Describe result frameworks

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Il Project Cycle Management :A Technical Guide The Logical Framework Approach 1 1.
Advertisements

1 UN Coherence: High level monitoring and evaluation approach.
Poverty Monitoring - Good Practice in Selecting Indicators Presentation by Dirk U. Hahn, Consultant at the Workshop on Prioritization, Operationalization.
Results Based Monitoring (RBM)
Introduction to Monitoring and Evaluation
M & E for K to 12 BEP in Schools
Improve your Club’s project design and implementation Presented by: Ulrike Neubert SIE PD Ann-Christine Soderlund SIE APD.
Decision Making Tools for Strategic Planning 2014 Nonprofit Capacity Conference Margo Bailey, PhD April 21, 2014 Clarify your strategic plan hierarchy.
RBM in the context of Operations and Programme and Project Management Material of the Technical Assistance Unit (TAU)
The Logical Framework. 2 Definition of a Project A “project” is defined as: a set of executed interventions, over an established timeline and budget,
Logic Modeling for Success Dr Kathryn Wehrmann Illinois State University.
Results-Based Management: Logical Framework Approach
Role of Result-based Monitoring in Result-based Management (RBM) Setting goals and objectives Reporting to Parliament RBM of projects, programs and.
Monitoring & Evaluation in World Bank Agriculture and Rural Development Operations SASAR Monitoring & Evaluation Workshop New Delhi; June 20, 2006.
Dr. G. Johnson, Program Evaluation and the Logic Model Research Methods for Public Administrators Dr. Gail Johnson.
Monitoring Evaluation Impact Assessment Objectives Be able to n explain basic monitoring and evaluation theory in relation to accountability n Identify.
Proposal Writing for Competitive Grant Systems
Nine steps of a good project planning
CONCEPT PAPER RESULT BASED PLANNING. RESULT-ORIENTED PLANNING Overall Objective/ Goal Specific Objective/ Purposes Expected Result/ Output Activities.
This project is funded by the EUAnd implemented by a consortium led by MWH Logical Framework and Indicators.
1 RBM Background Development aid is often provided on a point to point basis with no consistency with countries priorities. Development efforts are often.
KEYWORDS REFRESHMENT. Activities: in the context of the Logframe Matrix, these are the actions (tasks) that have to be taken to produce results Analysis.
SESSION 3: FROM SETTING PRIORITIES TO PROGRAMMING FOR RESULTS.
Monitoring and Evaluation Orientation 17 th May 2011 MCA Namibia.
The P Process Strategic Design
Project Management Learning Program 23 Mar – 3 Aprl 2009, Mekong Institute, Khon Kaen, Thailand Managing for Development Results Results-Oriented Monitoring.
Community Planning 101 Disability Preparedness Summit Nebraska Volunteer Service Commission Laurie Barger Sutter November 5, 2007.
Logic Model, Monitoring, Tracking and Evaluation Evaluation (Section T4-2)
Logical Framework Approach 1. Approaches to Activity Design Logical Framework Approach (LFA) – Originally developed in the 1970s, this planning process.
HUMANITARIAN RESPONSE MONITORING. HOW TO USE THIS PRESENTATION This presentation contains a complete overview of all aspects of Response Monitoring Presenting.
Results Oriented Monitoring & Evaluation Model (ROMEM) Presented by Shawn Grey Ministry of Transport and Works Jamaica. Model developed by MTW and DPMI.
Developing a Monitoring & Evaluation Plan MEASURE Evaluation.
Bottom up evaluation of strategies Jela Tvrdonova 2016.
Building an ENI CBC project
Monitoring & Evaluation and Impact Assessment of Project
Project monitoring and evaluation
Template Contents of the Low Carbon Development Strategy (LCDS)
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS Organisations in Papua New Guinea Day 3. Session 9. Periodic data collection methods.
PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF PROJECT MONITORING AND EVALUATION M&E.
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS Organisations in Papua New Guinea Day 2. Session 6. Developing indicators.
Strategic Planning for Learning Organizations
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS Organisations in Papua New Guinea Day 3. Session 7. Managers’ and stakeholders’ information needs.
Measuring Outcomes of GEO and GEOSS: A Proposed Framework for Performance Measurement and Evaluation Ed Washburn, US EPA.
Business Environment
Business Environment
Business Environment
Business Environment
Developing & Refining a Theory of Action
Multi-Sectoral Nutrition Action Planning Training Module
Claire NAUWELAERS, independent policy expert
Logic Models and Theory of Change Models: Defining and Telling Apart
Assistant Staff Director Office of Contracted Client Services
General Notes Presentation length - 10 – 15 MINUTES
Session 9 Recap on LFM and IL.
PROJECT DOCUMENTATION
Monitoring programs and projects Using Results Framework
WHAT is evaluation and WHY is it important?
Monitoring programs and projects
Appraising result framework
Monitoring programs and projects Using Results Framework
Monitoring and Evaluating FGM/C abandonment programs
Appraising result framework
Appraising result framework
Civil Society Facility and Media Programme Call for proposals: EuropeAid/162473/DH/ACT/Multi Webinar no. 3: Preparing effective Concept Note.
Integrating Gender into Rural Development M&E in Projects and Programs
Data for PRS Monitoring: Institutional and Technical Challenges
Appraising result framework
How is an M & E framework derived from the logframe?
Appraising result framework
M & E Plans and Frameworks
Presentation transcript:

