Administrative Review Committee

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Special Faculty Meeting Faculty Handbook – Section 4 April 10, 2013.
Advertisements

School Community Councils Working Together for School Improvement.
Proposal for the Process of Faculty Selection to Committees in the School of Undergraduate Studies History As the School of Undergraduate Studies (UGS)
Faculty Forum: March 5, 2008 Shall the Collected Rules and Regulations be revised to adopt the revised Pilot Faculty Grievance Procedure recommended by.
CLA RTP amendments 1. Align with December 10 vote to allow up to 2 members of same academic area to serve at different ranks 2. Specify that two members.
2014 CLA Retreat Mission, Vision, Strategic Planning.
Faculty Senate Special Meeting June 12, Agenda I. Call to Order and Roll Call - Melanie Mormile, Secretary II.Bylaw Amendment III.Adjourn Pres.
2015 Workshop Permanent Status and Promotion Policy and Procedures Overview.
Version 2 November Provost and VPAA G.E. Assessment Task Force Centers Program Assessment and Review Committee President Director of Institutional.
Staff Assembly General Membership Meeting September, 2007.
CSU Chico Web Site A Unified approach to Governance, Management, and Accessibility.
GRU Faculty Governance GRU Faculty Governance. Terminology General Faculty: all individuals holding full- time, ranked faculty appointments at GRU University.
Chapter Leadership ______________________________________________________________________________________ 2009 SWCS Annual Meeting Leadership Development.
The Tenure and Promotion Application Process. Each candidate is responsible for compiling the materials for his/her application with the assistance of.
2 From the BOV Bylaws Faculty Representatives The Faculty shall elect a non-voting representative to the following committees of the Board: Academic.
Proposed Bylaws Revisions Faculty Senate – June 12, 2014.
UMKC All Faculty Meeting March 3, 2015.
Proposed Language for Faculty Handbook: The Curriculum & Programs Committee (C&PC) Description of C&PC activities and duties The committee shall review.
Nominating Committees and Elections Area II Gwinnett County Council of PTAs January 21, 2014.
Report to the Faculty Senate April 14, 2009 Bryan L. Spangelo, Chair.
Program Review – Assessing the Health of Curriculum Programs Mark Lupton Director, Institutional Research, Planning and Effectiveness South Piedmont Community.
Faculty Senate Meeting November 19, Agenda I.Call to Order and Roll Call - M. Bruening, Secretary II.Proposed Amendment to the Faculty Bylaws (CRR.
1Tuesday, April 21, 2009Presentation on the Latest Research kfairf aifiar 1 Speaker and Deputy are elected from within the Senate. What the Faculty Senate.
Developing & Maintaining Policies & Procedures 2007 National Leadership Conference.
University Senate February 11, University Senate February 11, 2016 Summary Senate Chair’s Report The Senate leadership has been meeting with senator.
Shared Governance A More Inclusive Governmental Structure for CSU.
1 Establishing a New Gallaudet Program Review Process Pat Hulsebosch Office of Academic Quality CUE – 9/3/08: CGE – 9/16/08.
Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
Best Practices Subcommittee
Faculty Senate Special Meeting June 12, 2014
Shared Governance Territorial Act (1889): The faculty, the president, and the regents are jointly responsible for governing the university. NWCCU, Standard.
Tenure Procedure Northwest Vista College
Faculty Senate Meeting November 17, 2016
2017 Workshop Tenure and Promotion Policy and Procedures Overview
We’re going to follow the chronological order of the process.
The Council for Diversity and Interculturalism
New Senator Presentation
Faculty Senate Meeting September 20, 2016
Senate Meeting Summary
Overview Background UPS Operational Policy TC 4
FGCU GOVERNANCE STRUCTURE
Faculty Senate Meeting
Faculty Senate Meeting April 20, 2017
Special Meeting.
Administrative Review Process
College of Alameda Integrated Planning and Budgeting Process
Review Committee February 21,2018.
Promotion/Tenure Portfolio
CHANCELLOR’S REPORT.
Overview of the Committee on Governance
Administrative Committee Review
Administrative Review
University of Massachusetts Amherst Faculty Search Activities Guide
Uwm university staff shared governance
COLLEGE OF SOCIAL AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES College Academic Calendar
COLLEGE OF SOCIAL AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES College Academic Calendar
Shared Governance Territorial Act (1889): The faculty, the president, and the regents are jointly responsible for governing the university. NWCCU, Standard.
School Community Councils
Elections RP&A Report October 18, 2012 Administrative Review
Faculty Senate Mission
Administrative Committee Review
Administrative Review Committee
Administrative Review Committee
FA Review and Clarification of Appendix 15A
UND’s Promotion & Tenure Process: Electronic Submission and Next Steps
Position descriptions
Faculty Governance at NU
RULES, PROCEDURES, AND AGENDA
Responsibility for assessment at Brooklyn college – a distributed leadership model OFFICE OF Institutional effectiveness September 9, 2019.
Academic Senate Orientation
Presentation transcript:

