 23, 2011.
K E M A T & D C O N S U L T I N G Power System Conference, Clemson, South Carolina, March 8-11, 2005 Principles and Issues Relating to the Interconnection.
Sixth Northwest Conservation & Electric Power Plan Draft Wholesale Power Price Forecasts Maury Galbraith Northwest Power and Conservation Council Generating.
BI Marketing Analyst input into report marketing Report TitleElectricity in California Report Subtitle State profile of power sector, market trends and.
Klondike Wind Power Project, Oregon Donald Furman Senior Vice President - Business Policy and Development December 3, 2009 Energy Bar Association Mid-Year.
May 31, Resource Adequacy Capacity Standard Resource Adequacy Forum Technical Committee May 31, 2006 Background Image: Bennett, Christian Science.
June 27, Pacific Northwest Resource Adequacy Assessment for 2010 and 2012 Resource Adequacy Forum Steering Committee Meeting Northwest Power Pool.
Geothermal Fields On the Ring of Fire Prospect Developed Fields.
HMTF Understanding PLF August 31, 2015 Kevin Harris, ColumbiaGrid TEPPC\Hydro Modeling Work Group - Chair.
Resource Adequacy Technical Committee Meeting April 6, 2011.
Resource Adequacy Steering Committee Meeting October 4, 2011.
Renewable & Alternative Power Senate Energy, Utilities & Communications Committee Stuart R. Hemphill Director, Renewable and Alternative Power Southern.
Relationship of Regional Resource Adequacy Standards to Utility Planning PNW Resource Adequacy Steering Committee Meeting June 27, 2007.
Power Association of Northern California Maintaining Grid Reliability In An Uncertain Era May 16, 2011 PG&E Conference Center Jim Mcintosh Director, Executive.
Providing Resource Planning Guidance to Individual Utilities PNW Resource Adequacy Technical Committee Meeting June 20, 2007.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council Slide 1 The Role of Efficiency In Meeting PNW Energy Needs Tom Eckman Manager, Conservation Resources Northwest.
October 29, Organizational role of Short-Term Planning and Hydro Duty Scheduling Relationship to other groups in BPA Planning and analysis job.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council A Look At The Council’s Conservation Planning Methodology and Assumptions A Look At The Council’s Conservation.
ISO Proposed Flexible Capacity Requirements Stephen Keehn Senior Advisor California ISO CPUC Workshop January 26, 2012.
2009 Pacific Northwest Resource Adequacy Assessment Resource Adequacy Technical Committee October 16, 2009.
2010 Work Plan Steering Committee January 29, 2010.
Providing Resource Planning Guidance to Individual Utilities PNW Resource Adequacy Steering Committee Meeting April 13, 2007.
Work Plan Resource Adequacy Forum Technical Committee July 29, 2009.
Resource Adequacy Assessment for 2015 Resource Adequacy Forum Technical Committee Meeting October 1, 2010.
Out of Region Market Assumption Resource Adequacy Technical Committee December 1, 2011.
Pacific Northwest Resource Adequacy Assessment for 2011 and 2013 Resource Adequacy Forum Steering Committee Meeting July 21, 2008.
Slide 1 Overview of Conservation in the Pacific Northwest Energy Efficiency Options in the Northwest Post-2011Meeting March 4, 2008.
ISO Confidential Overview of California’s Current Drought and its Effects on the Energy System Dede Subakti, P. E. Director, Operations Engineering Services.
High Level Post Processing Cost Estimates MWG SSC Meeting September 26, 2011.
AP MACROECONOMICS Multiple Deposit Expansion – Module 25.
Steering Committee Meeting March 9, Why talk about assumptions? Garbage in, garbage out! “Let’s go dumpster diving!” Results sensitive to key.
PEAK CAPACITY COST & DEMAND RESPONSE PACIFIC NORTHWEST DEMAND RESPONSE PLANNING COMMITTEE BILL DICKENS TACOMA POWER FEBRUARY 23, 2012.
2010 Northwest Regional Forecast Resource Adequacy Technical Committee April 22, 2010.
Sixth Northwest Conservation & Electric Power Plan Draft Wholesale Power Price Forecasts Maury Galbraith Generating Resource Advisory Committee Meeting.
Power Supply Adequacy for the 2021 Operating Year Resource Adequacy Advisory Committee Steering Committee Webinar June 8, 2016.
Slide 1 B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N BPA Network Open Season 2013 Cluster Study ColumbiaGrid Planning Meeting May 2, 2013.
Estimating the resource adequacy value of demand response in the German electricity market Hamid Aghaie Research Scientist in Energy Economics, AIT Austrian.
Target Reserve Margin (TRM) and Effective Load Carrying Capability (ELCC) of Wind Plants Evaluation - Input and Methodology ERCOT Planning 03/25/2010.
“Other” Cost Estimates
Growth in electricity generation over time
Demand Response in the 7th Power Plan
penetration of wind power
Opportunities in the Changing Energy System
Steering Committee Webinar March 25, 2016
Key Findings and Resource Strategy
Vetting the GENESYS Model
Out of Region Market Assumptions
Jeff King Northwest Power & Conservation Council July 28, 2010
BPA Overview BPA is part of the U.S. DOE, but it is self-funded and covers all of its costs by selling products and services. Congress created BPA in 1937.
Nordic Winter Power Balance
Forecasting and Operations CAISO Case
Technical Committee Meeting January 27, 2012
Capacity Analysis in the Sixth Plan
Technical Committee Meeting March 18, 2016
Jim Mcintosh Director, Executive Operations Advisor California ISO
Presentation transcript:

Back-of-envelope balancing reserve adequacy check for draft 6th Plan Portfolio Base on maximum operating wind capacity at end of planning period Existing wind capacity (Operating + Under construction) Maximum buildout of wind in draft portfolio Estimate balancing reserve requirement Estimated growth in incremental balancing reserve requirement (MW rapid-response capacity/MW wind as percent of load) BPA needs assessment Extend to region Adjust down by estimated impact of improved forecasting. Estimate supply of rapid-response capacity Assume BPA capability is representative for large hydro + allowance for non-federal large hydro + allowance for RR capability of existing thermal units (CC, GT, Coal?? - PGE work) + allowance for RR capability of new thermal units in portfolio at max wind buildout.

Issues So simple as to be worse than nothing? If so, is there a better approach (Nothing not an option) How should we view California acquisitions (larger issue)