Describe result frameworks Apply monitoring frameworks for programs and projects Preparation stage Implementation stage Completion stage

3

A results framework represents the underlying logic that explains how the development objective of a project is to be achieved. It is an explicit articulation (graphic display, matrix, or summary) of the different levels, or chains, of results expected from a particular intervention - project, program, or development strategy.

Source: http://kathmandupost. ekantipur

National/se ctor area National/se ctor area Expected situation Goal Purpose Project /Program Project/Pr ogram Outputs Inputs Activities Expected situation Present situation

Is there any hierarchy of change in design? If yes, are they measurable? How sure are you in achieving results? P1: Nepal: Melamchi Water Supply Project and Kathmandu Valley Water Services Sector Development Program Time: Discussion in group – 10 minutes Share in plenary – 5 minutes

Goal/impact/target: the highest or ultimate objective Purpose/outcome: immediate benefit from the project Output: measurable outcomes to be achieved Activities: actions required to get outputs Input: resources to undertake activities/implementation plan Monitoring arrangements: set of indicators and results to track progress; baseline, daily, weekly, monthly, annual and final targets; roles and responsibilities for collecting, reporting, and analyzing data Assumptions/risks: factors likely to obstruct scheduled work Sustainability: safeguarding positive impacts

Key Questions Regarding M and E Indicators for the Project

To what extent will/has the project contribute(d) towards its longer term goals? Why or why not? What unanticipated positive or negative consequences will/did the project have? Why will/did they arise?

What changes will/have occur(red) as a result of the outputs and to what extent are these likely to contribute towards the project purpose and desired impact? Will/Has the project achieve(d) the changes for which it can realistically be held accountable?

What direct tangible products or services will/has the project deliver(ed) as a result of activities?

Will/Have planned activities be(en) completed on time and within the budget? What unplanned activities have been completed and what planned activities have not been completed?

Will/Are the resources be(ing) used efficiently?

Data analysis/data quality INDICATOR DEFINITION What are its indicator and are they sufficient? BASELINE What is the current value? TARGET What is the target value? DATA SOURCE How will it be measure d? FREQUENCY How often will it be measure d? RESPONSIBLE Who will monitor and who will evaluate? REPORTING Where will it be reported? Goal Outcome Output Activity … Data analysis/data quality

Case study Checklist Close/open-ended (structured/semi-structured) interview Direct observation FGD KII Survey/census Questionnaire Written document review Statistical data review

Budget Allocation Human Resources Political / Administrative will Technical Assistance Evidence: data and information Compliance Managing stakeholders: coordination/cooperation between line agencies Access

Thank You