Administrative Review Committee 2016-2017 members: Dr. Ali Hurson Dr. V. A. Samaranayake Dr. William Schonberg Dr. Nancy J. Stone, Chair

Faculty Bylaws (300. 030 D. 6. b) https://www. umsystem “Administrative Review Committee (1) This committee sets policies and procedures for review of campus administrators. The committee recommends the evaluation questionnaires and a plan/schedule for conducting reviews to the Faculty Senate. The committee conducts the reviews; oversees the sending of the evaluation forms to the evaluating persons; oversees the collection and collation of the resulting evaluations; and, along with the officers of the Faculty Senate, reviews and forwards the results of the evaluation. (2) The committee consists of four (4) representatives nominated by the Rules, Procedures and Agenda Committee (with the possibility of nominations from the floor) and elected by a vote of the Faculty Senate. Committee members serve for two (2) years, terms to be staggered with the election of two faculty members each year, and shall be full-time, tenured faculty members with an administrative component of 50% or less.”

Academic Review Committee Who will be reviewed. Process of administering surveys. Use/disclosure of results. Tentative timeline and activities

Who Will be Reviewed Proposed review process by 2015-2016 Administrative Review Committee* 2017: Vice Chancellors: Global and Strategic Partnerships; Human Resources, Equity and Inclusion; Finance and Administration; University Advancement; and Student Affairs. Chief Information Officer 2018: Vice Provosts: Dean of Engineering and Computing, Graduate Studies, Undergraduate Studies, Research, and Enrollment Management. Director of Institutional Research and Assessment and Director and Library and Learning Resources *This schedule assumes the administrator under review will have completed one academic year of service prior to the review in a non-interim or non-acting appointment.

2015-2016 Academic Review Committee Annual Report (dated July 5, 2016) Schedule for reviews of all administrators between 2016 and 2018: 2016: Chancellor; Provost; Vice Provost and Dean of College of Arts, Sciences, and Business 2017: Vice Chancellors: Global and Strategic Partnerships; Human Resources, Equity and Inclusion; Finance and Administration; University Advancement; and Student Affairs. Chief Information Officer 2018: Vice Provosts: Dean of Engineering and Computing, Graduate Studies, Undergraduate Studies, Research, and Enrollment Management. Director of Institutional Research and Assessment and Director and Library and Learning Resources *This schedule assumes the administrator under review will have completed one academic year of service prior to the review in a non-interim or non-acting appointment. **The committee, given the views shared by many in the Faculty Senate, recommends one amendment to the above schedule: the Chancellor and Provost be reviewed every two years.

Process of Administering Surveys Issues of trust. Qualtrics Security Individualized links Prohibit ballot box stuffing Can only submit once Anonymize Pilot testing Distribution of surveys, data file Will verify e-mail lists

Use/Disclosure of Results The results will be shared with the individual reviewed, then the immediate supervisor, and then the faculty senate officers.  Beyond these recipients of the results, the Administrative Review Committee members will maintain confidentiality of the results.

Tentative Timeline & Activities End of November Job descriptions due January 26, 2017 Questions to Faculty Senate for review/approval End of January Statement of accomplishments due February 23, 2017 Final approval of questions March Review administration (ending before spring break) April Results to Faculty Senate Officers